Background. Severe hallux rigidus can be treated with total or hemi arthroplasty to preserve motion in the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). Decreased dorsiflexion impairs the rollover motion of the 1st MTPJ and recent studies of patients with 1st MTPJ osteoarthritis show increased plantar forces on the hallux. Objectives. Our aim was to examine the plantar force variables under the hallux and the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd – 5th distal metatarsal head (MH) on patients operated with a proximal hemiarthroplasty (HemiCap) in the 1st MTPJ and compare to a control group of healthy patients. Secondary aims: To examine correlations between the force and the 1st MTPJ range of motion (ROM) and pain. Study Design & Methods. Seventy patients operated with HemiCap were invited. 41 were included, (10 men, 31 women), median operation date 2011(range 2007–2014), age 63(47–78), 37 unilateral and 4 bilateral. Dorsal ROM of the 1st MTPJ was measured by goniometer and by x-ray. Pain evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS 1–10) during daily activities (DA) and during testing (DT). Emed (Novel) Foot Pressure Mapping system was used to measure peak force (N) and force/time integral (N/s) under the hallux, 1st and 2nd and 3–5th metatarsal heads (MH). Statistics: Force variables between operated feet and control group were compared by independent two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Force variables association to ROM and pain by linear regression models. Results. Median (range) for HemiCap/Control group: Peak force (N): Hallux: 12(1–26)/20(4–30), 1st MH: 17(8–41)/24(14–42), 2nd MH 24(15–37)/28(24–37), 3rd–5th MH: 27(18–36)/30(25–35). Force/time integral (N/s): Hallux: 1(1–4)/4(1–12), 1st MH: 5(2–18)/7(3–11), 2nd MH 8(4–13)/10(7–13), 3rd–5th MH: 9(6–15)/10(8–14). Significant difference between HemiCap patients and healthy controls in peak force and force/time integral was found under the hallux (p<0.01), 1st (p<0.05) and 2nd MH (p<0.05), and max force under the 3–5th MH (p<0.01). Dorsal ROM of the operated feet was 45 degrees (10–75) by goniometer and 41 degrees (16–70) by x-ray. An increase in dorsal ROM decreased the peak force and force/time integral under the hallux (p>0.05) but not under the MHs. Most patients reported no pain (VAS 1: 62% DA, 78% DT), only 2 patients reported VAS>3. No significant correlation between pain and force or force/time integral. Conclusions. A mid-term hemiarthroplasty do not restore the joint motion to normal. The loading patterns are in opposition to AO patients as as assfgjkdfgjkfdgjk the HemiCap patients show a significantly decreased peak force and force/time integral under the hallux compared to the control group and the larger the dorsiflexion achieved postoperatively the smaller the force/time integral becomes. It may reflect a patient reluctance to load the 1st ray and 2nd MH. The plantar forces are not linked to pain. Most report minimal pain, but the pain score is biased by missing numbers and exclusion of revisions

Background. PROMS and PREMS are a fundamental and essential part of the NHS. Chilectomy and fusion procedures for hallux rigidus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to compare what PROMS/PREMS for chilectomy/fusion for hallux rigidus are at UHSM including variance across osteoarthritis grades. Methods. Data was collected from March-2013 to December-2014. Scores used to assess outcomes included EQ-5D-VAS, EQ-5D Health-Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Patient-Personal-Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively. Data was compared. Results. 10 patients (4F, 6M) (9R, 1L) had a 1st MTPJ chilectomy. Average age- 47.3 (range 34–70). 16 patients (12F, 4M) (9RT, 7LT) had a 1st-MTPJ fusion. Average age-60.3yrs (range19–83). Chilectomy pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction: 33.5 (range 5–70), 27.6 (range 0–64) and 24.9 (range 0–75) respectively. Post operatively these improved to 25.0 (range 0–70), 24.3 (range 0–68) and 21.9 (range 0–50). EQ5D scores showed a regression; pre-op index average of 0.72 and post op 0.70. Pre-op VAS score average of 86.8 with post-op 80.4. Fusion pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction: 50.7 (range 25–75), 49.1 (range 4–75) and 48.4 (range 25–75) respectively. Post-operatively improved to 9.7 (range 0–57), 16.1 (range 0–57) and 20.1 (range 0–50). EQ5D scores showed improvement; with pre-op index average of 0.68 and post-op 0.83. Pre-op VAS score average of 72.5 and post-op 83.6. Higher grades of OA responded better to fusion and lower grades better to chilectomy. 17 patients (10 fusion/7 chilectomy) filled PPE-questionnaires. Results show overall satisfactory experience for both sets of patients. Conclusion. Both procedures show improved outcomes. Fusions have greater improvements than chilectomy based on reported outcomes. Higher grades of OA do better with fusion. Level of Evidence. Prospective case series- Level 3

