Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 29 - 29
1 Apr 2018
Teoh KH Whitham R Hariharan K
Full Access

Background. Fractures of the metatarsal bones are the most frequent fracture of the foot. Up to 70% involve the fifth metatarsal bone, of which approximately eighty percent are located proximally. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been shown to be a useful adjunct in the treatment of delayed fractures and non unions. However, there is no study looking at the success rate of LIPUS in fifth metatarsal fracture delayed unions. Objectives. The aim of our study was to investigate the use of LIPUS treatment for delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures. Study Design & Methods. A retrospective review of patients who were treated with LIPUS following a delayed union of fifth metatarsal fracture was conducted over a three-year period (2013 – 2015). Delayed union was defined as lack of clinical and radiological evidence of union, bony continuity or bone reaction at the fracture site if 3 months has elapsed from the initial injury. Results. There were thirty patients (9 males, 21 females) in our cohort. The average age was 39.3 years. Type 2 fractures made up 43% of our cohort. Twenty-seven (90%) patients went on to progress to union clinically and radiologically following LIPUS treatment. Smoking (p=0.014) and size of fracture gap (p=0.045) were predictive of non-union. Conclusions. This is the first study looking at the use of LIPUS in the treatment of delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures. We report a success rate of 90%. There is a role in the use of LIPUS in delayed union of fifth metatarsal fractures and can serve as an adjunct prior to consideration of surgery


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 58 - 58
1 May 2017
Akimau P Dakin W Cawthron K Chadwick C Blundell C Davies M
Full Access

Background. Avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal are some of the commonest foot injuries. The robust scientific evidence on the optimal non-operative treatment of these fractures is scant. We designed and conducted a prospective randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of symptomatic treatment versus cast immobilisation with the null hypothesis that cast immobilisation gave substantial benefit over the symptomatic treatment in terms of patient reported outcome measures(PROMs). The alternative hypothesis was that symptomatic treatment was not inferior. Methods. The primary outcome was the validated Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) score ranging from 0 to 100. The non-inferiority boundary was set at −10 points. Power sizing determined a minimum of 12 patients per group. Anticipating a significant loss to follow up, 60 patients of 16 years of age or older were randomised to receive either below knee walking cast immobilisation (n = 24) or symptomatic double- elasticated bandage (n = 36) for 4 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol-5D, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores. Data was analysed at the baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post injury by a clinician blinded to a treatment arm. Results. Symptomatic treatment proved to be non-inferior to cast immobilisation treatment in terms of VAS FA at baseline, 4 weeks and 6 months. Secondary outcomes showed similar comparative values between two treatment groups. Loss to follow up reached 43% at 6 months. The imputation of missing data was done and confirmed the non-inferiority of symptomatic treatment. Conclusions. Cast immobilisation does not appear to give benefits over symptomatic treatment of these injuries in terms of validated PROMs in adults. A significant loss to follow up should be expected with these fractures in medium term. Level of Evidence. II. Approval. NRES Yorkshire and the Humber reference: 11/YH/0297. Disclosure. This study was supported with a small research grant from a British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 42 - 42
1 Aug 2013
Ferguson K McGlynn J Kumar C Madeley N Rymaszewski L
Full Access

Fifth metatarsal fractures are common and the majority unite regardless of treatment. A sub-type of these fractures carries a risk of non-union and for this reason many centres follow up all 5. th. metatarsal fractures. In 2011, a standardised protocol was introduced to promote weight-bearing as pain allowed with a tubigrip or Velcro boot according to symptoms. No routine fracture clinic appointments were made from A&E but patients were provided with information and a help-line number to access care if required. Some patients still attended fracture clinics, but only after review of their notes/X-rays by an Orthopaedic Consultant, or after self-reported “failure to progress” using the special help-line number. Audit of a year prior to the introduction of the protocol and the year following it was performed. All x-rays taken at presentation in A&E were reviewed and classified independently (KBF/JM) for validation. During 2009/2010, 279 patients presented to A&E with a 5. th. metatarsal fracture and were referred to a fracture clinic. 106(38%) attended 1 appointment, 130(47%) attended 2 appointments and 31 (11%) attended 3 or more appointments – 491 appointments in total. 3% failed to attend the clinic. Operative fixation was performed in 3 patients (1.07%). In 2011/2012, of 339 A&E fractures, only 63 (19%) attended fracture clinic. 37 (11%) attended 1 appointment, 12 (4%) 2 and 9 (3%) 3 or more appointments – 96 appointments in total. Four patients (1.17%) required operative fixation. Our study did not demonstrate any added value for routine outpatient follow-up of 5. th. metatarsal fractures. Patients can be safely allowed to weight bear and discharged at the time of initial presentation in the A&E department if they are provided with appropriate information and access to a “help line” run by experienced fracture clinic staff. The result is a more efficient, patient-centred service


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 67 - 67
2 Jan 2024
Belvedere C
Full Access

3D accurate measurements of the skeletal structures of the foot, in physiological and impaired subjects, are now possible using Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) under real-world loading conditions. In detail, this feature allows a more realistic representation of the relative bone-bone interactions of the foot as they occur under patient-specific body weight conditions. In this context, varus/valgus of the hindfoot under altered conditions or the thinning of plantar tissues that occurs with advancing age are among the most complex and interesting to represent, and numerous measurement proposals have been proposed. This study aims to analyze and compare these measurements from CBCT in weight-bearing scans in a clinical population. Sixteen feet of diabetic patients and ten feet with severe adult flatfoot acquired before/after corrective surgery underwent CBCT scans (Carestream, USA) while standing on the leg of interest. Corresponding 3D shapes of each bone of the shank and hindfoot were reconstructed (Materialise, Belgium). Six different techniques found in the literature were used to calculate the varus/valgus deformity, i.e., the inclination of the hindfoot in the frontal plane of the shank, and the distance between the ground and the metatarsal heads was calculated along with different solutions for the identification of possible calcifications. Starting with an accurate 3D reconstruction of the skeletal structures of the foot, a wide range of measurements representing the same angle of hindfoot alignment were found, some of them very different from each other. Interesting correlations were found between metatarsal height and subject age, significant in diabetic feet for the fourth and fifth metatarsal bones. Finally, CBCT allows 3D assessment of foot deformities under loaded conditions. The observed traditional measurement differences and new measurement solutions suggest that clinicians should consider carefully the anatomical and functional concepts underlying measurement techniques when drawing clinical and surgical conclusions


The ankle radiograph is a commonly requested investigation as the ankle joint is commonly injured. Each radiograph exposes 0.01 mSv of radiation to the patient that is equivalent to 1.5 days of natural background radiation [1]. The aim of the clinical audit was to use the Ottawa Ankle Rule to attempt to reduce the number of ankle radiographs taken in patients with acute ankle injuries and hence reduce the dose of ionising radiation the patient receives. A retrospective audit was undertaken. 123 ankle radiograph requests and radiographs taken between May and July 2018 were evaluated. Each ankle radiograph request including patient history and clinical examination was graded against the Ottawa Ankle Rule. The rule states that 1 point(s) indicates radiograph series; (1) malleolar and/or midfoot pain; (1) tenderness over the posterior 6cm or tip of the lateral or medial malleolus (ankle); (1) tenderness over the navicular or the base of the fifth metatarsal (foot); (1) unable to take four steps both immediately and in the emergency department [2]. Patients who score 0 do not need radiograph series. Each radiograph was reviewed if a fracture was present or not. The clinical audit identified 14 true positives where the Ottawa Ankle Rule scored 1 and the patient had an ankle fracture, and 2 false negatives (sensitivity 88%). There were 81 false positives, and 23 true negatives (specificity 22%). Therefore, a total of 23/123 ankle radiographs were unnecessary which is equivalent to 34.5 days of background radiation. The negative predictive value of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in this audit was 92%. The low rate of Ottawa rule utilisation may unnecessarily cause patient harm that should be addressed. An educational intervention with physicians combined with integration of the Ottawa rule scoring in ankle radiograph requests is planned with re-audit in 6 months


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1114 - 1118
1 Aug 2008
Ling ZX Kumar VP

Compartment syndrome of the foot requires urgent surgical treatment. Currently, there is still no agreement on the number and location of the myofascial compartments of the foot. The aim of this cadaver study was to provide an anatomical basis for surgical decompression in the event of compartment syndrome. We found that there were three tough vertical fascial septae that extended from the hindfoot to the midfoot on the plantar aspect of the foot. These septae separated the posterior half of the foot into three compartments. The medial compartment containing the abductor hallucis was surrounded medially by skin and subcutaneous fat and laterally by the medial septum. The intermediate compartment, containing the flexor digitorum brevis and the quadratus plantae more deeply, was surrounded by the medial septum medially, the intermediate septum laterally and the main plantar aponeurosis on its plantar aspect. The lateral compartment containing the abductor digiti minimi was surrounded medially by the intermediate septum, laterally by the lateral septum and on its plantar aspect by the lateral band of the main plantar aponeurosis. No distinct myofascial compartments exist in the forefoot.

Based on our findings, in theory, fasciotomy of the hindfoot compartments through a modified medial incision would be sufficient to decompress the foot.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1660 - 1665
1 Dec 2007
Krause F Windolf M Schwieger K Weber M

A cavovarus foot deformity was simulated in cadaver specimens by inserting metallic wedges of 15° and 30° dorsally into the first tarsometatarsal joint. Sensors in the ankle joint recorded static tibiotalar pressure distribution at physiological load.

The peak pressure increased significantly from neutral alignment to the 30° cavus deformity, and the centre of force migrated medially. The anterior migration of the centre of force was significant for both the 15° (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), p = 0.021) and the 30° (repeated measures ANOVA, p = 0.007) cavus deformity. Differences in ligament laxity did not influence the peak pressure.

These findings support the hypothesis that the cavovarus foot deformity causes an increase in anteromedial ankle joint pressure leading to anteromedial arthrosis in the long term, even in the absence of lateral hindfoot instability.