Classification systems for the reporting of surgical complications have been developed and adapted for many surgical subspecialties. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the variability and frequency of reporting terms used to describe complications in ankle fracture fixation. We hypothesized that the terminology used would be highly variable and inconsistent, corroborating previous results that have suggested a need for standardized reporting terminology in orthopaedics. Ankle fracture outcome studies meeting predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for analysis by two independent observers. Terms used to define adverse events were identified and recorded. If a difference occurred between the two observers, a third observer was enlisted. Results of both observers were compared. All terms were then compiled and assessed for variability and frequency of use throughout the studies involved. Reporting terminology was subsequently grouped into 10 categories. In the 48 studies analyzed, 301 unique terms were utilized to describe adverse events. Of these terms, 74.4% (224/301) were found in a single study each. Only one term, “infection”, was present in 50% of studies, and only 19 of 301 terms (6.3%) were used in at least 10% of papers. The category that was most frequently reported was infection, with 89.6% of studies reporting on this type of adverse event using 25 distinct terms. Other categories were “wound healing complications” (72.9% of papers, 38 terms), “bone/joint complications” (66.7% of papers, 35 terms), “hardware/implant complications” (56.3% of papers, 47 terms), “revision” (56.3% of papers, 35 terms), “cartilage/soft tissue injuries” (45.8% of papers, 31 terms), “reduction/alignment issues” (45.8% of papers, 29 terms),“medical complications” (43.8% of papers, 32 terms), “pain” (29.2% of papers, 16 terms) and “other complications” (20.8% of papers, 13 terms). There was a 78.6% interobserver agreement in the identification of adverse terms across the 48 studies included. The reporting terminology utilized to describe adverse events in ankle fracture fixation was found to be highly variable and inconsistent. This variability prevents accurate reporting of adverse events and makes the analysis of potential outcomes difficult. The development of standardized reporting terminology in orthopaedics would be instrumental in addressing these challenges and allow for more accurate and consistent outcomes reporting

The effect of early surgery on hip fracture outcomes has received considerable study and although it has been suggested that early surgical treatment of these fractures leads to better patient outcomes, the findings are inconclusive. The American College of Surgeon's (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) prospectively collects blinded, risk-adjusted patient-level data on surgical patients in over 600 participating hospitals worldwide. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of ACS-NSQIP hospital patients that are currently being treated within the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) time to hip fracture surgery benchmark. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for missing the benchmark, and determine if the benchmark is associated with improved 30-day patient outcomes. Patients that underwent hip fracture surgery between 2005–2013 and entered in the ACS-NSQIP database were included in the study. Counts and proportions were used to determine how frequently the NICE benchmark was met. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of missing the NICE benchmark and determine if missing the benchmark was associated with 30-day mortality/complications rates. 26,006 patients met the study enrolment criteria. 71.4% of patients were treated within the NICE benchmark and 89.4% were treated by post-admission day two. Gender, dyspnea, infectious illness, bleeding disorders, preoperative hematocrit, preoperative platelet count, arthroplasty procedure type, race other than White, and hip fracture diagnosis were all statistically significant predictors of missing the benchmark (p<0.01). Meeting the NICE benchmark was not associated with reductions in major complications (OR=0.93, CI=0.83–1.05, p=0.23), nor a clinically significant difference in postoperative length of stay (LOS) (parameter estimate=0.77, p<0.01); however, it was associated with a decreased 30-day mortality (OR=0.88, CI=0.78–0.99, p=0.03) and the likelihood of minor complications (OR=0.92, CI=0.84–0.995, p=0.04). ACS-NSQIP hospitals are currently compatible with the NICE benchmark. However, data from the ACS-NSQIP database suggests that surgical treatment within the NICE benchmark may be unnecessarily narrow. Extending the benchmark to post-operative day two did not significantly increase the risk of 30-day mortality and minor complications; nor did it extend the average LOS. Neither the NICE benchmark, nor the extended two-day standard, was associated with reductions in major complications. The findings highlight the importance of further prospective investigation to monitor the effect of time to surgery benchmarks

Aims

Now that we are in the deceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus has shifted to how to safely reinstate elective operating. Regional and speciality specific data is important to guide this decision-making process. This study aimed to review 30-day mortality for all patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery during the peak of the pandemic within our region.

