INTRODUCTION. Femoral stem impingement can damage an acetabular liner, create polyethylene wear, and potentially lead to dislocation. To avoid component-to-component impingement, many surgeons aim to align acetabular cups based on the “Safe Zone” proposed by Lewinnek. However, a recent study indicates that the historical target values for cup inclination and anteversion defined by Lewinnek et al. may be useful but should not be considered a safe zone. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of altering femoral head size on hip range-of-motion (ROM) to impingement. METHODS. Ten healthy subjects were instrumented and asked to perform six motions commonly associated with hip dislocation, including picking up an object, squatting, and low-chair rising. Femur-to-pelvis relative motions were recorded throughout for flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation. A previously reported custom, validated hip ROM three-dimensional simulator was utilized. The user imports implant models, and sets parameters for pelvic tilt, stem version, and specific motions as defined by the subjects. Acetabular cup orientations for abduction and anteversion combinations were chosen. The software was then used to compute minimum clearances or impingement between the components for any hip position. Graphs for acetabular cup abduction vs. anteversion were generated using a tapered wedge stem with a 132º neck angle, a stem version of 15°, and a pelvic tilt of 0°. The only variable changed was femoral head size. Head sizes reviewed were 32mm, 36mm, and a Dual-Mobility liner with an effective head size of 42mm. All femoral head sizes can be used with a 50mm acetabular cup. RESULTS. We found that the “Safe Zone” varies considerably depending on the size of the femoral head used for all subjects. A typical plot illustrating the ROM to impingement is presented in Figures 1a-1c. The area to the left of each curve represents an impingement zone for that motion, and to the right, a non-impingement zone. In all cases the non-impingement area is smaller than the Lewinnek safe zone. Motions like picking up an object and squatting had the greatest influence on impingement. CONCLUSIONS. The true acetabular target for impingement-avoidance motion is much smaller than previously believed and identifies the need to take into account the size of the femoral head to be used. This may explain why approximately 70% of dislocations have been reported to be found even when cups were placed within the Lewinnek safe zone. Certain activities, such as picking up an object and squatting reduce the size of the safe zone. This study supports the need for better patient planning and intraoperative execution for placement of the acetabular component

Increased femoral head size may reduce dislocation rates following total hip replacement. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales has highlighted a statistically significant increase in the use of femoral heads ≥ 36 mm in diameter from 5% in 2005 to 26% in 2009, together with an increase in the use of the posterior approach. The aim of this study was to determine whether rates of dislocation have fallen over the same period. National data for England for 247 546 procedures were analysed in order to determine trends in the rate of dislocation at three, six, 12 and 18 months after operation during this time. The 18-month revision rates were also examined. Between 2005 and 2009 there were significant decreases in cumulative dislocations at three months (1.12% to 0.86%), six months (1.25% to 0.96%) and 12 months (1.42% to 1.11%) (all p < 0.001), and at 18 months (1.56% to 1.31%) for the period 2005 to 2008 (p < 0.001). The 18-month revision rates did not significantly change during the study period (1.26% to 1.39%, odds ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.24), p = 0.118). There was no evidence of changes in the coding of dislocations during this time. These data have revealed a significant reduction in dislocations associated with the use of large femoral head sizes, with no change in the 18-month revision rate

Key Points:. Historically, 22.25, 26, 28, or 32 mm metal femoral heads were used in primary total hip arthroplasty, but innovations in materials now permit head sizes 36 mm or larger. Stability and wear of primary total hip arthroplasty are related to the diameter and material of the femoral head. Larger diameter femoral heads are associated with increased joint stability through increases in arc range of motion and excursion distance prior to dislocation. Fixation of the acetabular component may be related to the size of the femoral head, with increased frictional torque associated with large diameter heads and certain polyethylene. Linear wear of highly crosslinked polyethylenes seems unrelated to femoral head diameter, but larger heads have been reported to have higher volumetric wear. Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion at the connection between the modular femoral head and neck may be associated with the femoral head size and material. Cobalt chromium alloy, alumina ceramic composite, or oxidised zirconium femoral heads on highly crosslinked polyethylene are the most commonly used bearing surfaces, but each may have unique risks and benefits. Conclusions. At present, there is a wave of enthusiasm for the routine use of “large” (32, 36 mm, or larger) femoral heads with highly crosslinked polyethylene for the vast majority of patients having a primary THA. It may be reasonable to consider the “graduated femoral head-outer acetabular diameter system”, using 28 mm femoral heads with “smaller” acetabular components (<50 mm), 32 mm femoral heads with acetabular components 50 – 56 mm outer diameter, and 36 mm or larger femoral heads with acetabular components 58 mm or larger in diameter, to minimise both the risk of dislocation and the frictional torque. Although the linear wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene appears to be independent of head size, the reported increase in volumetric wear with large femoral heads and highly crosslinked polyethylene requires further study, and should temper the use of femoral heads 36 mm or larger in younger and more active patients. With its long and successful history, it is difficult to recommend the complete abandonment of the cobalt chromium alloy femoral head in all patients having a primary THA. Alumina ceramic or oxidised zirconium heads may be considered for younger, heavier, and more active patients, who seem to have the highest risk of trunnion corrosion. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the unique possible complications of these two newer femoral head materials

