Introduction and Objective. Hip fractures represent one of the most challenging injuries in orthopaedic practice due to the associated morbidity, mortality and the financial burden they impose on the health care systems. By many still considered as the gold standard in the management of intertrochanteric fractures, the Dynamic Hip Screw utilizes controlled collapse during weight bearing to stabilize the fracture. Despite being a highly successful device, mechanical failure rate is not uncommon. The most accepted intraoperative indicator for lag screw failure is the tip apex distance (TAD), yet lateral femoral wall thickness (LWT) is another evolving parameter for detecting the potential for lateral wall fracture with subsequent medialization and implant failure. The aim of this study is to determine the mean and cut off levels for LWT that warrant lateral wall fracture and the implications of that on implant failure, revision rates and implant choice. Materials and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 42 patients with a mean age of 70.43y with intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with DHS fixation by the same consultant surgeon from April 2019 to December 2019. The study sample was calculated based on a confidence level of 90% and margin of error of 5%. Fracture types included in the study are 31A1 and 31A2 based on the AO/OTA classification system. LWT was assessed in all patients preoperatively using Surgimap (Nemaris, NY, USA) software. Patients were divided into two groups according to the post-operative integrity of the lateral femoral wall, where group (A) sustained a lateral femoral wall fracture intraoperatively or within 12 months after the index procedure, while in group (B) the lateral femoral wall remained intact. All patients were regularly followed up radiologically and clinically per the Harris Hip Score (HHS) for a period of 12 months. Results. At 12 months five patients (12%) suffered a postoperative lateral wall fracture, while in 37 patients (88%) the lateral femoral wall remained intact. The mean preoperative LWT of patients with a postoperative lateral wall fracture was 18.04 mm (SD ± 1.58) compared to 26.22mm (SD ± 5.93) in the group without a lateral wall fracture. All patients with post-operative lateral femoral wall fracture belong to 31A2 group, while 78.4% of the patients that did not develop post-operative lateral femoral wall fracture belong to 31A1 group. Eighty percent of patients in group (A) experienced shortening, collapse, shaft medialization and varus deformity. The mean Harris hip score of group (A) was 39.60 at 3 months and 65.67 at 6 months postoperatively, while that of group (B) was 80.75 and 90.65 at 3 and 6 months respectively, denoting a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Treatment failure meriting a revision surgery was 40 % in group (A) and 8% in group (B) denoting a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). The cut-off point of LWT below which there is a high chance of post-operative lateral wall fracture when fixed with DHS is 19.6mm. This was shown on the receiver operating curve (ROC) by plotting the sensitivity against the 100 % specificity with a set 95% confidence interval 0.721 – 0.954. When lateral wall thickness was at 19.6 mm, the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 81.8%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.838, which was statistically significant (P = 0.015). Conclusions. Preoperative measurement of LWT in elderly patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures is decisive. The cut off point for postoperative lateral wall fracture according to our study is 19.6 mm; hence, intramedullary fixation has to be considered in this situation

Results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) when compared with primary osteoarthritis (OA) are controversial. Different factors like age, THA type or surgical technique may affect outcome. We hypothesized that patients with ON had an increased revision rate compared with OA. We analysed clinical outcome, estimated the survival rate for revision surgery, and their possible risk factors, in two groups of patients. In this retrospective cohort analysis of our prospective database, we assessed 2464 primary THAs implanted between 1989 and 2017. Patients with OA were included in group 1, 2090 hips; and patients with ON in group 2, 374 hips. In group 2 there were more men (p<0.001), patients younger than 60 years old (p<0.001) and with greater physical activity (p<0.001). Patients with lumbar OA (p<0.001) and a radiological acetabular shape type B according to Dorr (p<0.001) were more frequent in group 1. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score and radiological analysis included postoperative acetabular and femoral component position and hip reconstruction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having revision surgery for different reasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors for revision surgery. Clinical improvement was better in the ON at all intervals. There were 90 hips revised, 68 due to loosening or wear, 52 (2.5%) in group 1, and 16 (4.3%) in group 2. Overall, the survival rate for revision surgery for any cause at 22 years was 88.0 % (95% CI, 82-94) in group 1 and 84.1% (95% CI, 69 – 99) in group 2 (p=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis showed that hips with conventional polyethylene (PE), compared with highly-cross linked PEs or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, (p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.12, 95% CI 1.15-3.92), and cups outside the Lewinnek´s safe zone had a higher risk for revision surgery (p<0.001, HR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.69-3.91). Modern highly-cross linked PEs and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings use, and a proper surgical technique improved revision rate in patients undergoing THA due to ON compared with OA

