Aims. The impact of concomitant injuries in patients with proximal femoral fractures has rarely been studied. To date, the few studies published have been mostly single-centre research focusing on the influence of upper limb fractures. A retrospective cohort analysis was, therefore, conducted to identify the impact and distribution of concomitant injuries in patients with proximal femoral fractures. Methods. A retrospective, multicentre registry-based study was undertaken. Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019, data for 24,919 patients from 100 hospitals were collected in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma. This information was queried and patient groups with and without concomitant injury were compared using linear and logistic regression models. In addition, we analyzed the influence of the different types of additional injuries. Results. A total of 22,602 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of a concomitant injury was 8.2% with a predominance of female patients (8.7% vs 6.9%; p < 0.001). Most common were fractures of the ipsilateral upper limb. Concomitant injuries resulted in prolonged time-to-surgery (by 3.4 hours (95 confidence interval (CI) 2.14 to 4.69)) and extended length of stay in hospital by 2.2 days (95% CI 1.74 to 2.61). Mortality during the admission was significantly higher in the concomitant injury group (7.4% vs 5.3%; p < 0.001). Additionally, walking ability and quality of life were reduced in these patients at discharge. More patients were discharged to a nursing home instead of their own home compared to patients without additional injuries (25.8% vs 30.3%; p < 0.001). Conclusion. With a prevalence of 8.2%, the appearance of a concomitant injury is common in elderly patients with hip fracture. These patients are at a greater risk for death during the admission, longer hospital stays, and delayed surgery. This knowledge is clinically important for all who are involved in the treatment of proximal femur fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1526–1533

Aims

The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of postoperatively restricted weight-bearing and its association with outcome in patients who undergo surgery for a fracture of the hip.

Aims. Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery. Methods. This observational cohort study enrolled consecutively admitted patients with a proximal femoral fracture, for which surgery was performed between 1 January 2018 and 11 January 2021 in two level II trauma teaching hospitals. Patients with medical indications to postpone surgery were excluded. A total of 1,803 patients were included, of whom 1,428 had surgery < 24 hours and 375 had surgery ≥ 24 hours after admission. Results. Prolonged total length of stay was found when surgery was performed ≥ 24 hours (median 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 4 to 9) vs 7 days (IQR 5 to 10); p = 0.001) after admission. No differences in postoperative length of hospital stay nor in 30-day mortality rates were found. In subgroup analysis for time frames of 12 hours each, pressure sores and urinary tract infections were diagnosed more frequently when time to surgery increased. Conclusion. Longer time to surgery due to non-medical reasons was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative pressure sores and urinary tract infections when time to surgery was more than 48 hours after admission. No association was found between time to surgery and 30-day mortality rates or postoperative length of hospital stay. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1369–1378

Aims. Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest. Methods. A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS). Results. In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures. Conclusion. A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):236–242

Introduction. The length of hospital stay following a hip fracture has decreased significantly during the past decades. Knowing that a hip fracture patient is often one with several comorbidities and high mortality, is it possible to further decrease the length of stay without compromising the quality of care?. Setting. Prior to November 2007 a hip fracture patient at Svendborg Hospital would be admitted to the orthopedic department. Postoperatively the patient would be treated by the orthopedic surgeons. If needed a geriatric consult could occur. If the patient was eligible she could be transferred to the geriatric department for further rehabilitation. After November 2007 eight orthopedic beds were dedicated to hip fracture patients, in an orthogeriatric setting. The patient was treated operatively by the orthopedic surgeons, and then a geriatric consultant was responsible for the rest of the stay. Nurses and therapists were dedicated to the care of hip fracture patients, and had recieved special training regarding. The patient would stay in the same bed throughout the hospitalisation. Material. 224 consecutive hip fracture patients prior to November 2007 treated in a classic orthopedic department compared to 224 consecutive hip fracture patients after November 2007 treated in the orthogeriatic department. Of the 224 patients treated prior to November 2007 117 were eventually transferred to the geriatric department. Result. the overall mean hospital stay in the classic orthopedic department was 17.5 days (range 2–58 days, 95% CI 15.9–18.8 days). Patients (N=107), who were not transferred to the geriatric department had a mean of 8,7 days, whereas those who were transferred had a mean stay of 25,5 days. After November 2007 the overall mean length of stay was 11.5 days (range 1–38, 95% CI 10.5–11.9 days). The hip fracture patients spent 1,388 less days in hospital when admitted to the orthogeriatric setting as compared to the classic orthopedic setting. The 30 day mortality was 11,3% in the group prior to November 2007 compared to 9,8% in the group after November 2007. Conclusion. Changing the setting in which hip fracture patients are treated, significantly reduces the overall length of stay (p<0.0000), without compromising mortality. It involves an interdisciplinary setting with dedicated nurses and therapists. The hip fracture patient is first and foremost regarded as a geriatric patient and thus treated postoperatively by geriatric consultants

Hip fracture care is complex multi-disciplinary. We hypothesise that quality of care is affected by variance in resources between ‘in-hours’ (Monday-Friday, 0800–1700) and ‘out-of-hours’ services. This prospective multicentre national cohort study assessed quality of care by evaluating adherence to the evidence-based Scottish Standards of Care for Hip Fracture Patients. Data was collected by the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit for 15174 patients admitted to any of 22 Scottish hospitals from January 2014-April 2018. 11197/15174 (73.8%) patients were admitted out-of-hours. They were significantly less likely to meet the following Standards: ED Big-6-Bundle (OR 0.85, p= 0.002); Time in ED <4 hours (OR 0.76, p< 0.001); avoidance of repeated fasting (OR 0.80, p< 0.001), and avoidance of prolonged fluid fasting (OR 0.83, p< 0.001). Out-of-hours admissions were more likely to receive: geriatric assessment <3 days (OR 1.16, p< 0.001); OT input <3 days (OR 1.10, p= 0.013), and PT input <2 days (OR 1.44, p< 0.001). There were no significant differences for: Time to Theatre <36 hours; Inpatient Care Bundle <24 hours, and Post-op Day 1 Mobilisation. Quality of hip fracture care is affected by time of admission. ED care is poorer out-of-hours, which may reflect limited resources, and out-of-hours admissions are more likely to be excessive fasted excessively. Weekday in-hours admissions are less likely to receive geriatric and allied health professional input in the days following admission, which may reflect the reduced weekend services. Examination of out-of-hours service organisation is required for the pursuit of consistent, equitable care for hip fracture patients

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Minimum Common Dataset (MCD) within established national hip fracture registries, and to propose a revised MCD to enable international benchmarking for hip fracture care.

Aims

Posterior column plating through the single anterior approach reduces the morbidity in acetabular fractures that require stabilization of both the columns. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of posterior column plating through the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) in the management of acetabular fractures.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe the current pathways of care for patients with a fracture of the hip in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in South Asia (Nepal and Sri Lanka) and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines).

Aims

The aims of this study were to assess quality of life after hip fractures, to characterize respondents to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to describe the recovery trajectory of hip fracture patients.

Aims

Despite limited clinical scientific backing, an additional trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) has been advocated when treating unstable trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw (SHS). We aimed to explore whether the TSP would result in less post operative fracture motion, compared to SHS alone.

Aims

The use of multimodal non-opioid analgesia in hip fractures, specifically acetaminophen combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has been increasing. However, the effectiveness and safety of this approach remain unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among patients with hip fractures who preoperatively received either acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs, NSAIDs alone, or acetaminophen alone.

Aims

Patients with proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are often multimorbid, thus unplanned readmissions following surgery are common. We therefore aimed to analyze 30-day and one-year readmission rates, reasons for, and factors associated with, readmission risk in a cohort of patients with surgically treated PFFs across Austria.

Aims

This study aimed to identify risk factors (patient, healthcare system, and socioeconomic) for mortality after hip fractures and estimate their relative importance. Further, we aimed to elucidate mortality and survival patterns following fractures and the duration of excess mortality.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of hospital-level service characteristics on hip fracture outcomes and quality of care processes measures.

Aims

Minimally invasive fixation of pelvic fragility fractures is recommended to reduce pain and allow early mobilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of two different stabilization techniques in bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum (BFFS).

Background. Growing of the geriatric population has brought about increase of lower extremity fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of surgical site infection after the surgery for lower extremity fractures, except proximal femoral fracture, in over eighty years old patients. Methods. Patients with closed lower extremity fracture which were treated surgically in 2011 were divided into two groups (Group O; the equal or more than 80 years old, Group Y; from 20 to 65 years old), and the incidence of infection and the outcome after its treatment was compared between Group O and Group Y. Results. In group O, there were 35 fractures in 35 patients with average age of 86.7 years (range from 80 to 92). Five patients (14.3%) showed infection. Only one case recovered from infection, one died because of sepsis and the other three required amputation. The reasons for amputation were advanced sepsis in 2 and severe soft tissue damage in 1. In group Y with 110 fractures in 101 patients, there was no infection (p = 0.0007). Conclusions. The presented study showed that infection rate following lower extremity fracture surgery in group O had been significantly higher than that of group Y. Despite the application of minimum invasive surgery or intramedullary nail, infection occurred in Group O. Once, infection occurred after lower extremity fracture surgery in advanced age patients, it may be difficult to recover the infection without amputation

Backgrounds. Hip fractures have significant excess mortality, but it is unknown how long excess mortality persists. Our study was to explore the short and long term excess mortality after hip fractures, assess the impact of hip fracture on excess mortality and estimate the population attributable risk proportion (PARP) of risk factors for excess mortality. Methods. A total of 216 elderly with first time low trauma hip fracture admitted to NTUH were age and sex matched with 215 elder patients from Geriatric Department of the same hospital. All 63 covariates associated with mortality were analyzed using COX regression model. The survival status of these subjects was followed through National Death Registry for 60 months. Results. Hip fracture patients had an increased mortality in the first year after fractures compared with controls (Multivariable adjusted odds ratio {OR}: 2.4; 95% CI 1.05–5.4; PAR: 44.7%). At 60 months follow-up, the excess mortality of hip fracture remained high (OR: 2.7; 95% CI 1.3–5.5; PAR: 48.0%). Risk factors for short term mortality were hip fracture, betel nut use, comorbidities and MMSE< 19. Risk factors for long term mortality were hip fracture, ADL difficulty, smoking, coordination abnormality, T score < −2.19, BMI< 20 and the existence of comorbidities. Conclusions. Excess mortality after hip fracture lasts beyond 5 years. Excess mortality is attributable to hip fracture, which has higher PARP than other risk factors in both short and long term mortality

Background. Continual implant stability is an important factor for the long-term success of cementless hip replacements. The increasing lifespan of patients causes a higher frequency of osteoporosis which may result in implant loosening due to bone loss. This study aimed to evaluate stability of long living implants in patients with advanced age. Patients and methods. Nine cementless stems made of Titanium-alloy including adjacent bone tissue obtained post mortem were evaluated by radiologic-microradigraphical, histological and morphometrical analysis. The percentage of the surface area covered by bone (BICI=bone implant contact index) was determined. The age of seven women and two men ranged between 81 and 92 years. The time in situ ranged between 10 and 20 years. From the entire length of the femora bearing implants 5 transverse segments were excised, dehydrated, embedded in methylmethacrylate. After the grinding procedure, the sections were evaluated by light microscopy and morphometrical analysis. The autopsy findings were recorded. Atherosclerosis and their related diseases were evident in all cases. Results. The femora of all female patients revealed features of high bony atrophy with concomitant transformation of the corticalis into spongy bone, whereas in male patients minor to moderate atrophic bone changes in the proximal femoral area without implication of the corticalis could be observed. All of the cementless stems made of Titanium-alloy showed osteointegration. The stabilization of the implant resulted in the forceps-like encasement of the edges of the implant within the cortical anchoring and by the development of compensatory bony hypertrophy. The BICI ranged between 35 und 63 percent. Conclusion. Elderly patients provided with cementless hip replacments revealed stable implants in spite of marked bone atrophy and an implantation period up to 20 years. Simultaneously, severe atherosclerosis and their related diseases, which may contribute to bone loss, were evident. The present findings may result from the favoring properties of cementless endoprostheses made of titanium alloy, cortical prosthesis anchoring, and self regulating bone processes. Pharmacologic and therapeutic consequences together with geriatric assessment should be required to preserve functionality and mobility

We reviewed 286 consecutive patients with a fracture of a pubic ramus. The overall incidence was 6.9/100 000/year in the total population and 25.6/100 000/year in individuals aged over 60 years. The mean age of the patients was 74.7 years and 24.5% suffered from dementia. Women were affected 4.2 times more often than men. After injury, geriatric rehabilitation was frequently required and although most surviving patients returned to their original place of residence, their level of mobility was often worse. The overall survival rates at one and five years were 86.7% and 45.6%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that age and dementia were the only independent significant factors to be predictive of mortality (p < 0.05). Patients with a fracture of a pubic ramus had a significantly worse survival than an age-matched cohort from the general population (log-rank test, p < 0.001), but this was better than patients with a fracture of the hip during the first year after injury, although their subsequent mortality was higher. Five years after the fracture there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups