Purpose and background. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) leads to nerve compression in the lumbar spine, and requires immediate treatment to prevent permanent neurological dysfunction, including urinary/anorectal incontinence. The consequences for the patient are significant as, in the decade to 2018, CES has cost the NHS £186,134,049. No study has reported patients’ experiences of being managed with suspected CES in an emergency department (ED), and this study explores patients’ experiences and how the NHS can optimise care for patients experiencing this condition. Methods and Results. In this qualitative secondary analysis, 14 participants (aged 23–63 years) with suspected CES were purposively sampled from 4 EDs in England. Online, semi-structed interviews were undertaken (in 2021, during the pandemic), and were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were managed using a Framework approach and analysed thematically. Three themes were identified: quality of care; environmental factors; and expectations. The quality of care included managing uncertainty, the importance of communication, appropriate assessment and follow-up care. Environmental factors, including the chairs, waiting times and the busy nature of the ED, negatively impacted patients’ experiences. Furthermore, an expectation gap was identified, as most individuals came to the ED expecting to receive a scan, an accurate diagnosis and a cure. Despite frustrations, patients expressed gratitude towards the ED staff. Conclusion. This study highlights the importance of empathically acknowledging the patient's pain and providing comprehensive assessments and management plans for people attending ED with suspected CES. Optimising the ED environment to minimise patients’ pain and distress while waiting to access care is paramount and overdue. No conflicts of interest.  . Sources of funding. Funding for primary data: Health Education England & National Institute of Health and Care Research (ICA-CDRF-2018-04-ST2-040)

Endoscopic spine surgery is a promising and minimally invasive technique for the treatment of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. However, the literature on the outcome of interlaminar endoscopic decompression (IED) versus conventional microsurgical technique (CMT) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is scarce. We analyzed 88 patients (IED: 36/88, 40.9%; CMT: 52/88, 59.1%) presenting with lumbar central spinal stenosis between 2018–2020. Surgery-related (operation time, complications, time to hospital release (THR), ASA score, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), side (unilateral/bilateral), patient-reported (ODI, NRS (leg-, back pain), eQ5D, COMI), and radiological (preoperative dural sack cross-sectional area (DSCA), Shizas score (SC), left (LRH) and right (RRH) lateral recess heights, left (LFA) and right (RFA) facet angle) parameters were extracted. Complication (most often re-stenosis due to hematoma and/or residual sensorimotor deficits) rates were higher in the endoscopic (38.9%) than microsurgical (13.5%) treatment group (p<0.01). Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively evaluated ODI, COMI, eQ5D, NRS leg, or NRS back values in our cohort. We did not observe significant differences in the endoscopic versus microsurgical group for the patient-reported outcomes. Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with patient-centered outcomes and should be considered in future studies. Endoscopic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis was similarly successful as the conventional microsurgical approach, although it was associated with higher complication rates in our single-center study experience. This was probably because of the surgeons' lack of experience with this method and the resulting different learning curve compared with the conventional technique

Background and purpose of the study. Patients with sciatica experience high levels of disability and poor outcomes and treatment has demonstrated, at best, only modest success. To be effective, management strategies must be informed by patients' perceptions about ‘what matters’ about experiencing this condition. The aim of this paper is to explore the lived experience of sciatica and to consider the implications for clinical practice. Methods and results. In this qualitative study, based on the principles of interpretative phenomenological analysis, 14 participants with a clinical presentation of sciatica of likely nerve root origin were purposively recruited from an NHS, Primary Care Musculoskeletal Service in the UK. Individual, semi-structured interviews were used to collect data, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were managed using a framework approach and analysed thematically. Sciatica was experienced as a protracted journey of acute exacerbations of uncontrolled and incapacitating symptoms that were overwhelming and difficult to make sense of. Adversely affecting almost all aspects of life, participants struggled to maintain their physical, functional and financial independence; their important relationships; social networks and the roles and activities that provided joy and purpose. The impact of sciatica was a ‘life on hold’; an altered sense of self and an uncertain future. For three participants, the experience of sciatica was sufficiently distressing for them to contemplate suicide. Conclusions. This paper reveals the severity and devastating impact of the symptoms and effects of sciatica. Important practice and research implications have been identified regarding managing symptoms and the need to align treatment strategies with patients' complex and multifaceted needs. Conflicts of interest: None. Funding acknowledgements: This study was funded by an NIHR Masters in Clinical Research Fellowship awarded to CR. LR is funded, in part, by an NIHR Senior Clinical Lecturer award (Round 3)

