Background. Lengthening over nail (LON) and the use of internal lengthening nails have been developed to minimize patients' time in a frame during femur lengthening. This study compares the outcomes of two techniques of femur lengthening, LON and Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distraction (ISKD). Methods. In this retrospective study, 12 consecutive ISKD procedures were performed for femoral lengthening and followed for an average of 76 months. After the ISKD group, 20 consecutive femoral lengthening procedures were performed as an LON technique and followed for an average of 27 months. Results. There was no significant difference in achieving the lengthening goals between the two procedures. The healing index for the LON group averaged 1.4 months/cm, while the ISKD group was 3.2 months/cm (p=0.242). The distraction rates for the ISKD had a fast group (>1mm/day) with an average distraction rate of 1.7 mm/day and a slow group (<1mm/day) with a distraction rate of 0.84 mm/day. The LON group had an average distraction rate of 0.88 mm/day (p<0.001). The incidence of complications that required further unanticipated surgeries for the LON group was 1/20 (5%), while the ISKD group had complications in 6/12 femurs (50%, p=0.004). Conclusions. We concluded that the LON technique is a more predictable and reliable method for femoral lengthening than the ISKD

Many studies describe the use of the Ilizarov ring fixator for lower limb lengthening and for the management of the 3-dimensional lower limb deformities in achondroplasia, and most confirm the efficacy of this technique. However, long term follow up of these achondroplastic patients is lacking. Most studies have focused on magnitude of lengthening, treatment time required and complications, but no study has analyzed the long term postoperative condition of these patients using an objective, functional method such as gait analysis. Nineteen (19) achondroplastic patients, 12 males and 7 females, aged 19–38 years (mean 27.3 y) who have undergone tibia and femur lengthening, using the Ilizarov method, at the age of 9–19 years (mean 12.6 y), were evaluated 5–19 years (mean 10.1 y) after their last surgery, using 3-dimensional gait analysis. Nineteen (19) normal, height-matched subjects were used as controls. The VICON Nexus 8 Camera System was used to accurately measure spatiotemporal characteristics (walking velocity, stride length, step length, cadence) and kinematics (range of motion) of lower limb joints. Statistical comparison of deformity parameters between achondroplastic patients and normal population was done using the student t- test. A level of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Walking velocity, step length and stride length were statistically significantly decreased (p<0.05) in achondroplastic patients compared to normal population values. The achondroplastic group presented with excessive anterior pelvic tilt (mean 21.9. o. ± 7.3), excessive pelvic rotation (range 28.7. o. ±7.8), decreased hip extension (mean 1.8. o. ±10.1) and decreased plantar flexion (mean 17.1. o. ±5.1) when compared to normal controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the knee kinematics between the operated achondroplastic patients and normal controls. The achondroplastic patients present decreased values in their spatiotemporal characteristics compared to the normal subjects because, despite the height gain, their lower limbs remain shorter. Their excessive anterior pelvic tilt is attributed to their lordosis. Their excessive forward pelvic rotation is an attempt to increase stride and step length. The decreased hip extension is due to their anterior pelvic tilt. The correction of these patients genu varum restored knee kinematics to normal. In order to address the hip and pelvis deformities a proximal femoral osteotomy should be considered. The Ilizarov method provides functional height gain and substantially corrects the three-dimensional lower limb deformities of achondroplastic patients especially around the knee joint but more planning needs to be implemented when the system is applied to correct the disease specific deformities of the hip and pelvis. Gait analysis is an objective tool that can be used to address these design issues