Purposes. To compare the acetabular component size relative to the patient's native femoral head size between conventional THA (CTHA) approach and robotic-guided THA (RGTHA) to infer which of these techniques preserves more acetabular bone. Methods. Patients were included if they had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and underwent total hip replacement between June 2008 and March 2014. Patients were excluded if they had missing or rotated postoperative anteroposterior radiographs. RGTHA patients were matched to a control group of CTHA patients, in terms of pre-operative native femoral head size, age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and approach. Acetabular cup size relative to femoral head size was used as a surrogate for amount of bone resected. We compared the groups according to two measures describing acetabular cup diameter (c) in relation to femoral head diameter (f): (1) c-f, the difference between cup diameter and femoral head diameter and (2) (c-f)/f, the same difference as a fraction of femoral head diameter. Results. 57 matched pairs were included in each group. There were no significant differences between groups for demographic measures, femoral head diameter, or acetabular cup diameter (p>0.05). However, measures (1) and (2) did differ significantly between the groups, with lower values in the RGTHA group (p<0.02). Conclusion. Using acetabular cup size relative to femoral head size as an approximate surrogate measure of acetabular bone resection may suggest greater preservation of bone stock using RGTHA compared to CTHA. Further studies are needed to validate the relationship between acetabular cup size and bone loss in THA

In metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA large femoral metal heads are designed to increase stability and to reduce dislocation risk. The increased head size could lead to increased taper corrosion with the release of metal ions and adverse reactions. Using blood ion measurements, we aimed to investigate the association between femoral head size and metal-ion release after MoP THA. 96 patients were enrolled at two centers and randomized to receive either a 32-mm metal head or a 36–44 mm metal head (the largest possible fitting the thinnest available polyethylene insert). Blood metal ions and PROMs (OHS, UCLA) were measured at two- and five-year follow-ups. Both 2- and 5-year median chrome, cobalt, and titanium levels were below taper corrosion indicative ion levels. At 5 years, median chrome, cobalt, and titanium levels were 0.5 μg/L (0.50–0.62), 0.24 μg/L (0.18–0.30), and 1.16 μg/L (1.0–1.68) for the 32-mm group, and 0.5 μg/L (0.5–0.54), 0.23 μg/L (0.17–0.39), and 1.30 μg/L (1–2.05) for the 36–44 mm group, with no difference between groups (p=0.825, p=1.000, p=0.558). At 2 years, 7 (32-mm) versus 4 (36–44-mm) patients had elevated ions. At 5 years, 6 (32-mm) versus 7 (36–44-mm) patients had elevated ions. There was no difference in either OHS (p=0.665) or UCLA (p=0.831) between patients with or without elevated blood metal ions. 5 years after the insertion of MoP THAs, we found no differences in the blood metal ion levels between 32 mm heads and 36–44 mm heads and no corrosion-related revisions. As taper corrosion can debut after 5 years, there is still a need for long-term follow-up studies on the association between head size and corrosion in MoP THA