Aims

To determine the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaediatric admissions and fracture clinics within a regional integrated care system (ICS).

The ideal operative treatment of displaced sub capital femoral fractures in the elderly is controversial. Recently, randomised controlled trials have suggested a better outcome with the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat displaced intra capsular fractures of the femur for elderly patients in good health. More recently the concept of dual mobility cups is being promoted to avoid dislocations in this cohort of patients. However, overall there is limited evidence to support the choice between different types of arthroplasty. Dislocation remains a main concern with THA, especially when a posterior approach is used. We analysed the outcome of 115 primary THR (112 cements and 3 uncemented) THR using a posterior approach with soft tissue repair in active elderly patients presenting with displaced intra capsular femoral neck fractures. Size 28 mm head was used in 108 and a size 32 mm head in the rest. All surgery was performed by specialist hip surgeons. Satisfactory results were noted in terms of pain control, return to pre-morbid activity and radiological evidence of bone implant osteo-integration. The 30-day mortality was nil. There were two dislocations and only one needed revision surgery due to recurrent dislocation. In conclusion, with optimal patient selection, THA seems to provide a good functional outcome and pain relief in the management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Excellent outcome can be achieved when done well using the standard cemented THR and with 28mm head. A good soft tissue repair and a specialist hip surgeon is preferable

A ceramic is currently considered as the most ideal articulation in primary THA. The authors evaluated clinicoradiographic results and complications of cementless THA with 3rd generation of ceramic bearing. From April 2001 to January 2008, 310 primary THAs were performed in 300 patients using 3rd generation of ceramic bearing. In results, Harris hip score at last follow up was improved to an average of 95.4 points from 51.6 points preoperatively. In all cases, fixations around implants were stable and there was no osteolysis. Complications were dislocations, squeaking, ceramic femoral head and liner fracture. Our outcomes using cementless THA with 3rd generation of ceramic articulation were satisfactory, but more clinical study and investigation will be necessary to reduce complications

Introduction. Traditionally complex spinal surgery in Belfast has been performed at the Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH). Since an amalgamation the RVH has become effectively the level 1 trauma centre for the province. The ever increasing complexity of spinal surgery in addition to changes in practice such as the management of metastatic spinal cord, are placing significant demands on the service. At a time when resources are scarce trends in patient profiles are highly important to allow adequate planning of our service. Aim. To establish trends in patient profiles in a level one trauma centre also managing spinal pathology over the last 10 years and to examine the impact of this on our service. Methods. The Fracture Outcome Research Data base (FORD) was interrogated to provide data for patient profiles from 2000 to 2010. The Hospital planning and performance department contacted for finance data. Results. In 2000 the most common admission was for a fractured neck of femur (n=1014). This has not significantly changed over the ten years. In 2000 fractured tibia (n= 386), fractured forearms (n= 324), fractured ankles (n= 312) and spinal cases (n=335) were admitted. By 2010 a 49% increase had occurred in spinal admissions making them the second most common patient admitted to the unit. Of spinal case admissions, tumours have increased by 333%, spinal fractures by 10%, cervical disc surgery by 163% and suspected cauda equine cases by a staggering 537%. Conclusions. The throughput of spinal admissions to the unit has significantly increased between 2000 and 2010 making them now the second most common admission to the unit. The impact of this on bed days, theatre usage and oncall arrangements is huge and must be taken into account in stratregic planning of our service especially given the background of ongoing financial constraint

We have a national UK database for hip fracture outcome. It has been developed synchronously with an agreed care pathway that is multi-disciplinary, including surgeons, anaesthetists, geriatricians, osteoporosis experts, healthcare managers and lay charities. Care has been improved and audit established for future evolution. The database started in 2007 and now includes 85 units. The synchronous care pathway deals with falls and osteoporosis prevention, perioperative multi-disciplinary care, rehabilitation and outcome results. Key issues are avoidance of delay and cancellation of surgery and how we deal with patients with medical co-morbidities. Outcome is analysed prospectively to take account of co-morbidities and variations in surgical techniques. The care pathway and data base are now universally accepted as a national priority with advice for all UK trauma units to participate. Of the 121 registered units, only 85 actively contribute data. The cost and staff needs for data input are now accepted. To date, 12,983 clinical cases have been entered. Variation of trauma theatre list operating time per head of population and other related resource has been highlighted. This has been accepted by politicians and health managers. The NHS Institute of Improvement has started a rapid improvement plan to support units with poor resource/audit outcome. It is early days in terms of validity of outcome data for technical variations in treatment eg. fixation/replacement/use of bone cement. We have a national increase in resouce for hip fractures. We now have some logic to interaction between surgeons and medics/managers. Objectively struggling units get active support. We accept the possible lack of validity of some outcome data. Some units who look bad on paper should not be disadvantaged

