More than half of patients with neck of femur (NOF) fractures report their pain as severe to very severe in the first 24hrs. Opioids remain the most commonly used analgesia and are effective for static pain but not dynamic pain. Opioids provide suboptimal analgesia when patients are in a dynamic transition state and their side-effects are a source of morbidity in these patients. The Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) involves infiltration of the fascia iliaca compartment with a large volume of low concentrated local anaesthetic to reduce pain by affecting the femoral and lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. The London Quality Standards for Fractured neck of femur services (2013) stated that the FICB should be routinely offered to patients. We performed an audit of patient outcomes following the introduction of the FICB across three centres. We performed a two-cycle audit across two hospitals in 2014/15. The first cycle audited compliance with the NICE guidance in the management and documentation of pain and AMTS (Abbreviated Mental Test Scores) in patients. The second cycle was conducted following the integration of the FICB into the multidisciplinary NOF fracture protocol across three hospital sites. Data was collected on numeric pain scores, pre and post-op AMTS and opioid requirements. There were 40 patients audited with 20 in the first cycle prior to the introduction of the FICB and 20 following this. In the second cycle, there was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in the difference between the pre and post-op AMTS. The preliminary findings in this audit support the use of the FICB adjunct to analgesia in the pre-operative management of NOF fracture patients. The FICB is a safe procedure and the organisational learning of this procedure through a multidisciplinary approach can significantly improve the outcomes of NOF fracture patients

Background. Fractured neck of femurs cause substantial morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and represent a huge financial burden to the NHS. Hip fracture patients are generally malnourished on admission, often having poor nutritional inpatient intake, hindering recovery and increasing chances of “unfavourable outcome.” Nutritional care is included in intercollegiate guidelines for management of fractured neck of femur patients, but is nutrition a management priority in clinical practice?. Study Aim. To evaluate protein and energy intake of acute fractured neck of femur patients depending on admission MMSE, and compare these to department of health targets. Method. 40 acute fractured neck of femur admissions were recruited between December 08-March 09 and put into three groups depending on admission MMSE. Initial nutrition screening information (mid-arm circumference, grip strength, MUST score) was recorded and through food charts daily kcal and protein intake were calculated for a three day period. Results. 100% of patients recruited were high risk of malnutrition on admission. Overall average daily calorie intake over 3 days was 385.9 kCal, average protein intake was 14.1g. Intake for each group was well below recommended target intake of 1810kCal and 46.5g, p<0.05. Discussion. On admission all 40 patients included were classified high risk for malnutrition, therefore in need of dietetic and nutritional intervention. Two patients received dietician input and oral supplementation. Recorded nutritional intake was very low, well below target nutrient intakes for this population even before extra requirement due to the stress response is accounted for. Whilst there is a paucity of hard evidence linking poor nutrition to clinical outcome, this is likely to be detrimental to rehabilitation from surgery. Conclusion. Despite attempted adherence to NICE nutrition guidance, involving screening tools, care plans and protected mealtimes; acutely unwell, malnourished patients are not receiving their basic nutritional requirements

Contrary to NICE guidance there remains a role for Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty (AM) for patients with significant pre-existing comorbidities who are at higher risk of death and complications following cemented hemiarthroplasty.

We analysed prospectively-collected data comparing uncemented AM hemiarthroplasty in frail, poorly-mobile patients, and cemented hemiarthroplasty. We analysed age, pre-operative morbidity, duration of operation, death rate and complication rate.

AM patients were significantly older with significantly higher ASA grades. It took significantly longer to optimise them before surgery. AM was significantly shorter to perform. There was no significant difference in complications requiring re-operation. Twice as many AM patients developed post-operative pneumonia despite absence of cement. Twice as many AM patients died after surgery and a significant proportion died within the first month despite no increased risk of repeat operation, shorter operating time and no risk of cement-disease. We infer that these patients would likely have fared badly had they undergone a longer, cemented procedure. A modern cemented prosthesis costs £691 more than AM.

There exists a subset of patients within the neck of femur cohort who are significantly more unwell. Contrary to guidelines, we suggest that the cheaper, user-friendly Austin-Moore can be a reasonable prosthesis to use for this cohort.

The objective was to compare vastus lateralis muscle splitting verses muscle sparing surgical approach to proximal femur for fixation of intertrochanteric fracture.

Of the 16 patients in this prospective randomised double blind study 8 were randomised to vastus lateralis muscle splitting and rest to muscle sparing group. Main outcome measurement was assessment of status of vastus lateralis muscle at 2 and 6 weeks using nerve conduction study. Preoperative demographics were identical for both the groups.

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regards to velocity, latency, and amplitude. The postoperative haemoglobin drop, heamatocrit, position of the dynamic hip screw and mobility status were identical.

Both clinical and neurophysiological outcome suggest that damage done to vastus lateralis either by splitting or elevating appears to be identical.