Decellularization techniques have advanced to reduce the risk of immune rejection in transplantation. Validation of these protocols typically relies on Crapo's criteria. 1. , which include the absence of visible nuclei and low DNA content. In our study, five decellularization protocols were compared to determine the optimal approach for human fascia lata (HFL) samples. However, our findings raised questions as to why recipients can still develop immunity despite meeting validation criteria. HFL samples were decellularized using four protocols with SDS-Triton X100-DNase (D1 to D4-HFL) and one protocol using solvent-detergent-based baths (D5-HFL). The decellularized samples (D-HFL) were compared to native samples (N-HFL) using histology, and DNA content was measured. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) content within the matrix was assessed using western blot analysis. Both D-HFL and N-HFL samples, along with negative control patches, were implanted in the backs of 28 Wistar rats. Anti-human IgG serum levels were evaluated after one month. H&E and Hoechst staining revealed the absence of residual cells in all decellularization protocols. DNA content was consistently below the critical threshold (p<0.05). All implanted D-HFL samples resulted in significantly lower anti-human IgG levels compared to N-HFL (p<0.01). However, 2.5 out of 4 rats developed immunity after being implanted with D1 to D4-HFL, with varying levels of anti-human IgG. Only rats implanted with D5-HFL showed undetectable levels of IgG and were considered non-immunized. Western blot analysis indicated that only D5-HFL had a residual HLA content below 1%. The literature on decellularization has primarily relied on Crapo's criteria, which do not consider the role of HLA mismatch in acute immune rejection. Our results suggest that a residual HLA content below 1% should also be considered to prevent immunization, even if other validation criteria are met. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of residual HLA levels on human allotransplantation outcomes

Blood transfusion, organ and bone marrow transplantation and allogeneic tissue grafting create the potential for significant immunological challenges through the introduction of non-genetically identical major (HLA) and minor histocompatibility antigens (“allo-antigens”) into the body. Strategies to avoid the complications of immune responses against allo-antigens (transfusion reactions, rejection and graft versus host disease) include HLA matching, immunosuppressive therapies and immune tolerance promoting protocols. In the case of allogeneic mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (allo-MSC), it was initially believed that their combined properties of low HLA expression and inherent immune modulatory functions would render them invisible to the host immune system and, therefore, capable of being permanently accepted without further interventions. For clinical indications such as bone and tendon repair, in which permanent engraftment of allo-MSC or MSC-derived tissue constructs is particularly desirable, this model of “immune privilege” seemed almost too good to be true – and indeed, a decade of experimental research in this area has now convincingly demonstrated that allo-MSC typically elicit cellular (T-cell) and humoral (B-cell/antibody) immune responses in immunocompetent hosts – raising concern about their safety and long-term efficacy in human conditions. However, questions related to the immunogenicity of allo-MSC have evolved beyond a simple yes/no scenario to involve interesting observations and concepts about the potency, diversity, duration, functional characteristics and even potential clinical benfits of immunological responses to allo-MSC. In this presentation, I will summarise and critically evaluate current understanding of allo-MSC immunogenicity under experimental and clinical trial conditions with an emphasis on the implications for orthopaedic therapeutics

Objectives

The molecular mechanism of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains elusive. We conducted a protein-protein interaction network-based integrative analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and gene expression profiles of RA.

Although success has been achieved with implantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (bMSCs) in degenerative discs, its full potential may not be achieved if the harsh environment of the degenerative disc remains. Axial distraction has been shown to increase hydration and nutrition. Combining both therapies may have a synergistic effect in reversing degenerative disc disease. In order to evaluate the effect of bMSC implantation, axial distraction and combination therapy in stimulating regeneration and retarding degeneration in degenerative discs, we first induced disc degeneration by axial loading in a rabbit model.

The rabbits in the intervention groups performed better with respect to disc height, morphological grading, histological scoring and average dead cell count. The groups with distraction performed better than those without on all criteria except the average dead cell count.

Our findings suggest that bMSC implantation and distraction stimulate regenerative changes in degenerative discs in a rabbit model.