Objectives. This presentation discusses the experience at our Centre with treating traumatic thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and also looks at clinical and radiological outcomes as well as complications. Design. This is a retrospective study reviewing all cases performed between Jan 2013 and June 2019. Subjects. In our study there were 257 patients in total, of which there were 123 males and 134 females aged between 17 and 70. Methods. We reviewed the case notes and imaging retrospectively to obtain the relevant data. Results. A total of 257 patients were included, 123 males and 134 females; the mean age was 47.6 years. The majority of injuries were from fall from significant height. In 98 cases the fracture involved a thoracic vertebra and in 159 cases a lumbar vertebra. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was performed either one level above and below fracture or Two levels above and below the fracture depending upon the level of injury. Forty two cases were treated with additional short pedicle screws at the level of fracture. More than 15% (39) of patients presented with a neurological deficit on admission and more than 80% (32) of those showed post-operative improvement in their neurology as per Frankel Grading system. The mean Operative time was 117minutes +− 45, and mean length of hospital stay was 7.2 +− 3.8 days, with significant improvement in Visual analogue score. Percutaneous fixation achieved a satisfactory improvement in radiological parameters including sagittal Cobb angle (SCA) post-operatively in all patients. The vast majority of patients achieved a good functional outcome according to modified Macnab criteria. Follow up was for a maximum of two years, with relevant imaging at each stage. Ten (3.8%) patients had wound infection with three patients requiring wound debridement. Four patients had upper level screws pulled out and in Four cases one screw was misplaced. All eight had revision surgery. Conclusions. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe surgical option with comparable outcomes to open surgery and a potential reduction in perioperative morbidity. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is the primary surgical technique to treat traumatic thoracolumbar fractures at our Centre. There were no major complications in our series, with good functional outcome following surgery

Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lille, Service de Neurochirurgie et Chirurgie du Rachis, Lille, France. Assessment of current thoughts regarding spinal fellowships amongst spinal fellows in the United Kingdom and abroad. Qualitative analysis provides rich and contextual detail that cannot be borne out by quantitative research. We undertook detailed interviews amongst fellows who have varying fellowship experience both in the United Kingdom and abroad. Ten fellows, all of whom were approaching their Certificate of Completion of Training (or equivalent) in Trauma and Orthopaedic surgery, or just awarded the certificate. All undertaking/undertaken at least one 12-month fellowship. Qualitative experiences. A large unit provides a breadth of pathology that may is usually not encountered in smaller units. Fellows who worked in such units felt confident that they would recognise a variety of pathologies, but did not necessarily feel confident in their surgical management. Operative exposure to deformity surgery, whilst not necessarily a future part of practice, was felt useful for the added technical skills it provides. Fellows attending a smaller unit, where they may have been the sole ‘spinal fellow’, reported greater satisfaction in operative experience. Interestingly, there was felt to be a ‘saturation point’, where a fellow perceived no further educational benefit from remaining in one particular unit. A fellowship in spinal surgery is useful in preparing for independent practice as a spinal surgeon. Large units provide skills that are applicable to several aspects of spinal surgery. There appears to be a difference in breadth and complexity of pathology versus operative experience