In order to reduce the risk of dislocation larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are being used by surgeons in recent years. The standard head size of 28 mm used in 73% of all hip procedures in 2003 was used in only 29% in 2016; whereas head sizes of 32 mm and 36 mm combined, were used in 70%. The increase of head size effectively reduces the thickness of the acetabular cup, altering the load transfer. Herein, this research work investigates the effect of increasing the femoral head size on the stresses of the periacetabular bone at two selected regions: A1 (superior) and A2 (anterior). Three Finite Element models were developed from CT scan data of a hemipelvis implanted with a cemented all-polyethylene acetabular cup with a 50 mm outer diameter and inner diameter to accommodate three head sizes: 28 mm, 32 mm and 36 mm. The peak reaction force at the hip joint during one leg stand for an overweight patient with a body weight of 100 Kg was simulated for head sizes investigated. We found that highest average von Mises stress was 5.7 MPa and occurred in the cortical bone of region A1 which is located within Zone 1 boundaries (Charnley &DeLee); whereas a lower stress of 4.0 MPa occurred at region A2. In the two regions the stresses were the same for the three head sizes. Periacetabular bone was found to be insensitive to the increase of femoral head diameter in cemented THA

Introduction. The use of larger femoral heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty has increased in order to reduce the risk of dislocation and to improve the range of motion of the joint. In 2003, within the UK, the “standard” head size of 28mm was used in 73% of all hip procedures, whereas by 2012, this figure dropped to 36%. Concerns regarding the impact of this increment in head size on the cement and bone stresses have arisen; however, this has yet to be clearly determined. Methods. To understand the relationship between femoral head size and cement mantle and bone stress in cemented hip arthroplasty, 3D-Finite-Element models of a hemipelvis with cemented cup[tb6] (50mm outer-diameter) were developed. Loading conditions of single-leg-stance (average and overweight) were simulated for three head sizes (28, 32 and 36mm). The models were validated with an in-vitro experiment using the average loading condition. Results. Stresses were evaluated at the periacetabular bone and cement mantle. In the pelvic bone the peak von Mises stress value presented no change in magnitude due to change in head size for the average patient; for the overweight patient, there was a small increment. In the cement mantle, there was a noticeable difference in the pattern distribution and magnitude of the stresses for the two loading conditions[tb7]. For the average patient, average stresses in the cement were 1.7MPa, 1.8MPa and 1.9MPa for 28, 32 and 36mm heads, respectively; whereas for the overweight patient the stresses were 3.4MPa, 3.6MPa and 3.8MPa. Conclusions. Pelvic bone remained largely unaffected by the changes in femoral head size. The major effect of femoral head size occurs in the stress level and stress distribution pattern in the cement mantle. The current predicted cement stresses are below the cement endurance limit, this indicates that the cement fatigue life is not affected by the increasing head size

Metal-on-metal (MOM) hip resurfacing devices are known to release metal ions locally and into the systemic circulation. Previous studies suggest that larger prosthetic head size will correlate to reduced wear properties and may result in lower systemic release of metal ions. This project assessed the effect of femoral head size on serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) levels in subjects after unilateral hip resurfacing with the Cormet 2000 prosthesis. We prospectively collected patient characteristics, outcome, and serum samples from device implanted subjects at six months, one, two, and three years following surgery. Serum Co/Cr levels were determined using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Students t-test was used to compare ion levels in two groups based on femoral head size. Thirty-five subjects (twenty male) were followed. Co/Cr levels were increased at all time points when compared to control levels. A significant negative correlation was observed between Co and Cr levels and femoral head size. Co/Cr levels in subjects with larger femoral heads were significantly lower when compared to those implanted with smaller heads (Co, −35.8%; Cr, −33.0%). This correlated with significantly higher Co/Cr levels in females versus males, with females receiving significantly smaller heads on average. Elevated serum Co/Cr levels were observed at all time points following implantation and in females and in subjects with femoral heads

