Total hip arthroplasty is well established as a successful treatment modality for end stage arthritis, with a variety of components currently available. However, utilising traditional stemmed implants in patients with distorted proximal femoral geometry can be technically challenging with increased risk of complications. We present seven patients with distorted proximal femoral anatomy or failed hip arthroplasty in whom a technically challenging primary or revision operation was simplified by use of a Proxima stem. This is a short, stemless, metaphyseal loading implant with a pronounced lateral flare. At twelve months follow up there have been no complications with average improvement in Oxford and Harris scores of forty and forty-nine respectively. Radiological analysis shows all stems to be stable and well fixed. Designed primarily as a bone conserving implant for primary hip arthroplasty we propose that the Proxima prosthesis also be considered in cases where a conventional stemmed implant may not be suitable due to challenging proximal femoral anatomy. The use of the stemless Proxima implant provided a simple solution in seven difficult and potentially lengthy complex primary and revision hip arthroplasties with gratifying clinical and radiological outcomes

Introduction

The current methods for measuring femoral torsion have limitations, including variability and inaccuracies. Existing 3D methods are not reliable for abnormal femoral anteversion measurement. A new 3D method is needed for accurate measurement and planning of proximal femoral osteotomies. Currently available software for viewing and modelling CT data lacks measurement capabilities. The MSK Hip planner aims to address these limitations by combining measurement, planning, and analysis functionalities into one tool. We aim to answer 5 key questions: Is there a difference between 2D measurement methods? Is there a difference between 3D measurement methods? Is there a difference between 2D and 3D measurement methods? Are any of the measurement methods affected by the presence of osteoarthritis or a CAM deformity?

Intraoperative fractures although rare are one of the complications known to occur while performing a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, due to lower incidence rates there is currently a gap in this area of literature that systematically reviews this important issue of complications associated with THA. Method: We looked into Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the archives of meetings of orthopaedic associations and the bibliographies of included articles and asked experts to identify prospective studies, published in any language that evaluated intra-operative fractures occurring during total hip arthroplasty from the year 1950-2020. The screening, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two researchers and if there was any discrepancy, a third reviewer was involved. Fourteen studies were identified. The reported range of occurrence of fracture while performing hip replacement surgery was found to be 0.4-7.6%. Major risk factors identified were surgical approaches, Elderly age, less Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Index score, change in resistance while insertion of the femur implants, inexperienced surgeons, uncemented femoral components, use of monoblock elliptical components, implantation of the acetabular components, patients with ankylosing spondylitis, female gender, uncemented stems in patients with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy and with cortices, different stem designs, heterogeneous fracture patterns and toothed design. Intraoperative fractures during THA were managed with cerclage wire, femoral revision, intramedullary nail and cerclage wires, use of internal fixation plates and screws for management of intra operative femur and acetabular fractures. The main reason for intraoperative fracture was found to be usage of cementless implants but planning and timely recognition of risk factors and evaluating them is important in management of intraoperative fractures. Adequate surgical site exposure is critical especially during dislocation of hip, reaming of acetabulum, impaction of implant and preparing the femoral canal for stem insertion. Eccentric and increased reaming of acetabulum to accommodate a larger cup is to be avoided, especially in females and elderly patients as the acetabulum is thinner. However, this area requires more research in order to obtain more evidence on effectiveness, safety and management of intraoperative fractures during THA

Summary Statement. A population based finite element study that accounts for subject-specific morphology, density and load variations, suggests that osteoporosis does not markedly lower the mechanical compliance of the proximal femur to routine loads. Introduction. Osteoporosis (OP) is a bone disease defined by low bone density and micro-architectural deterioration. This deterioration is neither uniform nor symmetric at the proximal femur. Evidence from analyses performed at the tissue level suggests that the cortical shell at the femoral neck is thinner in OP patients, especially in the superior regions, but not in the infero-anterior ones [Poole, Rubinacci]. Analogously, OP femurs show a higher anisotropy of the trabecular bone than controls [Ciarelli], suggesting a preservation of load bearing capacity in the principal loading direction vs. the transverse one. There is general consensus that the regions subjected to higher loads during walking, which is the predominant motor activity in the elderly, are mostly preserved. All these findings suggest that the OP femur should exhibit an almost normal mechanical competence during daily activities. This would be in accordance with the very low incidence of spontaneous fractures [Parker] and with the moderate fracture predictivity of BMD. Although reasonable, this hypothesis has never been tested at the organ level. Aim of the present study was to verify it with a population-based finite element (FE) study. Patients & Methods. Whole femur Computed Tomography (CT) scans of 200 patients (115 women) with normal femoral anatomy were retrieved from a repository of the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. The database is representative of an adult Italian population (mean 57yrs, range 23–84), and spans a wide range of morphological and densitometric characteristics (CT-simulated T-score of femoral neck BMD ranging from 1 to −4.6). Personalised FE models of all femurs were built from CT data using a validated procedure [Schileo]. A personalised estimate of the variability of loads acting on the proximal femur during normal walking (NW) and stair climbing (SC) was obtained by querying an indexed and searchable database of joint and muscle loads obtained from musculoskeletal models of 90 subjects. 78 possible loading combinations for NW and 50 for SC were defined for each subject, taking into account individual characteristics (height, weight, femoral antetorsion, CCD angle and neck length). Risk of fracture (RF) was defined for each subject as the maximum principal strain / limit strain (1.04% compressive, 0.73% tensile) ratio over the whole loading spectrum. Results and Discussion. No fracture was predicted by the FE models throughout the entire population, yielding an average safety coefficient of between 4 and 5, which is consistent with experimentally determined failure loads in the single leg stance configuration (around 11 BW [Cristofolini]). While a general inverse association was observed with R2∼0.2, no clear correlation was present between the fracture risk and the T-score. The hypothesis that OP does not macroscopically influence the mechanical competence of the femur for daily activities was therefore corroborated, suggesting that the highest risk of fracture in OP patients might be related to a lower OP induced compliance to accidental loads

In uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), the optimal femoral component should allow both maximum cortical contact with proximal load transfer and accurate restoration of individual joint biomechanics. This is often compromised due to a high variability in proximal femoral anatomy. The aim of this on-going study is to assess the variation in proximal femoral canal shape and its association with geometric and anthropometric parameters in primary hip OA. In a retrospective cohort study, AP-pelvis radiographs of 98 consecutive patients (42 males, 56 females, mean age 61 (range:45-74) years, BMI 27.4 (range:20.3-44.6) kg/m2) who underwent THA for primary hip OA were reviewed. All radiographs were calibrated and femoral offset (FO) and neck-shaft-angle (NSA) were measured using a validated custom programme. Point-based active shape modelling (ASM) was performed to assess the shape of the inner cortex of the proximal femoral meta- and diaphysis. Independent shape modes were identified using principal component analysis (PCA). Hierarchical cluster analysis of the shape modes was performed to identify natural groupings of patients. Differences in geometric measures of the proximal femur (FO, NSA) and demographic parameters (age, height, weight, BMI) between the clusters were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way-ANOVA or Chi-square tests, as appropriate. In the entire cohort, mean FO was 39.0 mm, mean NSA was 131 degrees. PCA identified 10 independent shape modes accounting for over 90% of variation in proximal femoral canal shape within the dataset. Cluster Analysis revealed 6 shape clusters for which all 10 shape modes demonstrated a significantly different distribution (p-range:0.000-0.015). We observed significant differences in age (p=0.032), FO (p<0.001) and NSA (p<0.001) between the clusters. No significant differences with regard to gender or BMI were seen. Our preliminary analysis has identified 6 different patterns of proximal femoral canal shape which are associated with significant differences in femoral offset, neck-shaft-angle and age at time of surgery. We are currently evaluating the entire dataset of 345 patients which will allow a comprehensive classification of variation in proximal femoral shape and joint geometry. The present data may optimise preoperative planning and improve future implant design in THA