Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 67
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 41 - 41
7 Aug 2024
Pavlova A Cooper K Deane J Hart-Winks E Hemming R Johnson K
Full Access

Purpose and background. Nearly 70% of UK physiotherapists experience work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) during their career, with a significant proportion occurring in the back and being attributed to patient handling tasks. Evidence suggests that manual handling training alone is ineffective and interventions among nurses indicate that a tailored approach, including targeted exercise (TE), can reduce WRMSD rates. This study aimed to explore physiotherapists’ perspectives of WRMSDs, patient handling, and the role of TE in reducing WRMSDs among physiotherapists. Methods and Results. Key informant interviews were conducted with 4 physiotherapy operational leads and 1 manual handling trainer from NHS Grampian. Interviews were transcribed and Framework Analysis was utilised to identify key themes, including challenges, barriers, and facilitators. Following this, two online focus groups were conducted with 7 qualified NHS physiotherapists across the UK. Views of manual handling training varied across specialities, with some finding it comprehensive and adaptable, and others finding it less applicable to patients in their speciality or community setting. Physiotherapist views on fitness for work varied, with some highlighting the necessity of TE to ensure workforce health whilst others considered exercise to be a personal matter. Facilitators to implementation identified by participants were having support from management and a strong justification for the exercise content. Varied work schedules and facilities were identified as barriers to implementation of a work-based TE intervention. Conclusion. Varying perspectives on TE interventions and barriers to implementation were identified. This work will inform future research to develop TE interventions in consultation with key stakeholders. Conflicts of Interest. No conflicts of interest. Source of Funding. NHS Endowment Research Grant 22/001


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 35 - 35
1 Oct 2022
Hutting N Oswald W Staal J Heerkens Y
Full Access

Background. Low back pain (LBP) is a major problem across the globe and is the leading cause worldwide of years lost to disability. Self-management is considered an important component the treatment of people with non-specific LBP. However, it seems that the self-management support for people with non-specific LBP provided by physiotherapists can be improved. Moreover, the way exercise therapists (ET) address self-management in practice is unknown. Purpose. To investigate the ideas, opinions and methods used by physiotherapists and ET with regard to self-management and providing self-management support to patients with non-specific LBP. Methods. This study was a qualitative survey. An online questionnaire with open-ended questions was developed. The survey was conducted among physiotherapists and ET working in the Netherlands. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results. Respondents considered self-management support an important topic in physiotherapy and exercise therapy for people with non-specific LBP. In the self-management support provided by the respondents, providing information and advice were frequently mentioned. The topics included in the support given by the respondents covered a broad range of important factors. The topics frequently focused on biomechanical factors. Therapists mainly provided patient education rather than self-management support. Moreover, important self-management skills were generally not addressed sufficiently. The majority of respondents had a need with regard to self-management or providing self-management support. These needs include having more knowledge, skills and tools aimed at facilitating self-management. Conclusion. The way physiotherapists and ET address self-management in people with non-specific LBP is not optimal and should be improved. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained. Previous publication: This work was published in a scientific journal: Hutting N, Oswald W, Staal JB, Heerkens YF. Self-management support for people with non-specific low back pain: A qualitative survey among physiotherapists and exercise therapists. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Dec; 50:102269. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102269. This work was never presented at a conference


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 34 - 34
1 Jan 2012
Bronfort G Maiers M Schulz C Evans R Bracha Y Svendsen K Grimm R Owens E Garvey T Transfeldt E
Full Access

Purpose. The importance of interpreting clinical trial results in terms of the benefits a treatment may offer to individuals with chronic pain is becoming more widely recognized. The clinical meaningfulness of group differences can better be described by looking at the percentages of responders in each treatment group, rather than between group mean differences. We have reassessed the outcomes of a clinical trial for chronic low back pain (LBP) from this new perspective. Methods. The randomized clinical trial examined short- (12 weeks) and long-term (52 weeks) efficacy of high-dose, supervised trunk exercise (SET), spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), and a course of home exercise and self-care advice (HEA) for the treatment of LBP ≥ 6 weeks duration. We calculated response to care at 2 levels for 2 variables: numeric back pain scores (NRS) and Roland-Morris Disability (RMD), and at 3 timepoints (Weeks 12, 26 and 52). The 2 levels were calculated as percent improvement from baseline ≥ 30% and ≥75%. Finally, we calculated the relative proportion (± 95% confidence intervals) of the sample (∼100 per treatment group) that achieved each level of improvement. Conclusion. In general, 60%-80% of patients had ≥ 30% improvements in pain @ week 12, while 20%-30% showed ≥75% improvement. At week 52, the percentage of patients with ≥ 30% improvement dropped slightly, while ≥75% improvement increased slightly. For RMD scores, 30%-50% of patients showed ≥75% improvement at week 52. We will present these results and compare them to the previous analysis of between group mean differences