BACKGROUD/PURPOSE. Recently, the use of a large diameter femoral head has been discussed as a means to reduce the risk of hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although it has been clear that increasing the head size increases the oscillation angle and hip stability, a consensus on the usefulness of a larger head size has not been reached due to an increased propensity for bone impingement. We studied the effect of the range of motion (ROM) and bone impingement caused by increasing the femoral head size using a 3D simulation system. PATIENTS AND METHODS. All patients who had undergone a primary THA in our hospital from October 2010 were selected, and we excluded those with severe osteoarthritis, severe dysplasia (Crowe group), or excessive femoral neck anteversion (35°). This resulted in 60 patients (16 men and 44 women), with a mean age of 66.6 years (range, 47–83 years). The diagnoses were osteoarthritis in 42 hips, osteonecrosis in 11 hips, rheumatoid arthritis in four hips, and femoral neck fracture in three hips. A virtual hip model was generated from the preoperative CT scan and a component was virtually implanted via computer simulation software (Zed Hip, LEXI, Japan). The acetabular cup was implanted with an inclination of 45°, anteversion of 20°, and the femoral stem was implanted into the femur recreating the same head height with an anteversion of 25°. We defined three leg positions: (A) maximum flexion (B) internal rotation with hip in 90°of flexion and 20°of adduction as posterior dislocation, and (C) external rotation with hip in 0°of extension as anterior dislocation. In each leg position, range of motion up to the impingement and the type of impingement (implant or bone) was assessed with 22-, 26-, 28-, 32-, and 36 mm femoral head sizes. RESULTS. We found a significant increase in ROM between the 22 mm and 26-, 28-, 32-, and 36 mm femoral heads, and between the 26 mm and 36 mm femoral head in each leg position, but no significant difference was found in femoral heads more than 28 mm. Bone impingement preceding implant impingement was increased with larger head sizes more than 50% of the 28 mm head size in each leg position. The 36 mm head size corresponded to (A) 87%, (B) 85%, and (C) 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. We concluded that increasing the head size increased bone impingement, which led to restricting improvement in ROM. There was no significant increase in ROM for femoral heads more than 28 mm; therefore, excessively large head sizes may result in restrictive ROM due to an increased oscillation angle

Introduction:. Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) allows for very large femoral head size, which may be beneficial for hip range of motion (ROM). No clinical study has objectively compared ROM in patients with DM-THA and large (36-mm head) total hip arthroplasty (36-THA). The aim of this prospective case-control study is to test the hypotheses that DM-THA provides superior hip ROM compared to 36-THA by dynamic radiography, and that surgical approach (posterolateral [PL] versus modified anterolateral [AL]) has effect on post-operative hip ROM. Materials and Methods:. Sixteen patients (11 males, 5 females) who had undergone DM-THA with a minimum follow up of one year were age, sex and body mass index (BMI) matched to twenty patients (12 males, 8 females) with 36-THA, all operated upon by the senior author. Maximum hip-trunk flexion, extension and total hip-trunk ROM was calculated on standing lateral digital radiographs of the lower lumbar spine, pelvis and hip, using commercially available software (TraumaCad®, BrainLab, Munich, Germany) from three upright positions; standing neutral, standing with maximum hip flexion and standing with maximum hip extension. Contributions to motion from lumbo-sacral spine (LSS) and pelvic tilt were calculated and subtracted from hip-trunk measurements to quantify true hip flexion, extension and total true hip ROM. Statistical analysis (SPSS software, Chicago, IL) was performed on all radiographic measurements to detect difference in ROM between DM-THA and 36-THA, and to detect difference in ROM between THAs performed through posterolateral (THA-PL) and anterolateral (THA-AL) approaches. Results:. There was no significant difference in age, sex and BMI between groups (p > 0.05). In DM-THA versus 36-THA, hip-trunk flexion (118° +15.3° vs. 112.75° +16.44°), hip-trunk extension (20.88° +6.72° vs. 21.00° +6.00°) and total hip-trunk ROM (139.50° +17.86° vs. 133.75° +16.29°) revealed no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, true hip flexion (100.63° +14.77° vs. 99.85° + 13.55°), extension (12.75 + 6.01° vs. 12.20 + 3.71°) and total true hip ROM (113.38° +19.28° vs. 112.05° +14.84°) did not show statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). No significant difference in true hip flexion or extension existed between THA-PL and THA-AL (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in total hip-trunk and total true hip ROM between males and females (p > 0.05). Patients with degenerative/stiff LSS (LSS ROM <15°) exhibited significant reduction in hip-trunk total ROM (130.62° +15.97°) compared to patients with flexible (ROM >15°) LSS (144.27° +15.56°) (p = 0.015), without any significant reduction in true total hip ROM (112.81° +16.59° vs. 112.40° +17.46, respectively) (p = 0.943). Conclusion:. DM-THA does not provide superior ROM compared to 36-THA as evidenced by dynamic radiography. PL/AL surgical approach, with presumptive violation of hip extensors/flexors, does not affect post-operative hip extension/flexion, respectively. THA patients with flexible LSS may exhibit apparent increased hip ROM due to compensatory movement at the LSS, rather than an actual increase in true hip ROM

