Introduction: Patients can vary widely in their illness perceptions and subsequently, the manner in which they respond and adapt to health threats. A patient’s perception about his/her hand injury may explain their health behaviours such as adherence to post-operative therapy, coping, emotional response and eventual clinical outcome. Aims: To examine illness beliefs in patients with hand injuries in the acute trauma setting. Methods: The disability and severity of injury were determined using the DASH questionnaire and HISS score. The revised Illness Perception Questionnaire(IPQR) was used to explore the patient’s illness perception. Results: Fifty seven patients were recruited. There was no correlation between the DASH and HISS scores, or their correlation with the different components of the IPQ-R scores. The cohort was optimistic about their treatment and duration of recovery. There was some evidence to suggest that patients with more severe injury were over-optimistic about recovery. Beliefs of negative consequences, chronic, cyclical duration and low illness coherence were linked with negative emotional response. Female patients and dominant hand injuries reported higher subjective disability. Conclusions: The lack of correlations suggests that illness perceptions were not influenced by the severity of the injury. Patients in this cohort were optimistic about recovery, particularly in those with more severe injury (over-optimistic). These findings suggest that there could be a role for psychological intervention in hand injury. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate illness beliefs in hand injury during the post-operative period

Aims. The aims of this study were to describe the epidemiology of metacarpal shaft fractures (MSFs), assess variation in treatment and complications following standard care, document hospital resource use, and explore factors associated with treatment modality. Methods. A multicentre, cross-sectional retrospective study of MSFs at six centres in the UK. We collected and analyzed healthcare records, operative notes, and radiographs of adults presenting within ten days of a MSF affecting the second to fifth metacarpal between 1 August 2016 and 31 July 2017. Total emergency department (ED) attendances were used to estimate prevalence. Results. A total of 793 patients (75% male, 25% female) with 897 MSFs were included, comprising 0.1% of 837,212 ED attendances. The annual incidence of MSF was 40 per 100,000. The median age was 27 years (IQR 21 to 41); the highest incidence was in men aged 16 to 24 years. Transverse fractures were the most common. Over 80% of all fractures were treated non-surgically, with variation across centres. Overall, 12 types of non-surgical and six types of surgical treatment were used. Fracture pattern, complexity, displacement, and age determined choice of treatment. Patients who were treated surgically required more radiographs and longer radiological and outpatient follow-up, and were more likely to be referred for therapy. Complications occurred in 5% of patients (39/793). Most patients attended planned follow-up, with 20% (160/783) failing to attend at least one or more clinic appointments. Conclusion. MSFs are common hand injuries among young, working (economically active) men, but there is considerable heterogeneity in treatment, rehabilitation, and resource use. They are a burden on healthcare resources and society, thus further research is needed to optimize treatment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):652–661

Like athletes, musicians are vulnerable to musculoskeletal injuries that can be career ending or have a severe negative financial impact. All ages are affected, with a peak incidence in the third and fourth decades. Women are slightly more likely to be affected than men. It is incumbent upon orthopaedic surgeons to be able to complete a thorough physical assessment, be aware of the risk factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms in musicians, and have a detailed knowledge of the specific syndromes they suffer and their appropriate treatment. In this paper we review the common hand injuries that afflict musicians and discuss their treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:146–50

We conducted a prospective review of patients treated specifically for phalangeal fractures over a period of 6 months. Data was sourced from patient records, Emergency Dept records and theatre records. X-rays were reviewed by the senior authors using the AGFA IMPAX Web1000 v5.1 System.

A total of 654 patients presented to our hospital during the study. Of these, 257 (39%) patients were referred to the plastics and hand surgical team on-call. Remaining 397 (61%) patients were seen and treated at the local accident and emergency. Our review identified a patient group of 75 out of 654 (11.5%) patients who required operation.

Mechanism of injury: Direct impact: n=60 (80%), Hyperextension n=11 (15%), Hyper-flexion injury n=4 (5%).

The average patient age for a phalangeal fracture was 37.3 years. 47 (63%) patients were in the age group 20–40 years. The mean age for a phalangeal fracture in males was 35.9 (16–75) years and 42.2 (23–70) years in females. The gender distribution of these patients reveals that 58/75 (77%) patients were males. This indicates that males were at an increased relative risk of 3.4 for sustaining a hand fractures than females.

The fractures were studied with respect to their complexity, digit(s) involved, phalanx and the site on the phalanx, pattern of fracture and finally the involvement of the MCP or the IP joints.

Our study revealed that fifty-two (69%) of the fractures were closed while twenty-three (31%) were open. Injuries to the distal phalanges accounted for the most of the open fractures (15/23, 67%). The little finger and the ring finger were the common fingers to be involved.

