The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the first Global Patient Safety Challenge in 2005 and introduced the ‘5 moments of hand hygiene’ in 2009 in an attempt to reduce the burden of health care associated infections. Many NHS trusts in England adopted this model of hand hygiene, which prompts health care workers to clean their hands at five distinct stages of caring for the patient. Our review analyses the scientific foundation for the five moments of hand hygiene and explores the evidence, as referenced by WHO, to support these recommendations. We found no strong scientific support for this regime of hand hygiene as a means of reducing health care associated infections. Consensus-based guidelines based on weak scientific foundations should be assessed carefully to prevent shifting the clinical focus from more important issues and to direct limited resources more effectively. We recommend caution in the universal adoption of the WHO ‘5 moments of hand hygiene’ by orthopaedic surgeons and other health care workers and emphasise the need for evidence-based principles when adopting hospital guidelines aimed at promoting excellence in clinical practice

The role that fomites have to play in surgical site infection (SSI) and periprostheitic joint infection (PJI) has been observed and researched in the past. However the role that cellphones play in the transfer of microorganisms from hands to surgical sites and the indiscriminate use of cellphones within the Orthopaedics, could increase the risk of infection. This study aimed to measure the contamination of cellphones of health care workers (HCW's) in a South African tertiary hospital. Secondarily was to investigate the cellphone hygiene behaviour of HCW's. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in June 2022. Samples were taken from the the participant's cellphones under an aseptic technique and sent for microbiology. The participants also filled out a questionnaire on cellphone behaviour. The inclusion criteria was orthopaedic HCW's working in the institution; This included nurses and doctors in the orthopaedic theatres and main orthopaedic wards. Sixty-two participants were included; 54 from Orthopaedics and 7 from Anaesthesia. From the samples, 71% grew pathogens while 30,64% grew two or more colonies. This is slightly lower than other studies which showed contamination up to 100%. Micro-organisms cultured included Staphylococcus species; S.Epidermidis, Methycillin sensitive S.aureas; and E.Coli. Cellphone hygiene behaviour was also better than most other studies in terms of frequency of cleaning the devices and hand hygiene around cellphone usage. This which may be a contributing factor to the lower micro-organism contamination. This study should be the first of many as we have identified that there are indeed pathogens on cellphones transferable to patients; causing sepsis. Though cellphones have become vital in patients management in the hospital setting, factors such as improvement in cellphone hygiene through education and frequent cleaning of cellphones will aid in disabling the negative impact of cellphones in the orthopaedic environment

Aims. Infection after surgery increases treatment costs and is associated with increased mortality. Hip fracture patients have historically had high rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and surgical site infection (SSI). This paper reports the impact of routine MRSA screening and the “cleanyourhands” campaign on rates of MRSA SSI and patient outcome. Methods. A total of 13,503 patients who presented with a hip fracture over 17 years formed the study population. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for MRSA and SSI. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling adjusted for temporal trends in rates of MRSA. Kaplan-Meier estimators were generated to assess for changes in mortality. Results. In all, 6,189 patients were identified before the introduction of screening and 7,314 in the post-screening cohort. MRSA infection fell from 69 cases to 15 in the post-screening cohort (p < 0.001). The ARIMA confirmed a significant reduction in MRSA SSI post-screening (p = 0.043) but no significant impact after hand hygiene alone (p = 0.121). Overall SSI fell (2.4% to 1.5%), however deep infection increased slightly (0.89% to 1.06%). ARIMA showed neither intervention affected overall SSI (“cleanyourhands” -0.172% (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.39% to 0.21); p = 0.122, screening -0.113% per year, (95% CI -0.34 to 0.12); p = 0.373). One-year mortality after deep SSI was unchanged after screening (50% vs 45%; p = 0.415). Only warfarinization (OR 3.616 (95% CI 1.366 to 9.569); p = 0.010) and screening (OR 0.189 (95% CI 0.086 to 0.414); p < 0.001) were significant covariables for developing MRSA SSI. Conclusion. While screening and decolonization may reduce MRSA-associated SSI, the benefit to patient outcome remains unclear. Overall deep SSI remains an unsolved problem that has seen little improvement over time. Preventing other hospital-associated infections should not be forgotten in the fight against MRSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):170–177

Between 2016–2019, 4 patients developed hip infections post-hemiarthroplasty. However, between 2020–2021 (Covid-19 pandemic period), 6 patients developed hip infections following hip hemiarthroplasty. The purpose of the investigation is to establish the root causes and key learning from the incident and use the information contained within this report to reduce the likelihood of a similar incident in the future. 65 patients presented with a neck of femur fracture during Covid-19 pandemic period between 2020–2021, 26 had hip hemiarthroplasty of which 6 developed hip infections. Medical records, anaesthetic charts and post-hip infections guidelines from RCS and NICE were utilised. Proteus, Enterococci and Strep. epidermis were identified as the main organisms present causing the hip infection. The average number of ward moves was 4 with 90% of patients developing COVID-19 during their hospital stay. The chance of post-operative wound infection were multifactorial. Having had 5 of 6 patients growing enterococci may suggest contamination of wound either due to potential suboptimal hygiene measures, inadequate wound management /dressing, potential environmental contamination if the organisms (Vancomycin resistant enterococci) are found to be of same types and potential hospital acquired infection due to inadequate infection control measures or suboptimal hand hygiene practices. 3 of the 5 patients grew Proteus, which points towards suboptimal hygiene practices by patients or poor infection control practices by staff. Lack of maintenance of sterility in post op wound dressings alongside inexperience of the handling of post-operative wound in non-surgical wards; multiple ward transfers exceeding the recommended number according to trust guidelines especially due to pandemic isolation measures and COVID-19 infection itself had resulted in an increased rate of hip infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multidisciplinary team education and planned categorisation and isolation strategy is essential to minimise the rate of further hip infections during the pandemic period in future

Aims. The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is directly impacting the field of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology with postponed operations, changed status of planned elective surgeries and acute emergencies in patients with unknown infection status. To this point, Germany's COVID-19 infection numbers and death rate have been lower than those of many other nations. Methods. This article summarizes the current regimen used in the field of orthopaedics in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Internal university clinic guidelines, latest research results, expert consensus, and clinical experiences were combined in this article guideline. Results. Every patient, with and without symptoms, should be screened for COVID-19 before hospital admission. Patients should be assigned to three groups (infection status unknown, confirmed, or negative). Patients with unknown infection status should be considered as infectious. Dependent of the infection status and acuity of the symptoms, patients are assigned to a COVID-19-free or affected zone of the hospital. Isolation, hand hygiene, and personal protective equipment is essential. Hospital personnel directly involved in the care of COVID-19 patients should be tested on a weekly basis independently of the presence of clinical symptoms, staff in the COVID-19-free zone on a biweekly basis. Class 1a operation rooms with laminar air flow and negative pressure are preferred for surgery in COVID-19 patients. Electrocautery should only be utilized with a smoke suction system. In cases of unavoidable elective surgery, a self-imposed quarantine of 14 days is recommended prior to hospital admission. Conclusion. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, orthopaedic patients admitted to the hospital should be treated based on an interdisciplinary algorithm, strictly separating infectious and non-infectious cases. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:309–315

Introduction. Today, Uganda has the second highest rate of road accidents in Africa and the world after Ethiopia. According to the World Health Organization's Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013, Uganda is named among countries with alarmingly high road accident rates. If such trend of traffic accidents continues to increase, the health losses from traffic injuries may be ranked as the second to HIV/AIDS by 2020. These road traffic accidents often result in terrible open injuries. Open fractures are complex injuries of bone and soft tissue. They are orthopedic emergencies due to risk of infection secondary to contamination and compromised soft tissues and sometimes vascular supply and associated healing problems. Any wound occurring on the same limb should be suspected as result of open fracture until proven otherwise. The principles of management of open fracture are initial evaluation and exclusion of life threatening injuries, prevention of infection, healing of fracture and restoration of function to injured extremity. Because of the poor hygienic circumstances and the high rate of cross-infection due to the crowded patient-wards, the risk of getting a post-operative infection is relatively high. Osteoset-T® (Wright Medical) is a medical grade calcium sulfate bone graft substitute which is enhanced for use in infected sites by incorporating 4% tobramycin sulfate. The tobramycin is released locally, allowing therapeutic antibiotic levels at the graft site, while maintaining low systemic antibiotic levels. This local treatment of infection allows new bone formation in the defect site, while decreasing potential systemic effects. Purpose/aim. Prevention and treatment of postoperative osteomyelitis by introducing alcoholic hand-sanitizers and the use of wound debridement and implantation of a medicated bone graft substitute. Materials and Methods. We treated some existing osteomyelitis cases and some open fractures with the medicated bone graft substitutes, at Kilembe Mines Hospital, Uganda. A proper debridement with sequestrectomy when needed was performed after which the pellets were implanted and the wound was closed. A preoperative X-ray was taken as well as clinical pictures. Post-operative x-rays were obtained at 6 weeks post-operative and 6 months post-operative when possible. The case presented in this abstract is a 25year old nurse with a bilateral open tibia fracture due to a motorcycle accident. A proper debridement and plate and screw osteosynthesis was performed after which the pellets were implanted underneath the plate. After surgery systemic antibiotics were given and the wound-dressings were changed when dirty. Results. The case presented is currently 6 months post-operatively and is able to walk without support. The fracture is fully consolidated and the wounds are healed without any sign of infection. Conclusion. Even though the clinical follow-up is not easy in this developing country setting, we were able to evaluate some patients postoperatively. By introducing better hand hygiene (by use of alcoholic hand sanitizers) and medicated bone graft substitutes, we hope to be able to prevent osteomyelitis after open fractures and also to treat chronic osteomyelitis cases. More people are being treated at the moment and a case-control study will be started soon

The incidence of MRSA infection is increasing worldwide. Costs incurred in treating MRSA infection are over twice that of normal patients, and the duration of hospital stay is up to 10 times longer. Risk factors are age, previous MRSA infection, prolonged hospitalization, patients from convalescent homes, immunocompromised states, vascular and pulmonary disease. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 14 patients who developed MRSA infection in our unit, over a period of six years. Data included: age, gender, neurological status, length of hospital and ICU admission, type of procedure performed, HIV status, co-morbidities, nutritional status, haemoglobin, sensitivities and treatment. Results. Age ranged from 2 to 52 (mean 15.75 years) and included four males, six females, and four children. Of the thirteen patients who developed Surgical Site Infection (SSI), nine were posterior surgical wounds. Two patients were HIV positive. Mean albumin and lymphocyte count was 34.88 and 2.37 respectively. The average wait to surgery was 23.8 hospital days, average length of ICU admission was 5.01 days. Signs of SSI developed at 11.75 days on average. Four cases showed sensitivity to Vancomycin, while ten were sensitive to Clindamycin. Patients were treated for a total of six weeks with antimicrobial therapy. Five patients required debridement, two required implant removal for chronic infection. Infection subsequently resolved in all patients. Conclusion. The risk factors were prolonged hospitalization, and posterior surgical wounds. Infection by community acquired MRSA was twice as common as nosocomial MRSA. Current recommendations are to treat superficial sepsis with topical Mupirocin, while systemic antibiotics are reserved for patients at risk for MRSA bacteraemia and who have prosthetic implants. Screening for patient colonization is recommended when risk factors are present, while staff screening is recommended following outbreaks. The cornerstone in preventing MRSA infection is strict hand hygiene

Aims

The mechanism by which synovial fluid (SF) kills bacteria has not yet been elucidated, and a better understanding is needed. We sought to analyze the antimicrobial properties of exogenous copper in human SF against Staphylococcus aureus.

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic drastically affected elective orthopaedic services globally as routine orthopaedic activity was largely halted to combat this global threat. Our institution (University College London Hospital, UK) previously showed that during the first peak, a large proportion of patients were hesitant to be listed for their elective lower limb procedure. The aim of this study is to assess if there is a patient perception change towards having elective surgery now that we have passed the peak of the second wave of the pandemic.

Aims

This study aimed to identify patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) for trauma during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and quantify the risks of contracting SARS-CoV-2 virus, the proportion of patients requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), and rate of complications including mortality.

The transition from shutdown of elective orthopaedic services to the resumption of pre-COVID-19 activity presents many challenges. These include concerns about patient safety, staff safety, and the viability of health economies. Careful planning is necessary to allow patients to benefit from orthopaedic care in a safe and sustainable manner.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):807–810.

Aims

COVID-19 represents one of the greatest global healthcare challenges in a generation. Orthopaedic departments within the UK have shifted care to manage trauma in ways that minimize exposure to COVID-19. As the incidence of COVID-19 decreases, we explore the impact and risk factors of COVID-19 on patient outcomes within our department.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Orthopaedic departments have adopted business continuity models and guidelines for essential and non-essential surgeries to preserve hospital resources as well as protect patients and staff. These guidelines broadly encompass reduction of ambulatory care with a move towards telemedicine, redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons/residents to the frontline battle against COVID-19, continuation of education and research through web-based means, and cancellation of non-essential elective procedures. However, if containment of COVID-19 community spread is achieved, resumption of elective orthopaedic procedures and transition plans to return to normalcy must be considered for orthopaedic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic also presents a moral dilemma to the orthopaedic surgeon considering elective procedures. What is the best treatment for our patients and how does the fear of COVID-19 influence the risk-benefit discussion during a pandemic? Surgeons must deliberate the fine balance between elective surgery for a patient’s wellbeing versus risks to the operating team and utilization of precious hospital resources. Attrition of healthcare workers or Orthopaedic surgeons from restarting elective procedures prematurely or in an unsafe manner may render us ill-equipped to handle the second wave of infections. This highlights the need to develop effective screening protocols or preoperative COVID-19 testing before elective procedures in high-risk, elderly individuals with comorbidities. Alternatively, high-risk individuals should be postponed until the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection is minimal. In addition, given the higher mortality and perioperative morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing surgery, the decision to operate must be carefully deliberated. As we ramp-up elective services and get “back to business” as orthopaedic surgeons, we have to be constantly mindful to proceed in a cautious and calibrated fashion, delivering the best care, while maintaining utmost vigilance to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 during this critical transition period.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:222–228.

During the pandemic of COVID-19, some patients with COVID-19 may need emergency surgeries. As spine surgeons, it is our responsibility to ensure appropriate treatment to the patients with COVID-19 and spinal diseases. A protocol for spinal surgery and related management on patients with COVID-19 has been reviewed. Patient preparation for emergency surgeries, indications, and contraindications of emergency surgeries, operating room preparation, infection control precautions and personal protective equipments (PPE), anesthesia management, intraoperative procedures, postoperative management, medical waste disposal, and surveillance of healthcare workers were reviewed. It should be safe for surgeons with PPE of protection level 2 to perform spinal surgeries on patients with COVID-19. Standardized and careful surgical procedures should be necessary to reduce the exposure to COVID-19.

The rate of surgical site infection after elective foot and ankle surgery is higher than that after other elective orthopaedic procedures.

Since December 2005, we have prospectively collected data on the rate of post-operative infection for 1737 patients who have undergone elective foot and ankle surgery. In March 2008, additional infection control policies, focused on surgical and environmental risk factors, were introduced in our department.

We saw a 50% reduction in the rate of surgical site infection after the introduction of these measures. We are, however, aware that the observed decrease may not be entirely attributable to these measures alone given the number of factors that predispose to post-operative wound infection.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:516–19.