Pelvic bone defect in patients with severe congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH) lead to abnormalities in lumbar spine and lower limb alignment that can determine total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients' outcome. These variables may be different in uni- or bilateral CDH. We compared the clinical outcome and the spinopelvic and lower limb radiological changes over time in patients undergoing THA due to uni- or bilateral CHD at a minimum follow-up of five years. Sixty-four patients (77 hips) undergoing THA due to severe CDH between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed: Group 1 consisted of 51 patients with unilateral CDH, and group 2, 113 patients (26 hips) with bilateral CDH. There were 32 females in group 1 and 18 in group 2 (p=0.6). The mean age was 41.6 years in group 1 and 53.6 in group 2 (p<0.001). We compared the hip, spine and knee clinical outcomes. The radiological analysis included the postoperative hip reconstruction, and the evolution of the coronal and sagittal spinopelvic parameters assessing the pelvic obliquity (PO) and the sacro-femoro-pubic (SFP) angles, and the knee mechanical axis evaluating the tibio-femoral angle (TFA). At latest follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was 88.6 in group 1 and 90.7 in group 2 (p=0.025). Postoperative leg length discrepancy of more than 5 mm was more frequent in group 1 (p=0.028). Postoperative lumbar back pain was reported in 23.4% of the cases and knee pain in 20.8%, however, there were no differences between groups. One supracondylar femoral osteotomy and one total knee arthroplasty were required. The radiological reconstruction of the hip was similar in both groups. The PO angle improved more in group 1 (p=0.01) from the preoperative to 6-weeks postoperative and was constant at 5 years. The SFP angle improved in both groups but there were no differences between groups (p=0.5). 30 patients in group 1 showed a TFA less than 10º and 17 in group 2 (p=0.7). Although the clinical outcome was better in terms of hip function in patients with bilateral CDH than those with unilateral CDH, the improvement in low back and knee pain was similar. Patients with unilateral dysplasia showed a better correction of the PO after THA. All spinopelvic and knee alignment parameters were corrected and maintained over time in most cases five years after THA

Abstract. Objective. Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims to preserve the proximal bone stock for future revisions, so that the first revision should resemble a primary intervention rather than a revision. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in revision THA after failed short stem versus after failed conventional stem THA. Methods. This study included forty-five patients with revision THA divided into three groups (15 each); group A: revision after short stem, group B: revision after conventional cementless stem and group C revision after conventional cemented stem. The studied groups were compared regarding 31 variables including demographic data, details of the primary and revision procedures, postoperative radiological subsidence, hospital stay, time for full weight bearing (FWB), preoperative and postoperative clinical scores. Results. Early stem subsidence (40%) was the main indication of revision in group A compared to peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) (73.3%) and aseptic loosening (53.3%) in group B and C respectively (P=0.021). The mean time to revision was significantly shorter in group A (15 months) compared to 95.33 and 189.40 months in group B and C respectively. (P=0.005). Sixty % (9 patients) in group A were revised in the first year. The mean operative time, blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay were significantly lower in group A compared to group B and C (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.002 and 0.001 respectively). Revisions in group A were performed using either short stems (13.3%) or conventional stems (86.7%) whilst 80% of patients needed long stems and 20% of patients needed conventional stems in group B and C (P<0.001). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the latest follow up was 87.07, 87.53 and 85.47 in group A, B and C respectively. All PFFS had excellent results according to Beal's and Tower's criteria; all fractures healed and the implants were stable. Conclusion. The most common cause of failure of short stems is early stem subsidence. Short stem THA has specific indications and patient selection is very crucial. Preoperative templating for short stems and a detailed analysis of the individual patient anatomy in anteroposterior and lateral views are mandatory to predict the correct implant size more accurately. The use of intraoperative imaging can verify the sizing, implant position, and sufficient contact with the lateral cortex. Revision of short stem THA resembled the primary THA. If a standard implant can be used in a surgical revision instead of a longer revision stem, this can be considered as an advantage for the hip arthroplasty treatment concept. However, this only applies if the longevity of the first treatment with a short stem is comparable with that of a standard stem. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Aim. This study aims to define the normal postoperative presepsin kinetics in patients undergoing primary cementless total hip replacement (THR). Methods. Patients undergoing primary cementless THR at our Institute were recruited. At enrollment anthropometric data, smocking status, osteoarthritis stage according to Kellgren and. Lawrence, Harris Hip Score (HHS), drugs assumption and comorbidities were recorded. All the patients underwent serial blood tests, including complete blood count, presepsin (PS) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) 24 hours before arthroplasty and at 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-hours postoperatively and at 3-, 6- and 12-months follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v25.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by the Dunn multiple comparison post hoc tests were carried out. Correlations between PS, CRP and TOT were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. P values below 0.05 were considered significant. Results and conclusion. A total of 96 patients were recruited (51 female; 45 male; mean age= 65.74±5.58) were recruited. The mean PS values were: 137.54 pg/ml at baseline, 192.08 pg/ml at 24-hours post-op; 254.85 pg/ml at 48-hours post-op; 259 pg/ml at 72-hours post-op; 248.6 pg/ml at 96-hour post-op; 140.52 pg/ml at 3-months follow-up; 135.55 pg/ml at 6-months follow-up and 130.11 pg/ml at 12-months follow-up. In two patients (2.08%) a soft-tissue infection was observed; in these patients higher levels (>350pg/mL) were recorded at 3-months follow-up. The lack of a presepsin decrease at 96 hours post-operatively should be a predictive factor of infection