Background. In the adolescent population, operative management of hallux-valgus is controversial. Operations may be less successful than in adults and post-operative recurrence is more common before full skeletal maturity. This study assesses the radiographic, functional and qualitative outcomes of surgical Hallux Valgus correction in adolescents. Methods. Three independent reviewers retrospectively analysed pre and post-operative radiological markers of hallux valgus severity for 44 operations on patients age 13–18. The patient cohort were also asked the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) to assess functional outcome via telephone interview and patient notes were reviewed for any evidence of complications. Results. There was no evidence of NICE recognised complications from any of the operations performed, however there was persistence or recurrence in 20.8%, requiring a second operation in 10.3%. Radiologically, all operations performed resulted in a reduction in hallux valgus severity. The hallux valgus angle showed a mean reduction of 18.0 degrees (16.3–19.7) and the inter-metatarsal angle by 7.3 degrees (6.55–8.14). 93% of operations resulted in a good MOXFQ outcome score of less than 20 out of a possible 80 negative functional outcome points. This score worsened with age in a statistically significant manner (p=0.03) but had no significant correlation with BMI. Conclusion. Surgical correction of adolescent hallux valgus reduces the radiographic severity, which correlates with good long term outcome. This surgery provides beneficial results to the patient, however there is a high recurrence rate, correlating with younger age and this must be taken into account

Background and aims. Hallux rigidus in the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) can be treated with arthroplasty to reduce pain and enhance motion. Few studies have investigated the functionality and the survival of HemiCap arthroplasty. Primarily we aimed to examine the medium to long-term functionality and the degree of pain after surgery. Secondarily the failure and revision rate of HemiCap implants. Methods. A total of 106 patients were operated with HemiCap arthroplasty (n=114) from 2006 to 2014, median age 53 (16 to 80) years, 78 females, 37 dorsal flange (DF) implants. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively to collect revision data. Pre operative Coughlin/Shurnas arthrosis degree, hallux valgus (HV), intermetatarsalintermetatarsal (IM) and Distal Metaphyseal Articular Angle (DMAA) angles was were measured. Pre- and post operative 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 year2-year pain levels of the first MTPJ by Visuel Analog Skala (VAS 1–10), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS 0 to 100 points) and, Range of Motion (ROM), were available for 51 patients. FortysevenForty-seven of the 70 available for reexamination partook in a cross sectional follow up where the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS 0–48 points) was added to the Patients Related Outcome Measures (PROMs). Statistics. Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis, adjusted for sex, radiological angles, degree of arthrosis and dorsal flange. Prospective PROMs and ROM compared by paired t-test. Results. At 3, 5 and 7 years we had an mean implant survival of 85%, 83% and 78%. Almost all were revised due to pain, one due to malalignment and one due to loosening of the Hemicap. Dorsal flange, gender, preoperative arthrosis degree, HV, IM or DMAA angles did not statistically influence the result. For those (n=23) that were re-examined, preoperative dorsal ROM changed from mean(sd) 21 (6) to 42 (18) degrees, VAS from 7 (2) to 2 (2) and AOFAS from 61 (11) to 87 (11) (p < 0.001). At mean 5 year follow up (n=47), mean (sd) dorsal ROM was 46 (17) degrees,. AOFAS was 84 (9), VAS 2 (1) and SEFAS 42 (6) points. The dorsal flange made no statistical significant difference for ROM or PROMs, but DF displayed 51 degrees of extension vs. 44 without (p=0.1). Periprostethic lucency (<2 mm) was observed in 27/47. Conclusions. In general, we saw an acceptable implant survival rate. We did not find any predictors that influenced implant failure and the design alterations with the dorsal flange are not evident clinically. Patients who were not revised had significantly less pain, greater ROM, and better overall foot and ankle conditions than preoperatively, but the data are biased by missing numbers and revisions

Introduction

The management of adolescent hallux valgus (AHV) remains controversial, with reservations about both conservative and surgical treatments. Non-operative management has a limited role in preventing progression. Surgical correction of AHV has, amongst other concerns, been associated with a high prevalence of recurrence of deformity after surgery. We conducted a systematic review to assess clinical and radiological outcomes following surgery for AHV.

Background

Patient reported outcomes/experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS since 2009. Osteotomy procedures for hallux valgus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess what the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus are at UHSM.