Background and Purpose. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can be constant or episodic. Fluctuations are common. We present two different pictures of the CLBP experience; timelines illustrating back pain over time and ‘web diagrams’ showing a snapshot of a phase in time. Methods. Semi structured interviews from 34 participants from the UK BeST trial included timelines drawn collaboratively by the researcher and participant. Symptoms, events, treatment and consultations were arranged chronologically along a timeline. Initial thematic analysis on 63 interviews gave bio-psychosocial themes that were spoken about in an integrated way. Further analysis explored these interactions between themes. Interactions were classified as; helpful to recovery, unhelpful or mixed. Web diagrams were drawn for each interview and classified as Dense- mostly unhelpful interactions, Open – a combination of helpful and unhelpful interactions and Sparse – mostly helpful interactions. Results. Timelines were easy to compile and helped participants to describe their CLBP history. Timelines elicited rich data and promoted comparisons within and between cases aiding reflexivity. Web diagrams graphically illustrated the complexities of a person's LBP experience at that time. Dense webs showed a complex ‘locked in’ presentation. Open webs showed some helpful and less unhelpful interactions suggesting change may be easier to facilitate and sparse webs suggested that the participant was managing their own recovery. Conclusions. Timelines are a useful tool to assist history taking and facilitate discussion. Web diagrams illustrate the complex presentations often found in CLBP. Identifying patterns of unhelpful as well as helpful interactions between bio psychosocial factors may aid clinicians in their treatment approaches. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Funded by the Health Technology Assessment Programme

Introduction

Spine is a common site for haematological malignancies. Multiple myeloma affects the spine in 70% of cases. New guidelines were published in 2015 to help manage spinal haematological malignancies.

Despite neural compression or spinal instability, instrumentation of the spine should be avoided. Surgery carries significant risks of wound complications and more importantly delaying the definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cement augmentation and bracing for pain and prevention of deformity is key to the new strategies.

We aimed to evaluate the different treatment modalities adopted in the spine unit at St George's hospital for spinal haematological malignancies. We compared our practice to the current guidelines published in 2015.

Introduction

The placement of a large interbody implant allows for a larger surface area for fusion, vis a vis, via retroperitoneal direct anterior, antero-lateral and lateral approaches. At the same time, spinal navigation facilitates a minimally invasive fixation for inserting posterior pedicle screws. We report on the first procedures in the United Kingdom performed by a single-surgeon at a single- centre using navigated robot-assisted spine surgery without the need for guide-wires.

The K2M MESA Rail is a new implant with a unique beam-like design which provides increased rigidity compared with a standard circular rod of equivalent diameter potentially allowing greater control and maintenance of correction. The aim of this study was to review our early experience of this implant. We retrospectively reviewed the case notes and radiographs of all consecutive cases of spinal deformity correction in which at least one rail was used. All radiological measurements were made according to the Scoliosis Research Society definitions. Since June 2012 thirty-three cases of spinal deformity correction were performed using the K2M Rail system. One case was excluded as there were no pre-operative radiographs. Median age was 15 years; there were 23 females. There were 26 scoliosis cases of which two had associated Chiari malformation, three were neuromuscular, and the remainder were adolescent idiopathic cases. Six patients had kyphotic deformity secondary to Scheuermann's disease. Mean length of follow-up was 16 months. In the scoliosis cases the mean pre-operative Cobb angle of the major curve was 58.6° with a mean correction of 35.6°. The mean post-operative thoracic kyphosis was 21.1°. The median number of levels included in the correction was 13. Bilateral rails were used in four cases, the remainder had one rail on the concave side and a contralateral rod. No patients required an anterior release or staged surgery. All kyphosis cases had posterior apical corrective osteotomies. The mean pre-operative thoracic kyphosis was 75.5° with a mean correction of 31°. The median number of levels included in the correction was 11. Four patients had bilateral rails. No patients required anterior release. Complications: two patients had prominent hardware. One patient had a malpositioned screw causing nerve root irritation, which was removed. There were three superficial infections, which settled with antibiotics. There were no cases of implant breakage, screw pull-out, or loss of correction. The K2M MESA Rail is a powerful new implant design which helps to achieve and maintain satisfactory correction of complex spinal deformity, and is particularly strong at correcting kyphotic deformity. It also enables restoration of normal thoracic kyphosis, particularly in idiopathic thoracic curves, which tend to be lordosing. This may prevent thoracic flat back and potential long-term sequelae. Early results show that the system is as safe and effective as other posterior deformity correction implants on the market, however, it requires further prospective follow-up to ascertain its outcomes in the long-term

