Aims. To establish our early clinical results of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial component introduced in 2013 and compare it to other designs in use at our hospital during the same period. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 166 (154 patients) consecutive cemented, fixed bearing, posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs (ATTUNE) at one hospital performed by five surgeons. These were compared with a reference cohort of 511 knees (470 patients) of other designs (seven manufacturers) performed at the same hospital by the same surgeons. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or follow-up times between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was revision performed or pending. Results. In total, 19 (11.5%) ATTUNE study TKAs have been revised at a mean 30.3 months (SD 15), and loosening of the tibial component was seen in 17 of these (90%). Revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees. There was no difference between the 31 knees revised or with revision pending and the remaining 135 study knees in terms of patient characteristics, type of bone cement (p = 0.988), or individual surgeon (p = 0.550). In the reference cohort, there were significantly fewer knees revised (n = 13, 2.6%) and with revision pending (n = 8, 1.5%) (both p < 0.001), and only two had loosening of the tibial component as the reason for revision. Conclusion. This new TKA design had an unexpectedly high early rate of revision compared with our reference cohort of TKAs. Debonding of the tibial component was the most common reason for failure. Additional longer-term follow-up studies of this specific component and techniques for implantation are warranted. The version of the ATTUNE tibial component implanted in this study has undergone modifications by the manufacturer. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):137–144

Purpose of the study. Assessing medium term outcome of medial Uni compartmental replacement and whether there is a difference in outcome between mobile and fixed bearing variants of the same prosthesis. Methods. Knee outcome was assessed in 150 patients (81 male, 69 females, mean age 67.0±10.4yrs) undergoing medial UKR knee (Uniglide, Corin Medical, UK) using either fixed or mobile bearing prosthesis between 2002-2007. All operations were performed by members of the Bristol knee group. All patients were scored using the American Knee Score (AKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and WOMAC pre-operatively and at 2-year follow up. The mobile group (n=93) comprised 43 males and 50 females, aged 62.8±8.9yrs. The fixed bearing group (n=57) comprised 38 males and 19 females, aged 74±8.8yrs. Results. Pre-operative measures of AKS, OKS, and WOMAC did not significantly differ between mobile and fixed bearing groups (p>0.05) with scores in the range of 111-113 out of 175, 19.6 out of 48, and 36.7-37.5 out 60, in the AKS, OKS, and WOMAC respectively. Two-year follow up scores for AKS, OKS, and WOMAC demonstrated a significant (p<0.0001) improvement in function with scores ranging from 167-171, 33.1-34.5, and 23.3-24.8 points respectively. No significant difference was observed at 2-year follow up between mobile or fixed bearing groups (p>0.05). Discussion. Two-year follow up outcome scores demonstrated a significant improvement in patient function for both fixed and mobile bearing prostheses compared with pre-operative scores, with no differences in outcome observed between mobile or fixed bearing devices

Abstract. Introduction. Medial fix bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) designs are consider safe and effective implants with many registries data and big cohort series showing excellent survivorship and clinical outcome comparable to that reported for the most expensive and surgically challenging medial UKR mobile bearing designs. However, whether all polyethylene tibial components (all-poly) provided comparable results to metal-backed modular components during medial fix bearing UKR remains unclear. There have been previous suggestions that all-poly tibia UKR implants might show unacceptable higher rates of early failure due to tibial component early loosening especially in high body max index (BMI) patients. This study aims to find out the short and long-term survival rate of all-poly tibia UKR and its relationship with implant thickness and patient demographics including sex, age, ASA and BMI. Material and Methods. we present the results of a series of 388 medial fixed bearing all-polly tibia UKR done in our institution by a single surgeon between 2007–2019. Results. We found out excellent implant survival with this all-poly tibia UKR design with 5 years survival rate: 96.42%, 7 years survival rate: 95.33%, and 10 years survival rate: 91.87%. Only 1.28% had early revision within 2 years. Conclusion. Fixed bearing medial all-poly tibia UKR shows excellent survivor rate at 2, 5, 7 and 10 years follow up and the survival rate is not related with sex, age, BMI, ASA grade or implant thickness. Contrary to the popular belief, we found out that only 1.71% of all implants was revised due to implant loosening

