Aims. To establish our early clinical results of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial component introduced in 2013 and compare it to other designs in use at our hospital during the same period. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 166 (154 patients) consecutive cemented,
Purpose of the study. Assessing medium term outcome of medial Uni compartmental replacement and whether there is a difference in outcome between mobile and
Abstract. Introduction. Medial fix bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) designs are consider safe and effective implants with many registries data and big cohort series showing excellent survivorship and clinical outcome comparable to that reported for the most expensive and surgically challenging medial UKR mobile bearing designs. However, whether all polyethylene tibial components (all-poly) provided comparable results to metal-backed modular components during medial fix bearing UKR remains unclear. There have been previous suggestions that all-poly tibia UKR implants might show unacceptable higher rates of early failure due to tibial component early loosening especially in high body max index (BMI) patients. This study aims to find out the short and long-term survival rate of all-poly tibia UKR and its relationship with implant thickness and patient demographics including sex, age, ASA and BMI. Material and Methods. we present the results of a series of 388 medial
The outcome and survivorship of osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis are closely correlated to the changes in the weight bearing axis. Questions remain over the optimal correction when undertaking medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Prospective data was collected on 50 patients (30F:20M) undergoing
Introduction. Unidirectional mobile bearing knees (RP) were developed to optimise the tibio-femoral articulation in an effort to enhance function and reduce polyethylene wear. The self aligning bearing should also benefit the patello-femoral joint further improving outcome. This study was designed to assess whether these potential benefits are realised in the clinical setting. Methods. A total of 352 patients undergoing a PS PFC Sigma TKR were randomly allocated to receive either a Mobile Bearing (176 knees) or a
Summary. We report a large study of 331 patients at two years post operation who were prospectively randomised to receive either a rotating platform or a
Mobile-bearing TKRs allow some axial rotation and may provide a more natural patellar movement. The aim was to compare patellar kinematics among the normal knee, fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing TKR. Optical computer navigation (Brainlab) was used to track the position of the femur, tibia and patella in 9 whole lower extremities (5 fresh cadavers) in the natural knee, in the same knee with the trial components of a posterior stabilised fixed-bearing TKR (FB) (Sigma PFC, Depuy) and a posterior stabilised mobile-bearing TKR (MB) (Sigma RP Stabilised). The patellae were not resurfaced. Values: mean+/−one standard deviation. Statistical analysis: two tailed paired Student's T-test.Introduction
Methods
There is conflicting evidence about the merits of using mobile bearings at total knee replacement (TKR), partly because most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered. A pragmatic multicentre RCT involving 116 surgeons in 34 UK centres was begun in 1999. Within a partial factorial design, 539 patients were randomly allocated to mobile or fixed bearings. The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS); secondary measures included SF-12, EQ-5D, costs, cost-effectiveness and need for further surgery.Introduction
Methods
This randomised trial evaluated the outcome of
a single design of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee (UKA) with
either a cemented all-polyethylene or a metal-backed modular tibial
component. A total of 63 knees in 45 patients (17 male, 28 female)
were included, 27 in the all-polyethylene group and 36 in the metal-backed
group. The mean age was 57.9 years (39.6 to 76.9). At a mean follow-up
of 6.4 years (5 to 9.9), 11 all-polyethylene components (41%) were
revised (at a mean of 5.8 years; 1.4 to 8.0) post-operatively and
two metal-backed components were revised (at one and five years).
One revision in both groups was for unexplained pain, one in the
metal-backed group was for progression of osteoarthritis. The others
in the all-polyethylene group were for aseptic loosening. The survivorship
at seven years calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method for the all-polyethylene
group was 56.5% (95% CI 31.9 to 75.2, number at risk 7) and for
the metal-backed group was 93.8% (95% CI 77.3 to 98.4, number at
risk 16) This difference was statistically significant (p <
0.001).