Background. The New Zealand Joint Registry was started in 1999. An audit in 2009 showed 98% compliance. Ten year results were published in 2009. For Total Hip Replacement it showed that dislocation was the most common cause for revision (35%). Methods. We reviewed the rate of revision for dislocation in the two most common diagnostic groups, Osteoarthritis (86%) and Acute Fracture NOF (3.6%) relative to the two most common surgical approaches, posterior and lateral. We also sought to analyse whether larger femoral head sizes decreased the dislocation rate. Results. In Osteoarthritis there was a highly significant increase (p< 0.001) in revision for dislocation for the posterior (307 of 27,219 or 1.1%) over the lateral approach (56 of 12,599 or 0.4%). The revision rate per 100 component years decreased with increasing head size in both surgical approaches. This was significant only in the posterior approach for 36mm over 22mm and 28mm heads (p< 0.05). In Acute Fracture NOF the revision rates are higher than for osteoarthritis (1.6% posterior and 1.1% lateral) but there is no statistical difference between the two approaches (p = 0.37). The NOF group shows a non-significant increase in dislocation for 32mm heads over 28mm in both approaches, but no dislocations for the small number of 36mm heads. Conclusion. This review confirms that the posterior approach has a significantly higher revision rate for dislocation over the lateral approach in osteoarthritis. The posterior approach shows a significant advantage for the 36mm head over 22 and 28mm, but the rate for the 36mm head posterior was virtually the same as for a 28mm head via the lateral approach. Larger diameter heads could lead to later revision from greater volumetric wear, increased frictional torque and thinner poyethylene liners and should be used with caution. To reduce dislocation in osteoarthritis the lateral approach should be considered

Background: The role of polyethylene (PE) wear in relation to synovitis and elevated hydrostatic pressure in the loosening process after THA has gained increased attention. The aim of our study was to investigate the correlation between prosthetic head size, PE wear and sonographic capsular distention, reflecting the degree of intracapsular synovitis/synovia/hydrostatic pressure.

Patients and methods: In 2005 we analyzed 60 randomly selected and unrevised OA patients 10 years after surgery with 32 or 28mm femoral heads. We evaluated radiographic signs of loosening, linear and volumetric PE wear. Sonographic examination was performed to measure the “capsular distance”, i.e. the capsular distension, defined as the distance between the metallic echo from the anterior surface of the prosthetic femoral neck, and the echo from the anterior surface of the anterior capsule.

Results: The linear wear was 0.2 mm per year and 0.1 mm per year in the 32 mm and 28 mm head size group respectively (p< 0.001), the volumetric wear was 139 mm3/year and 48 mm3/year (p< 0.001), and the capsular distention was 17 mm and 13 mm respectively (p< 0.001). There was also a significant positive correlation between PE volumetric wear and capsular distension (r=0.63, p< 0.001).

Interpretation: We conclude that 32 mm femoral heads were associated with almost three times higher volumetric wear as compared to 28 mm heads, and increased “capsular distension”, reflecting increased synovitis/synovia/hydrostatic pressure in prosthetic hip.

Metal on metal total hip arthroplasty provides the potential improvement in articular wear and the use of large-diameter femoral heads following the prospect for reduction in the risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as serum metal ion level between the two different component designs with small and large femoral heads in metal on metal total hip arthroplasty.

We studied 39 patients with large head (Magnum®, Biomet; cup size minus 6 mm) and 37 patients with small head (M2a taper®, Biomet; 28 or 32 mm head) of metal on metal total hip arthroplasty between December 2009 to October 2011 with follow-up of 2.1 years (1.0–3.3 years) after surgery. Harris Hip Score, UCLA activity score, EQ-5D, radiographic assessment, and serum cobalt and chromium ion levels were evaluated.

Harris Hip Score, UCLA activity score, and EQ-5D were improved after surgery in small and large head groups, however, no significant differences were observed between both groups. Cup inclination was below 50 degree in all prosthesis. No loosening and no osteolysis were observed. Cobalt and chromium ion was not detected before surgery; however, metal ion levels of both groups were increased after surgery in time dependent manner. There was no significant difference between two groups at one year after surgery. One patient in each group showed the increase of cobalt ion level over 7 ppb (15.4 ppb, 12.9 ppb) without any clinical symptom including pain. Cup inclination was 29 degree in both patients and cup anteversion was 38 and 41 degree, respectively.