The outcome and survivorship of osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis are closely correlated to the changes in the weight bearing axis. Questions remain over the optimal correction when undertaking medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Prospective data was collected on 50 patients (30F:20M) undergoing fixed bearing medial UKR which included pre-operative and 12 month Oxford Knee Scores and pre and post-operative weight-bearing long-leg radiographs. The weight bearing axis was measured from the centre of the femoral head to the mid-point of the talus. The point at which this axis crossed the tibial plateau was expressed as a percentage of the width of that plateau - 0 (medial cortex) to 100% (lateral cortex). Regression method and correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between the response and variables. A significant correlation was seen between the 12 month score and the change in axis, which was maintained when the pre-operative score was adjusted for (p = 0.043 and 0.046 respectively). Larger changes in scores were seen with larger changes in axis (p = 0.046) when the pre-operative axis was adjusted for. Higher BMIs reported worse scores at 12 months (p = 0.022) and a smaller overall change in score one year post-operatively (p = 0.037). This significance was improved when the pre-operative scores were adjusted (p = 0.017 and 0.017 respectively). Proximity of correction of axis to the assumed contralateral normal was weakly correlated (p = 0.049) to the 12 month score, especially when BMI was corrected for. These results suggest that the weight bearing axis and BMI do play a significant role in early patient outcomes following fixed bearing unicompartmental knee replacement

Introduction. Unidirectional mobile bearing knees (RP) were developed to optimise the tibio-femoral articulation in an effort to enhance function and reduce polyethylene wear. The self aligning bearing should also benefit the patello-femoral joint further improving outcome. This study was designed to assess whether these potential benefits are realised in the clinical setting. Methods. A total of 352 patients undergoing a PS PFC Sigma TKR were randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (176 knees) or a Fixed Bearing (176 knees) tibial tray. Within each group a further randomisation for patella resurfacing versus retention was included. All knees were scored using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patella Score) by independent nurse specialists. At 5 year review there had been 38 deaths (19 in each group), 5 revisions (4 fixed, 1 RP), 7 late patella resurfacings (4 fixed, 3 RP) and a small number of other patients had withdrawn, leaving 142 fixed bearing knees and 144 mobile bearing knees for evaluation. Results. The rotating platform TKR design had no impact on range of motion, Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society knee and function scores when compared to its fixed bearing equivalent at minimum 5 year follow-up. Patella resurfacing, however, resulted in a greater improvement in knee function score from pre-op when compared to patella retention (25.5 vs 15.5, p=0.0015), with subsequent significant benefits seen in the SF-12 Physical and Total Scores (p=0.0004 and p=0.017 respectively). 5 year survivorship curves with revision for any cause as the endpoint were similar for both groups (fixed 96.2%, mobile 97.6%). This survivorship rises to 100% for both designs when considering aseptic loosening alone. Conclusion. There was no difference in performance between the fixed and RP groups. Patella resurfacing offered advantages over patella retention with this design and we would recommend its routine use

Summary. We report a large study of 331 patients at two years post operation who were prospectively randomised to receive either a rotating platform or a fixed bearing knee replacement of an otherwise identical design. Introduction. The mobile bearing total knee replacement was developed as there are theoretical benefits in that it may allow a better range of motion, better patella tracking and lower wear rates. This study was designed to see if these potential advantages are borne out in practice when using a cruciate retaining design. Methods. 331 patients undergoing TKR surgery were randomised to receive either a fixed bearing (170 patients) or a mobile bearing (161 patients). The femoral implant design was identical in the two groups. The tibial polyethylene bearing was either fixed in the metallic tibial tray (FB) or of rotating platform design (RP). All patients were assessed pre-operatively and at two years post-operatively using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patellar Score) by independent nurse specialists. Results. The groups who received the FB and the RP implants have been assessed and their pre-operative to two year outcomes analysed with regard to the improvement in the range of motion (9.1 v. 10.2 degrees), Oxford Knee Score (-19.2 v. -17.6) and American Knee Society Knee and Function scores (51.3 v. 49.5 and 25.3 v. 23.6) at two years follow up. Conclusion. This large study shows that there is no statistical difference between a FB and a RP cruciate retaining TKR at two years post operation

Introduction

Mobile-bearing TKRs allow some axial rotation and may provide a more natural patellar movement. The aim was to compare patellar kinematics among the normal knee, fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing TKR.

Introduction

There is conflicting evidence about the merits of using mobile bearings at total knee replacement (TKR), partly because most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered.