The fractures were treated with various standard techniques of operative fixation. Postoperatively patients were mobilised as soon as possible and fitted with a removable thermoplastic splint to allow daily active and passive exercises. Hand therapists followed unit protocol including at least one visit per week, with follow up for four to six weeks. Final review was undertaken by a clinician in a dedicated Hand clinic six weeks post fixation.

Our work provides data on incidence and demographic distribution of phalangeal injuries presenting acutely to an NHS Trust covering a population area of 500,000. In our trust it is standard protocol for all such injuries to be reviewed by the Hand team to institute optimal hand therapy for patients. The study enabled us to develop a patient care pathway which will improve both patient and resource management

Aims

COVID-19 remains the major focus of healthcare provision. Managing orthopaedic emergencies effectively, while at the same time protecting patients and staff, remains a challenge. We explore how the UK lockdown affected the rate, distribution, and type of orthopaedic emergency department (ED) presentations, using the same period in 2019 as reference. This article discusses considerations for the ED and trauma wards to help to maintain the safety of patients and healthcare providers with an emphasis on more remote geography.

The August 2023 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: Complications and patient-reported outcomes after trapeziectomy with a Weilby sling: a cohort study; Swelling, stiffness, and dysfunction following proximal interphalangeal joint sprains; Utility of preoperative MRI for assessing proximal fragment vascularity in scaphoid nonunion; Complications and outcomes of operative treatment for acute perilunate injuries: a systematic review; The position of the median nerve in relation to the palmaris longus tendon at the wrist: a study of 784 MR images; Basal fractures of the ulnar styloid? A randomized controlled trial; Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis in SLAC and SNAC wrist; Managing cold intolerance after hand injury: a systematic review

Aims. Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. Methods. Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. Results. In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). Conclusion. This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752

The aim of this study was to determine the floor and ceiling effects for both the QuickDASH and PRWE following a fracture of the distal radius. Secondary aims were to determine the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and if there were patient factors associated with achieving a floor or ceiling effect. A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture and managed at the study centre during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, the PRWE, EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and the normal wrist score. There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs (20–95) and 421 (77%) were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs (4.3–5.5). A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the minimum clinical important difference of the best available score, the ceiling effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for the PRWE. Patients that achieved a ceiling score for the QuickDASH and PRWE subjectively felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, a dominant hand injury and better health-related quality of life were the common factors associated with achieving a ceiling score for both the QuickDASH and PRWE (all p<0.05). The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrate ceiling effects when used to assess the outcome of fractures of the distal radius. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’. Future patient-reported outcome assessment tools for fractures of the distal radius should aim to limit the ceiling effect, especially for individuals or groups that are more likely to achieve a ceiling score

Aims. With novel promising therapies potentially limiting progression of Dupuytren’s disease (DD), better patient stratification is needed. We aimed to quantify DD development and progression after seven years in a population-based cohort, and to identify factors predictive of disease development or progression. Methods. All surviving participants from our previous prevalence study were invited to participate in the current prospective cohort study. Participants were examined for presence of DD and Iselin’s classification was applied. They were asked to complete comprehensive questionnaires. Disease progression was defined as advancement to a further Iselin stage or surgery. Potential predictive factors were assessed using multivariable regression analyses. Of 763 participants in our original study, 398 were available for further investigation seven years later. Results. We identified 143/398 (35.9%) participants with DD, of whom 56 (39.2%) were newly diagnosed. Overall, 20/93 (21.5%) previously affected participants had disease progression, while 6/93 (6.5%) patients showed disease regression. Disease progression occurred more often in patients who initially had advanced disease. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that both ectopic lesions and a positive family history of DD are independent predictors of disease progression. Previous hand injury predicts development of DD. Conclusion. Disease progression occurred in 21.5% of DD patients in our study. The higher the initial disease stage, the greater the proportion of participants who had disease progression at follow-up. Both ectopic lesions and a positive family history of DD predict disease progression. These patient-specific factors may be used to identify patients who might benefit from treatment that prevents progression. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):704–710

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for hand trauma services during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, specifically related to surgical requirements. This will provide useful information for planning and resource allocation in the event of any further lockdown. Methods. A prospective analsysis of all patients attending our hand trauma unit throughout the UK COVID-19 lockdown period (24 March to 10 May 2020) was carried out. Prospectively collected departmental data from the same period in 2019 was obtained and reviewed for comparison. The number of patients attending clinic, undergoing surgery, the type of surgical procedure, and rate of surgery was compared. Results. In all, 463 patients attended hand trauma services during the lockdown period compared to 793 in 2019 (32% reduction); 190 surgical procedures were carried out during lockdown compared to 236 in 2019 (20% reduction). Intervention rate was higher during the lockdown period (41% compared to 30%). There was no difference in the type of cases. In the first half of lockdown, 47% fewer procedures were performed than in 2019, but in the second half of lockdown 13% more procedures were carried out than the same period in 2019. Conclusion. Requirements for hand trauma surgery remain high during a pandemic lockdown. Attendances and surgical requirements can be expected to steadily return to normal levels during a prolonged lockdown period. Throughout any future lockdown period adequate surgical provision must be maintained for patients with hand injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:639–643