There was no significant difference of ion levels between both groups. No dislocation was observed in large head group while one dislocation occurred in small head group. No patients required the revision surgery.

This metal on metal component, especially with large femoral heads, showed the good clinical results at the maximum follow up of 3.3 year after surgery. However, the ion level of two patients increased over 7 ppb and longer follow-up will be needed.

Different types of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) have been introduced widely in acetabular cups in hip prostheses to reduce the incidence of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Also, we reported that HXLPE cups with 28-mm alumina ceramic femoral head exhibited lower wear than conventional PE cups. Recently, the combination of HXLPE cup and larger diameter femoral head is used widely to prevent dislocation. In this study, we examined the wear of HXLPE with 32-mm alumina ceramic femoral head and compared it with the wear of HXLPE with 28-mm alumina ceramic femoral head.

The in vivo wear of 60 HXLPE cups (Aeonian; Kyocera Corp., Kyoto, Japan, currently Japan Medical Materials Corp., Osaka, Japan) with 28-mm alumina ceramic femoral head with clinical use for 3.1–9.1 years (mean 7.4 years) and eight HXLPE cups with 32-mm alumina ceramic femoral head used for 2.3–3.2 years (mean 2.8 years) were examined by radiographic analysis.

The early wear rate for the first year of HXLPE cups with 28-mm and 32-mm alumina ceramic femoral head were 0.24±0.10 mm/year and 0.29±0.12 mm/year respectively. There was no significant difference in both femoral head groups (p>0.05). The steady wear rate after 1 year were 0.001±0.03 mm/year and −0.03±0.10 mm/year respectively. There was no significant difference either in both femoral head groups (p>0.05).

These findings from this radiographic analysis suggest that the early wear rate in the first 1 year probably represents the creep deformation in bedding-in stage; and the steady wear rate after 1 year probably represents mainly the wear than of the creep deformation. By the radiographic analysis, HXLPE cups in both femoral head groups exhibited low steady wear rate.

In conclusion, we expect that the combination of HXLPE cup and 32-mm diameter alumina ceramic femoral head has favorable wear properties with possibility of prevention of dislocation in long-term clinical use.

Despite excellent results, the use of cemented total hip replacement (THR) is declining. This retrospective cohort study records survival time to revision following primary cemented THR using the most common combination of components that accounted for almost a quarter of all cemented THRs, exploring risk factors independently associated with failure. All patients with osteoarthritis who had an Exeter V40/Contemporary THR (Stryker) implanted before 31 December 2010 and recorded in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales were included in the analysis. Cox’s proportional hazard models were used to analyse the extent to which risk of revision was related to patient, surgeon and implant covariates, with a significance threshold of p < 0.01. A total of 34 721 THRs were included in the study. The overall seven-year rate of revision for any reason was 1.70% (99% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 2.12). In the final adjusted model the risk of revision was significantly higher in THRs with the Contemporary hooded component (hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, p < 0.001) than with the flanged version, and in smaller head sizes (< 28 mm) compared with 28 mm diameter heads (HR 1.50, p = 0.005). The seven-year revision rate was 1.16% (99% CI 0.69 to 1.63) with a 28 mm diameter head and flanged component. The overall risk of revision was independent of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, body mass index, surgeon volume, surgical approach, brand of cement/presence of antibiotic, femoral head material (stainless steel/alumina) and stem taper size/offset. However, the risk of revision for dislocation was significantly higher with a ‘plus’ offset head (HR 2.05, p = 0.003) and a hooded acetabular component (HR 2.34, p < 0.001).

In summary, we found that there were significant differences in failure between different designs of acetabular component and sizes of femoral head after adjustment for a range of covariates.

Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing has been widely performed in the United Kingdom for over a decade. However, the literature reports conflicting views of the benefits: excellent medium- to long-term results with some brands in specific subgroups, but high failure rates and local soft-tissue reactions in others. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) has collected data on all hip resurfacings performed since 2003. This retrospective cohort study recorded survival time to revision from a resurfacing procedure, exploring risk factors independently associated with failure. All patients with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis who underwent resurfacing between 2003 and 2010 were included in the analyses. Cox’s proportional hazard models were used to analyse the extent to which the risk of revision was related to patient, surgeon and implant covariates.