There is conflicting evidence about the merits of mobile bearings in total knee replacement, partly because most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered. We report the results of a multicentre RCT of mobile versus fixed bearings. This was part of the knee arthroplasty trial (KAT), where 539 patients were randomly allocated to mobile or fixed bearings and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) plus secondary measures including Short Form-12, EuroQol EQ-5D, costs, cost-effectiveness and need for further surgery. There was no significant difference between the groups pre-operatively: mean OKS was 17.18 (. sd. 7.60) in the mobile-bearing group and 16.49 (. sd. 7.40) in the fixed-bearing group. At five years mean OKS was 33.19 (. sd. 16.68) and 33.65 (. sd. 9.68), respectively. There was no significant difference between trial groups in OKS at five years (-1.12 (95% confidence interval -2.77 to 0.52) or any of the other outcome measures. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with knee-related re-operations or in total costs. In this appropriately powered RCT, over the first five years after total knee replacement functional outcomes, re-operation rates and healthcare costs appear to be the same irrespective of whether a mobile or fixed bearing is used. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:486–92

Aims

It has been suggested that mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) might lead to better outcomes by accommodating some femorotibial rotational mismatch, thereby reducing contact stresses and polyethylene wear. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing versions of a contemporary TKA with respect to durability, range of movement (ROM) and function, ten years postoperatively.

Aims. Uncemented mobile bearing designs in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have seen an increase over the last decade. However, there are a lack of large-scale studies comparing survivorship of these specific designs to commonly used cemented mobile and fixed bearing designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of these designs. Methods. A total of 21,610 medial UKAs from 2007 to 2018 were selected from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare uncemented mobile bearings with cemented mobile and fixed bearings. Adjustments were made for patient and surgical factors, with their interactions being considered. Reasons and type of revision in the first two years after surgery were assessed. Results. In hospitals performing less than 100 cases per year, cemented mobile bearings reported comparable adjusted risks of revision as uncemented mobile bearings. However, in hospitals performing more than 100 cases per year, the adjusted risk of revision was higher for cemented mobile bearings compared to uncemented mobile bearings (hazard ratio 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.34 to 2.35)). The adjusted risk of revision between cemented fixed bearing and uncemented mobile bearing was comparable, independent of annual hospital volume. In addition, 12.3% of uncemented mobile bearing, 20.3% of cemented mobile bearing, and 41.5% of uncemented fixed bearing revisions were for tibial component loosening. The figures for instability were 23.6%, 14.5% and 11.7%, respectively, and for periprosthetic fractures were 10.0%, 2.8%, and 3.5%. Bearing exchange was the type of revision in 40% of uncemented mobile bearing, 24.3% of cemented mobile bearing, and 5.3% cemented fixed bearing revisions. Conclusion. The findings of this study demonstrated improved survival with use of uncemented compared to cemented mobile bearings in medial UKA, only in those hospitals performing more than 100 cases per year. Cemented fixed bearings reported comparable survival results as uncemented mobile bearings, regardless of the annual hospital volume. The high rates of instability, periprosthetic fractures, and bearing exchange in uncemented mobile bearings emphasize the need for further research. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1261–1269

Aims. The primary objective of this study was to compare migration of the cemented ATTUNE fixed bearing cruciate retaining tibial component with the cemented Press-Fit Condylar (PFC)-sigma fixed bearing cruciate retaining tibial component. The secondary objectives included comparing clinical and radiological outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Methods. A single blinded randomized, non-inferiority study was conducted including 74 patients. Radiostereometry examinations were made after weight bearing, but before hospital discharge, and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. PROMS were collected preoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Radiographs for measuring radiolucencies were collected at two weeks and two years postoperatively. Results. The overall migration (mean maximum total point motion (MPTM)) at two years was comparable: mean 1.13 mm (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97 to 1.30) for the ATTUNE and 1.16 mm (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.35) for the PFC-sigma. At two years, the mean backward tilting was -0.43° (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.21) for the ATTUNE and 0.08° (95% CI -0.16 to 0.31), for the PFC-sigma. Overall migration between the first and second postoperative year was negligible for both components. The clinical outcomes and PROMs improved compared with preoperative scores and were not different between groups. Radiolucencies at the implant-cement interface were mainly seen below the medial baseplate: 17% in the ATTUNE and 3% in the PFC-sigma at two weeks, and at two years 42% and 9% respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion. In the first two postoperative years the initial version of the ATTUNE tibial component was not inferior with respect to overall migration, although it showed relatively more backwards tilting and radiolucent lines at the implant-cement interface than the PFC-sigma. The version of the ATTUNE tibial component examined in this study has subsequently undergone modification by the manufacturer. Level of Evidence: 1 (randomized controlled clinical trial). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1158–1166