Hand injuries are common in military personnel deployed on Operations. We present an analysis of 6 years of isolated hand injuries from Afghanistan or Iraq. The AEROMED database was interrogated for all casualties with isolated hand injuries requiring repatriation between April 2003 and 2009. We excluded cases not returned to Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM). Of the 414 identified in the study period, 207 were not transferred to RCDM, 12 were incorrectly coded and 41 notes were unavailable. The remaining 154 notes were reviewed. 69% were from Iraq; only 14 % were battle injuries. 35% were crush injuries, 20% falls, 17% lacerations, 6% sport, 5% gun-shot wounds and 4% blast. Injuries sustained were closed fractures (43%), open fractures (10%), simple wounds (17%), closed soft tissue injuries (8%) tendon division (7%), nerve division (3%), nerve/tendon division (3%) complex hand injuries (4%). 112 (73%) of the casualties required surgery. Of these 44 (40%) had surgery only in RCDM, 32 (28%) were operated on only in deployed medical facilities and 36 (32%) required surgery before and after repatriation. All 4 isolated nerve injuries were repaired at RCDM; 2 of the 4 cases with tendon and nerve transection were repaired before repatriation. Of the 10 tendon repairs performed prior to repatriation 5 were subsequently revised at RCDM. This description of 6 years of isolated hand injuries in military personnel allows future planning to be focused on likely injuries and raises the issue of poor outcomes in tendon repairs performed on deployment

Aims. The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service. Methods. Data was collected from an adult major trauma centre, paediatric major trauma centre, district general hospital, and a regional hand trauma unit. Data collection included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury type and treatment required. Time periods studied corresponded with the two weeks leading up to lockdown in the UK, two weeks during lockdown, and the same two-week period in 2019. Results. There was a 55.7% (12,935 vs 5,733) reduction in total accident and emergency (A&E) attendances with a 53.7% (354 vs 164) reduction in trauma admissions during lockdown compared to 2019. The number of patients with fragility fractures requiring admission remained constant (32 patients in 2019 vs 31 patients during lockdown; p > 0.05). Road traffic collisions (57.1%, n = 8) were the commonest cause of major trauma admissions during lockdown. There was a significant increase in DIY related-hand injuries (26% (n = 13)) lockdown vs 8% (n = 11 in 2019, p = 0.006) during lockdown, which resulted in an increase in nerve injuries (12% (n = 6 in lockdown) vs 2.5% (n = 3 in 2019, p = 0.015) and hand infections (24% (n = 12) in lockdown vs 6.2% (n = 8) in 2019, p = 0.002). Conclusion. The national lockdown has dramatically reduced orthopaedic trauma admissions. The incidence of fragility fractures requiring surgery has not changed. Appropriate provision in theatres should remain in place to ensure these patients can be managed as a surgical priority. DIY-related hand injuries have increased which has led to an increased in nerve injuries requiring intervention

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to identify the true incidence, pattern, and location of the injury and nature of fracture following hand injuries in different paediatric age groups attending a hand unit. Three hundred and sixty children (237 boys and 123 girls) under 16 years of age who presented with hand injuries between 1st April 2000 and 30th September 2000 were included in the study. Bony injuries accounted for 65.5% (236 injuries), 33.3% (120 injuries) were soft tissue injuries. The projected annual incidence rate for skeletal injuries was 418/100,000 children/year. Incidence was low in toddlers (34/100,000), more than doubled in pre-school children (73/100,000) and steeply increased to around 20 fold after the 10th year (663/100,000). Girls had a higher incidence of hand injuries among toddlers and pre-school children. Crushing was the most common cause of hand injury (64%) and most injuries were sustained at home (45%). Toddlers sustained soft tissue injuries predominantly (86%) and older children sustained more bony injuries (77%). Sport was the cause of injures commonly in the older children. There was a higher incidence of fracture in little finger (52%) followed by the thumb (23%). The proximal phalanx was the most frequently fractured bone (67%) among the phalanges. Diaphyseal fractures (46%) were more common in the metacarpal and basal fractures (51%) were common in the phalanges. At discharge more than 80% of the patients felt that they were cured or significantly better. This paper highlights the changing pattern and the different varieties of hand injuries in different paediatric age groups