A total of 27 971 hip resurfacings were performed during the study period, of which 1003 (3.59%) underwent revision surgery. In the final adjusted model, we found that women were at greater risk of revision than men (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.30, p = 0.007), but the risk of revision was independent of age. Of the implant-specific predictors, five brands had a significantly greater risk of revision than the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) (ASR: HR = 2.82, p < 0.001, Conserve: HR = 2.03, p < 0.001, Cormet: HR = 1.43, p = 0.001, Durom: HR = 1.67, p < 0.001, Recap: HR = 1.58, p = 0.007). Smaller femoral head components were also significantly more likely to require revision (≤ 44 mm: HR = 2.14, p < 0.001, 45 to 47 mm: HR = 1.48, p = 0.001) than medium or large heads, as were operations performed by low-volume surgeons (HR = 1.36, p <  0.001). Once these influences had been removed, in 4873 male patients < 60 years old undergoing resurfacing with a BHR, the five-year estimated risk of revision was 1.59%.

In summary, after adjustment for a range of covariates we found that there were significant differences in the rate of failure between brands and component sizes. Younger male patients had good five-year implant survival when the BHR was used.

The number one reason to consider large heads in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is for increased stability. Large diameter femoral heads substantially increase stability by virtue of increased range of motion and increased jump distance, which is the amount of displacement required to sublux the head out of the socket. Prevention is the best means for reducing dislocation, with requisites for stability being appropriate component position, restoration of leg length, and restoration of offset.

In a review from our center studying the frequency of dislocation with small diameter femoral heads (≤32 mm) in 1262 patients (1518 hips) who underwent primary THA performed via a direct lateral approach, we observed a dislocation rate of 0.8% (12 of 1518). In a subsequent study of 1748 patients (2020 hips) who underwent primary THA at our center with large diameter heads (mean 43 mm, range 36–60 mm), we observed a substantially lower 0.04% frequency of dislocation (one of 2010) at a mean followup of 2.6 years.

Our findings have been echoed in studies from several other centers. Howie et al. reported a prospective controlled trial of 644 low risk patients undergoing primary or revision THA randomised to receive either a 36 mm or 28 mm metal head articulated on highly crosslinked polyethylene. They observed significantly lower frequency of frequency of dislocation with 36 mm heads both overall (1.3%, 4 of 299 versus 5.4%, 17 of 216 with 28 mm heads, p=0.012) and in primary use (0.8%, 2 of 258 versus 4.4%, 12 of 275 with 28 mm heads, p=0.024), and a similar trend in their smaller groups of revision patients (5%, 2 of 41, versus 12%, 5 of 41 with 28 mm heads, p=0.273).

Lachiewicz and Soileau reported on early and late dislocation with 36- and 40 mm heads in 112 patients (122 hips) at presumed high risk for dislocation who underwent primary THA. Risk factors were age >75 for 80 hips, proximal femur fracture for 18, history of contralateral dislocation for 2, history of alcohol abuse in 2, large acetabulum (>60 mm) in 6, and other reasons in 14. Early dislocation (<1 year) occurred in 4% (5 of 122), all with 36 mm heads. Late dislocation (>5 years) did not occur in any of the 74 patients with followup beyond 5 years.

Stroh et al. compared 225 patients (248 hips) treated with THA using small diameter heads (<36 mm) to 501 patients (559 hips) treated with THA using large diameter heads (≥36 mm). There were no dislocations with large diameter heads compared with 1.8% (10 of 559) with small diameter heads.

Allen et al. studied whether or not large femoral heads improve functional outcome after primary THA via the posterior approach in 726 patients. There were 399 done with small heads (<36 mm), 254 with medium heads (36 mm), and 73 with large heads (>36 mm), analyzed pre-operatively, at 6 months, and at 12 months. The authors could not find a correlation between increasing head size and improved function at one year, but observed that dislocation was reduced with large diameter heads.

Optimization of hip biomechanics via proper surgical technique, component position, and restoration of leg length and offset are mandatory in total hip arthroplasty. Large heads enhance stability by increasing range of motion prior to impingement and enhancing jump stability.

Increased femoral head size reduces the rate of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). With the introduction of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners in THA there has been a trend towards using larger size femoral heads in relatively smaller cup sizes, theoretically increasing the risk of liner fracture, wear, or aseptic loosening. Short to medium follow-up studies have not demonstrated a negative effect of using thinner HXLPE liners. However, there is concern that these thinner liners may prematurely fail in the long-term, especially in those with thinner liners. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival and revision rates of HXLPE liners in primary THA, as well as the effect of liner thickness on these outcomes. We hypothesized that there would be no significant differences between the different liner thicknesses. We performed a retrospective database analysis from a single center of all primary total hip replacements using HXLPE liners from 2010 and earlier, including all femoral head sizes. All procedures were performed by fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons. Patient characteristics, implant details including liner thickness, death, and revisions (all causes) were recorded. Patients were grouped for analysis for each millimeter of PE thickness (e.g. 4.0-4.9mm, 5.0-5.9mm). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were estimated with all-cause and aseptic revisions as the endpoints. A total of 2354 patients (2584 hips) were included (mean age 64.3 years, min-max 19-96). Mean BMI was 29.0 and 47.6% was female. Mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range 11.0-18.8). Liner thickness varied from 4.9 to 12.7 mm. Seven patients had a liner thickness <5.0mm and 859 had a liner thickness of <6.0mm. Head sizes were 28mm (n=85, 3.3%), 32mm (n=1214, 47.0%), 36mm (n=1176, 45.5%), and 40mm (n=109, 4.2%), and 98.4% were metal heads. There were 101 revisions, and in 78 of these cases the liner was revised. Reason for revision was instability/dislocation (n=34), pseudotumor/aseptic lymphocyte-dominant vasculitis associated lesion (n=18), fracture (n=17), early loosening (n=11), infection (n=7), aseptic loosening (n=4), and other (n=10). When grouped by liner thickness, there were no significant differences between the groups when looking at all-cause revision (p=0.112) or aseptic revision (p=0.116). In our cohort, there were no significant differences in all-cause or aseptic revisions between any of the liner thickness groups at long-term follow-up. Our results indicate that using thinner HXPE liners to maximize femoral head size in THA does not lead to increased complications or liner failures at medium to long term follow-up. As such, orthopedic surgeons can consider the use of larger heads at the cost of liner thickness a safe practice to reduce the risk of dislocation after THA when using HXLPE liners

The April 2023 Hip & Pelvis Roundup. 360. looks at: Do technical errors determine outcomes of operatively managed femoral neck fractures in younger adults?; Single-stage or two-stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM); Fixation better than revision in type B periprosthetic fractures of taper slip stems; Can you maximize femoral head size at the expense of liner thickness?; Plasma D-dimer for periprosthetic joint infection?; How important is in vivo oxidation?; Total hip arthroplasty for HIV patients with osteonecrosis

Aims. In metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA), large metal femoral heads have been used to increase stability and reduce the risk of dislocation. The increased size of the femoral head can, however, lead to increased taper corrosion, with the release of metal ions and adverse reactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the size of the femoral head and the levels of metal ions in the blood in these patients. Methods. A total of 96 patients were enrolled at two centres and randomized to undergo MoP THA using either a 32 mm metal head or a femoral head of between 36 mm and 44 mm in size, being the largest possible to fit the thinnest available polyethylene insert. The levels of metal ions and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Hip Score, University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale) were recorded at two and five years postoperatively. Results. At five years, the median levels of chromium, cobalt, and titanium were 0.5 μg/l (interquartile range (IQR) 0.50 to 0.62), 0.24 μg/l (IQR 0.18 to 0.30), and 1.16 μg/l (IQR 1.0 to 1.68) for the 32 mm group, and 0.5 μg/l (IQR 0.5 to 0.54), 0.23 μg/l (IQR 0.17 to 0.39), and 1.30 μg/l (IQR 1 to 2.05) for the 36 mm to 44 mm group, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.825, p = 1.000, p = 0.558). There were increased levels of metal ions at two years postoperatively in seven patients in the 32 mm group, compared with four in the 36 mm to 44 mm group, and at five years postoperatively in six patients in the 32 mm group, compared with seven in the 36 mm to 44 mm group. There was no significant difference in either the OHS (p = 0.665) or UCLA (p = 0.831) scores between patients with or without an increased level of metal ions. Conclusion. In patients who underwent MoP THA, we found no differences in the levels of metal ions five years postoperatively between those with a femoral head of 32 mm and those with a femoral head of between 36 mm and 44 mm, and no corrosion-related revisions. As taper corrosion can start after five years, there remains a need for longer-term studies investigating the relationship between the size of the femoral head size and corrosion in patients undergoing MoP THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(3 Supple A):31–37