Introduction. Both mobile bearing and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have demonstrated clinical success. However, much debate persists about the superiority of a single design. Currently most clinical data is based on high volume centers data, however to reduce bias, we undertook a through review of retrospective national joint registries. In this study, we aim to investigate UKA implant utilization and survivorship between 2000 and 2018. Methods. Ten annual joint registry reports of various nations were reviewed. Due to the variable statistical methods of reporting implant use and survivorship we focused on three registries: Australia (AOANJRR), New Zealand (NZJR), United Kingdom (NJR) for uniformity. We evaluated UKA usage, survivorship, utilization and revision rates for each implant. Implant survivorship was reported in the registries and was compared within nations due to variation in statistical reporting. Results. UKAs accounted for 7.24–10.3% of all primary knee surgeries. The most popular implants were, in order of popularity, the Oxford (ZimmerBiomet, Warsaw IN), ZUK (Smith & Nephew, Memphis TN / LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy), Sigma HP (DePuy, Warsaw IN), Miller-Galante (ZimmerBiomet Warsaw IN), and Preservation (DePuy, Warsaw IN) models. UKA revision rates varied by nation and ranged from 8.22%–12.8%. The Sigma HP and ZUK designs had the lowest total percent revised in the registries-Australian (3.6% and 5.1%, respectively) and New Zealand (2.5% and 1.96%, respectively)-and demonstrated among the highest 10-year survivorship in the United Kingdom registry. The United Kingdom registry reports a greater number of mobile versus fixed bearing UKA undergoing revision for dislocation and/or subluxation and instability. Conclusion. Preference for implant design as well as survivorship rates varied significantly by nation. The fixed bearing ZUK and Sigma HP implants were among the highest performing implants across the three registries

Purpose. The aim of the present study was to look at survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene tibial component. Materials and Methods. We report the survivorship of 91 fixed bearing unicompartmental arthroplasties with all-polyethylene tibial components (Preservation DePuy UK), which were used for medial compartment osteoarthritis in 79 patients between 2004 and 2007. The satisfaction level of patients who had not undergone revision of the implant was also recorded. For comparison, we reviewed 49 mobile bearing unicompartmental arthroplasties (Oxford UKA Biomet UK Ltd), which had been used in 44 patients between 1998 and 2007. Results. Mean length of follow up of patients with the fixed bearing implant was 44.7 months (range 24 - 74 months) and for the mobile bearing replacement, the mean follow up was 67.6 months (24 - 119). In the fixed bearing design, at maximum follow up period of 74 months, 8 implants (8.8%) had been revised (or were listed for revision) to total knee replacement and in the mobile bearing design over the maximum follow up period of 119 months there had been only one revision (2.0%). Patients who had not undergone revision were asked if they were satisfied with their knee following the unicompartmental arthroplasty. In the fixed bearing design, 83.5% said that they were satisfied with the outcome of the operation compared to 93.9% of the patients receiving the mobile bearing design. Conclusion. We conclude that there is a higher incidence of revision of this fixed bearing design using an all-polyethylene tibial component compared to the mobile bearing design. We found that those patients who had not required revision had a lower rate of satisfaction with the fixed bearing compared to the mobile bearing design

Introduction. Kneeling ability is better in unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty. There is also an impression that mobile bearing knees achieve better functional outcome than their fixed bearing cousins in unicompartmental and to a lesser extent total joint arthroplasty. In the UK, the market leading unicompartmental replacement is mobile bearing. Aim. To analyse kneeling ability after total and unicompartmental knee replacement using mobile and fixed bearing inserts. Methods. In our department there are two prospective randomised studies (fixed versus mobile) in this area. For total knee arthroplasty, 207 TKR patients receiving the same prosthesis (Rotaglide, Corin, UK) were randomised into mobile bearing (102 patients, mean age of 53 years) or fixed bearing (105 patients, mean age of 55 years). Regarding unicondylar knees, data was collected on 352 UKR patients who received the same implant (Uniglide - previously known as AMC - Corin, UK). Within this group there was a randomised controlled trial of fixed v mobile bearings: 52 patients (mean age 62 years) had a mobile insert and 57 (mean age 65 yrs) had a fixed insert. Data was also collected on patients undergoing fixed bearing lateral unicondylar replacement (Uniglide). All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, (where 0 = bad and 48 = good). There kneeling ability (question 7) and total Oxford scores were analysed. We are currently collecting objective data on post-operative kneeling ability with force plate analysis and subjective anterior knee-specific scoring systems. Results. Subjective kneeling ability: Oxford Knee Score Question 7 as range 0-4, where 4 = good. Conclusion. Both fixed and mobile UKR and TKR have good outcome. No group produced good kneeling ability, but there was a modest improvement in all groups from the preoperative kneeling scores. Fixed bearing knee replacement showed better outcome than mobile bearing knees, in both UKR and TKR groups

