Fragility fractures are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Their association with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is well documented. It is a reasonable assumption that hip fracture severity is linked to the magnitude of bone loss, (the lower the BMD, the more severe the fracture), however it is not known whether this correlation exists. Our aim therefore was to investigate the relationship between BMD and hip fracture severity. We reviewed 142 patients, 96 females and 46 males, mean age 74 years (49-92), who had sustained a hip fracture following a simple ground level fall. All had subsequently undergone DEXA bone scanning of the contralateral hip and lumbar spine. Fractures were classified as intra-capsular, extra-capsular or subtrochanteric, then sub-classified using the Garden, Jensen and Seinsheimer classifications respectively. They were grouped into simple (stable) or comminuted (unstable) fracture patterns. Risk factors for osteoporosis were recorded. A low hip BMD (<2.5) was associated with an increased risk of extra-capsular fracture (p=0.025). However, no association with fracture type (extra vs. intra-capsular, p>0.05) was identified with the following variables; age, gender, BMI <25, smoking, and excess alcohol intake. We did not find any statistically significant associations between fracture severity and the nine principle variables tested for: age; gender; smoking; BMI < 25; alcohol excess and low hip or lumbar BMD T or Z score <-2.5. Although the association between BMD and risk of fragility fractures is well documented, the results of this study would suggest that severity of hip fractures does not follow this correlation. Therefore, no assumption can be made about BMD of the proximal femur based on the severity of fracture observed on plain radiographs alone

Introduction. The treatment of distal femoral fractures has undergone several changes during the past century, from non-operative techniques to more recently minimally-invasive internal fixation. The Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) is an internal fixation plate that combines closed fixation of the distal femur using an anatomically pre-contoured plate with locked unicortical screws. Study aim. The purpose of this multicentre study was to review the use of the LISS plate in three regional centres with respect to fracture healing between different severities of fractures. Materials and methods. Patients treated with a LISS plate for a distal femoral fracture (AO/OTA Type 33A1 to 33C3) between 1st January 2004 and 1st June 2008 were recruited. Demographic data plus mechanism of injury, type of fracture, injury severity scores (ISS) and complications were documented. Subgroup statistical analysis using SPSS for Windows v. 17 was conducted to determine differences in the mean ISS, operating time, length of hospitalisation and ultimately, the time taken for union between groups of different fracture severities (Type 33A vs. Type 33C fractures). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results. Across the 3 regional centres, a total of 88 patients presented with a distal femoral fracture, of which 44 were treated with a LISS plate. The mean age of the patients was 66.1 (range 9 - 99), with 15 males and 29 females. There were 14 Type 33A1, 13 Type 33A2, 6 Type 33A3, 1 Type 33B2, 1 Type 33C1, 5 Type 33C2 and 4 Type 33C3 fractures. Union was achieved within an average of 14.7 weeks (range 8 - 25) in 33 cases. Five cases exhibited non-union and were managed by a retrograde nail or another locking compression plate. Six cases developed delayed union. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with Type 33C (n = 10) fractures presented with a significantly greater mean ISS score (12.7 vs. 10.0, p = 0.031), endured longer operating time (203.7 minutes vs. 125.8 minutes, p = 0.016) and spent longer in hospital compared to Type 33A (n = 33) fractures (35.3 days vs. 12.5 days, p = 0.004). However, no difference in the mean time for radiological union between the groups was observed (16.4 weeks vs. 13.6 weeks, p = 0.058). Discussion. We observed an overall success rate of 75% (33 out of 44 cases) as fractures reached radiological union within an average of 14.7 weeks. Interestingly, despite a greater mean ISS score and operating time among Type 33C fractures, the subgroup analysis confirmed that the LISS plate is a robust treatment option across all fracture severities, as this did not translate as longer time to union compared to Type 33A fractures. However, there were 5 cases of non-union and 6 cases of delayed union in our series. These may have arisen due to lack of precision in surgical technique, as we observed 8 cases of suboptimal implant positioning. Three cases involved distal screws lacking contact with the medial cortex of the femur. Overall, our data suggest a favourable outcome for the LISS plate in the treatment of distal femoral fractures

Background. Intracapsular neck of femur fractures are one of the most common injuries seen in Orthopaedics. When the fracture is amenable to internal fixation there are 2 main treatment options, namely multiple cannulated hip screws (MCS) and 2-hole sliding hip screws (SHS). In this retrospective study we examine the outcomes associated with these two methods of internal fixation. At present there is little consensus regarding which treatment should be used. Methods. 161 patients were found to have suffered intracapsular neck of femur fracture treated with either SHS or MCS fixation over a 5 year period from April 2009 to April 2014, allowing at least 1 year follow up following injury. The patients imaging and clinical notes were then reviewed to ascertain the outcome of their treatment and any complications. Results. 93 patients were treated with a sliding hip screw compared to 68 that had been treated with cannulated screws. To ensure the fractures in each group were comparable in terms of fracture severity they were classified using gardens and pauwels score. The mean age of the group treated with SHS was 75.15 years, 7.69 years higher than those treated with MCS. The mean length of inpatient stay was 4.7 days longer for patients treated with sliding hip screws than those treated with cannulated screws, which is significantly more than would be predicted by age difference alone. Further patients were excluded for analysis of failure rate if they had not been sufficiently followed up, leaving 122 patients, 58 treated with MCS and 64 with SHS. A significantly higher (p=0.0136) proportion of patients treated with SHS (32%) suffered failure of their fixation compared to those treated with MCS (10%). The SHS group was further classified by whether or not a permanent derotation screw was employed. The use of a derotation screw provided protection against failure with a number needed to treat of 3.82, decreasing the failure rate to 14% which was not significantly more than the failure rate for MCS. Conclusions. We recommend that the first choice treatment for intracapsular neck of femur fractures amenable to internal fixation should be cannulated screws due to a lower rate of failure and shorter length of inpatient stay. If a surgeon has a strong preference for sliding hip screw we strongly recommend inserting a permanent derotation screw