At the most recent follow-up, significantly better mean Western
Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index Scores were found
in the all-polyethylene group (13.4 vs 23.0, p
= 0.03) but there was no difference in the mean Knee injury and
Osteoarthritis Outcome scores (68.8; 41.4 to 99.0 vs 62.6;
24.0 to 100.0), p = 0.36). There were no significant differences
for range of movement (p = 0.36) or satisfaction (p = 0.23). This randomised study demonstrates that all-polyethylene components
in this design of
Aims. Uncemented mobile bearing designs in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have seen an increase over the last decade. However, there are a lack of large-scale studies comparing survivorship of these specific designs to commonly used cemented mobile and
Aims. The primary objective of this study was to compare migration of the cemented ATTUNE
Introduction. Both mobile
Purpose. The aim of the present study was to look at survivorship and patient satisfaction of a
Introduction. Kneeling ability is better in unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty. There is also an impression that mobile bearing knees achieve better functional outcome than their
Introduction. The purpose of this study was to use patient generated digital surveillance PROM's to track outcomes of TKA, Medial PKA, Lateral PKA. Methods. From Aug 2018 until June 2019 we performed 873 knee arthroplasties. Of these, 41 were
There is conflicting evidence about the merits
of mobile bearings in total knee replacement, partly because most randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered. We report
the results of a multicentre RCT of mobile versus fixed
bearings. This was part of the knee arthroplasty trial (KAT), where
539 patients were randomly allocated to mobile or fixed bearings
and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome measure
was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) plus secondary measures including
Short Form-12, EuroQol EQ-5D, costs, cost-effectiveness and need
for further surgery. There was no significant difference between the groups pre-operatively:
mean OKS was 17.18 (. sd. 7.60) in the mobile-bearing group
and 16.49 (. sd. 7.40) in the fixed-bearing group. At five
years mean OKS was 33.19 (. sd. 16.68) and 33.65 (. sd. 9.68),
respectively. There was no significant difference between trial
groups in OKS at five years (-1.12 (95% confidence interval -2.77
to 0.52) or any of the other outcome measures. Furthermore, there
was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with
knee-related re-operations or in total costs. In this appropriately powered RCT, over the first five years
after total knee replacement functional outcomes, re-operation rates
and healthcare costs appear to be the same irrespective of whether
a mobile or
Introduction. Previous studies comparing cruciate retaining (CR) and cruciate sacrificing - posterior stabilised (PS) TKRs have failed to demonstrate a difference in outcomes based on numbers of patients recruited. This large study compares clinical outcomes in groups having PS and CR TKR and reports the results at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Methods. A total of 683 patients undergoing TKR were consecutively enrolled in a prospective multi-centre study with 2 arms. In the first arm patients receiving a PS component were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing (176 patients) or
Aims. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, inpatient functional rehabilitation, time to hospital discharge, and complications in patients undergoing conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 146 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary UKA performed by a single surgeon. This included 73 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based mobile bearing UKA, followed by 73 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted
Intro/Purpose. Lateral partial knee replacement is indicated as an alternative to total knee replacement for isolated end stage lateral compartment degenerative joint disease. The purpose of this study is to report the surgical technique and clinical results of a large series of lateral partial knee replacements from two institutions. Methods. A retrospective review identified 205 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty procedures performed in two practices over a six-year period (Aug 2011 – June 2017). Patients indicated for surgery met specific preoperative clinical and radiographic criteria confirming lateral compartment arthritic disease with a correctable deformity, intact full-thickness medial cartilage, competent anterior cruciate ligament, and minimal disease in the patellofemoral compartment. A single cemented
Introduction. Robotic technology has been applied to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in order to improve surgical precision in prosthetic component placement, restore knee anatomic surfaces, and provide a more physiologic ligament tensioning throughout the knee range of motion. Recent literature has demonstrated high reliability of robotic-arm assisted UKA in component placement and executing a soft-tissue tensioning plan, with excellent short-term survivorship. Few studies have investigated survivorship and patients' satisfaction at longer follow-ups. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship, clinical results and patients' satisfaction of robotic-arm assisted UKAs at a mid-term follow-up, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Methods. The present retrospective study includes 252 patients (260 knees) who underwent robotic-arm assisted