Introduction A prospective study of consecutive hand injuries treated at a British Field Hospital revealed a distinctive pattern of injury. This is a unique review of hand injuries in a recent military deployment. Method Patients presenting to the field hospital with hand injuries over a two-month period were entered into a database. The parameters studied included mechanism of injury, timing and nature of treatment and ultimate disposal. An anatomical comparison of pattern of injury with six months retrospective data and a literature search was performed. Results Of nine hundred and thirty one patients attending the hospital in this period, fifty-three had injuries to the hand. Only seven cases resulted from battle injuries. Of the remainder, thirty-three were work related and the 13 were due to sport. Twenty-eight of the patients required a surgical procedure; the mean time to surgery was 1.7 hours. Twelve patients were subsequently aero medically evacuated. Conclusion Wounds of conflict account for a small proportion of hand injuries seen in the operational environment. The injury pattern seen reflects Daily Non-Battle Injury (DNBI) – the hazards encountered by deployed troops on a daily basis

Background. Patients with hand injuries frequently present to Emergency Departments. The ability of junior doctors to perform an accurate clinical assessment is crucial in initiating appropriate management. Objectives. To assess the adequacy of junior doctor hand examination skills and to establish whether further training and education is required. Methods. A double-centre study was conducted using an anonymous survey assessing hand examination completed by junior doctors (Foundation year 1 and Senior House Officer grades) working in Trauma & Orthopaedics or Emergency Departments. The survey covered all aspects of hand examination including assessment of: Flexor and Extensor tendons, Nerves (motor and sensory) and Vascular status. Surveys were marked against answers pre-agreed with a Consultant hand surgeon. Results. 32 doctors completed the survey. Tendons: 59% could accurately examine extensor digitorum, 41% extensor pollicis longus, 38% flexor digitorum profundus and 28% flexor digitorum superficialis. Nerves – Motor: 53% could accurately examine the radial nerve, 37% the ulnar nerve, 22% the median nerve and 9% the anterior interosseous nerve. Nerves – Sensory: 88% could accurately examine the radial nerve, 81% the ulnar nerve, 84% the median nerve and 18.8% digital nerves. Vascular: 93% could describe 3 methods of assessing vascularity. Conclusions. Tendon and neurological aspects of hand clinical examination were poorly executed at junior doctor level in this pragmatic survey. This highlights the need for targeted education and training to improve the accuracy of junior doctor hand injury assessment and subsequent improving patient treatment and safety. Recommendations include dedicated hand examination teaching early in Orthopaedic/A&E placements and introduction of an illustrated Hand Trauma Examination Proforma. Level of evidence. III - Evidence from case, correlation, and comparative studies

Complex hand injuries are those which involve more than one functionally significant anatomic structure of the hand (i.e vessels, nerves, tendons, bones). The epidemiologic and management characteristics of these injuries, encountered in a specialized center covering an urban and agricultural population, were recorded and studied. Between 1997 and 2002 the Orthopaedic Department of the University of Ioannina surgically treated 211 complex hand injuries in 190 patients with a mean age of 35 year (range 2.5–73). The majority of patients were male (89%). The incidence of these injuries was low at the extremes of the age distribution (children and adults over 60 years old). The greatest incidence was in the 15–30 year old age group. The mechanism of the injury was found to be clean cut trauma in 31% and avulsion or crushing in 69%; with the later being frequent agricultural injuries. Fifty-nine per cent of the injuries were viable, while 41% where non-viable (complete amputation in 63% and incomplete in 37%). Of the non viable injuries 66% eventually underwent stump configuration. Primary repair of only one anatomical structure was performed in 58%, most commonly osteosynthesis and tendon suturing. In 42% primary repair of more than one structure was performed, most commonly osteosynthesis and tendonorrhaphy in avulsion injuries and neuroraphy combined with tendonorrhaphy in clean cut injuries. Complex hand injuries are frequently seen in young male adults and the most common mechanism of injury is avulsion-crushing. Most of them are work-related accidents, so prevention should focus on adherence to safety guidelines. Management of such injuries requires special surgical techniques and expertise, necessary for staged reconstruction

The June 2012 Wrist & Hand Roundup. 360. looks at; radial osteotomy and advanced Kienböck's disease; fixing the Bennett fracture; PEEK plates and four-corner arthrodesis,;carpal tunnel release and haemodialysis; degloved digits and the reverse radial forearm flap; occupational hand injuries; trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis; fixing the fractured metacarpal neck and pyrocarbon implants for the destroyed PIPJ

The April 2023 Wrist & Hand Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: MRI-based classification for acute scaphoid injuries: the OxSMART; Deep learning for detection of scaphoid fractures?; Ulnar shortening osteotomy in adolescents; Cost-utility analysis of thumb carpometacarpal resection arthroplasty; Arthritis of the wrist following scaphoid fracture nonunion; Extensor hood injuries in elite boxers; Risk factors for reoperation after flexor tendon repair; Nonoperative versus operative treatment for displaced finger metacarpal shaft fractures.

Aims

The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set of what to measure in all future clinical research on hand fractures and joint injuries in adults.