Introduction and Objective. A proper restoration of hip biomechanics is fundamental to achieve satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). A global hip offset (GO) postoperatively reduction of more than 5 mm was known to impair hip functionality after THA. This study aimed to verify the restoration of the GO radiographic parameter after primary THA by the use of a cementless femoral stem available in three different offset options without length changing. Materials and Methods. From a consecutive series of 201 patients (201 hips) underwent primary cementless THA in our centre with a minimum 3-year follow up, 80 patients (80 hips) were available for complete radiographic evaluation for GO and limb length (LL) and clinical evaluation with Harris hip score (HHS). All patients received the same femoral stem with three different offset options (option A with – 5 mm offset, option B and option C with + 5 mm offset, constant for each sizes) without changing stem length. Results. Mean GO significantly increased by + 3 mm (P < 0.05) and mean LL significantly decreased by + 5 mm (P < 0.05) after surgery, meaning that postoperatively the limb length of the operated side increased by + 5 mm. HHS significantly improved from 56.3 points preoperatively to 95.8 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Offset option A was used in 1 hip (1%), B in 59 hips (74%) and C in 20 hips (25%). Conclusions. The femur is lateralized with a mean of + 5mm after surgery than, the native anatomy, whatever type of stem was used. Thus, the use of this 3-offset options femoral stem is effective in restoring the native biomechanical hip parameters as GO, even if 2 offset options were considered sufficient to restore GO

Introduction and Objective. Despite pure alumina have shown excellent long-term results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), alumina matrix composites (AMCs) composed of alumina and zirconium oxide are more commonly used. There are no comparative studies between these two different ceramics. We performed a retrospective case-control study to compare results and associated complications between AMC from two manufacturers and those with pure alumina from another manufacturer. Materials and Methods. 480 uncemented THAs with ceramic on ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces (288 men and 192 women; mean age of 54.1 ± 12.4 years), were implanted from 2010 to 2015. Group 1: 281 THAs with pure alumina; Group 2A: 142 with AMC bearing in a trabecular titanium cup. Group 2B: 57 hips with AMC bearing with a porous-coated cup. Results. The mean follow-up was 7.3 years. There was one late infection in group 1, eight dislocations, three in group 1 (1.1%), three in group 2A (2.1%), all with a 36 mm femoral head, and two in group 2C (3.5%). Liner malseating was found in one hip in group 1, and in five hips in group 2C, of these, there were four liner fractures (7.0%). Four cups were revised for iliopsoas impingement (three in group 1 and one in group 2B). Two cups were revised for aseptic loosening, one in group 1 and one in group 2A, and four revised femoral stems in group 2A, three for subsidence and another for postoperative periprosthetic B. 2. fracture. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 48.6 ± 3.3 in the whole series and 93.9 ± 7.2 at the end of follow-up. The survival rate of revision for any cause was 98.2% (95% Confidence Interval: 96.6–99.8) at ten years for group 1, 95.8% (95% CI: 92.1–99.5) for group 2A, and 91.1% (95% CI: 83.7–98.5) for group 2B (log-rank 0.030). Conclusions. Outcome of uncemented CoC THA in young patients was satisfactory at mid-term in all three groups. However, liner fractures were frequent in group 2B. All dislocated hips in group 2A had a 36 mm femoral head diameter, and revision due to any cause was less frequent in group 1. Pure alumina CoC THA can be used as a benchmark for comparison with newer CoC THAs