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to use patient generated digital surveillance PROM's to track outcomes of TKA, Medial PKA, Lateral PKA. Methods. From Aug 2018 until June 2019 we performed 873 knee arthroplasties. Of these, 41 were fixed bearing lateral partial knee replacements (5%), 309 medial partial knee replacements (35%), and 523 total knee replacements (60%). The average age was 65 years old and 59% were female. KOOS-Jr scores were recorded preoperatively, and 6, 12 months postoperatively using digital surveillance technology with a greater than 90% response rate. Results. Baseline, 6 month, and 12 month KOOS-JR scores for TKR (54, 76, 79) were not different than baseline, 6 month, and 12 month KOOS-JR scores for medial PKA (56, 78, 82) [p values of 0.23, 0.32, 0.20 respectively]. Baseline and 6 month KOOS-JR scores for TKR were not different than baseline and 6 month KOOS-JR scores for lateral PKA (55, 77) [p values of 0.35 and 0.50 respectively). Where as, the 12 month KOOS-JR scores for TKR (79) were significantly less than 12 month KOOS-JR scores for lateral PKA (84)[p value of 0.04]. Baseline, 6 month, and 12 month KOOS-JR scores for medial PKR were not different than lateral PKR (55, 77, 84) [p values of 0.49, 0.39, 0.20]. Conclusions. Prospective digital surveillance of PROM following knee arthroplasty has proven to be a cost-effective strategy. Short term improvements in PROM's following TKA and medial PKA were not different. Lateral PKA demonstrated statistically significant higher 1 year PROM but unlikely clinically significant. Longer-term follow-up is needed for determination of implant and unreplaced compartment survivorship. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Previous studies comparing cruciate retaining (CR) and cruciate sacrificing - posterior stabilised (PS) TKRs have failed to demonstrate a difference in outcomes based on numbers of patients recruited. This large study compares clinical outcomes in groups having PS and CR TKR and reports the results at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Methods. A total of 683 patients undergoing TKR were consecutively enrolled in a prospective multi-centre study with 2 arms. In the first arm patients receiving a PS component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (176 patients) or fixed bearing (176 patients) implant. In the second arm, patients receiving a CR component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (161 patients) or fixed bearing (170 patients) implant. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively using standard tools (Oxford, AKSS, Patellar Score) by independent nurse specialists. The data from the 2 arms of the trial were then analysed to compare differences between PS and CR implants. Results. Patients with a PS component showed a greater improvement in the pain component of the AKSS at 1 year (p=0.0003) and at 2 years (p=0.0085) post-op. Patients with a PS also showed a greater improvement in the AKSS knee score at 1 (p=0.0001) and 2 (p=0.001) years. Range of motion (ROM) improvement was also greater in the PS group at 1 (p=0.0001) and 2 (p=0.0170) years. PS knees also achieved better outcomes in these variables in both mobile and fixed subgroups. There were no other significant differences in the scores between the two groups at any stage. Conclusion. Improvements in pain and knee components of the AKSS score and ROM at both 1 and 2 years follow-up were greater in PS knees. Although this difference was statistically significant, differences in real terms were relatively small

Aims. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, inpatient functional rehabilitation, time to hospital discharge, and complications in patients undergoing conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 146 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary UKA performed by a single surgeon. This included 73 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based mobile bearing UKA, followed by 73 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing UKA. All surgical procedures were performed using the standard medial parapatellar approach for UKA, and all patients underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation programme. Postoperative pain scores on the numerical rating scale and opiate analgesia consumption were recorded until discharge. Time to attainment of predefined functional rehabilitation outcomes, hospital discharge, and postoperative complications were recorded by independent observers. Results. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased opiate analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001), and increased maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based UKA. Mean time to hospital discharge was reduced in robotic UKA compared with conventional UKA (42.5 hours (. sd 5.9). vs 71.1 hours (. sd. 14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups within 90 days’ follow-up. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced opiate analgesia requirements, improved early functional rehabilitation, and shorter time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based UKA

