When patients present at an early age with osteoarthritis of the hip, there is usually an underlying predisposing cause. In men, a common cause is femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This is evident as anterior neck osteophytes, with retroversion and varus alignment of the femoral head, most likely the result of subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The resulting femoroacetabular cam impingement causes degenerative osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, at an earlier age than primary OA. Patients present in their 40s and 50s with advanced arthritis, and are faced with the prospect of a total hip arthroplasty. Women may experience this as well, but may present with early hip arthritis as a result of subclinical dysplasia or pincer FAI more often than their male counterparts. Hip resurfacing has several advantages over traditional total hip replacement for younger patients, especially men. These include bone preservation, less dislocation, thigh pain or leg length inequality, easier return to athletics, and easy revision on the femoral side. It is indicated in young, active patients. The resurfacing procedure realigns the femoral head on the native and resurfaces the arthritic joint. Anterior neck osteoplasty is performed. Head retroversion is corrected. This restores deep flexion, and eliminates forced external rotation in flexion. Hip resurfacing can be done through either an anterior or posterior approach, although the anterior approach gives easier access to the anterior femoral neck, and preserves the blood supply to the head. This may help prevent femoral neck fractures and late head collapse

Hip resurfacing, like other orthopaedic procedures, depends for its success upon the confluence of three factors: a well-designed device, implanted using good technique, in a properly selected patient. Cleveland Clinic has had good mid-term results in more than 2,200 patients using the Birmingham device since its FDA approval in 2006. These results are quite similar to other reported series from many centers around the world. All surgery was performed using an anterolateral approach. Males accounted for 72% of the patients, and the average age was 53 years (12‐84). More than 90% of the patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, and femoroacetabular impingement was the predominant pathology. The average component head size in males was 51mm, and in females 45mm. Complications were few, with no dislocations, no femoral loosening, one socket loosening, one head collapse, 2 femoral neck fractures, and 2 deep infections. There were two patients with metallosis, one due to component malposition, and one in a small, dysplastic female. There were no destructive pseudotumors. Overall survivorship at up to 8 years was more than 99%. Survivorship in young males, under age 50 with OA was 100%. New mushroom templates for head size are described. Additional imaging recommendations including a standing lateral of the pelvis, and a CT scan for femoral anteversion may be helpful in patient selection

We report our early experience with distracting external fixation used to offload the hip after avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head secondary to severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). A case series of five patients treated in a tertiary centre is reported. Electronic case records and radiographs were reviewed. Data recorded included demographics, initial presentation, timing of head collapse, timing and duration of distraction and outcome including referral to adult arthoplasty services. Mean age at presentation was 12 years (range 12–15). 4 were females. Initial treatment in 4 cases was a delayed cuneiform osteotomy and pinning, one patient underwent serendipitous reduction and percutaneous pinning. Mean duration to initial surgery was 10 days (range 5–16). All patients had femoral head collapse at a mean of 148 days from time of presentation. 2 patients required backing out of screws due to intra-articular protrusion. All patients underwent distraction at a mean 193 days from presentation. Average distraction achieved was 10 mm and duration of application was 125 days (range 91–139). All patients experienced improvement or resolution of pain but persistence of poor function, characterised by fixed adduction and limb length discrepancy. 3 patients were referred to adult arthroplasty services. This may be an effective treatment option for pain associated with AVN post SUFE. However, in our experience normal anatomy and function of the hip is not restored if performed after collapse of the femoral head. Consideration should be given to application of the distractor either at the time of initial fixation or prior to femoral head collapse. Authors believe that timing of the application of the distractor is critical for a successful outcome and recommend a prospective study with large numbers

Introduction. Most metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants currently being used worldwide utilize bone ingrowth fixation on the acetabular side, but cement fixation remains the standard method of fixation on the femoral side. Our hypothesis is that bone ingrowth fixation of a fully porous-coated component is superior to cement fixation of the femoral hip resurfacing component. Methods. From March 2007 to Jan 2009, 429 consecutive metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon in 396 unselected patients using Biomet uncemented femoral and acetabular components. All of these were at least 5-years postop. Three patients died with causes unrelated to their hip arthroplasty. The three most common primary diagnoses were osteoarthritis in 318 (74%) cases, dysplasia in 66 (15%) hips, and osteonecrosis in 19 (4%) hips. The average size of the femoral component was 50 ± 4 cm. All pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative data were prospectively collected and entered into our database for review. All patients are allowed unrestricted activity including impact sports after 6 months. Results. Metal ion test results were available for 78% of patients. There were 14 (3.2%) failures identified at the time of this study. There were six (1.4%) early femoral failures (4 femoral neck fractures, 2 head collapses prior to 2 years), four loose acetabular components (one failed at 2 months postoperatively; three after 2 years), two (0.5%) adverse wear related failures (AWRF; metal ion levels ≥10 ug/L, AIA> 50. 0. , metalosis), one intertrochanteric fracture; and one failure due to subluxation. There were no cases of failure of femoral ingrowth or late femoral loosening. For the non-failed group, the average post-operative HHS score was 97±9 at their latest follow-up; the average UCLA Activity Score was 7±2. Survivorship was 96.7% at 5 years (all failures). Femoral survivorship was 98.4%. The AWRF rate was 0.5% at 5 years. No femoral failures occurred after one year postop up to 7 years. Conclusions. Bone ingrowth fixation with a fully porous femoral component in hip resurfacing remains highly durable beyond 5 years. Femoral ingrowth is more reliable than acetabular ingrowth. No cases of femoral loosening have been encountered up to 7 years post implantation. AWRF is rare (0.5% at 5 years) and is caused by acetabular component malposition

Purpose. Proximal femoral osteotomy is an attractive joint preservation procedure for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cause of failure of proximal femoral osteotomy in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Patients and Methods. Between 2008 and 2014, proximal femoral osteotomy was performed by one surgeon in 13 symptomatic hips. Ten trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomies (anterior: 7, posterior: 3) and 3 intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy were performed. Of the patients, 9 were male and 1 was female, with a mean age at surgery of 36.9 years (range, 25–55 years). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 38 months (range, 12–72 months). Three patients (4 hips) had steroid-induced osteonecrosis, and 7 (9 hips) had alcohol-associated osteonecrosis. At 6 postoperative weeks, partial weight bearing was permitted with the assistance of 2 crutches. At more than 6 postoperative months, full weight bearing was permitted. Patients who had the potential to achieve acetabular coverage of more than one-third of the intact articular surface on preoperative hip radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were considered suitable for this operation. A clinical evaluation using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system and a radiologic evaluation were performed. Clinical failure was defined as conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or progression to head collapse and osteoarthritis. The 13 hips were divided into two groups, namely the failure and success groups. Results. The mean preoperative JOA score was 59 points. The score in the success group (7 hips) improved to 89 points at the time of final follow-up. In the failure group (6 hips), 5 hips were converted to THA because of progression to secondary collapse or osteoarthritis in a mean postoperative period of 35 months (range, 24–51 months). After converting to THA, good clinical and radiographic results were achieved, except in 1 patient who had incomprehensible severe pain around the affected hip. Advanced osteoarthritis was observed in 1 hip awaiting THA. Various factors cause failure of proximal femoral osteotomy, such as difficulty in controlling the underlying disease with less than 10 mg of steroid (Fig. 1), overuse of the affected hip within 6 postoperative months without the physician's consent, vascular occlusion after total necrosis of the femoral head as a result of damage to the nutritional vessel during or after the operation, and incorrect judgement of the indication of the operation and the extent of the intact load-bearing area. Conclusion. We think that full weight bearing should be permitted postoperatively only after more than 6 months, and heavy work and sport, only after more than 1 year. Efforts should be made to improve surgeons' skill in proximal femoral osteotomy and accurate judgement of imaging data. For steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head, proximal femoral osteotomy is an acceptable procedure for relieving pain if the underlying disease can be controlled with not more than 5 mg of steroid

Metal on metal hip resurfacing is increasing in popularity for the young, active patient. We present the results of a consecutive series from a single surgeon over a ten year period; 295 hip resurfacings (McMinn and Cormet; Corin, Cirencester, UK) with a minimum follow up of 2 years and a mean follow up of 4 years. There were 173 males with a mean age of 53.4 years and 121 females with a mean age of 50.3 years. Forty-six patients underwent bilateral resurfacings. All resurfacings were performed through a posterior approach. The aetiology in this group was primary OA in 75.9%, inflammatory arthritis in 6.1%, DDH in 6.1%, AVN in 4.7%, trauma in 4.7%, Perthes in 1.7% and SUFE in 0.7%. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically on an annual basis. Follow-up was available on 93% of patients. 94.2% of hips have survived and the mean Harris Hip Score is 87.5. Females had a higher failure rate (10.7%) than males (2.3%). There was no clear trend between patient age and failure rate. The highest failure rate (33.3%) was seen in patients with DDH whilst only 4.5% of patients with OA failed. One patient with AVN failed but no failures occurred in patients with inflammatory arthritis, trauma, Perthes or SUFE. Failures occurred due to cup loosening (2.0%), neck fractures (1.7%), head loosening (1.0%), head collapse (0.3%), infection (0.3%) and pain (0.3%). The five patients who suffered neck fractures were symptomatic within 3 months of surgery. We remain cautiously optimistic about the medium term results of hip resurfacing. Careful patient selection is important and caution should be taken in females and patients with DDH