Aims. Second-generation metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were introduced in order to reduce wear-related complications. The current study reports on the serum cobalt levels and the clinical outcome at a minimum of 20 years following THA with a MoM (Metasul) or a ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing. Methods. The present study provides an update of a previously published prospective randomized controlled study, evaluating the serum cobalt levels of a consecutive cohort of 100 patients following THA with a MoM or a CoP articulation. A total of 31 patients were available for clinical and radiological follow-up examination. After exclusion of 11 patients because of other cobalt-containing implants, 20 patients (MoM (n = 11); CoP (n = 9)) with a mean age of 69 years (42 to 97) were analyzed. Serum cobalt levels were compared to serum cobalt levels five years out of surgery. Results. The median cobalt concentration in the MoM group was 1.04 μg/l (interquartile range (IQR) 0.64 to 1.70) at a mean of 21 years (20 to 24) postoperatively and these values were similar (p = 0.799) to cobalt levels at five years. In the CoP control group, the median cobalt levels were below the detection limit (< 0.3 μg/l; median 0.15 μg/l, IQR 0.15 to 0.75) at 20 years. The mean Harris Hip Score was 91.4 points (61 to 100) in the MoM group and 92.8 points (63 to 100) in the CoP group. Conclusion. This study represents the longest follow-up series evaluating the serum cobalt levels after 28 mm head MoM bearing THA and shows that serum cobalt concentrations remain at low levels at a mean of 21 years (20 to 24) after implantation. Cite this article:Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(3):145–150

Femoral impaction bone grafting (IBG) may be used to restore bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and allow use of a shorter, than otherwise, length prosthesis. This is most beneficial in young patients who are more likely to require further revision surgery. This study aimed to assess the results of femoral IBG for staged revision THA for infection. A prospective cohort of 29 patients who underwent staged revision THA for infection with femoral IBG and a cemented polished double-tapered (CPDT) stem at the final reconstruction was investigated. The minimum follow-up was two years (2 – 10 years, median 6 years). Stem subsidence was measured with radiostereometric analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Harris Hip, Harris Pain, and and Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie Activity (SICOT) Scores. The original infection was eradicated in 28 patients. One patient required a repeat staged revision due to re-infection with the same organism. At two-year follow-up, the median subsidence at the stem-bone interface was −1.70 mm (−0.31 to −4.98mm). The median Harris Hip Score improved from 51 pre-operatively to 80 at two years (p=0.000), the Harris Pain Score from 20 to 44 (p=0.000) and the SICOT Score from 2.5 to 3 (p=0.003). As successful eradication of infection was achieved in the majority of patients and the stem migration was similar to that of a primary CPDT stem, this study supports the use of femoral IBG during the final reconstruction of the femur after staged revision THA for infection

Background. Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) is a procedure which is gaining acceptance for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee with good results and a long term durable outcome. Its use in other joints has been limited, mainly to the ankle. We aimed to assess the outcome of ACI in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects in the hip. Methods. Fifteen patients underwent ACI for chondral or osteochondral defects in the femoral head with a follow up of upto 8 years (mean of 2 years) in our institution with a mean age of 37 years at the time of operation. Pre-operatively hip function was assessed by using the Harris Hip Score and MRI. Post-operatively these were repeated at 1 year and hip scores repeated annually. Failure was defined as a second ACI to the operated lesion or a conversion to a hip resurfacing or replacement. Results. The mean pre-op Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 55 which increased to 63 at 1 year and 70 at the latest follow up. Patients who underwent ACI for cartilage defects secondary to trauma (four) were better with a mean HHS of 69 at a mean follow up of 3.5 years. Six patients underwent THR at a mean of 32 months and were classed as failures. Five patients had evidence of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head post operatively of which four AVN pre-op. Conclusion. These early results suggest that ACI could be a viable option for the treatment of isolated chondral defects in the hip. The presence of AVN or bone cysts pre-op may be a predictor of failure