To assess adverse events related to XLIF approach in lumbar degenerative disease. Recently novel minimally disruptive spine procedure eXtreme lateral Interbody Fusion i.e XLIF has been developed. It is 90 (off the midline true lateral approach, which allows large graft placement, excellent disc height restoration and indirect decompression at the stenotic motion segment. We describe our experience in 28 patients. Retrospective review of records of patients undergoing surgery between July 2008- Jan 2010. Presenting complaints, number of levels performed and complications (medical, approach, or implant related) were audited. Results: 28 patients (17 female: 11 male) with median age of 47 yrs, range (38-75) formed the study group. Average stay was 4 days. All patients had MRI of lumbar spine. 2/3 rd patients had low back pain as their presenting complaint. All patients had nerve monitoring through out the procedure. There were 12 single, 15 two level and 1 three level cases (total 45 levels). 14/28 patients underwent plating at the same time. EBL was 100ml. There were 11/45 adverse events (24.4%). 6 events were approach, 4 were implant bone interface and 1 medical related. Major complication occurred in 1 patient (3.6%). 2/3 rd of patients, were better after the surgery. Almost negligible blood loss, low infection rate and short average stay seemed to work in favour of this approach. Complications are there as (with any new procedure) our results indicate, but these are manageable and less common with this technique. This did not require Ethics approval and there was no grant or industry support for the above

Introduction. Lumbar spinal pain can be a consequence of discogenic pain. After failure of conservative management, lumbar fusions are popular and considered the gold standard. However, these techniques are associated with significant morbidity. A percutaneous trans-sacral technique may address these for L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 alone spinal fusions. Our unit has adopted this technique and presents our initial experience of 51 patients and preliminary results. Method. Patients with a confirmed clinical and radiological evidence of degenerate intervertebral disc with or without prior surgical intervention were selected. Patients with a history of pelvic surgery/radiotherapy were excluded. Data was collected prospectively using the Global Patient Outcome Scoring System and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at clinical follow-up. Results. 51 patients received the procedure and 30 achieving a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Patients had a median age of 46(range 20-78) and included 19 male and 32 females with on average 40 months of pain. The mean ODI score improved after surgery from pre-operative levels 52.9(SEM 3.0) to 6 month scores of 38.4(SEM 3.9), t(29)=4.2, p<0.0002 . This difference remained statistically significant at 12 month follow-up with a mean ODI scores 34.3 (SEM 5.2), t(18)=4.37, P<0.0004 (Mean difference of 21.1 SEM 4.8). A sub-analysis of confounding factors identified patients with previous surgery, claiming state benefits, pursuing litigation, mainly leg pain and requiring pedicular fusion failed to achieve statistical significance. Patients receiving a 360 degree fusion with facet screws alone improved sooner and achieving a mean difference in ODI score of 27.6(SEM 8.2). Conclusion. Our initial results confirm this to be an effective alternative treatment modality for lumbar spine fusion in the management of primary discogenic back pain. Patients receiving 360 degree fusion and not claiming state benefits or pursuing litigation appear to have a better outcome

Competency levels of AOSpine members (Europe) based on whether or not they had undertaken a full 12 month fellowship in spinal surgery

Self-assessment questionnaire distributed to members (60 questions relating to: previous surgical training, fellowships and their nature, and both theoretical and practical competency amongst basic and advanced spinal conditions)

289 completed responses

Competency levels with(out) fellowship; differences in fellowship training; overall competence in spinal surgery as neurosurgeons versus those trained as orthopaedic surgeons. Competency defined as those able to deal with complications or able to perform without supervision.

28% (n=80) undertook a full 12 month fellowship

Notable differences between groups were identified (fellowship vs no fellowship): spinal deformity (58% vs 26%), cervical trauma (83% vs 59%), cervical stabilisation (78% vs 53%), lumbar and thoracic trauma (85% vs 57%) and anterior surgery (66% vs 41%) and its complications (46% vs 23%).

Interestingly of the whole group only 43% were competent in the actual practice of conservative management of spinal conditions.

There was no significant difference in theoretical knowledge or practical skills between orthopaedics surgeons and neurosurgeons.

Fellowship training is effective, but there are deficiencies in areas. In order to provide a routine and emergency service as a spinal surgeon, competency at relatively common procedures must be reached. Our data demonstrates a lack of uniformity in such competencies, and we believe efforts towards a formal curriculum for spinal training should be embarked upon.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of 8 children treated with vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) for correction of early onset spinal scoliotic deformities.

Purpose

Retrospective review of growth sparing spinal instrumentation.

