The purpose of this study was to examine five-year outcomes of patients previously enrolled in a non-operative rotator cuff study. Patients with chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears (demonstrated on imaging) who were referred to one of two senior shoulder surgeons were enrolled in the study between October 2008 and September 2010. Patients participated in a comprehensive non-operative, home-based treatment program. After three months patients were defined as “successful” or “failed”. “Successful” patients were essentially asymptomatic and did not require surgery. “Failed” patients were symptomatic and consented to surgical repair. All patients were followed up at one year, two years, and five-plus years. Original results of our study showed that 75% of patients were treated successfully with non-operative treatment, while 25% went on to surgery. These numbers were maintained at two-year follow-up (previously reported) and five-year follow-up. At five+ years, 88 patients were contacted for follow-up. Fifty-eight (66%) responded. The non-operative success group had a mean RC-QOL score of 80 (SD 18) at previously reported two-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up this score did not decrease (RCQOL = 82 (SD 16)). Furthermore, between two and five years, only two patients who had previously been defined as “successful” became more symptomatic and underwent surgical rotator cuff repair. From the original cohort of patients, those who failed non-operative treatment and underwent surgical repair had a mean RC-QOL score of 89 (SD 12) at five-year follow-up. The operative and non-operative groups at five-year follow-up were not significantly different (p = 0.07). Non-operative treatment is an effective and lasting option for many patients with a chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tear. While some may argue that non-operative treatment delays inevitable surgical fixation, our study shows that patients can do extremely well over time

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in the level of pre- and 6 months post-operative objective and subjective measures of disability between patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears and those with impingement syndrome/low grade partial thickness rotator cuff tears. Impact of age, gender, and job demands was taken into consideration. Methods. Standardised pre- and post-operative data were collected on consecutive patients who had undergone surgery related to rotator cuff pathology. A disease-specific disability measure, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index which explores five domains of physical symptoms – life style, work, sports, and emotions – was the primary outcome. Paired and independent non-parametric statistics and multivariable regression analysis were performed. Results. Three hundred and thirty patients (140 women and 190 men) with a mean age of 58 years (range, 21-82) met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and fifteen (65%) patients had full-thickness rotator cuff tears and 115 (35%) had impingement or partial thickness rotator cuff tears. Patients with full-thickness tears complained of greater weakness and had a higher prevalence of a fall on an outstretched hand. They were significantly weaker in elevation both pre- (p=0.0002) and post-operatively (< 0.0001). Patients with impingement syndrome expressed more emotional disability both prior to (0.007) and after surgery (0.004). Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in overall pain, disability and strength 6 months following surgery (p< 0.0001). Factors that affected emotional disability at both time points were job demands and age. Females were more emotionally disabled before surgery. Conclusion. Patients with impingement syndrome and less extensive tears tend to be more emotionally disabled due to their gender, age and work status/job demands. This needs to be considered when planning for return to work and other activities and when assessing treatment outcomes

When compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US) performed by experienced users is an inexpensive tool that has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing rotator cuff (RC) tears. However, many practitioners are now utilizing in-office US with little to no formal training as an adjunct to clinical evaluation in the management of RC pathology. The purpose of our study was to determine if US without formal training is effective in managing patients with a suspected RC tear. This was a single centre prospective observational study. Five fellowship-trained surgeons each examined 50 participants referred for a suspected RC tear (n= 250). Patients were screened prior to the consultation and were included if ≥ 40 years old, had an MRI of their affected shoulder, had failed conservative treatment of at least 6 months, and had ongoing pain and disability. Patients were excluded if they had glenohumeral instability, evidence of major joint trauma, or osteonecrosis. After routine clinical exam, surgeons recorded their treatment plan (“No Surgery”, “Uncertain”, or “Surgery”). Surgeons then performed an in-office diagnostic US followed by an MRI and documented their treatment plan after each imaging study. Interrater reliability was analyzed using a kappa statistic to compare clinical to ultrasound findings and ultrasound findings to MRI, normal and abnormal categorization of biceps, supraspinatus, and subscapularis. Following clinical assessment, the treatment plan was recorded as “No Surgery” in 90 (36%), “Uncertain” in 96 (39%) of cases, “Surgery” in 61 (25%) cases, and incomplete in 3 (2%). In-office US allowed resolution of 68 (71%) of uncertain cases with 227 (88%) of patients having a definitive treatment plan. No patients in the “No Surgery” group had a change in treatment plan. After MRI, 16 (6%) patients in the “No Surgery” crossed-over to the “Surgery” group after identification of full-thickness tears, larger than expected tears or alternate pathology (e.g., labral tear). The combination of clinical examination and in-office US may be an effective method in the initial management of patients with suspected rotator cuff pathology. Using this method, a definitive diagnosis and treatment plan was established in 88% of patients with the remaining 12% requiring an MRI. A small percentage (6%) of patients with larger than expected full-thickness rotator cuff tears and/or alternate glenohumeral pathology (e.g., labral tear) would be missed at initial evaluation