Introduction

Preservation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), along with the posterior cruciate ligament, is believed to improve functional outcomes in total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this study was to examine gait differences and muscle activation levels between ACL sacrificing (ACL-S) and bicruciate retaining (BCR) TKR subjects during level walking, downhill walking, and stair climbing.

The Step Holter is a software and mobile application that can be used to easily study gait analysis. The application can be downloaded for free on the App Store and Google Play Store for iOS and Android devices. The software can detect with an easy calibration the three planes to detect the movement of the gait. Before proceeding with the calibration, the smartphone can be placed and fixed with a band or stowed into a long sock with its top edge at the height of the joint line, in the medial side of the tibia. The calibration consists in bending the knee about 20 to 30 degrees and then making a rotation movement, leaving the heel fixed to the ground as a rotation fulcrum. After calibration, the program records data related to lateral flexion, rotation, and bending of the leg. This data can be viewed directly from the smartphone screen or transmitted via a web link to the Step Holter web page . www.stepholter.com. by scanning a personal QR code. The web page allows the users to monitor the test during its execution or view data for tests done previously. By pressing the play button, it is possible to see a simulation of the patient's leg and its movement. With the analyze button, the program is capable of calculating the swing and stance phase of every single step, providing a plot with time and percentages. Finally, with the Get Excel button, test data can be conveniently exported for more in-depth research. The advantage of this application is not only to reduce the costs of a machine for the study of gait analysis but also being able to perform tests quickly, without expensive hardware or software and be used in specific spaces, without specialized personnel. Furthermore, the application can collect important data concerning rotation that cannot be highlighted with the classic gait analysis. The versatility of a smartphone allows tests to be carried out not only during walking but also by climbing or descending stairs or sitting down or getting up from a chair. This software offers the possibility to easily study any kind of patients; Older patients, reluctant to leave their homes for a gait analysis can be tested at home or during an office control visit. Step Holter could be one small step for patients, one giant leap for gait study simplicity. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Financial and human cost effectiveness is an increasing evident outcome measure of surgical innovation. Considering the human element, the aim is to restore the individual to their “normal” state by sparing anatomy without compromising implant performance. Gait lab studies have shown differences between different implants at top walking speed, but none to our knowledge have analysed differing total hip replacement patients through the entire range of gait speed and incline to show differences. The purpose of this gait study was to 1) determine if a new short stem femoral implant would return patients back to normal 2) compare its performance to established hip resurfacing and long stem total hip replacement (THR) implants. Method. 110 subjects were tested on an instrumented treadmill (Kistler Gaitway), 4 groups (short-stem THR, long-stem THR, hip resurfacing and healthy controls) of 28, 29, 27, and 26 respectively. The new short femoral stem patients (Furlong Evolution, JRI) were taken from the ongoing Evolution Hip trial that have been tested on the treadmill minimum 12months postop. The long stem total hip replacements and hip resurfacing groups were identified from our 800+ patient treadmill database, and only included with tests minimum 12 months postop and had no other joint disease or medical comorbidities which would affect gait performance. All subjects were tested through their entire range of gait speeds and incline after having a 5 minute habituation period. Speed were increased 0.5kmh until maximum walking speed achieved and inclines at 4kmh for 5,10,15%. At all incremental intervals of speed 10seconds ere collected, including vertical ground reaction forces (normalized to body mass), center of pressure and temporal measurements were for both limbs (fs=100Hz). Symmetry Index(SI) were calculated on a range of features comparing leg with implanted hip to the contralateral normal hip. Group means for each feature for each subject group were compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-hoc test with significance set at α=0.05. Results. The four groups were reasonably matched for demographics and the implant groups for subjective outcome measures (Oxford Score & EQ5D). Hip resurfacing group had a clear top walking speed advantage, but when assessing SI on all speeds and incline, no groups were significantly different (Figure 1-3). Push-off and step length was statistically less favorable for the short/long stemmed THR group (p=0.005–0.05) depending on speed/incline comparing only implanted side. Discussion. The primary aim of this study was to determine if implant design affected gait symmetry and performance. Interestingly, irrespective of implant design, symmetry with regards to weight acceptance, impulse, push-off and step length was returned to normal when comparing to healthy controls. However individual implant performance on the flat and incline, showed inferior (p<0.05) push-off force and step length in the short stem and long stem THR groups when compared to controls. Age and gender may have played a part for the short stem group. It appears that the early gait outcomes for the short stem device are promising. Assessment at the 3-year mark should be conclusive

The position of this surgeon is that there is no approach that provides superior outcomes for total hip replacement (THR). The direct anterior approach (DAA) has become popular with patients because of marketing by companies, misinformation given to journalists for public consumption, and yes, some surgeons. Because of patient pressure generated by this marketing there has been pressure on surgeons to convert their surgical approach for perceived protection of their practice. Unfortunately, the leaders of orthopaedic organizations have not countered this marketing with education of the public that there is NO scientific evidence to support DAA superiority. These orthopaedic organizations exist to be advocates for their members but have abdicated that responsibility. Whatever happened to the time honored belief of choosing a surgeon to do your operation? Instead we now choose an approach? Do anterior surgeons think that they are immune to the Bell Curve of talent? The fact is that there is NO outcome data of DAA with the longest follow up study being one year, and recent data from both coasts of the USA raise concerns with more failures from loosening of the femoral component. How in the world can we bamboozle patients about better results when there are no published results with the DAA except for recovery? The mini-posterior approach has data for all aspects of its use. Short term data shows rapid recovery and hospital discharge can be the same day; gait studies show A quality at six weeks (so does this mean that cut muscles recover quickly?). Dislocation rates are equal in most comparative studies, but I believe this favors the DAA, however, fractures are 3X greater with DAA. Data from the Mayo Clinic comparative studies showed posterior patients return to work faster! There are two 10 year studies of mini-posterior patients which show some of the best 10 year results in the literature. And there are superior technical surgeons who perform this operation to the benefit of their patients, and they should not need to suffer the implicit bias from DAA marketing that their care of patients is inferior

Introduction. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) devices are now increasingly subjected to a progressively greater range of kinematic and loading regimes from substantially younger and more active patients. In the interest of ensuring adequate THA solutions for all patient groups, THA polyethylene acetabular liner (PE Liner) wear representative of younger, heavier, and more active patients (referred to as HA in this study) warrants further understanding. Previous studies have investigated HA joint related morbidity [1]. Current or past rugby players are more likely to report osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and joint replacement than a general population. This investigation aimed to provide a preliminary understanding of HA patient specific PE liner tribological performance during Standard Walking (SW) gait in comparison to IS0:14242-1:2014 standardized testing. Materials and Methods. Nine healthy male subjects volunteered for a gait lab-based study to collect kinematics and loading profiles. Owing to limitations in subject selection, five subjects wore a weighted jacket to increase Body Mass Index ≥30 (BMI). An induced increase in Bodyweight was capped (<30%BW) to avoid significantly effecting gait [3] (mean=11%BW). Six subjects identified as HA per BMI≥30, but with anthropometric ratios indicative of lower body fat as previously detailed by the author [2] (Waist-to-hip circumference ratio and waist circumference-to-height ratio). Three subjects identified as Normal (BMI<25). Instrumented force plate loading profiles were scaled (≈270%BW) in agreement with instrumented hip force data [4]. A previously verified THA (Pinnacle® Marathon® 36×56mm, DePuy Synthes) Finite Element Analysis wear model based on Archard's law and modified time hardening model [5] was used to predict geometrical changes due to wear and deformation, respectively (Figure 1). Subject dependent kinematic and loading conditions were sampled to generate, for both legs, 19 SW simulation runs using a central composite design of response surface method. Results. HA group demonstrated comparable SW gait characteristics and Range of Motion (RoM) to the Normal group (p>0.1) (Figure 2) but statistically greater SW peak loads, PE liner wear rates, deformation, and penetration after 3Mc (Million cycles) of SW (p<0.01). HA group demonstrated comparable RoM (p>0.4) and peak loading to ISO-14242-1:2014 (p>0.1) although, up to 8° increase in flexion-extension angle was observed. The HA group demonstrated statistically greater wear rates (mean 7.5% increase) to ISO-14242-1:2014 (p<0.05) (Figure 3). No difference in PE liner deformation or penetration was observed (p>0.4). Discussion. This study detailed only a 19. th. percentile within a broader HA population (BW=91kg, n=485) [6] however, were statistically worst-case compared to a Normal group and ISO-14242-1:2014. A 95. th. percentile HA population (BW=127kg) may produce lower PE liner tribological performance than reported in this investigation and therefore, warrants further investigation. Further studies would be beneficial to determine whether the increase in PE liner wear rate for HA patients is predictable based on kinematics and loading alone, or whether influences exist in design inputs and surgical factors. Conclusion. The HA population detailed in this study (representative of a 19. th. percentile) demonstrated statistically greater SW PE liner wear rates compared to ISO-14242-1:2014. This study may have implications for the test methods considered appropriate to verify novel designs. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Enhanced appreciation of normal knee kinematics and the inability to replicate these in the replaced total knee has led to increased enthusiasm for partial knee arthroplasty by some. These arthroplasties more closely replicate normal kinematics since they inherently preserve the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Indications for medial UKA are: anteromedial osteoarthritis with an intact ACL, posterior cruciate ligament, and medial collateral ligament (MCL), full thickness cartilage loss, and correctable deformity demonstrated radiographically with valgus stress view; full thickness cartilage laterally with no central ulcer; <15 degrees of flexion contracture, < 15 degrees varus and > 90 degrees flexion. The state of the patellofemoral joint, chondrocalcinosis, obesity, age and activity level are NOT contraindications to medial mobile-bearing UKA. The only certain contraindications are the presence of inflammatory arthritis or a history of previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Advantages of medial UKA are that it preserves undamaged structures, it is a minimally invasive technique with low incidence of perioperative morbidity, preservation of the cruciate mechanism results in more “normal” kinematics versus TKA, it normalises contact forces and pressures in the patellofemoral joint, and it provides better range of motion than TKA. Furthermore, medial UKA results in better function than TKA in gait studies, with demanding activities, such as climbing stairs, having a better “feel”. Pain relief with medial UKA is equivalent or better than TKA, and morbidity and mortality are decreased compared with TKA, as well as venous thromboembolism. Recommended preoperative imaging studies consist of plain radiographs with the following views obtained: standing AP, PA flexed, lateral, Merchant or axial, and valgus stress. There are several surgical perils associated with performing medial UKA. First, in regard to patient selection, avoid medial UKA in patients with residual hyaline cartilage – the joint must be bone on bone. Second, perform a conservative tibial resection with respect to depth to prevent tibial collapse as well as excessive overload of weakened bone, and avoid excessive posterior slope. Perform the tibial resection coplanar with tibial spine/ACL insertion to maximise tibial coverage. Avoid overcorrection of deformity. Do not perform a medial release. Balance flexion/extension gaps meticulously. For mobile-bearing designs, remove all impinging osteophytes. Over 55 published studies report results with mobile-bearing medial UKA, with survival ranging 63.2–100% at mean follow-up ranging from 1 to 17.2 years

Background. The aim of this study is to analysis the ability of these patients, treated with MOMHR, to resume sport activities by gait analysis and clinical evaluations. Metal on metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR) is indicated to treat symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in young active patients. These patients require a high level of function and desire to resume sport activities after surgery. Study Design & Methods. 30 consecutive male patients playing high impact sports with unilateral hip osteoarthritis and normal contralateral hip were included in the study, they were treated with MOMHR by the same surgeon. No patients were lost to follow. The mean age at operation was 39.1 years (range 31 to 46). Primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis. OHS, HHS, UCLA activity score were completed at pre-operative time, six months and one year after surgery. Functionally, gait analysis was performed in all patients 6 months and one year after surgery. A stereophotogrammetric system (Smart-DX, BTS, Milano, Italy, 10 cameras, 250Hz) and two platforms (9286BA Kistler Instrumente AG, Switzerland) were used. Cluster of 4 markers were attached on the skin of each bone segment, a number of anatomical landmarks were calibrated and segment anatomical frames defined, markers were positioned by the same operator. Walking, running and squat jump were analyzed and strength and range of movement of the hips and knees were calculated. Results. At follow-up times the survival rate for the whole cohort was 100%. The mean pre-op OHS was 28.1 points (range 15.0 to 38.0), at 6 months after surgery was 44.5 points (range 44 to 48), at one year after surgery was 47.9 points (range 45 to 48). The mean pre-op HHS was 54.7 points (range 33.1 to 73.4), at 6 months after surgery was 96.7 points (range 93.4 to 100), at one year after surgery was 99.7 points (range 95.7 to 100). The mean pre-op UCLA activity score was 2.7 (range 2 to 4), at 6 months after surgery was 7.4 (range 5 to 10), at one year after surgery was 8.6 (range 7 to 10). At 6 months after surgery, patients showed a reduction of the differences between the operated and the contralateral side during walking, running and squat jumping. (p<0.01). One year after the operation there were no differences. At 3 months after surgery the mean hip flexion extension range of motion was in the normal hips 41±1.7 and in the operated hips 37.3±2.1; at 6 months after surgery the mean hip flexion extension range of motion was in the normal hips 45.4±1.8 and in the operated hips 42.0±1.7; At 1 year after surgery the hip flexion extension range of motion was in the normal hips 42.9±1.7 and in the operated hips 45.5±1.4. (p=0.001). Conclusions. Our gait analysis study shows that the biomechanical function of the operated hip is completely recovered 1 year after MOMHR operation. As a consequence sport activities can be successfully resumed. MOMHR is a good choice for young and active patients affected by hip osteoarthritis requiring a high level of activity

Answering the question of what the patient can teach us about the future of joint replacement starts with a look to the past. The modern era of total joint replacement began in the late 1950's with the pioneering work of John Charnley that established the fundamental structure of a total joint replacement with a metal component bearing against polyethylene and provided many disabled patients with a substantial improvement in function. As the application of joint replacement expanded to a broader patient population it became apparent that a better understanding of the mechanics of patient function was needed to provide more rigorous design criteria and objective assessment of design changes. This presentation will examine how improvements in total knee replacement has been aided by objective measures of ambulatory function and the potential for future improvements in joint replacement that can be based on information from testing patients. Specifically, from a historical viewpoint one of the major problems limiting the use of total knee replacement in the 1970's was tibial component loosening. The problem of tibial component loosening could be related to the load imbalance between the medial and lateral surface of the tibia. The load asymmetry at the knee resulting from the adduction moment during gait provided a strong rationale for maintaining proper limb alignment following total knee arthroplasty. The analysis clearly showed that knees with a varus alignment of the mechanical axis were more likely to have a substantial load imbalance creating the type of stresses that would eventually lead to tibial component loosening. When the information from gait studies was combined with both clinical and biomechanical studies, tibial component designs were modified using metal backing of the polyethylene articulating surface and instrumentation was modified to allow for proper alignment of the mechanical axis and avoid residual varus deformity following total knee replacement. Similarly, knee kinematics and moments have been used to differentiate the functional characteristics of different types of designs during stair climbing. Patients with cruciate-sacrificing knee replacements had a tendency to reduce the moment sustained by the quadriceps by leaning forward during the portion of the support phase of ascending stairs when the quadriceps moment would reach a peak value, while patients with a posterior cruciate retaining design were able to sustain normal quadriceps function. The functional differences between the PCL-retaining and sacrificing designs were associated with the normal posterior movement of the femur on the tibia (rollback), with flexion. This finding indicated that TKR design must permit rollback in the early phases of knee flexion to sustain normal stair climbing. This presentation will conclude with a review of the functional performance of patients with an anterior cruciate deficient knee as a basis for addressing the future needs of a knee replacement to permit natural knee movement. Specifically the role of the anterior cruciate ligament will be discussed in the context of the interaction of the curvature of the articulating surfaces in maintaining a functional envelope of movement that is consistent with retaining both cruciate ligaments

Introduction:. Kinematic studies are used to evaluate function and efficacy of various implant designs. Given the large variation between subjects, matched pairs are ideal when comparing competing designs. It is logical to deduce that both limbs in a subject will behave identically during a given motion [1], barring unilateral underlying pathology, thus allowing for the most direct comparison of two designs. It is our goal to determine if this is a valid assumption by assessing whether or not there are significant differences present in the kinematics of left and right knees from the same subject. Gait studies have compared pre-and postoperative implantation kinematics for various pathologies like ACL rupture [2] and osteoarthritis [3, 4]. We designed a study to assess squatting in cadaver specimens. Methods:. Sixteen matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadavers, (Eleven males, five females; aged 71 years [± 10 yrs]) were tested. Each knee, intact, was tested by mounting it on a dynamic, quadriceps-driven, closed-kinetic-chain Oxford knee rig (OKR), which simulated a deep knee bend from full extension to 120° flexion. We chose femoral rollback, tibiofemoral external rotation, tibial adduction, patellofemoral tilt and shift as our outcomes, which were recorded using an active infrared tracking system. Results:. The maximum difference over 120° of flexion between the mean values of tibial adduction, tibiofemoral external rotation and patellofemoral tilt were 1.48 (Fig. 1), 0.94 and 1.64 degrees, respectively. The maximum differences between means for femoral rollback and patellofemoral lateral shift were 1.19 (Fig. 2) and 0.55 millimeters, respectively. Using the left knees as a baseline, the cumulative kinematic difference of each of our five outcomes was also calculated by summing the area under the curve of the absolute difference between right and left knees. The summed differences for each outcome were then broken down into four flexion ranges (Fig. 3). Discussion:. Being able to utilize direct comparisons and control variables during the design and testing of an implant is an important aspect in comparing one iteration or feature to another. Using paired knees from the same subject can be done to remove a level of variability and to provide a more one-to-one comparison. In our study we found that while the kinematics remain very similar, there is a trend of divergence between the knees as they go into deeper flexion. This trend was observed in each of our five outcomes, though no statistical significance could be determined. We also observed that the standard error of the kinematic means was equal to, or greater than the difference between means, indicating that subject to subject variation was greater than left to right variation. This finding potentially gives further weight to the validity of bilateral comparisons

Introduction:. Many variables contribute to aseptic loosening, and the release of wear particles is a predominant source of late failure. It has been difficult to measure TKA wear quantitatively from retrieved devices; hence, there is a relative paucity of clinically observed TKA wear rates in the literature. Additionally, little is known about patient factors influencing wear rates. This study (a) establishes a clinically relevant TKA wear rate for a cruciate retaining TKA design and (b) relate those wear readings to gait measures of their hosts. Methods:. 34 revision- and 11 postmortem-retrieved MG II tibial PE-components were included in the analysis. Wear scars on the articulating surface of the insert were digitized under light microscopy. The geometry of the surfaces was mapped at 100×100 μm using a low-incidence laser. Autonomous mathematical reconstruction of the original surface was used [1], and linear penetration on the medial and lateral surfaces and total wear volume were calculated (Fig-1). For five implants, gait data recorded during 1.5 years after surgery were available. Gait studies were performed using a three-dimensional optoelectronic system for motion capture. Joint kinematics and kinetics were calculated using a six-marker model of the lower extremity [2]. All knee moments are reported in Nm, acting externally at the tibia. Potential linear relationships between wear and moment characteristics were investigated. Results:. Total wear correlated linearly with time in situ (R. 2. = 0.42) resulting in a volumetric wear rate of 14.3 ± 2.8 mm. 3. /year (Fig-2). The five tibial inserts with gait information came from two female and two male patients (one of them bi-lateral). Their time in situ ranged from 16 to 98 months and their total volume loss from 11.3 mm. 3. to 258.2 mm. 3. At the time of testing, the patients were 55 ± 9 years old, pain free and walked at speeds of 1.1 ± 0.3 m/s. Except for one, subjects walked with slight flexion contracture at heel strike and reduced mid-stance flexion. Subjects further showed diminished flexion moments during mid-stance, an observation linked to ‘quadriceps reduced’ gait. Lower flexion moments were associated with a lower wear rate (R. 2. = 0.60). The correlation improved (R. 2. = 0.97) when the component being the least time in situ was removed from the analysis. Its wear rate of 83.1 mm. 3. /yr, a running-in phenomenon, was significantly larger than the 19.8 mm. 3. /yr average of the four remaining components. Also, the adduction (‘varus’) moment was positively associated with wear rate (R. 2. = 0.79). However, this association was largely driven by the implant with the high wear rate. Its removal dropped the correlation factor to 0.16. No relationship was found for internal and external rotation moments. Discussion:. As expected, wear of tibial PE-inserts increased with time in situ. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a reliable TKR clinical wear rate. Comparison to gait data suggests there are additional patient factors, other than ‘use’, that govern wear rate. Particularly external knee joint moments are associated with wear, a finding which underscores the role of joint moments as surrogate markers for contact load

Background. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are treatments of end-stage hip disease. Gait analysis studies comparing HRA and THA have demonstrated that HRA results in a more normal gait than THA. The reasons may include the larger, more anatomic head diameter or the preservation of the neck of the femur with restoration of the anatomical position of the hip centre and normal proprioception. This study investigated (1) whether femoral head size diameter affects gait; (2) whether gait still differs between THA and HRA patients even with comparable head diameters. Methods. We retrospectively analysed the gait of 33 controls and 50 patients with a unilateral hip replacement, operated by the same surgeon. Follow-up ranged from 9–68 months. In 27 hips a small femoral head size was used (≤ 36mm); in 23 hips a large head size (>36mm). The small size group consisted of 11 long femoral stem THA and 16 short-stem THA and the large group of 5 long-stem THA, 8 short-stem THA and 10 HRA patients. There were 14 females/19 males in the control group; 22 females/5 males in the small size group; 13 females/10 males in the large size group. Results. (1) We found a significant difference in the step-length between the small head size group and the controls (p<0.01) at speeds ranging from 4.0 to 5.5 km/h but no difference between the larger head size and the controls. There was no significant difference in maximum speed, weight acceptance, push-off, mid-stance, impulse and cadence between the groups. (2) Analysis between THA and HRA in the large head size group revealed that there was a significant difference in the maximum speed (p=0.021) between the long-stem THA (6.338 km/h± 1.542) and HRA (7.756km/h± 0.7604) patients. At 5.5 km/h there was a significantly better weight acceptance (p=0.009) and mid-stance (p=0.041) of the HRA compared to short-stems. Impulse was significantly higher for HRA compared to long-stem THA (p<0.05) at all speeds ranging 4 to 5.5 km/h. (3) Males (7.1972 km/h ± .9700) had significantly higher maximum speeds compared to females (6.6524km/h± 1.019) (p=0.017) and lower gait impulse (p<0.01) at speeds ranging from 4 to 5.5km/h. (4) There was no significant difference in the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EQ-5D of patients in the small compared to the large head size group. Conclusions. Gait analysis demonstrated a significant difference in step length between THA patients with head size ≤ 36mm and normal controls. There was no difference in step length between normal controls and THA patients with larger head sizes. Compared to larger head size THA, the HRA still revealed higher maximum speeds and better weight acceptance. Males had significantly higher maximum speeds compared to females (controls and hip replacement patients). We could not demonstrate a correlation between better gait and Oxford scores or EQ-5D scores but these scores are known to have a ceiling effect. In a former study, better gait parameters such as longer step length and higher maximum speed have been associated with higher patient satisfaction

The excitement and enthusiasm that accompanies the introduction of many new technologies and techniques can be self-sustaining, meaning that the appeal of doing something new or different (not necessarily doing something better) becomes the prime driver. Such is likely the case today with the direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty. Can THA be done successfully through a direct anterior approach? Certainly the answer is yes; and with experience it can be done in relatively broad groups of patients with an acceptable risk of complications. Is it a better way to do THA than other approaches? Well probably not in 2012. Contemporary THA done with a variety of approaches and coupled with advanced anesthetic, pain management and rapid rehabilitation protocols has been shown to be safe and effective with both short hospital stays (48 hours) and even outpatient surgery in selected patients. No substantial clinical advantage has been shown to date with a direct anterior approach. The sometimes extraordinary claims associated with the direct anterior approach are accompanied by relatively ordinary data. The purported benefits of direct anterior related to more rapid recovery, better function, or a lower dislocation risk just have not proved to be demonstrable in broad groups of patients. In regard to recovery there are now several studies suggesting no difference at 2 hours; 2 days; 2 weeks or 2 years after surgery; and likely no difference at 2 months either. In regard to function there are now multiple gait analysis studies with no demonstrable benefit at 2 weeks or 6 weeks. In regard to lower risk of dislocation if we pool the data from big published studies Sariali (1.5%) Matta (0.6%) Jewett (1%) and Woolson (0%) the mean is 0.88%. Interestingly, contemporary posterior approach THA with formal capsular repair also has <1% dislocation rate when we look at published data from White (0.5%) Pagnano (0.3%) and Dorr (0%). The direct anterior does come at a cost including: longer operative times; additional equipment and/or personnel; unique complications; and in some techniques the need for intra-operative fluoroscopy with attendant exposure to radiation for the surgeon and staff. It is clear in 2012 that the direct anterior approach is just another technique for performing a very successful procedure, namely total hip arthroplasty. With advanced anesthetic, pain management, and rapid rehabilitation protocols it will be extremely difficult to prove any marginal benefit associated with THA surgical technique. To summarize the available data on direct anterior THA it is not unreasonable to conclude that “the extraordinary claims are accompanied by very ordinary data.”

Aims

A flexed knee gait is common in patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy and occurs with increased age. There is a risk for the recurrence of a flexed knee gait when treated in childhood, and the aim of this study was to investigate whether multilevel procedures might also be undertaken in adulthood.