Introduction. To evaluate the results of correction of knee deformities based on deformity analysis in Achondroplasia, the commonest skeletal dysplasia as some have concomitant ligamentous deformities. Materials and Methods. Retrospective study from a prospective database (2007–2020) of achondroplasts who underwent growth modulation. Analysis of medical records with objective measurement of mechanical axis radiographs was done (Traumacad). Satisfactory alignment was defined as neutral to slightly varus (0–15 mm MAD) so that the MCL/LCL laxity is not revealed. Results. 23 patients, 41 limbs, 34 bilateral, 6 unilateral underwent multiple growth modulation procedures. 2 had valgus knees. 15 patients underwent proximal fibular epiphysiodesis in addition for LCL laxity with one isolated fibular epiphysiodesis. Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) improved or normalised in 16 patients (70%). 4 patients were still undergoing correction. 4 patients needed further surgery out of which 2 patients were over 13 years when growth modulation was attempted and 2 needed correction of ankle varus. JLCA improved/ normalised in 12 patients (75%) with evidence of indirect LCL tightening and no improvement was seen in 4. The rate of correction was MAD 0.61mm/month, LDFA 0.29°/month and MPTA 0.13°/month; expectedly lower in achondroplasia due to lower growth velocity. Conclusions. This study highlights the pathology, application of growth modulation as per deformity analysis unlike previous studies. Proximal fibular epiphysiodesis improves LCL laxity in a majority of these children and is a simple procedure compared to our published series with indirect LCL tightening with frames

With observed success and increased popularity of growth modulation techniques, there has been a trend towards use in progressively younger patients. Younger age at growth modulation increases the likelihood of complete deformity correction and need for implant removal prior to skeletal maturity introducing the risk of rebound deformity. The purpose of this study was to quantify magnitude and identify risk factors for rebound deformity after growth modulation. We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing growth modulation with a tension band plate for coronal plane deformity about the knee with subsequent implant removal. Exclusion criteria included completion epiphysiodesis or osteotomy at implant removal, ongoing growth modulation, and less than one year radiographic follow-up without rebound deformity. Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and mechanical axis station were measured prior to growth modulation, prior to implant removal, and at final follow-up. Sixty-seven limbs in 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at growth modulation was 9.8 years (range 3.4–15.4 years) and mean age at implant removal was 11.4 years (range 5.3–16.4 years). Mean change in HKA after implant removal was 6.9O (range 0O–23 O). Fifty-two percent of patients had greater than 5O rebound and 30% had greater than 10O rebound in HKA after implant removal. Females less than ten years and males less than 12 years at time of growth modulation had greater mean change in HKA after implant removal compared to older patients (8.4O vs 4.7O, p=0.012). Patients with initial deformity greater than 20O degrees had an increased frequency of rebound greater than 10O compared to patients with less severe initial deformity (78% vs 22%, p=0.002). Rebound deformity after growth modulation is common. Growth modulation at a young age and large initial deformity increases risk of rebound. However, rebound does not occur in all at risk patients, therefore, we caution against routine overcorrection. Patients and their families should be informed about the risk of rebound deformity after growth modulation and the potential for multiple surgical interventions prior to skeletal maturity

Introduction. Angular deformity in the lower extremities can result in pain, gait disturbance, deformity and joint degeneration. Guided growth modulation uses the tension band principle with the goal of treatment being to normalise the mechanical axis. To assess the success of this procedure we reviewed our results in an attempt to identify patients who may not benefit from this simple and elegant procedure. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the surgical records and imaging in our tertiary children's hospital to identify all patients who had guided growth surgery since 2007. We noted the patient demographics, diagnosis, peri-operative experience and outcome. All patients were followed until skeletal maturity or until metalwork was removed. Results. 173 patients with 192 legs were assessed for eligibility. Six were excluded due to inadequate follow-up or loss of records. Of the 186 treated legs meeting criteria for final assessment 19.8% were unsuccessful, the other 80.2% were deemed successful at final follow up. Complications included infection and metal-work failure. Those with a pre-treatment diagnosis of idiopathic genu valgum/ varum had a success rate of 83.6%. Conclusions. In our hands, guided growth had an 80-percent success rate when all diagnosis were considered. Those procedures that were unlikely to be successful included growth disturbances due to mucopolysaccharide storage disease, Blounts disease and achondroplasia. Excluding those three diagnoses, success rate was 85.4%. We continue to advocate the use of guided growth as a successful treatment option for skeletally immature patients with limb deformity