Though there are many techniques utilised in the correction of hallux valgus (HV), no single approach has been reported to be ideal for all patients to date. A great deal of controversy remains concerning the type of osteotomy, method of fixation, and inclusion of soft tissue procedures. Herein, we compared the outcomes of two different operative techniques, the minimally-invasive modified percutaneous technique and the distal chevron osteotomy, used to treat mild to moderate hallux valgus. This study was conducted in line with the CONSORT 2010 guidelines. 41 patients (58 feet) with mild to moderate hallux valgus were randomly assigned by computer to two different groups. The first group containing 24 patients (33 feet) was treated by the modified percutaneous technique, whereas the second group included 17 patients (25 feet) treated by distal chevron osteotomy. In the modified percutaneous group, after a mean follow up of 43 months, the mean correction of hallux valgus angle (HVA) was 26.69° (P=0.00001), the mean correction of intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was 9.45° (P=0.00001), and the mean improvement of AOFAS score was 47.94 points (P=0.00001). In the chevron osteotomy group, after a mean follow up of 44 months, the mean correction of hallux valgus angle was 26.72° (P=0.00001), the mean correction of intermetatarsal angle was 9° (P=0.00001), and the mean improvement of AOFAS score was 44.76 points (P=0.00001). In our study, the modified percutaneous technique proved to be equally effective as the distal chevron osteotomy, but with fewer complications and a higher rate of patient satisfaction.

Osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint is a common disorder in elderly, resulting in pain and disability. Arthrodesis of this joint shows satisfactory results, with relieve of pain in approximately 85% of the patients. However, the compensation mechanism for loss of motion in the MTP1 joint after MTP1 arthrodesis is unknown. A reduced compensation mechanism of the foot may explain the disappointing result of MTP1 arthrodesis in the remaining 15% of the patients. This study was conducted to elucidate this compensation mechanism. We hypothesize that the ankle and forefoot are responsible for compensation after MTP1 arthrodesis. Gait was evaluated in eight patients with arthrodesis of the MTP1 joint (10 feet) and twelve healthy controls (21 feet) by using a sixteen-camera Vicon-system. The four-segmental, validated Oxford-Foot-Model was used to investigate differences in range of motion of the hindfoot-tibia, forefoot-hindfoot and hallux-forefoot segment during stance. For statistical analysis, the unpaired t-test with Bonferroni correction (p<0.0125) was performed. No differences in spatiotemporal parameters were observed between both groups. In the frontal plane, MTP1 arthrodesis decreased the range of motion in midstance, while an increased range of motion was observed in terminal stance for the hindfoot relative to the tibia in the transversal plane. Subsequently range of motion in the forefoot in preswing was increased. This resulted in less eversion in the hindfoot during midstance, increased internal rotation of the hindfoot during terminal stance and more supination in the forefoot during preswing in the MTP1 arthrodesis group. Motion of the hallux was restricted in the loading response (i.e. plantar flexion) and terminal stance (i.e. dorsiflexion). As hypothesized, both the ankle and the forefoot are responsible for compensation after MTP1 arthrodesis, because arthrodesis causes less eversion and increased internal rotation of the hindfoot and increased supination of the forefoot. As expected, both dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the hallux was restricted due to arthrodesis. These findings suggest a gait pattern in which the lateral arch of the foot is more loaded and the stiff hallux is avoided during the stance phase of gait. Our results indicate that proper motion of the forefoot and ankle joint is important when considering arthrodesis of the MTP1 joint. Therefore, we emphasize careful assessment the range of motion in the forefoot and ankle joint in the pre-operative situation, since patients with a decreased range of motion in the forefoot and ankle joint have a less functioning compensation mechanism. We currently perform a study to evaluate the strength of the positive correlation between the pre-operative range of motion in the forefoot and ankle joint and the clinical outcome

Tourniquet is widely used in orthopedic surgery to reduce intraoperative bleeding and improve visualization. We evaluated the effect of tourniquet application on both peri- and postoperative cefuroxime concentrations in subcutaneous tissue, skeletal muscle, calcaneal cancellous bone, and plasma. The primary endpoint was the time for which the free drug concentration of cefuroxime was maintained above the clinical breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) forStaphylococcus aureus (4 µg/mL). Ten patients scheduled for hallux valgus or hallux rigidus surgery were included. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling of cefuroxime concentrations bilaterally in subcutaneous tissue, skeletal muscle, and calcaneal cancellous bone. A tourniquet was applied on the thigh of the leg scheduled for surgery. Cefuroxime (1.5 g) was administered intravenously as a bolus 15 minutes prior to tourniquet inflation, followed by a second dose 6 hours later. The mean tourniquet duration (range) was 65 (58; 77) minutes. Dialysates and venous blood samples were collected for 12 hours. For cefuroxime the T>MIC (4 μg/mL) ranged between 4.8–5.4 hours across compartments, with similar results for the tourniquet and non-tourniquet leg. Comparable T>MIC and penetration ratios were found for the first and second dosing intervals. We concluded that administration of cefuroxime (1.5 g) 15 minutes prior to tourniquet inflation is safe in order to achieve tissue concentrations above 4 µg/mL throughout surgery. A tourniquet application time of approximately 1 hour did not affect the cefuroxime tissue penetration in the following dosing interval