To assess screw malposition rates and complications associated with pedicle screw insertion using 3D navigation technology.

A retrospective study was undertaken for all cases where O-arm® and StealthStation® systems were used over a 2-year period. The primary outcome measure was return to theatre rates for pedicle screw malposition.

A total of 938 screws were inserted (934 thoracolumbar and 4 cervical), and 103 patients underwent spinal fixation using O-arm® and StealthStation® navigation. 64 were revision cases and 39 primary cases. Average number of levels was 4.6. There were a total of 10 complications: 3 infections, 1 DVT, 1 PE, 1 fast atrial fibrillation (AF), 1 screw malposition, 1 non-union, 1 undisplaced vertebral body fracture and 1 nerve root compression following osteotomy. The percentage return to theatre for screw malposition using 3D navigation was 1% of patients and 0.1% of pedicle screws. No patients developed permanent neurological compromise.

These systems provide accuracy that is comparable to traditional 2D fluoroscopic techniques. We advocate their use in the safe insertion of pedicle screws in complex revision deformity cases where original anatomical landmarks are absent or obscured. We also believe that radiation exposure is considerably less with navigation especially in these complex and revision cases.

Objective

To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following sacral resection

Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Wallis implant in management of discogenic back pain.

We have prospectively studied thirty patients between 2006 and 2007. Average age of patients was 40.8 years. Average follow-up period 20.6 months (9-28). Main inclusion criteria includes failure of conservative management of low back pain due to degenerative disc disease, preservation of 50% of the disc height and positive discographic features. In majority of the patients the implant was put in at the level of L4-L5.

Pre-op and post op SF36 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed during clinic follow-up and by telephonic interview. Mean SF36 score improved from thirty-seven (8.3 – 54.3) to 51.4. Mean ODI improved from forty-three (20-60) to 26.5(2-60) (p = 0.026). Complications including superficial infection occurred in one patient, deep infection in one patient, erosion of spinous process in one and displacement of the implant in one case. Three (10%) patients had revision surgery due to various reasons.

Wallis interspinous dynamic stabilization system could be used as a soft stabilisation device avoiding fusion and short-term results are promising. In selected group of discogenic low back pain patients it is a useful interim procedure. Long-term follow-up of our series is ongoing.

To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following resection of primary malignant bone tumours.

Primary malignant tumours of the sacrum are rare, arising from bony or neural elements, or bone marrow in haematological malignancies.

Management of these lesions is dictated by anatomical considerations and the behaviour of tumours. The three key issues which arise are the adequacy of tumour resection, mechanical stabilisation and the need for colostomy.

A retrospective review of the surgical management of primary malignant sacral tumours from 2004 - 2009.

The study included 46 patients (34 males, 12 females) with an average age of 49 (range 7 – 82). Median duration of symptoms before presentation was 26 months.

10 patients had inoperable tumours at presentation. 6 patients had chemotherapy. 2 patients opted for palliative radiotherapy. 1 patient was unfit for surgery.

25 patients (54%) underwent surgical resection. 8 underwent instrumented stabilisations with fibula strut graft vs. 17 uninstrumented.

Colostomy was performed in 10 patients (40%). Mean follow post-operatively was 19.0 months.

Wound healing problems were present in 5/25 (20%). There was no difference in infection rates between definitive surgery with and without colostomy. Mechanical failure of stabilisation was noted in 75%. There was one peri-operative death.

Local recurrence occurred in 12%(3/25) of operated patients although follow-up period was noted to be short.

Mechanical stabilisation for extensive lesions in the sacrum are particularly challenging in tumour surgery. Despite radiological failure in 7/8 instrumented stabilisations, patients were relatively asymptomatic and only 1/8 required revision stabilisation surgery.

Ethics approval: None: Audit Interest Statement: None

Introduction:

Scheuermann's kyphosis is a fixed round back deformity characterised by wedged vertebrae seen on radiograph. It is known patients presented with a negative sagittal balance before operation. Few studies investigated the outcome after operation, especially the change in the lumbar hyperlordosis.

Aim:

An analysis of significant neuromonitoring changes (NMCs) and evaluation of the efficacy of multimodality neuromonitoring in spinal deformity surgery.