Abstract. Objectives. Epiphysiodesis is a commonly used treatment for lower limb angular deformities. However, in recent years, distal tibial growth modulation using ‘eight plates’ or screws has emerged as an alternative treatment for paediatric foot and ankle disorders, such as CTEV. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of distal tibial modulation in correcting various paediatric foot and ankle disorders. Methods. This retrospective study analysed 205 cases of paediatric foot and ankle disorders treated between 2003 and 2022, including only cases where the eight plate or screw was fixed on the anterior surface of the distal tibia. Our aim was to measure post-operative changes in dorsiflexion, the distal tibial angle, and the tibiocalcaneal angle by examining clinical records and radiology reports. Results. We identified nine cases (nine feet) meeting the full inclusion criteria, comprising seven cases of CTEV, one case of arthrogryposis, and one case of cavovarus foot. The cohort consisted of five male and four female patients, with a mean age of 10 years and 9 months at the time of surgery. Seven cases involved the left tibia, and two cases involved the right tibia. The mean time between pre-operative X-ray to surgery was 168 days, and the mean turnaround time between surgery and post-operative X-ray was 588 days. A mean change in the distal tibial angle of 4.33 degrees was noted. However, changes in dorsiflexion were documented in only one case, which showed a change of 13 degrees. Notably, our average distal tibial angle was significantly lower than reported in the literature, at 4.33 degrees. Additionally, some studies in the literature used the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children to assess pre- and post-operative outcomes, but it is important to note that it is validated only for children aged 5 to 16. Furthermore, most cases reported an improved tibiocalcaneal angle except for an anomaly of 105 degrees. We assessed satisfactory patient outcomes using patient notes. Out of the 6 procured notes, one has been discharged. The rest are still under yearly or 6-monthly review and are at various stages, such as physiotherapy, removing the eight plate, or requiring further surgery. The most common presentations at review are plantaris deformity and pain. Conclusions. Our study suggests that distal tibial growth modulation can be an effective treatment option for selected paediatric foot and ankle disorders. However, due to the limited number of cases in our study, the lack of documentation of changes in dorsiflexion, and a lack of pre- and post-operative outcomes using a standardised method, further research is needed to investigate this procedure's long-term outcomes and potential complications. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion technique to correct scoliosis. It allows correction of scoliosis through Growth Modulation (GM) by tethering the convex side to allow concave unrestricted growth similar to the hemi-epiphysiodesis concept. The other modality is Anterior Scoliosis Correction (ASC) where the tether is able to perform most of the correction immediately where limited growth is expected. Methods. Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic data of 20 patients between 2014 to 2016 with a mean 5 year follow (range 4–6). Results. There were 10 patients in each group with a total of 23 curves operated on. VBT-GM mean age was 12.5y with mean Risser 0.63 and VBT-ASC was14.9y with a Risser of 3.66. Mean preop VBT-GM Cobb was 46° with a Fulcrum unbend of 13.6° compared to VBT-ASC 56.9° with 32.2° unbend. Postop VBT-GM was 21° and VBT-ASC Cobb was 10.8°. The early postop Correction Rate was 54.3% vs 81% whereas FBCI was 77.1% vs 186.6%. The last XR at mean 5y was 22.2° (VBT-GM) and 16.9° (VBT-ASC) 95% avoided fusion. Open TRC group had 3 over corrections. 1 patient alone had overcorrection, unplanned second stage and conversion to fusion. Discussion and Conclusion. We show a high success rate (95%) in helping children avoid fusion. Vertebral body tethering is a safe technique for correction of scoliosis in the skeletally immature patient. This is the first report at 5 years that shows two modalities of VBT can be employed depending on the skeletal maturity of the patient: Growth Modulation and Anterior Scoliosis Correction

