Introduction. Open fractures are fortunately rare but pose an even greater challenge due to poor soft tissues, in addition to poor bone quality. Co-morbidities and pre-existing medical conditions, in particular, peripheral vascular diseases make them often unsuitable for free flaps. We present our experience in treating severe open fractures of tibia with Acute Intentional Deformation (AID) to close the soft tissues followed by gradual correction of deformity to achieve anatomical alignment of the tibia and fracture healing with Taylor Spatial Frame. Materials and Methods. We treated 4 geriatric (3 female and 1 male) patients with Gustillo-Anderson III B fractures of the tibia between 2017–18. All were unfit to undergo orthoplastic procedures (free flap or local flaps). The age range is 69 yrs to 92 years. Co-morbidities included severe rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and heart failure. The procedure involved wound debridement, application of two ring Taylor Spatial Frame, acute deformation of the limb on the table to achieve soft-tissue closure/approximation. Regular neurovascular assessments were performed in the immediate post-operative period to monitor for compartment syndrome and nerve compression symptoms. After 7–10 days of latent period, the frame was gradually manipulated, according to a method we had previously published, to achieve anatomical alignment. The frame was removed in clinic after fracture healing. Results. Time in frame ranged from 1.5 months to 7 months. In one patient (92 yr old with an open fracture of the ankle) hindfoot nail was inserted after soft-tissue closure was achieved at 1.5 months, and frame removed. We achieved complete healing of soft tissue wounds without any input from plastic surgeons in all patients. All fractures healed in anatomical alignment. 3 patients had one episode of superficial pin infection each requiring 5 days of oral antibiotics. None of the patients developed a deep infection. Conclusions. Acute intentional deformation (AID) with Taylor Spatial Frame achieves good closure of soft tissues in physiologically compromised geriatric patients who were deemed unfit for plastic surgery. We also achieved fracture healing in all four cases without any major complications

Worldwide, it is expected that 6.3 million patients will sustain a hip fracture in 2050. Hemiarthroplasty is commonly practiced for displaced femoral neck fractures. The choice between unipolar (UH) or bipolar (BH) hemiarthroplasty is still controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the effect on hip function of BH compared to UH for a displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing BH to UH. Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All data was pooled in Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software. Selection of the studies included, data abstraction, data synthesis, risk of biais and quality of evidence evaluation was done independently by two authors. Our primary outcome was postoperative hip function. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), acetabular erosion and postoperative complications. 13 randomized controlled trials (n=2256) were eligible for the meta-analysis. There was no difference in hip function scores (standardized mean difference of 0.33 [−0.09–0.75, n=864, I. 2. = 87%,]). Patients with bipolar heads had higher Health-Related Quality of Life scores than patients with unipolar heads (mean difference in EQ-5D scores of 0.12 [0.04–0.19, n=550, I. 2. = 44%]). The use of BH decreased the incidence of acetabular erosion (relative risk of 0.37 [0.17–0.83, n=525, I. 2. = 0%]). There was no relative risk difference for mortality, dislocation, revision and infection. Due to the high heterogeneity between the studies included, it is still unclear whether patients undergoing BH have better hip function than patients undergoing UH. Although, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may be improved. Future research could be conducted to determine whether a BH offers a better quality of life than UH to geriatric patients undergoing surgery. More precise assessment scores could be developed to better evaluate postoperative outcomes

Acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after any hemiarthroplasty (HHA) implanted due to a proximal hip fracture. The growing number of chronic institutionalized geriatric patients (CIGP) colonized with multi-drug resistant bacteria (e.g.: MRSA), not covered by usual antibiotic prophylaxis, has been identified as a risk factor for PJI after HHA. We therefore sought to compare the HHA infection characteristics between non-institutionalized patients (NIP) with proximal hip fractures and CIGP. We investigate (1) the rate of compliance with a new proposed protocol, (2) the acute infection rate, 3) the microbiologic characteristics of the infection, and 4) the success of the new protocol. We gathered clinical, operative and infection data on all patients who underwent HHA due to a proximal femoral fracture in our center, during a 3-year period. We focus in the cases of acute postoperative infection (Zimmerli´s criteria). The new proposed antibiotic prophylaxis is cefazolin except in CIGP in which co-trimoxazole is used. During the study period a total of 385 HHA in 385 patients were performed. In all cases the HHA was performed after a proximal femoral fracture. Overall, 109 patients (28,2%) were CIGP. We found an acute postoperative PJI in 21 out 385 HHA procedures, that is, a global acute infection rate of 5.43%. Ten out 109 (9.17%) CIGP patients resulted infected compared to 11 out 278 (3.9%) non-institutionalized patients (p: 0.049). One or more causative microorganisms were identified in 20/21 (95%) of PJI. Globally the Gram-Negative bacilli group accounted for the majority of the infections (60%). Staphylococus aureus was isolated in 3 cases (8.6%) with only a single MRSA infection. The percentage of polymicrobial infections was 47% (10 out of 21). Co-trimoxazole was used in the prophylaxis in 80.1% of the CIGP. In the infected cases a non-effective drug against the microorganism was used in the prophylaxis in 17 (81%) of the acute infected HHA. We confirm that institutionalized patients are more prone to acute infections after a HHA. Our current strategy of antibiotic prophylaxis has showed to be effective in preventing MRSA PJI in CIGP. However, we found an increased rate of infection due to gram-negative bacilli non-covered by the current antibiotic prophylaxis. According our data an extended antibiotic prophylaxis on gram-negative drug will be proposed to be implemented in CIGP scheduled to a HHA because a proximal femoral fracture

Purpose. Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a very successful surgical intervention for the management of end-stage arthritis in geriatric patients (> age 65). The mid- to long-term results have been less satisfactory however, in younger patients primarily due to the wear of the acetabular liner and loosening of the femoral component. The primary study purpose was to compare pain, function and stiffness over the first five years in a population less than 60 years of age who received either an alumina liner/alumina femoral head (alumina group) or a crossfire UHMWPE liner/alumina head (Poly group) following primary THA. Secondarily, we compared re-operation rates over five years between these two groups. Method. This was a randomized, controlled clinical trial of subjects with non-inflammatory OA who were booked for primary THA and consented to participate in the study. Subjects were evaluated pre-operatively and again at one and five years post-operatively by an evaluator who was blinded to group allocation. At each assessment, subjects completed the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); complications and re-operations were also recorded. All analyses were performed on an intention to treat basis. Results. 92 subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean age of subjects was 52.4 (SD 6.8) and 50 (54%) were male and was similar between groups (p>0.10). Baseline pain, function and stiffness as measured by the WOMAC were also similar between groups (p>0.48). Five-year follow-up data was available for 78 (85%) patients. Both groups showed substantial improvement in pain, function and stiffness within one year that was maintained out to five years post-operatively; there were no statistically significant differences between groups (p>0.50). Four subjects required re-operation within five years; no re-operation was related to liner type two cases were dislocation due to the malposition of the cup while the remaining two re-operations occurred in the immediate post-operative period for removal of hematoma. Conclusion. Our prospective randomized controlled trial showed substantial post-operative improvements in pain, stiffness, and function that were maintained out to five years, with no statistically significant differences seen between the two groups. No re-operations that were related to the liner type occurred in the first five post-operative years