Background. Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in metal on metal bearing. One of the proposed advantages is ease of revision of the femoral component. Short term functional results after femoral revision are similar to those after conventional total hip replacement. Survival and function after revision of the acetabular component only or of both components have not been reported. We aimed to assess hip function and implant survival after revision of the acetabular component for failed Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR). Methods. The Oswestry Outcome Centre collected data prospectively on 5000 patients who underwent hip resurfacing between 1997 and 2002. Of these, 182 hips were revised: 42% had revision of the femoral component only, 8% revision of the acetabular component only, and 50% revision of both components. This study analyzed patients who had revision of the acetabular component, either in isolation or in combination with the femoral component. Results. In the isolated acetabular revision group the median Harris Hip Score was 74 at a mean of 4.5 years post-revision. In the both components revision group the median Harris hip score was 85 at a mean of 4 years. There was no significant difference in function between the groups. Kaplan-Meier survivor ship analysis after revision showed an average survival of 91% at 10 years. There was a significant difference between survival of isolated acetabular revision (75%) and both component revision (96%). Conclusions. Revision total hip replacement subsequent to failure of hip resurfacing has good outcome and good midterm survival. Isolated acetabular revision and revision of both components had similar function but survival was significantly worse in the isolated acetabular revision group

Introduction. The management of periprosthetic pelvic bone loss is a challenging problem in hip revision surgery. This study evaluates the minimum 10-year clinical and radiographic outcome of major column structural allografts combined with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular reconstruction. Methods. From January 1992 to August 2005, 106 hips with periprosthetic osteolysis underwent acetabular revision using massive allografts and the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage. Forty-five patients (49 hips) died for unrelated causes without further surgery. Fifty-nine hips in 59 patients underwent clinical and radiographic evaluation at an average follow-up of 15.1 years. There were 17 male and 42 female patients, with age ranging from 29 to 83 years (mean 59). Results. Ten hips required rerevision because of infection (3), aseptic loosening (6), and flange breakage (1). Moreover, 4 cages showed x-ray signs of instability with severe bone resorption. The survivorship of the Burch-Schneider cage at 21.9 years with removal for any reason or radiographic migration and aseptic or radiographic failure as the end points were 76.3 and 81.4, respectively. The average Harris hip score improved from 33.2 points preoperatively to 75.7 points at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Discussion. In hip revision surgery, severe deficiency of pelvic bone stock is a critical concern because of the difficulty in providing a stable and durable fixation of the prosthesis. Although antiprotrusio cages have a limited role in acetabular revision, the use in association with massive allografts in extended bone loss demonstrated highly successful long-term results, enabling bone stock restoration and cup stability

In Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures (ICHF) in young active patients, preservation of the femoral head and its blood supply are of high importance and urgent surgical treatment with anatomic reduction and internal fixation is the preferred intervention. Due to the strong varus displacement shear forces exerted across the hip, there are relatively high complication rates after fixation. There is no consensus regarding the optimal fixation device or technique. This retrospective study compared closed reduction internal fixation method using cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) with the Targon Femoral Neck (TFN) hip fixed angle screw. Data regarding, gender, operational data, duration of surgery, complications, NAS (Numerical Analogue Scale) pain score, Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and SF-12 scores were retrieved for patients younger than 65 with displaced ICHF. Eighty-two patients were included in the study, 30 patients treated with CCS were compared to 52 patients treated with TFN. Fracture configuration (Garden and Pauwel classifications), mean time to surgery and complication rate did not differ significantly. Operative time did differ significantly between groups (CCS 56 minutes, TFN 92 minutes, p<0.001). At final follow-up the CCS group reported less pain (NAS 2.3 vs 3.5, p< 0.049) and better Mental Health Composite score of SF-12 (p=0.017) compared to the TFN group. Complication rates for the treatment of displaced ICHF with TFN and CCS showed no significant differences; however, the functional outcomes, as presented by the NAS and Mental Health Composite score of SF-12, showed superiority for CCS treatment. As this fixation method is related to reduce costs, we suggest CCS for the treatment of displaced ICHF in the young population