Abstract. Aims. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion technique to correct scoliosis allowing correction of scoliosis through growth modulation (GM) by tethering the convex side to allow concave unrestricted growth similar to the hemiepiphysiodesis concept. The other modality is anterior scoliosis correction (ASC) where the tether is able to perform most of the correction immediately where limited growth is expected. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 20 patients (M:F=19:1 – 9–17 years) between January 2014 to December 2016 with a mean five-year follow-up (4 to 7). Results. There were ten patients in each group with a total of 23 curves operated upon. VBT-GM mean age −12.5 years (9 to 14), mean Risser of 0.63 (0 to 2) and VBT-ASC was 14.9 years (13 to 17) and mean Risser of 3.66 (3 to 5). Mean preoperative VBT-GM Cobb was 47.4° (40°–58°) compared to VBT-ASC 56.5° (40°–79°). Postoperative VBT-GM Cobb was 20.3° and VBT-ASC was 11.2°. The early postoperative correction rate was 54.3% versus 81% whereas Fulcrum Bending Correction Index (FBCI) was 93.1% vs 146.6%. Latest Cobb angle at mean five years' follow-up was 19.4° (VBT-GM) and 16.5° (VBT-ASC). Overall, 5% of patients required fusion. Conclusion. We show a high success rate (95%) in helping children avoid fusion at five years post-surgery. VBT is a safe technique for scoliosis correction in the skeletally immature patient. This is the first report at five years showing two possible options of VBT depending on the skeletal maturity of the patient: GM and ASC

Aims. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion technique to correct scoliosis. It allows correction of scoliosis through growth modulation (GM) by tethering the convex side to allow concave unrestricted growth similar to the hemiepiphysiodesis concept. The other modality is anterior scoliosis correction (ASC) where the tether is able to perform most of the correction immediately where limited growth is expected. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data of 20 patients aged between 9 and 17 years old, (with a 19 female: 1 male ratio) between January 2014 to December 2016 with a mean five-year follow-up (4 to 7). Results. There were ten patients in each group with a total of 23 curves operated on. VBT-GM mean age was 12.5 years (9 to 14) with a mean Risser classification of 0.63 (0 to 2) and VBT-ASC was 14.9 years (13 to 17) with a mean Risser classification of 3.66 (3 to 5). Mean preoperative VBT-GM Cobb was 47.4° (40° to 58°) with a Fulcrum unbend of 17.4 (1° to 41°), compared to VBT-ASC 56.5° (40° to 79°) with 30.6 (2° to 69°)unbend. Postoperative VBT-GM was 20.3° and VBT-ASC Cobb angle was 11.2°. The early postoperative correction rate was 54.3% versus 81% whereas Fulcrum Bending Correction Index (FBCI) was 93.1% vs 146.6%. The last Cobb angle on radiograph at mean five years’ follow-up was 19.4° (VBT-GM) and 16.5° (VBT-ASC). Patients with open triradiate cartilage (TRC) had three over-corrections. Overall, 5% of patients required fusion. This one patient alone had a over-correction, a second-stage tether release, and final conversion to fusion. Conclusion. We show a high success rate (95%) in helping children avoid fusion at five years post-surgery. VBT is a safe technique for correction of scoliosis in the skeletally immature patient. This is the first report at five years that shows two methods of VBT can be employed depending on the skeletal maturity of the patient: GM and ASC. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):123–129

Aims

Eight-plates are used to correct varus-valgus deformity (VVD) or limb-length discrepancy (LLD) in children and adolescents. It was reported that these implants might create a bony deformity within the knee joint by change of the roof angle (RA) after epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia following a radiological assessment limited to anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. The aim of this study was to analyze the RA, complemented with lateral knee radiographs, with focus on the tibial slope (TS) and the degree of deformity correction.

Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS) has been developed for the treatment of lower limb discrepancies with the aim of replacing traditional open procedures. The goal of this study was to evaluate its efficacy and safety at skeletal maturity. A total of 45 consecutive patients with a mean skeletal age of 12.7 years (8.5 to 15) were included and followed until maturity. The mean efficacy of the femoral epiphysiodesis was 35% (14% to 87%) at six months and 66% (21% to 100%) at maturity. The mean efficacy of the tibial epiphysiodesis was 46% (18% to 73%) at six months and 66% (25% to 100%) at maturity. In both groups of patients the under-correction was significantly reduced between six months post-operatively and skeletal maturity. The overall rate of revision was 18% (eight patients), and seven of these revisions (87.5%) involved the tibia. This series showed that use of the PETS technique in the femur was safe, but that its use in the tibia was associated with a significant rate of complications, including a valgus deformity in nine patients (20%), leading us to abandon it in the tibia. The arrest of growth was delayed and the final loss of growth at maturity was only 66% of that predicted pre-operatively. This should be taken into account in the pre-operative planning.

The aim of this study was to report the restauration of the normal vertebral morphology and the absence of curve progression after removal the instrumentation in AIS patients that underwent posterior correction of the deformity by common all screws construct whitout fusion. A series of 36 AIS immature patients (Risser 3 or less) were include in the study. Instrumentation was removed once the maturity stage was complete (Risser 5). Curve correction was assessed at pre and postoperative, before instrumentation removal, just post removal, and more than two years after instrumentation removal. Epiphyseal vertebral growth modulation was assessed by a coronal wedging ratio (WR) at the apical level of the main curve (MC). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb was corrected from 53.7°±7.5 to 5.5º±7.5º (89.7%) at the immediate postop. After implants removal (31.0±5.8 months) the MC was 13.1º. T5–T12 kyphosis showed a significant improvement from 19.0º before curve correction to 27.1º after implants removal (p<0.05). Before surgery, WR was 0.71±0.06, and after removal WR was 0.98±0.08 (p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, the mean sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the T12-S1 segment was 51.2±21.0º. SRS-22 scores improved from 3.31±0.25 preoperatively to 3.68±0.25 at final assessment (p<0.001). In conclusion, fusionless posterior approach using a common all pedicle screws construct correct satisfactory scoliotic main curves and permits removal of the instrumentation once the bone maturity is reached. The final correction was highly satisfactory and an acceptable ROM of the previously lower instrumented segments was observed

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is a growth modulating procedure used to manage idiopathic scoliosis by applying a flexible tether to the convex surface of the spine in skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the preliminary clinical outcomes for an adolescent patient cohort. 18 patients with scoliosis were selected using a narrow selection criteria to undergo AVBT. Of this cohort, 11 had reached a minimum follow up of 2 years, 4 had reached 18 months, and 3 had reached 6 months. These patients all demonstrated a primary thoracic deformity that was too severe for bracing, were skeletally immature, and were analysed in this preliminary study of coronal plane deformity correction. Using open-source image analysis software (ImageJ, NIH) PA radiographs taken pre-operatively and at regular follow-up visits post-operatively were used to measure the coronal plane deformity of the major and compensatory curves. Pre-operatively, the mean age was 12.0 years (S.D. 10.7 – 13.3), mean Sanders score 2.6 (S.D. 1.8-3.4), all Risser 0 and pre-menarchal, with mean main thoracic Cobb angle of 52° (S.D. 44.2-59.8°). Post-operatively the mean angle decreased to 26.4° (S.D. 18.4-32°) at 1 week, 30.4° (S.D. 21.3-39.6°) at 2 months, 25.7° (S.D. 18.7-32.8°) at 6 months, 27.9° (S.D. 16.2-39.6°) at 12 months, and 36.8° (S.D. 22.6– 51.0°) at 18 months and 38.2° (S.D. 27.6-48.7°) at 2 years. The change in curve at 2 years post-operative was statistically significant (P=0.004). There were 4 tether breakages identified that did not require return to theatre as yet, one patient underwent a posterior spinal instrumented fusion due to curve progression. AVBT is a promising new growth modulation technique for skeletally immature patients with progressive idiopathic scoliosis. This study has demonstrated a reduction in scoliosis severity