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 34 - 34
1 Oct 2019
Wood L Foster N Lewis M Bishop A
Full Access

Background and Aim of Study. Despite several hundred RCTs of exercise for persistent non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), the treatment targets of exercise are unclear. In a systematic review we observed 30 direct and indirect treatment targets of exercise described across 23 RCTs for persistent NSLBP. Since not all treatment targets and outcomes can be assessed in all RCTs, it is therefore important to prioritise these treatment targets through consensus from key stakeholders. These consensus workshops aimed to agree treatment targets for the use of exercise interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in persistent NSLBP using nominal group workshop (NGW) methodology. Methods and Results. The first UK workshop included people who had experience of exercise to manage their persistent NSLBP, clinicians who prescribe exercise for persistent NSLBP, and researchers who design exercise interventions tested in RCTs. The second workshop included participants attending an international back and neck pain research workshop. Twelve participants took part in the UK NGW and fifteen took part in the final ranking of the exercise treatment targets. In addition to the original list of 30 treatment targets, a further 26 ideas were generated. After grouping and voting, 18 treatment targets were prioritised. The top five ranked targets of exercise interventions for persistent NSLBP were: pain reduction, improvement in function, reduction of fear of movement, encouragement of normal movement and improvement of mobility. The results of the international NGW will also be presented. Conclusion. Future RCTs of exercise should consider more consistent assessment of these treatment targets. Sources of Funding: This PhD is funded by the Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University. Prof NE Foster is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator, and was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Professorship (NIHR-RP-011-015). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts of interest


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 40 - 40
1 Sep 2019
Sheeran L Robling M
Full Access

Purposes of the study and background. Clinical assessment of spinal function is a routine part of low back pain (LBP) assessment, yet there is no clear consensus on what constitutes ‘spinal dysfunction’ and how this informs treatment. This study's aims to develop a spinal function classification framework by gaining expert academic and clinical consensus on (i) spinal function assessment tests (ii) encountered LBP motor control/movement impairment (MCI/MI) sub-types (iii) their characteristics and (iii) exercises and feedback for each sub-type. Methods and Results. An online 2-round Delphi-survey of 4 world-leading academic experts and 36 clinical physiotherapists world-wide was employed. A five-point response scale was used to rate level of agreement on 174 items with a priori consensus defined by a ≠>80% level of agreement (LOA). Out of 15 spinal function assessment tests, 5 reached consensus with forward bend and sitting/standing tests highest scoring. 7 MCI/MI sub-types reached consensus as clinically encountered. 12 out of 128 of posture/movement descriptors within the 7 sub-types reached consensus. 7 exercises gained consensus in being considered as ‘important’ or ‘very important’ with exercises involving sitting, standing, forward bend scoring highest. Consensus was reached on MCI/MI sub-type specific exercises, compensation strategies and feedback to remedy these compensations. Conclusion. Academic and clinical expert consensus derived list of movement/posture descriptors, assessment tests and exercises considered clinically important provides a first to date, spinal function assessment classification framework for non-specific LBP. This offers a conceptual model for developing technologies (e.g. wearable sensors) to harness clinically useful information relating to spinal function, exercise performance and feedback for effective implementation of exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. No conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding: Health and Care Research Wales, RCBC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Sep 2019
Wood L Foster N Lewis M Bishop A
Full Access

Background. Exercise is a complex intervention, and often has more than one treatment target. Results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) typically show small to moderate effect sizes, but these may differ where outcomes better reflect the targets of interventions. This review aimed to describe what treatment targets, outcome domains and primary outcome measures are used in exercise RCTs, and examined how well the selected outcome domains match the treatment targets used in each RCT. Methods and Results. A computer-aided literature search was performed in eight databases, from inception to August 2018. Inclusion criteria: RCTs in CLBP, exercise compared to a non-exercise arm, sample size >60 per arm. Title and abstract review, subsequent full text review, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently undertaken by pairs of reviewers. Of 18251 initially identified titles and abstracts, 23 trials were included in the review. 30 treatment targets were extracted, and 6 primary outcome domains identified. A logic model of the treatment targets and outcomes demonstrated diverse relationships. Only 5 RCTs matched their primary outcome domain to the identified treatment targets, 12 used primary outcomes that did not match the reported treatment targets, and 6 were partially matched. Conclusion. The majority of included trials did not match the primary outcome domain to the treatment targets of the exercise intervention. Further research will explore if better matching between treatment targets and outcomes may change the conclusions of exercise trials in CLBP. No conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding: This PhD is funded by the Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University. Prof NE Foster is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator, and was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Professorship (NIHR-RP-011-015). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXI | Pages 2 - 2
1 Jul 2012
Mordecai S Dabke H
Full Access

Much debate exists over the value of exercise therapy for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aims to address the current evidence. An extensive search was carried out using the common medical databases, limiting results to clinical trials in English involving humans with defined outcome measures. 155 papers were identified and after applying strict inclusion criteria 12 papers remained for further analysis. These included 9 prospective cohort trials, 2 retrospective cohort trials and one case series. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Although all of the papers concluded an improvement in scoliotic curve after exercise therapy, not one of the papers had reliable methods or results to validate their conclusions. Identified shortcomings included, poor compliance with outpatient exercise regimes with no clear indication of who assessed for curve improvement, how it was assessed or what experience they had, nor was observer error for Cobb angle measurement taken into account. Additionally only a few of the studies had sound statistical analysis and no study could comment on whether the improvements seen were maintained after the exercise regime. Four previous systematic reviews have been performed finding favourable results for exercise therapy, but these were written by authors involved in the original research, adding significant reviewer bias. This systematic review has revealed only poor and low level evidence supporting the use of exercise therapy for treating AIS. Well designed controlled trials with randomisation are required to validate exercise therapy as an effective treatment option and as an appropriate use of NHS funds


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Sep 2021
Lui D Chan J Haleem S Lupu C Bernard J Bishop T Frere G Impey C Maude E
Full Access

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients were subjected to four weeks of Physiotherapy Scoliosis Specific Exercise (PSSE). 124 (Exclusion = 3) Patients were enrolled and assigned to either complete their treatment in one 4-week bout (4WC) (63 patients, M. age. = 14.52), or to complete their treatment in two separate fortnightly bouts (2X2WC) (63 patients, M. age. = 14.26). Clinical exam, surface topography and Scoliometer readings were compared. The SRS-30 questionnaire before and after treatment was conducted at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Group 1 (4WC) showed significant improvements from baseline (Pre-3.73 – Post 3.9; p=0.026) after the course of treatment, and showed significant improvements at 12 months follow up in Mental Health (p=0.006), Aggregate score (p= 0.005) and Satisfaction score (p=0.011). Satisfaction score remained statistically significant at 18 months follow up (p=0.016). Group 2 (2X2WC) did not record a significant improvement from baseline (p=0.058); however, showed significant improvements in self-image (p=0.013). There was no statically significant difference in SRS scores with respect to follow up time. We conclude that Physiotherapy Scoliosis Specific Exercise (PSSE) is a successful non-invasive therapy for AIS. The modified Schroth technique (ScolioGold) shows significant improvement in SRS30 scores with the 4-week intensive course that are sustained at a 2 year follow up


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 33 - 33
1 Oct 2019
Wood L Foster N Lewis M Bronfort G Groessl E Hewitt C Miyamoto G Reme S Bishop A
Full Access

