Restoration of leg length and offset is an important goal in total hip replacement. This paper reports a calliper-based technique to help achieve these goals by restoring the location of the centre of the femoral head. This was validated first by using a co-ordinate measuring machine to see how closely the calliper technique could record and restore the centre of the femoral head when simulating hip replacement on Sawbone femur, and secondly by using CT in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Results from the co-ordinate measuring machine showed that the centre of the femoral head was predicted by the calliper to within 4.3 mm for offset (mean 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.8)) and 2.4 mm for vertical height (mean -0.6 (95% CI -1.4 to 0.2)). The CT scans showed that offset and vertical height were restored to within 8 mm (mean -1 (95% CI -2.1 to 0.6)) and -14 mm (mean 4 (95% CI 1.8 to 4.3)), respectively.

Accurate assessment and restoration of the centre of the femoral head is feasible with a calliper. It is quick, inexpensive, simple to use and can be applied to any design of femoral component.

Femoral offset restoration is related to low rates of wear and dislocation. Replication of the native hip anatomy improves prosthesis survival, whereas increasing the femoral offset elevates the torque stresses, thus inducing a risk of suboptimal stem fixation. Although the Corail (DePuy Synthes, St Priest, France) uncemented stem has an excellent record of fixation, an unexpectedly number of aseptic loosenings has been noted in our institution. We sought to characterize the clinical parameters observed in a group of patients who have experienced metaphyseal aseptic loosenings with the collarless version of the Corail uncemented femoral component; describe the radiographic findings in this group of patients; expose the intraoperative findings in the cases that needed revision surgery and to calculate a possible frequency of this complication. We present a series of 15 metaphyseal debondings of the collarless version of the Corail uncemented stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. Eleven men and four woman with an average age of 60 years old (range: 42 to 81 years old) and a previous history of osteoarthritis presented with thigh pain and limping at an average of 33 months postoperative (range: 5 to 100 months). Seven cases presented a Dorr´s classification type A femur and 8 cases a type B femur. In 10 of the 15 cases a 36 mm ceramic on ceramic bearing surface was implanted and in 5 a 28 mm diameter ceramic on polyethylene pair. Radiographic assessment of the failures evidenced an increase in femoral offset of 6.2 mm in average (range: 0 to 17 mm). Nine of the 15 cases had a standard offset stem and 3 an extended offset stem. Leg length discrepancy was in average 2.4 mm (range: 0 to 8 mm). None of the failures presented a more than 2 mm subsidence. Alignment of these stems was in average 2.1 degrees of varus (range: 0 to 5 degrees). Six cases were revised to a long cemented or uncemented stem, 2 cases were lost and 7 cases are awaiting revision surgery. Although the incidence of this complication was low (15 failures in 855 cases in 10 years = 1.75%), we are concerned about the real magnitude of this problem, as this mode of failure was observed up to 8 years after implantation. Enhanced lateralization of the hip, independently of the type of stem, may have played a role in the infrequent early failures of this popular design. Routine use of “fine tunning” preoperative planning in order to avoid offset enhancement is strongly reccommended, as this was the only suspected factor that was present in almost all the failures we observed

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement with robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

We have compared the biomechanical nature of the reconstruction of the hip in conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) and surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) in a randomised study involving 120 patients undergoing unilateral primary hip replacement. The contralateral hip was used as a control.

Post-operatively, the femoral offset was significantly increased with THA (mean 5.1 mm; −2.8 to 11.6) and decreased with SRA (mean −3.3 mm; −8.9 to 8.2). Femoral offset was restored within sd 4 mm in 14 (25%) of those with THA and in 28 (57%) of the patients receiving SRA (p < 0.001). In the THA group, the leg was lengthened by a mean of 2.6 mm (−6.04 to +12.9), whereas it was shortened by a mean of 1.9 mm (−7.1 to +2.05) in the SRA group, compared with the contralateral side. Leg-length inequality was restored within sd 4 mm in 42 (86%) of the SRA and 33 (60%) of the THA patients. The radiological parameters of acetabular reconstruction were similar in both groups.

Restoration of the normal proximal femoral anatomy was more precise with SRA. The enhanced stability afforded by the use of a large-diameter femoral head avoided over-lengthening of the limb or increased offset to improve soft-tissue tension as occurs sometimes in THA. In a subgroup of patients with significant pre-operative deformity, restoration of the normal hip anatomy with lower pre-operative femoral offset or significant shortening of the leg was still possible with SRA.