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs). Methods. We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion. Results. We reviewed 43 patients (63% female) with a mean age of 6.4 years (SD 2.6) at the index procedure, and 12.2 years (SD 2.2) at final fusion. Their mean follow-up was 8.1 years (SD 3.4). A total of 16 patients were treated with MCGRs and 27 with TGRs. The mean number of distractions was 7.5 in the MCGR group and ten in the TGR group (p = 0.471). The mean interval between distractions was 3.4 months in the MCGR group and 8.6 months in the TGR group (p < 0.001). The mean Cobb angle had improved by 25.1° in the MCGR group and 23.2° in TGR group (p = 0.664) at final follow-up. The mean coronal T1 to S1 height had increased by 16% in the MCGR group and 32.9% in TGR group (p = 0.001), although the mean T1 to S1 height achieved at final follow-up was similar in both. Unplanned operations were needed in 43.8% of the MCGR group and 51.2% of TGR group (p = 0.422). Conclusion. In this retrospective, single-centre review, there were no significant differences in major curve correction or gain in spinal height at fusion. Although the number of planned procedures were fewer in patients with MCGRs, the rates of implant-related complications needing unplanned revision surgery were similar in the two groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):257–264

Background: The neurocentral junction often has been identified as a potential cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Disparate growth at this site has been thought to lead to pedicle asymmetry, which then causes vertebral rotation in the transverse plane and ultimately, the development of scoliotic curves. Objectives:. To develop a model that incorporates pedicle growth and growth modulation into an existing finite element model of the thoracic and lumbar spine already integrating vertebral growth and growth modulation. Using the model to investigate whether pedicle asymmetry, either alone or combined with other deformations, could be involved in scoliosis pathomechanisms. Methods: The model was personalised to the geometry of a non-pathological subject and used as the reference spinal configuration. Left/right asymmetry of pedicle geometry (i.e. initial length) and left/right asymmetry of the pedicle growth rate alone or in combination with other AIS potential pathogenesis (anterior, lateral, or rotational displacement of apical vertebra) were simulated over a period of 24 months. The Cobb angle and local scoliotic descriptors (wedging angle, axial rotation) were assessed at each monthly growth cycle. Results: Simulations with asymmetrical pedicle geometry did not produce significant scoliosis, vertebral rotation or wedging. Simulations with asymmetry of pedicle growth rate did not cause scoliosis independently and did not amplify the scoliotic deformity caused by other initial deformations tested by Villemure (2004). Discussion and Conclusion: The results of this biomechanical model do not support the hypothesis that asymmetrical neurocentral junction growth is a cause of AIS. This concurs with recent animal experiments in which neurocentral junction growth was unilaterally restricted and no scoliosis, vertebral wedging or rotation was noted. With regards to addressing the aetiology of scoliotic curve development, biomechanical modelling represents a powerful tool to investigate cause and affect relationships since AIS patients typically present to the scoliosis clinic well after curves have manifested. Contact person and Presenter: Carl-Éric Aubin, Ph.D., Canada Research Chair “CAD Innovations in Orthopedic Engineering”, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada, Tel: (514) 340-4711, ext. 4437; Fax: (514) 340-5867; E-mail: . carl-eric.aubin@polymtl.ca

Introduction: Experimental pinealectomy in chickens shortly after hatch produces scoliosis with morphological characteristics similar to that of human idiopathic scoliosis (Coillard et al., 1996). The objective of this study was to develop a finite element model (FEM) incorporating vertebral growth to analyse how bone growth modulation by mechanical loading affects development of scoliosis in chicken. Materials and Methods: We have adapted the experimental set-up of Bagnall et al. (1999) to study spine growth of pinealectomised chickens. Three groups were followed for a period of six weeks:. wild-type (controls) (n=25);. shams (surgical controls) (n=20);. pinealectomised (n=76). The experimental data was used to adapt a FEM previously developed to simulate the scoliosis deformation process in human (Villemure et al. 2002). The FEM consists of 7 thoracic vertebrae and the first lumbar, the intervertebral discs and the zygapophyseal joints. The geometry was measured on specimens using a calliper. The material properties of human spines were used as initial approximation. The growth process included a baseline growth (0.130 mm/day) and a growth modulation behaviour proportional to the stress and to a sensitivity factor. It was implemented through an iterative process (from the 14th to the 28th day). Asymmetric loads (2–14 Nmm) were applied to represent different paravertebral muscle abnormalities influenced by the induced melatonin defect. Results: Within the pinealectomised group, 55% of the animals (n = 42) developed a scoliosis. In the FEM model, by varying the value of the applied moment, different scoliosis configurations were simulated. The resulting Cobb angle varied between 6° and 37°, while the maximal vertebral wedging appeared at T4 or T5 (range between 5° to 28°). A descriptive comparison of the simulation results with the experimental deformation patterns (n = 41; mean Cobb angle: 26°) was made as a preliminary validation. In 2 typical cases, the scoliotic shapes were quite similar to that seen in the scoliotic chickens. Discussion and Conclusion: The basic mechanisms by which the metabolism of the growing spine is affected by mechanical factors remain not well known, and especially the role of tissue remodelling and growth adaptation in scoliosis. The agreement between the experimental study and preliminary simulation results shows the feasibility of the model to simulate the scoliotic deformation process in pinealectomised chickens. When completely developed and validated this modelling approach could help investigating the pathomechanisms involved in the scoliotic deformation process. Especially, computer simulations could be used to complement bio-molecular and mechanobiological studies concerning the neuroendocrinal hypothesis implicating melatonin signalling dysfunction, which could trigger a complex cascade of molecules and mechanoreceptors leading to an accumulation of specific factors in specialised tissues (Moreau et al. 2004), directly or indirectly implicated in proprioception, and which can be implicated in the pathomechanisms of scoliotic deformities

Introduction: The use of anterior vertebral staples in the fusionless correction of scoliosis has received increased attention in recent literature. Several animal studies have shown stapling to be effective in modulating vertebral growth. In 2005 Betz (1) published the only clinical series to date. Despite the increasing volume of literature suggesting the efficacy of this treatment, little is known about it’s biomechanical consequences. In 2007 Puttlitz (2) measured the change in spinal range of motion after staple insertion in a bovine model. They found a small but statistically significant decrease in range of motion in axial rotation and lateral bending. The clinical significance of this is questionable as the differences were only a few degrees over three vertebral levels. A well designed biomechanical evaluation of the effects of staple insertion on spinal stability is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of insertion of a laterally placed anterior vertebral staple on the stiffness characteristics of a single motion segment. Methods: Four-pronged shape memory alloy staples were inserted into fourteen individual bovine thoracic motion segments. A displacement controlled six degree-of-freedom robotic facility was used to test control and staple constructs through a pre-determined range of motion in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. All data were synchronised with robot position data and filtered using moving average methods. The stiffness in each condition was calculated in units of Nm/degree of rotation. Paired t-tests were used to compare results. Results: Stiffness measurements in the control condition correlated with previously published measures (3). A significant decrease in stiffness (p< 0.05) following staple insertion was found in flexion, extension, lateral bending away from the staple, and axial rotation away from the staple. Stiffness for axial rotation towards the stapled side was significantly greater than for away. A near significant increase in lateral bend stiffness away from the staple compared with towards was also seen. Discussion: These results suggest that staple insertion consistently decreased stiffness in all directions of motion. This is contrary to the results of Puttlitz (2), which reported a reduced range of motion (i.e. increased stiffness) for some motions using moment-controlled testing. This decrease in stiffness could not be explained by changes in anatomy or tissue properties between specimens, as each stapled motion segment was compared with its own intact state. Addition of the staple would intuitively be expected to increase motion segment stiffness, however we suggest that the staple prongs may cause sufficient disruption to the vertebral bodies and endplates to slightly reduce overall stiffness. Hence, growth modulation may be achieved through physical disruption of the endplate, rather than static mechanical stress. Further research is planned to investigate the proportion of load carried by the staple during spinal movement and the anatomical effect of the staple on the physis. In conclusion, anterior vertebral stapling causes a slight but significant decrease in the stiffness of treated motion segments

Aim: This study tested quantitatively whether calculated loading asymmetry of a spine with scoliosis, together with measured bone growth sensitivity to altered compression could explain the observed rate of scoliosis progression during adolescent growth. Scoliosis is thought to progress during growth because angular deformity produces asymmetrical spinal loading, generating asymmetrical growth, etc. in a ‘vicious cycle’. Materials and Methods: The magnitude of asymmetrical spinal loading was estimated for a spine with scoliosis, assuming physiologically plausible muscle activation strategies. In animal studies of vertebral and tibial growth plates of three different species, the growth plate response to sustained compression was measured and correlated with histological measures of chondrocytic proliferation and hypertrophic enlargement. These data were expressed in a linear formulation of growth G as a function of compressive stress, thus:. G = Gm(1-β(_-_m)); where β=1.68 MPa-1 was the empirically determined constant. (The subscript m signifies the ‘baseline’ growth and physiological stress). The vertebral and discal contributions to human adolescent spinal growth velocity were measured from stereo-radiographs of 208 patients of with scoliosis. The estimates of level-specific spinal loading asymmetry, together with the relationship expressing growth sensitivity to load were included in an analysis that was used to estimate the resulting asymmetrical vertebral growth, and its contribution to the progression of a scoliosis curvature. The initial geometry represented a lumbar scoliosis of 26° Cobb, averaged and scaled from measurements of fifteen patients’ radiographs. Spinal growth during each of the adolescent years was estimated from growth curves obtained from cross-sectional logistic-correlation of the radiographically determined spinal and vertebral heights versus age. Results: The analyses of mechanically modulated growth of the spine with an initial 26° Cobb scoliosis predicted curve progression for the majority of eleven loading conditions (effort magnitude and direction) that were analysed. The averaged final lumbar spinal curve magnitude was 34° Cobb at age 16 years when the efforts producing the spinal loading were at 50% of maximum effort, and it was 42° Cobb when the efforts were at 75% of maximum. Conclusions: An analysis that included analytically determined spinal load asymmetry and empirically determined growth sensitivity to load predicted that a substantial component of scoliosis progression during growth is biomechanically mediated. Clinical Relevance: The rationale for conservative management of scoliosis during skeletal growth assumes a biomechanical mode of deformity progression (Hueter-Volkmann principle). The present study provides a quantitative basis for this previously qualitative hypothesis. The findings suggest that an important difference between progressive and non-progressive scoliosis might lie in the differing muscle activation strategies adopted by individuals, leading to the possibility of improved prognosis and conservative interventions, as well as treatments employing early minimally invasive localised growth modulation or arrest

The December 2023 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: A comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants; How common are refractures in childhood?; Femoral nailing for paediatric femoral shaft fracture in children aged eight to ten years; Who benefits from allowing the physis to grow in slipped capital femoral epiphysis?; Paediatric patients with an extremity bone tumour: a secondary analysis of the PARITY trial data; Split tibial tendon transfers in cerebral palsy equinovarus foot deformities; Liposomal bupivacaine nerve block: an answer to opioid use?; Correction with distal femoral transphyseal screws in hemiepiphysiodesis for coronal-plane knee deformity.

The development of spinal deformity in children with underlying neurodisability can affect their ability to function and impact on their quality of life, as well as compromise provision of nursing care. Patients with neuromuscular spinal deformity are among the most challenging due to the number and complexity of medical comorbidities that increase the risk for severe intraoperative or postoperative complications. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory at every stage to ensure that all nonoperative measures have been applied, and that the treatment goals have been clearly defined and agreed with the family. This will involve input from multiple specialities, including allied healthcare professionals, such as physiotherapists and wheelchair services. Surgery should be considered when there is significant impact on the patients’ quality of life, which is usually due to poor sitting balance, back or costo-pelvic pain, respiratory complications, or problems with self-care and feeding. Meticulous preoperative assessment is required, along with careful consideration of the nature of the deformity and the problems that it is causing. Surgery can achieve good curve correction and results in high levels of satisfaction from the patients and their caregivers. Modern modular posterior instrumentation systems allow an effective deformity correction. However, the risks of surgery remain high, and involvement of the family at all stages of decision-making is required in order to balance the risks and anticipated gains of the procedure, and to select those patients who can mostly benefit from spinal correction.

Aims

Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) systems use non-invasive spinal lengthening for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these devices in the prevention of progression of the deformity. A secondary aim was to record the rate of complications.