Hip resurfacing procedures have gained increasing popularity for younger, higher demand patients with degenerative hip pathologies. However, with concerns regarding revision rates and possible adverse metal hypersensitivity reactions with metal-on-metal articulations, some authors have questioned the hypothesised superiority of hip resurfacing over total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and complication rates of these two procedures. A systematic review was undertaken of all published and unpublished research up to January 2010. The primary search was of the databases Medline, CINAHL, AMED and EMBASE, searched via Ovid using MeSH terms and Boolian operators ‘hip’ AND ‘replacement’ OR ‘arthroplasty’ AND ‘resurfacing’. A secondary search of unpublished literature was conducted using the databases SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK), the British Library's Integrated Catalogue and Current Controlled Trials databases using the same search terms as the primary search. All included studies were critically appraised with the CASP appraisal tool. In total, 46 studies were identified from 1124 citations. These included 3799 hip resurfacings and 3282 total hip arthroplasties. On meta-analysis, functional outcomes for subjects following hip resurfacing were better than or the same as subjects with a total hip arthroplasty, with significantly higher WOMAC score (Mean Difference (MD)=−2.41; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −3.88, −0.94; p=0.001), and significantly better Harris Hip Score (range of motion component) (MD=−0.05; 95% CI: (−0.07, −0.03; p<0.0001) and overall Harris Hip Score (MD=2.51; 95% CI: 1.24, 3.77; p=0.0001) in the hip resurfacing compared to total hip arthroplasty cohorts. However, there were significantly greater incidences of heterotopic ossification (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.62; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.14; p=0.006), aseptic loosening (RR=3.07; 95% CI:1.11, 8.50;p=0.03) and revision surgery (RR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.45; p=0.003) with hip resurfacing compared to total hip arthroplasty. The evidence-base presented with a number of methodological inadequacies such as the limited use of power calculations and poor or absent blinding of both patients and assessors, potentially giving rise to assessor bias. In respect to these factors, the current evidence-base, whilst substantial in its size, may be questioned in respect to its quality in determining superiority of hip resurfacing over total hip arthroplasty

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of Sugioka's transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO) for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods. Seventy-eight patients (87 hips) were consecutively treated by TRO from 1989 to 1994. All patients followed 15 years or more were included. Four patients (4 hips) with traumatic osteonecrosis and five patients (5 hips) followed less than 15 years were excluded. A total of 69 patients (78 hips) were included. Average age at the time of operation was 42 years. There were 51 men (57 hips) and 18 women (21 hips). The average follow-up was 17 years (range, 15 to 20 years). Type of osteonecrosis was as follows: Type B; 2 hips, Type C1; 50 hips, and Type C2; 26 hips. Stage was as follows: stage 2; 29 hips, stage 3A; 34 hips, stage 3B; 13 hips, and stage 4; 2 hips. Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy was performed in 76 hips and posterior rotational osteotomy was performed in 2 hips. Clinical evaluation was evaluated by Harris hip score. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed based on the end point of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or re-collapse. Results. Twenty-nine hips (37.2%) were converted to THA, and 38 hips (48.7%) were re-collapsed. Average Harris hip score before operation was improved from 67 to 82 points at final follow-up. The reasons for conversion to THA within five years after osteotomy were cervical fracture or fixation failure, and 10 years after osteotomy progression of osteoarthritis due to re-collapse. Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10 years after surgery was 69.2% (95% confidence interval: 58.8-79.6) and 15 years after surgery was 61.3% (95% CI: 49.9-72.7) with THA as the end-point. Kaplan-Meier survivorship at 10 years after surgery 50.0% (95% CI: 38.6-61.4) and at 15 years after surgery 50.0% (95% CI: 38.6-61.4) when re-collapse was defined as the end point. Type C1 was significantly better than Type C2. There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid-induced and non-corticosteroid-induced patients. There was no significant difference between the patients with early and late stage. Conclusion. The long-term outcome of transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head was excellent. Sixty-three percent of the hips were not converted to THA. Type C2 was a significant risk factor for TRO

We used a biodegradable mesh to convert an acetabular defect into a contained defect in six patients at total hip replacement. Their mean age was 61 years (46 to 69). The mean follow-up was 32 months (19 to 50). Before clinical use, the strength retention and hydrolytic in vitro degradation properties of the implants were studied in the laboratory over a two-year period. A successful clinical outcome was determined by the radiological findings and the Harris hip score. All the patients had a satisfactory outcome and no mechanical failures or other complications were observed. No protrusion of any of the impacted grafts was observed beyond the mesh. According to our preliminary laboratory and clinical results the biodegradable mesh is suitable for augmenting uncontained acetabular defects in which the primary stability of the implanted acetabular component is provided by the host bone. In the case of defects of the acetabular floor this new application provides a safe method of preventing graft material from protruding excessively into the pelvis and the mesh seems to tolerate bone-impaction grafting in selected patients with primary and revision total hip replacement

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiographical results in patients who underwent a modified minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthroplasty using large-diameter metal-on-metal articulations for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods. From December 2007 to July 2008, 45 hips (33 patients) underwent total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. There was 1 woman (2 hips) and 32 men (43 hips) who had a mean age of 39 years (range, 22 to 64 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (range, 12 to 19 months). The authors modified the original minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthroplasty technique and used large-diameter metal-on-metal articulations. In the lateral position, an anterolateral approach was used between the gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata muscles and for the posterior approach the muscle plane was between the piriformis and gluteus medius muscles. The acetabular components, Durom¯ (Zimmer) in 20 hips and Magnum¯ (Biomet) was used in 25 hips. M/L taper¯ (Zimmer) femoral stems were used in all cases. The size of the femoral heads were 38 mm (1 hip), 40 mm (3 hips), 42 mm (13 hips), 44 mm (18 hips), 46 mm (5 hips), 48 mm (4 hips) and 50 mm (1 hip). Postures such as excessive flexion or adduction which cause dislocation were not restricted, post-operatively. Functional results were measured by Harris hip scores (HHS), WOMAC scores, and range of motion. Radiographic evaluation was assessed for positions of components and post-operative complications were noted. Results. Mean operation time was 72 minutes (range, 54 to 94 minutes). The mean Harris hip score improved from 50 points (range, 38 to 73 points) pre-operatively to 96 points (range, 84 to 100 points) post-operatively, and the mean WOMAC score improved from 68 points (range, 50 to 93 points) to 28 points (range, 26 to 34 points). The mean flexion improved from 85° pre-operatively to 122° post-operatively. The mean internal rotation improved from 2.5° pre-operatively to 25.3° post-operatively. The mean external rotation improved from 31.8° pre-operatively to 60.1° post-operatively. The mean abduction improved from 24.0° pre-operatively to 41.6° post-operatively. The mean adduction improved from 19.4 ° pre-operatively to 26.6° post-operatively. All patients were able to sit cross legged and squat. On radiological evaluation, the mean lateral opening angle of the acetabular component was 39.4° (range, 32.2°-48.5°) and the mean stem position was valgus 0.3° (range, varus 2.8° to valgus 2.0°). At last follow-up, all femoral and acetabular components were well-fixed without loosening or subsidence. There were no complications such as dislocation, immediate post-operative deep infection or delayed infection. Conclusion. Modified minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthroplasty using large-diameter metal-on-metal articulations for osteonecrosis of the femoral head results in satisfactory early clinical and radiologic results

Physical functioning in patients undergoing hip surgery is commonly assessed in three ways: patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), performance test, or clinician-administered measure. It is recommended that several types of measures are used concurrently to capture an extended picture of function. Patient fatigue and burden, time, resources and logistical constraints of clinic and research appointments mean that collecting multiple measures is seldom feasible, leading to focus on a limited number of measures, if not a single one. While there is evidence that performance-tests and PROMs do not fully correlate, correlations between PROMs, performance tests and clinician-administrated measures are yet to be evaluated. It is also not known if the associations between function and patient characteristics depend on how function is measured. The aim of our study was to use different measures to assess function in the same group of patients before their hip surgery to determine 1. how well PROMs, performance tests and clinician-administrated measures correlate with one another and 2. Whether these measures are associated with the same patient characteristics. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the pre-operative information of 125 participants listed for hip replacement. The WOMAC function subscale, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and walk-, step- and balance-tests were assessed by questionnaire or during a clinic visit. Participant socio-demographics and medical characteristics were also collected. Correlations between functional measures were investigated with correlation coefficients (r). Regression models were used to test the association between the patient's characteristics and each of the three types of functional measures. None of the correlations between the PROM, clinician-administrated measure and performance tests were very high (r<0.90). The highest correlations were found between the WOMAC-function and the HHS (r=0.7) or the Walk-test (r=0.6), and between the HHS and the walk-test(r=0.7). All the other performance-tests had low correlations with the other measures(r ranging between 0.3 and 0.5). The associations between patient characteristics and functional scores varied by type of measure. Psychological status was associated with the WOMAC function (p-value<0.0001) but not with the other measures. Age was associated with the performance test measures (p-value ranging from ≤0.01 to <0.0001) but not with the WOMAC function. The clinician-administered (HHS) measure was not associated with age or psychological status. When evaluating function prior to hip replacement clinicians and researchers should be aware that each assessment tool captures different aspects of function and that patient characteristics should be taken into account. Psychological status influences the perception of function; patients may be able to do more than they think they can do, and may need encouragement to overcome anxiety. A performance test like a walk-test would provide a more comprehensive assessment of function limitations than a step or balance test, although performance tests are influenced by age. For the most precise description of functional status a combination of measures should be used. Clinicians should supplement their pre-surgery assessment of function with patient-reported measure to include the patient's perspective

Ganz peri-acetabular osteotomy is commonly used to treat symptomatic hip dysplasia. It aims to increase the load bearing contact area of the hip to reduce the risk of subsequent osteoarthritis. In this study we assess the radiographic and clinical results of the procedure since its introduction to our unit. All patients undergoing Ganz osteotomies at our unit were followed up prospectively. Data collected included patient demographics and pre- and post-operative functional scores (Harris and Non-arthritic hip scores). In addition, acetabular correction was evaluated on pre-and post-operative radiographs (using Centre-Edge angle and Tonnis angle). Complications were also noted. Overall 50 procedures were performed between 2007 and 2013 with median follow-up of 3 years (1 – 7 years). The majority of patients (90%) were female. Average age at time of surgery was 29 years (16–49). There were significant improvements in pre- and post-operative median functional scores (Modified Harris Hip Score = 49 versus 64, p=0.001), Non-arthritic Hip Score = 42 versus 56, p=0.007). Median Centre Edge Angle improved from 16 degrees pre-operatively (range = 7–31 degrees) to 30 degrees post-operatively (18–33) degrees), p<0.0001. Similarly, pre-operative Tonnis angle improved from 18 degrees (9–38) to 7 degrees (2–14), p<0.0001. Five patients developed post-operative complications: 2 superficial wound infection, 1deep infection requiring hip washout and antibiotic treatment and 2 patients subsequently requiring total hip replacements. We have shown that the Ganz peri-acetabular osteotomy can be effective for the treatment of painful hip dysplasia improving both functional and radiographic outcomes. However, patient selection is a key factor

Hip arthroscopy is performed in a number of specialist centres throughout the UK with good results, no work has been published on the outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the District General Hospital setting. The early results from our prospective observational study show good outcomes in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and labral pathologies. To date we have follow-up data on 46 patients who have undergone hip arthroscopy with a mean follow-up period of 23 weeks. Of these patients 14 were male (30%) and 32 were female (70%) with a mean age of 36 years (16 to 62). Analysis of the data has shown a mean improvement in the Modified Harris Hip Score from 46.89 pre-operatively to 59.50 post-operatively (p<0.01) and a mean improvement in the Non-arthritic Hip Score from 47.38 pre-operatively to 66.74 post operatively (p<0.01). One of the patients has since undergone a total hip arthroplasty. There was one episode of minor wound infection treated successfully with oral antibiotics. There are been no cases of nerve injury or venous-thromboembolism. Our results demonstrate that hip arthroscopy can be provided safely in the DGH setting with good early functional outcomes