Intro/Purpose. Lateral partial knee replacement is indicated as an alternative to total knee replacement for isolated end stage lateral compartment degenerative joint disease. The purpose of this study is to report the surgical technique and clinical results of a large series of lateral partial knee replacements from two institutions. Methods. A retrospective review identified 205 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty procedures performed in two practices over a six-year period (Aug 2011 – June 2017). Patients indicated for surgery met specific preoperative clinical and radiographic criteria confirming lateral compartment arthritic disease with a correctable deformity, intact full-thickness medial cartilage, competent anterior cruciate ligament, and minimal disease in the patellofemoral compartment. A single cemented fixed bearing tibial component design was used in all cases specifically designed for lateral compartment anatomy. Results. The average age was 65 years old and 76% were female. Average follow-up in the lateral partials was 1.7 years (range 0.5 years to 6 years). Knee Society Scores improved from 45 (pre-op) to 88 points (post-op). Range of motion improved from 6–115o (pre-op) to 0–122 o (post-op). No knees were revised to a TKA. One knee had an additional medial partial knee placed at 1.1 years post lateral partial knee replacement for medial disease progression. Two knees required an irrigation and debridement for traumatic wound dehiscence. Conclusion. This is the largest series of lateral partial knee replacements reported. Clinical improvements, range of motion, and survivorship were excellent at short-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up is needed for additional understanding of a novel implant designed specifically for the lateral compartment and the survivorship of the unreplaced compartments. We believe the lateral partial knee replacement to be a viable option for isolated lateral compartment disease in approximately 4% of patients

Introduction. Robotic technology has been applied to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in order to improve surgical precision in prosthetic component placement, restore knee anatomic surfaces, and provide a more physiologic ligament tensioning throughout the knee range of motion. Recent literature has demonstrated high reliability of robotic-arm assisted UKA in component placement and executing a soft-tissue tensioning plan, with excellent short-term survivorship. Few studies have investigated survivorship and patients' satisfaction at longer follow-ups. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship, clinical results and patients' satisfaction of robotic-arm assisted UKAs at a mid-term follow-up, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Methods. The present retrospective study includes 252 patients (260 knees) who underwent robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing metal backed UKAs at a single centre between April 2011 and July 2013. The mean age at surgery was 66.2 years (SD 8.6). Post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS) and asked about their satisfaction level after knee surgery (grade from 1 to 5). Post-operative complications were recorded. Failure mechanisms, revisions and reoperations were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated, considering reoperation for all causes and revision as the events of interest. Results. A total of 223 patients (231 robotic-arm assisted UKAs) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years post-operatively (88.5% follow-up rate, min. 60 months, max. 87 months). In 219 cases, a medial robotic-arm assisted UKA was implanted, in 12 cases a lateral implant was performed. Five medial robotic-arm assisted UKAs were revised, resulting in a survivorship of 98% (C.I. 96.0%–99.1%). One case underwent revision for prosthetic joint infection, one for tibial aseptic loosening, one for post-traumatic tibial plateau fracture, and two for unexplained pain. No lateral robotic-arm assisted UKAs were revised, resulting in a survivorship of 100%. On average, the FJS and the satisfaction level resulted 75.6 (SD 26.1) and 4.2 (SD 1.0) in medial UKAs, and 81.7 (SD 15.3) and 4.4 (SD 0.8) in lateral UKAs, respectively. In medial UKAs 83% of the examined cohort reported good/excellent FJS outcomes, while 92% of the lateral UKA patients had good/excellent FJS results. In medial UKAs, male patients resulted to have better FJS (p<0.01) and higher satisfaction level (p<0.03) compared to female patients, while no outcome differences were reported in patients with BMI>30 and among different age groups. Given the small number of lateral UKAs included in the present patients' cohort, no statistical analysis was performed on this group. Conclusion. In the present study, survivorship and clinical outcomes of a large cohort of 223 patients undergoing medial and lateral robotic-arm assisted UKAs were assessed at a mean of 5.8 years of follow-up. The overall survivorship was found to be 98%, with unexplained knee pain as the most common reason for UKA revision. The present study shows that robotic-arm assisted UKA patients had lower revision rates for aseptic loosening and osteoarthritis progression compared to conventional UKA at mid-term follow-up, as reported in the literature. The good post-operative clinical scores highlight the efficacy of robotic-arm assisted UKA in restoring knee function and relieving pain. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly