Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXV | Pages 10 - 10
1 Jul 2012
Farrar N Ahmed N Rajan R
Full Access

Purpose of this study. This study was designed to assess the utility of the scarf osteotomy in the management of symptomatic adolescent hallux valgus. Methods. This is a consecutive case series of 30 patients (38 feet) with a mean follow up of 38.2 months (range 6-60 months). The mean age at the time of surgery was 14.2 years (range 10-17 years). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores (AOFAS) were collected at final follow up, along with a rating of the overall satisfaction. Any complications were recorded. Results. The mean AOFAS score at final follow up was 91.2 (range 54-100). 87% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their final outcome. 1 patient has been listed for revision surgery after symptomatic recurrence at 3 years follow up. Conclusion. We have presented the results of the largest case series of scarf osteotomies for adolescent hallux valgus reported in the literature at this point, as far as we are aware. AOFAS scores at final follow up are comparable to the smaller studies previously reported and provide evidence that good outcomes and high levels of patient satisfaction can be achieved. Early follow up demonstrates a low level of recurrence, but long term data is still required


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 7 | Pages 890 - 898
1 Jul 2020
Cheung PWH Wong CKH Cheung JPY

Aims

The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of paediatric patients with orthopaedic conditions and spinal deformity is important, but existing generic tools have their shortcomings. We aim to evaluate the use of Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales in the paediatric population with specific comparisons between those with spinal and limb pathologies, and to explore the feasibility of using PedsQL for studying scoliosis patients’ HRQoL.

Methods

Paediatric patients attending a speciality outpatient clinic were recruited through consecutive sampling. Two groups of patients were included: idiopathic scoliosis, and paediatric orthopaedic upper and lower limb condition without scoliosis. Patients were asked to complete PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales, Youth version of 5-level EuroQol-5-dimension questionnaire, and Refined Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22r) questionnaire. Statistical analyses included scores comparison between scoliosis and limb pathology patients using independent-samples t-test, and correlation tests of PedsQL and SRS-22r.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 3 | Pages 420 - 426
1 Mar 2015
Martinkevich P Møller-Madsen B Gottliebsen M Kjeldgaard Pedersen L Rahbek O

We present the validation of a translation into Danish of the Oxford ankle foot questionnaire (OxAFQ). We followed the Isis Pros guidelines for translation and pilot-tested the questionnaire on ten children and their parents. Following modifications we tested the validity of the final questionnaire on 82 children (36 boys and 45 girls) with a mean age of 11.7 years (5.5 to 16.0) and their parents. We tested the reliability (repeatability (test–retest), child–parent agreement, internal consistency), feasibility (response rate, time to completion, floor and ceiling effects) and construct validity. The generic child health questionnaire was used for comparison. We found good internal consistency for the physical and the school and play domains, but lower internal consistency for the emotional domain. Overall, good repeatability was found within children and parents as well as agreement between children and parents. The OxAFQ was fast and easy to complete, but we observed a tendency towards ceiling effects in the school and play and emotional domains. To our knowledge this is the first independent validation of the OxAFQ in any language. We found it valid and feasible for use in the clinic to assess the impact on children’s lives of foot and/or ankle disorders. It is a valuable research tool.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:420–6.