Osteochondral (OC) defects of the knee are associated with pain and significant limitation of activity. Studies have demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapies in treating osteochondral defects. There is increasing evidence that the efficacy of MSC therapies may be a result of the paracrine secretion, particularly exosomes. Here, we examine the effects of MSC exosomes in combination with Hyaluronic Acid (HA) as an injectable therapy on functional osteochondral regeneration in a rabbit osteochondral defect model. Exosomes were purified from human MSC conditioned medium by size fractionation. A circular osteochondral defect of 4.5 mm diameter and 2.5 mm depth was surgically created in the trochlear grooves of 16 rabbit knees. Thereafter, eight knees received three weekly injections of 200 µg of exosomes in one ml of 3% HA, and the remaining eight knees received three weekly injections of one ml of 3% HA only. The rabbits were sacrificed at six weeks. Analyses were performed by macroscopic and histological assessments, and functional competence was analysed via Young Modulus calculation at five different points (central, superior, inferior, medial and lateral) of the repaired osteochondral defect site. MSC exosomes displayed a modal size of 100 nm and expressed exosome markers (CD81, TSG101 and ALIX). When compared to HA alone, MSC exosomes in combination with HA showed significantly better repair histologically and biomechanically. The Young Modulus was higher in 4 out of the 5 points. In the central region, the Young Modulus of MSC exosome and HA combination therapy was significantly higher: 5.42 MPa [SD=1.19, 95% CI: 3.93–6.90] when compared to HA alone: 2.87 MPa [SD=2.10, 95% CI: 0.26–5.49], p < 0 .05. The overall mean peripheral region was also significantly higher in the MSC exosome and HA combination therapy group: 5.87 MPa [SD=1.19, 95% CI: 4.40–7.35] when compared to HA alone: 2.70 MPa [SD=1.62, 95% CI: 0.79–4.71], p < 0 .05. The inferior region showed a significantly higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 7.34 MPa [SD=2.14, 95% CI: 4.68–10] compared to HA alone: 2.92 MPa [SD=0.98, 95% CI: 0.21–5.63], p < 0.05. The superior region showed a significantly higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 7.31 MPa [SD=3.29, 95% CI: 3.22–11.39] compared to HA alone: 3.59 MPa [SD=2.55, 95% CI: 0.42–6.76], p < 0.05. The lateral region showed a significantly higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 8.05 MPa [SD=2.06, 95% CI: 5.49–10.61] compared to HA alone: 3.56 MPa [SD=2.01, 95% CI: 1.06–6.06], p < 0.05. The medial region showed a higher Young Modulus in the combination therapy: 6.68 MPa [SD=1.48, 95% CI: 4.85–8.51] compared to HA alone: 3.45 MPa [SD=3.01, 95% CI: −0.29–7.19], but was not statistically significant. No adverse tissue reaction was observed in all the immunocompetent animals treated with MSC exosomes. Three weekly injections of MSC exosomes in combination with HA therapy results in a more functional osteochondral regeneration as compared to HA alone

Background. The identification of novel biomarker which is highly specific and sensitive for periprosthetic joint (PJI) have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and ultimately improve patient outcomes. Thus, the aim of this systemic review is to identify and evaluate novel biomarkers for the preoperative diagnostics of PJI. Methods. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases identified from 1. st. of January 2018 to 30. th. of September. 2022. We used “periprosthetic joint infection” OR “prosthetic joint infection” OR “periprosthetic infection” as the diagnosis of interest and the target index applied AND “marker”. To focus on novel biomarkers already used biomarkers of the established PJI diagnostic criteria of MSIS, ICM and EBJIS were not included in the analysis. These three criteria were considered the reference standard during quality assessment. Results. A total of 19 studies were included. In these, fourteen different novel biomarkers were analyzed. Fifteen studies (79%) had prospective designs and the other four (22%) were retrospective studies. Six studies (33%) included only periprosthetic knee infections and thirteen (67%) included periprosthetic knee and hip infections. Proteins were analyzed in most cases (nine studies), followed by molecules (three studies), exosome (two studies) as well as DNA (two studies), interleukin (one study) and lysosome (one study). One novel and promising marker that had been frequently analyzed is calprotectin. Conclusion. No marker demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity than already known parameters used for standardized treatment based on established PJI definitions. Further studies are needed to elucidate the benefit and usefulness of implementing new biomarkers in diagnostic PJI settings