Purpose. Conservative treatment of minimally displaced distal radius fractures (DFR) remains controversial. Circumferential casting (CC) in the acute setting is believed to supply superior support compared to splinting, but is generally cautioned due to the limited capacity of a cast to accommodate ongoing limb swelling possibly leading to complications. However, there is no conclusive data on which to base these beliefs. Moreover, the appropriate management of cast complications while minimizing risk to fracture integrity remains unclear. This retrospective study of distal radius fractures treated conservatively with circumferential cast in the acute setting aims to: A. Determine demographic, fracture dependant or management risk factors for CC complications. B. Determine the natural history for both patients with CC and those with CC necessitating cast modification. Method. Hospital records and radiographic data of 316 patients with DRFs treated with CC at a tertiary-care university hospital between the years 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Our primary outcome was to access risk factors for cast complications including swelling, pressure sores, neuropathies and loss of cast immobilization. Our secondary outcome accessed reduction stability in patients undergoing cast re-manipulation. Results. 31% of patients experienced cast related complications within the first two weeks of treatment. 22% of patients had their cast manipulated (replaced, split, trimmed or windowed). Increasing patient age or polytrauma were both associated with an increased risk of developing cast complications. Polytrauma was also associated with a poor overall rate of fracture reduction following non-operative management. Patient gender, physician specialty placing the cast as well as fracture type (AO classification) did not influence risk. Overall, patients with acute cast complications had no increased risk of losing reduction compared to patients with normal management. However, patients who complained of pressure in cast had a higher risk of loss reduction if their cast was split as opposed to being replaced. Conclusion. Circumferential casting in the acute setting of minimally displaced DRF reduces the workload of an orthopedic department. No previous study has shown improved fracture outcome compared to CC using other immobilization methods. This study has identified that elderly patients and polytrauma patients are at greater risk of returning to clinic for cast complications. Furthermore, replacing a cast as opposed to splitting it when accommodating painful swelling may aid in maintaining reduction integrity

The management of patients with displaced intra-capsular hip fractures is usually a hip hemiarthoplasty procedure. NICE guideline 124 published in 2011 suggested that Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery should be considered in a sub group of patients with no cognitive impairment, who walk independently and are medically fit for a major surgical procedure. The Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital manages approximately 600 patients every year who have sustained a fracture of neck of femur, of which approximately 90 patients fit the above criteria. Prior to the guideline less than 20% of this sub-group were treated with a THR whereas after the guideline over 50% of patients were treated with THR, performed by sub-specialist Hip surgeons. This change was achieved by active leadership, incorporation of ‘Firebreak’ lists, looking for cases, flexible use of theatre time and operating lists and the nomination of an individual senior doctor who was tasked with a mission to improve practice. This practice is financially viable; the Trust makes over £1000 per THR for fracture. Complete outcome data at 120 days show significantly fewer patients stepping down a rung in terms of both independent living and independent walking

High energy chest trauma resulting in flail chest injury is associated with increased rates of patient morbidity. Operative fixation of acute rib fractures is thought to reduce morbidity by reducing pain and improving chest mechanics enabling earlier ventilator weaning. A variety of operative techniques have been described and we report on our unit's experience of acute rib fracture fixation. Over 18 months, 10 patients have undergone acute rib fracture fixation. Outcome measures included; patient demographics, time ventilated pre-operatively, time ventilated post-operatively and time spent on ITU/HDU post operatively. The mean time from presentation to surgery was 5 days (range 2–12 days). The mean time ventilated post operatively was 2 days (range 1–4 days) and the mean number of days spent on ITU/HDU post-operatively was 6 days (range 2–11 days). Our results appear positive in terms of time spent ventilated post-operatively but no conclusion can be drawn as we have no comparable non-operative group. We have however shown, that rib fracture fixation can be carried out successfully and safely in a trauma centre. Further evidence on rib fracture fixation is required from a large, multi-centre randomised controlled trial