Benign aggressive tumors are common and can be debilitating for patients especially if they are in peri-articular regions or cause pathological fracture as is common for giant cell tumor of bone (GCT). Although GCT rarely metastasize, the literature reports many series with high rates of local recurrence, and evidence about which risk factors influence recurrence is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the recurrence rate and identify local recurrence risk factors by reviewing patient data from a single high-volume orthopedic oncology center. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for GCT at a tertiary orthopedic oncology center was conducted. In total 413 patients were treated for GCT between 1989 and 2017. Multiple patient and tumour characteristics were analysed to determine if they influenced local recurrence including: age, gender, anatomical site, Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension, presence of metastasis, pathologic fractures, and prior local recurrence. Additional variables that were analysed included type of treatment (en bloc resection or aggressive intralesional curettage) and use of local adjuvants. The main outcome parameters were local recurrence- free survival, metastasis-free survival and complications. Patients treated with Denosumab were excluded from analysis given its recently documented association with high rates of local recurrence. “There were 63/413 local recurrences (15.3%) at a mean follow-up of 30.5 months. The metastatic rate was 2.2% at a mean 50.6 months follow-up and did not vary based on type of treatment. Overall complication rate of 14.3% was not related to treatment modality. Local recurrence was higher (p=0.019) following curettage (55/310; 17.7%) compared to resection (8/103; 7.8%) however, joint salvage was possible in 87% of patients (270/310) in the curettage group. Use of adjuvant therapy including liquid nitrogen, peroxide, phenol, water versus none did not show any effect on local recurrence rates (p= 0.104). Pathological fracture did not affect local recurrence rates regardless of treatment modality (p= 0.260). Local recurrence at presentation was present in 16.3% (58/356) patients and did not show any significance for further local recurrence (p= 0.396). Gender was not associated with local recurrence (p=0.508) but younger patient age, below 20 years (p = 0.047) or below 30 years (p = 0.015) was associated with higher local recurrence rates. GCT in distal radius demonstrated the highest rate of local recurrence at 31.6% compared to other sites, although this was not significant (p=0.098). In addition, Campanacci stage and soft tissue extension were not risk factors for recurrence. The overall GCT local recurrence rate was 15.3%, but varied based on the type of resection: 17.7% following joint sparing curettage compared to 7.8% following resection. Local recurrence was also higher with younger patient age (30 years or less) and in distal radius lesions. In addition, neither Campanacci stage, soft tissue extension or presence of a pathologic fracture affected local recurrence. Most patients with GCT can undergo successful curettage and joint sparing, while only a minority require resection +/− prosthetic reconstruction. Even in the presence of soft tissue extension or a pathologic fracture, most joints can be salvaged with curettage

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTs) are locally aggressive tumors with recurrence potential that represent up to 10% of primary tumors of the bone. GCTs pathogenesis is driven by neoplastic mononuclear stromal cells that overexpress receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B/ligand (RANKL). Treatment with specific anti-RANKL antibody (denosumab) was recently introduced, used either as a neo-adjuvant in resectable tumors or as a stand-alone treatment in unresectable tumors. While denosumab has been increasingly used, a percentage of patients do not improve after treatment. Here, we aim to determine molecular and histological patterns that would help predicting GCTs response to denosumab to improve personalized treatment. Nine pre-treatment biopsies of patients with spinal GCT were collected at 2 centres. In 4 patients denosumab was used as a neo-adjuvant, 3 as a stand-alone and 2 received denosumab as adjuvant treatment. Clinical data was extracted retrospectively. Total mRNA was extracted by using a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded extraction kit and we determined the transcript profile of 730 immune-oncology related genes by using the Pan Cancer Immune Profiling panel (Nanostring). The gene expression was compared between patients with good and poor response to Denosumab treatment by using the nSolver Analysis Software (Nanostring). Immunohistochemistry was performed in the tissue slides to characterize cell populations and immune response in CGTs. Two out of 9 patients showed poor clinical response with tumor progression and metastasis. Our analysis using unsupervised hierarchical clustering determined differences in gene expression between poor responders and good responders before denosumab treatment. Poor responding lesions are characterized by increased expression of inflammatory cytokines as IL8, IL1, interferon a and g, among a myriad of cytokines and chemokines (CCL25, IL5, IL26, IL25, IL13, CCL20, IL24, IL22, etc.), while good responders are characterized by elevated expression of platelets (CD31 and PECAM), coagulation (CD74, F13A1), and complement classic pathway (C1QB, C1R, C1QBP, C1S, C2) markers, together with extracellular matrix proteins (COL3A1, FN1,. Interestingly the T-cell response is also different between groups. Poor responding lesions have increased Th1 and Th2 component, but good responders have an increased Th17 component. Interestingly, the checkpoint inhibitor of the immune response PD1 (PDCD1) is increased ~10 fold in poor responders. This preliminary study using a novel experimental approach revealed differences in the immune response in GCTs associated with clinical response to denosumab. The increased activity of checkpoint inhibitor PD1 in poor responders to denosumab treatment may have implications for therapy, raising the potential to investigate immunotherapy as is currently used in other neoplasms. Further validation using a larger independent cohort will be required but these results could potentially identify the patients who would most benefit from denosumab therapy

Purpose of the study. To review the primary bone tumours of the spine treated at our unit. Description of methods. Retrospective review of folders and x-rays of all the patients with primary bone tumours of the spine treated at our unit between 2005 and 2012. All haematological tumours were excluded. Summary of results. We treated 15 cases during this period. The median age at presentation was 36 years (8–65). There was a significant delay from onset of symptoms to diagnosis in most cases (median 7 months). Histological diagnoses included:. -Benign tumours.  Active. Hemangioma. 3. Osteoid osteoma. 1. Eosinophilic granuloma. 1.  Aggressive. Osteoblastoma. 1. Giant cell tumours. 2. Aneurysmal bone cysts. 4. -Malignant tumours.  Osteosarcomas. 2.  Leiomyosarcoma of bone. 1. A variety of definitive surgical methods were utilised. Seven patients had a debulking or intralesional resection of the tumour. Eight patients had an attempted marginal excision. This was achieved through anterior surgery only in 1 case, posterior only surgery in 6 cases and combination anterior and posterior surgery in 8 cases. The anterior and posterior surgery was performed in a single sitting in 5 cases and in a staged fashion in 3 cases. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy were used where indicated. Three cases presented with significant neurological impairment. Of these 2 made a significant recovery. There were no cases of neurological deterioration following surgery. All 3 patients with malignant tumours died in the follow up period. We had 1 case of hardware failure due to chronic sepsis. Conclusion. Primary bone tumours of the spine are associated with a significant delay in diagnosis. Surgical treatment options and adjuvant therapy should be tailor made for each case depending on the diagnosis. Acceptable results with minimal complications can be achieved with this approach