Introduction. Application of an external fixator for type B and C pelvic fractures can be life saving. Anteriorly the fixator half pins can be placed in the long and thick corridor of bone in the supra-acetabular region often referred to as the low anterior ex-fix. Pins in this location are favoured as they are more stable biomechanically. The bone tunnel for the low anterior ex-fix can be visualised with an iliac oblique projection intra-operatively. In some cases despite being outside the articular surface it may still be low enough to pass through the capsular attachment of the hip joint on the anterior inferior iliac spine. We aim to provide radiological markers for the most superior fibres of the capsule to help accurate extra-capsular pin placement within the supra-acetabular bone tunnel. Materials and Methods. Thirteen cadaveric pelves, embalmed with the method of Thiel, were used for this study. An image intensifier was positioned to acquire an iliac oblique outlet view, such that the supra acetabular bone tunnel was visualised. This was achieved by positioning the beam 30 degrees cephalad and 20 degrees medial. Both left and right hemipelves were examined in this way. A standard size metallic disc was included in all images with in the acetabulum to allow for image calibration. The proximal most fibres of the hip joint capsule were marked with a K-wire so that their relation to the bone tunnel could be clearly seen on the images. Once all images were acquired they were calibrated and analysed using ImageJ Software to estimate the height and maximum width of the bone tunnel as seen on the images and the vertical distance of the superior most fibres of the capsule from the dome of the acetabulum. Results. The mean height of the bone tunnel was 24.9 mm (SD 4.3 mm, Range 18.9–33.2 mm) and the maximum width of the tunnel was 11.7 mm (SD 2.6 mm, Range 7.6–16.3 mm). The inferior margin of the bone tunnel was on average 7.4 mm (SD 3.4 mm, Range 1.1–14.4 mm) superior to the acetabular dome and the most proximal fibres of the capsule were on average 9.2 mm (SD 2.4 mm, Range 4.7–16.1 mm) superior to the acetabular dome. This meant that on average 3.6 mm (SD 2.1 mm, Range 0.3–8.9 mm) of the inferior portion of the tunnel is within the joint. There was no statistically significant difference between the left and right sides. Conclusion. There is adequate space for two long external fixator pins within the described tunnel. These should be placed in the upper half of the anterior inferior iliac spine. Below this level there is risk of being intra-capsular which can lead to septic arthritis. For this reason we recommend that supra-acetabular pins should be placed at least 16 mm superior to the acetabular dome as visualised on the iliac oblique outlet view

We compared the outcome of patients treated for an intertrochanteric fracture of the femoral neck with a locked, long intramedullary nail with those treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) in a prospective randomised study. Each patient who presented with an extra-capsular hip fracture was randomised to operative stabilisation with either a long intramedullary Holland nail or a DHS. We treated 92 patients with a Holland nail and 98 with a DHS. Pre-operative variables included the Mini Mental test score, patient mobility, fracture pattern and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading. Peri-operative variables were anaesthetic time, operating time, radiation time and blood loss. Post-operative variables were time to mobilising with a frame, wound infection, time to discharge, time to fracture union, and mortality. We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables. The mean anaesthetic and operation times were shorter in the DHS group than in the Holland nail group (29.7 vs 40.4 minutes, p < 0.001; and 40.3 vs 54 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively). There was an increased mean blood loss within the DHS group versus the Holland nail group (160 ml vs 78 ml, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean time to mobilisation with a frame was shorter in the Holland nail group (DHS 4.3 days, Holland nail 3.6 days, p = 0.012). More patients needed a post-operative blood transfusion in the DHS group (23 vs seven, p = 0.003) and the mean radiation time was shorter in this group (DHS 0.9 minutes vs Holland nail 1.56 minutes, p < 0.001). The screw of the DHS cut out in two patients, one of whom underwent revision to a Holland nail. There were no revisions in the Holland nail group. All fractures in both groups were united when followed up after one year. We conclude that the DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail. However, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater. The Holland nail allows patients to mobilise faster and to a greater extent. We have therefore adopted the Holland nail as our preferred method of treating intertrochanteric fractures of the hip

Aims

We reviewed all patients who sustained a fracture of the hip and were treated in Northern Ireland over a period of 15 years to identify trends in incidence, the demographics of the patients, the rates of mortality, the configuration of the fracture and the choice of implant.

Prospective data on 6905 consecutive hip fracture patients at a district general hospital were analysed to identify the risk factors for the development of deep infection post-operatively. The main outcome measure was infection beneath the fascia lata.

A total of 50 patients (0.7%) had deep infection. Operations by consultants or a specialist hip fracture surgeon had half the rate of deep infection compared with junior grades (p = 0.01). Increased duration of anaesthesia was significantly associated with deep infection (p = 0.01). The method of fracture fixation was also significant. Intracapsular fractures treated with a hemiarthroplasty had seven times the rate of deep infection compared with those treated by internal fixation (p = 0.001). Extracapsular fractures treated with an extramedullary device had a deep infection rate of 0.78% compared with 0% for those treated with intramedullary devices (p = 0.02).

The management of hip fracture patients by a specialist hip fracture surgeon using appropriate fixation could significantly reduce the rate of deep infection and associated morbidity, along with extended hospitalisation and associated costs.

We have evaluated retrospectively the relationship of bony injuries seen on 106 consecutive MR scans in elderly patients of a mean age of 81.4 years (67 to 101) who were unable to bear weight after a low-energy injury.

There were no visible fractures on plain radiographs of the hip but eight patients (7.5%) had fractures of the pubic ramus. In 43 patients (40.5%) MRI revealed a fracture of the femoral neck and in 26 (24.5%) there was a fracture of a pubic ramus. In 17 patients (16%) MRI showed an occult sacral fracture and all of these had a fracture of the pubic ramus. No patient with a fracture of the femoral neck had an associated fracture of the pelvic ring or vice versa. Occult fracture of the hip and of the pelvic ring appear to be mutually exclusive and if an acute fracture of the pubic ramus is diagnosed radiologically further investigations are not needed to rule out an occult fracture of the hip.