Aim. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after arthroscopic reconstruction of isolated SSP lesions. Does double row repair in smaller lesions lead to better results and a lower retear rate?. Method. 80 patients with an isolated full thickness SSP tear were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (27 men, 13 Frauen, average age 57 y.) was repaired using a single row technique with 2 anchors (Mitek Fastin) with arthroscopic Mason-Allen stiches. Group 2 was repaired using a double row technique using 1 medial anchor (Mitek Fastin) and 2 lateral anchors (Versalok). PreOP an ultrasound and MRI was obtained as well as standard x-rays (a.p., outlet-view, transaxial). Included to this study were only patients matching the following criteria: intraoperative cartilage lesions ≤ Outerbridge Grade2, fatty degeneration ≤ Goutallier Grade 2, ap extent of the tear < 2,5 cm. Prospective follow up after 6, 12 and 24 months using UCLA and Constant Score as well as MRI at last follow up. Results. 37 patients in group 1 and 36 patients in group 2 were completely evaluated. Both groups showed improvement in Constant Score from 49,3 to 89,4 in group 1 (single row) compared to 47,6 and 90,7 in group 2 (Double Row). MRI at last follow up showed 4 retears in the single row group and 3 retears in the double row group. 1 shoulder in the double row group needed revision due to a loose anchor. Discussion. We could not find any significant difference between clinical results and retear rate using a single or double row suture anchor configuration in isolated full thickness SSP tears