The Cochrane Collaboration has produced three new reviews relevant to bone and joint surgery since the publication of the last Cochrane Corner. These are relevant to a wide range of musculoskeletal specialists, and include reviews in lateral elbow pain, osteoarthritis of the big toe joint, and cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients.

The anatomy of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and, in particular, the metatarsosesamoid articulation remains poorly understood. Its effect on sesamoid function and the pathomechanics of this joint have not been described. Fresh frozen cadaveric specimens without evidence of forefoot deformity were dissected to assess the articulating surfaces throughout a normal range of motion. The dissections were digitally reconstructed in various positions of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion using a MicroScribe, enabling quantitative analyses in a virtual 3D environment. In 75% of specimens, there was some degree of chondral loss within the metatarsosesamoid articulation. The metatarsal surface was more commonly affected. These changes most frequently involved the tibial metatarsosesamoid joint. The tibial sesamoid had an average excursion of 14.2 mm in the sagittal plane when the 1st MTP joint was moved from 10 degrees of plantarflexion to 60 degrees of dorsiflexion; the average excursion of the fibular sesamoid was 8.7 mm. The sesamoids also move in a medial to lateral fashion when the joint was dorsiflexed. The excursion of the tibial sesamoid was 2.8 mm when the joint was maximally dorsiflexed while that of the fibular sesamoid was 3.2 mm. There appears to be differential tracking of the hallucal sesamoids. The tibial sesamoid has comparatively increased longitudinal excursion whilst the fibular sesamoid has comparatively greater lateral excursion. This greater excursion of the tibial sesamoid could explain the higher incidence of sesamoiditis in this bone. The differential excursion of the 2 metatarsosesamoid articulations is also a factor that should be considered in the design and mechanics of an effective hallux MTP joint arthroplasty

Summary Statement. An alternative way to assess three dimensional skin motion artefacts of kinematic models is presented and applied to a novel kinematic foot model. Largest skin motion is measured in the tarsal region. Introduction. Motion capture systems are being used in daily clinical practise for gait analysis. Last decade several kinematic foot models have been presented to gain more insight in joint movement in various foot pathologies. No method is known to directly measure bone movement in a clinical setting. Current golden standard is based on measurement of motion of skin markers and translation to joint kinematics. Rigid body assumptions and skin motion artefacts can seriously influence the outcome of this approach and rigorous validation is required before clinical application is feasible. Validation of kinematic models is currently done via comparison with bone pin studies. However, these studies can only assess major bones in a highly invasive way; another problem is the non-synchronous measurement of skin markers and bone pins. Recently the Glasgow Maastricht kinematic foot model, which comprises all 26 foot segments, has been presented. To validate the model we propose a novel non-invasive method for the assessment of skin motion artefact, involving loaded CT data. Patients & Methods. 25 subjects (healthy and pathological feet) have undertaken CT scans. These CT-scans have been obtained in 1 unloaded and 3 varying loading conditions. CT-slices are 3D reconstructed and segmented. The principal axes of the segmented bones were derived from the surface points of the bones. These principal axes are used to compute bone orientation. Subsequently, coordinate systems of bones in the different loading conditions were matched. Markers were translated and rotated to orientations of their corresponding bones. Maximal distance between markers is calculated per subject to asses the influence of skin motion. Results. Preliminary results of 9 subjects show largest positional differences for markers associated with the cuneiform lateralis (5.7 ± 3.2 mm) and cuneiform intermedium (7.7 ± 3.7 mm). Smallest positional differences are found on the hallux proximalis (0.9 ± 0.34mm). Spatial resolution is too small to accurately calculate orientation of smaller bones, therefor distal phalanges 2–5 are not taken into account in the analysis. Discussion/Conclusion. Skin motion is a major cause of inaccuracy in gait analysis. This is the first study presenting an automated non-invasive method to calculate the 3D orientation of skin markers with respect to the coordinate system of the corresponding bone(s). Largest skin motion is measured in the tarsal region. Future work will be in calculation of the effect of skin motion in the accuracy of joint angle calculation