Abstract. Introduction. Distal Femoral Fractures around a Total Knee Replacement have a reported incidence of 0.25–2.3% of primary TKRs. Literature suggests that these fractures have high complication rates such as non union and revision. Methodology. A retrospective case note review was undertaken of all patients who sustained a distal femoral fracture around a TKR from April 2014-April 2021. Data parameters collected included patient demographics, classification of fracture, management, post op mobility, fracture union and mortality. Results. 52 distal femoral fractures were recorded, out of which 5 patients had bilateral fractures. The average age was 83.6 years (61–101). 41 fractures were managed operatively with 61% undergoing ORIF, 37% undergoing Distal Femoral Replacement & 2% undergoing a retrograde IM Nail. The median LOS was 22 days (11–85) for patients treated with DFR versus 10 (3–75) for those undergoing an ORIF. 60% of DFR patients were discharged home compared to 56% of those who underwent an ORIF. All the DFR patients were FWB post op compared to ORIF 24%. Conclusion. Over a 7 year study period, 52 distal femoral fractures were reviewed. Despite FWB status post op, patients undergoing a DFR had a longer length of stay and less were discharged home compared to the ORIF group. Given the cost of a distal femoral replacement (£4485-6500) compared to £212-297 for a locking plate, in order to get patients FWB post operatively potentially dual plating (medial and lateral) may need to be considered if the fracture is amenable to improve stability & allow FWB

Abstract. Introduction. COMPOSE describes the demographics, fracture characteristics, management and associated outcomes of knee femoral periprosthetic fractures (KFPPF). Methods. Multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted 01/01/2018-31/12/2018. Data collected included: patient demographics, social and mobility characteristics, fracture characteristics, management strategy and post-treatment outcomes (length of stay, reoperation, readmission, 30-day and 12-month mortality). Results. 785 PPFs from 27 NHS sites were included in the COMPOSE cohort. Of these 162 (21%) were related to an isolated knee prosthesis (151 femur, 10 tibia and 1 patella). The KFPPF group had a mean age of 81.1 years, 127 (84%) female, 114 (76%) living in their own home, with 99 (63%) reliant on walking aids/bedbound. Most fractures were B (58%) or C (35%) type and occurred around a primary cemented replacement (141,94%) at a mean of 8.2 years after surgery. 116 (76.8%) KFPPFs were treated operatively. Mean time to surgery was 5 days and the commonest surgical strategy was fixation alone (64%) vs revision+/-fixation (36%). Mean operative time was 126 minutes and 11 (10%) patients required ITU/HDU admission after surgery. Mean LOS was 22 days and 47 patients (31%) experienced a complication prior to discharge. Overall, 5 patients (3%) had a further operation within 12 months, 7 (5%) were readmitted within 30 days and the 30-day and 12-month mortality were 6.6% and 23.2% respectively. Conclusions. KFPPF patients are elderly and frail and have mortality, re-operation and readmission rates comparable to hip fracture patients. However, they wait longer for surgery and surgical treatment is more complex

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality.

This review considers the surgical treatment of displaced fractures involving the knee in elderly, osteoporotic patients. The goals of treatment include pain control, early mobilisation, avoidance of complications and minimising the need for further surgery. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) frequently results in loss of reduction, which can result in post-traumatic arthritis and the occasional conversion to total knee replacement (TKR). TKR after failed internal fixation is challenging, with modest functional outcomes and high complication rates. TKR undertaken as treatment of the initial fracture has better results to late TKR, but does not match the outcome of primary TKR without complications. Given the relatively infrequent need for late TKR following failed fixation, ORIF is the preferred management for most cases. Early TKR can be considered for those patients with pre-existing arthritis, bicondylar femoral fractures, those who would be unable to comply with weight-bearing restrictions, or where a single definitive procedure is required.