Background. Complex interventions, such as exercise for LBP, often have many treatment targets. Matching a primary outcome to the target(s) of exercise interventions may provide greater standardized mean differences (SMDs) than using an unmatched primary outcome. We aimed to explore whether the conclusions of exercise trials for LBP might differ with i) improved matching of outcomes to treatment targets and ii) the use of composite outcome measures. Methods and Results. We investigated i) matching in five trials (n=1033) that used an unmatched primary outcome but included some of their matched outcomes as secondary outcomes; ii) composite outcomes in four trials (n=864). The composite consisted of standardised averaged matched outcomes. All analyses replicated the primary outcome analysis, applied to the matched or composite outcome in each dataset. When not possible, SMDs were calculated for the primary and matched outcomes. i) Of five trials, three had greater SMDs and increased statistical significance with matched outcomes (pooled effect SMD 0.35 (95% CI 0.16, 0.54), p=0.0003) compared to an unmatched primary outcome (pooled effect SMD 0.13 (95% CI 0.04, 0.23) p=0.007). ii) Of four composite outcomes: two matched trials had greater SMDs and improved statistical precision in the primary outcome than the composite outcome; two unmatched trials had greater SMDs and improved statistical precision in the composite compared to the primary outcome. Conclusion. Using an outcome that matches exercise targets in LBP trials appears to produce greater SMDs than an unmatched primary outcome. Future trials should consider primary outcome selection aligned with exercise treatment targets. Sources of Funding: L Wood's PhD is funded by the Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University. Prof NE Foster is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator, and was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Professorship (NIHR-RP-011-015). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 48 - 48
1 Oct 2019
Walsh J Jones S Benedetto V Stockley R
Full Access

A statement of the purposes of the study and background. Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the ten leading causes of disease burden globally, producing significant detrimental effects on physical and emotional wellbeing whilst having a substantial economic burden for society. There is an inverse relationship between socio-economic status and pain prevalence. The effectiveness of a locally run ‘Back to Fitness Programme’ (6-week education and exercise programme) in the most deprived local authority area in England was evaluated. A summary of the methods used and the results. Patients at Blackpool Hospitals NHS Trust over a 6-month timeframe were included. Initial data were collected from 49 patients (mean age 53.4 years, 67% female). The amount of final data collected varied per outcome measure due to a range of factors. Participants reported the programme had helped with their understanding of pain (n=16, 100%), ability to move around and function (n=15, 94%), and level of pain (n=14, 88%). Looking at Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores (n=17), 88% (n=15) of patients indicated a reduction (n=12, 71%) or no change (n=3, 18%) in perceived disability. The Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (n=18) showed that 78% (n=14) of participants perceived an increase in their average level of confidence to move despite pain. There was an overall improvement in understanding of pain reflected by Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire scores (n=44): 89% (n=39) improved (n=36, 82%) or did not change (n=3, 7%). Regarding lumbar flexion post-programme (n=17), 77% (n=13) of participants demonstrated an improvement (n=9, 53%) or no change (n=4, 24%). Conclusion. The majority of clinical outcomes improved following participation, predominantly in relation to understanding of pain. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This study is supported by The University of Central Lancashire in partnership with The Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 10 - 10
1 Jan 2012
Kent P Mj⊘sund HL Petersen DHD
Full Access

Purpose of study and background. This systematic review sought to determine the efficacy of such targeted treatment in adults with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Many clinicians and researchers believe that tailoring treatment to subgroups of NSLBP positively impacts on patient outcomes. Method and results. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, AMED, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference list searching and citation tracking. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of targeted manual therapy and/or exercise for NSLPB that used trial designs capable of providing robust information on targeted treatment (treatment effect modification) for the outcomes of activity limitation and pain. Included trials needed to be hypothesis-testing studies published in English, Danish or Norwegian. Method quality was assessed using the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria. Four high-quality trials of targeted manual therapy and/or exercise for NSLBP met the inclusion criteria. One study showed statistically significant effects for short-term outcomes using McKenzie directional preference-based exercise. Other included studies showed effects that might be clinically important in size but were not statistically significant with their samples sizes, as research into subgroups requires much larger sample sizes than traditional two-group trials. Conclusions. The clinical implications of these results are that they provide very cautious evidence supporting the notion that treatment targeted to subgroups of patients with NSLBP may improve patient outcomes. The results were too patchy, inconsistent, and investigated in samples too small for clinical recommendations to be based on these findings. The research implications are that adequately powered controlled trials of treatment effect modification are uncommon


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 22 - 22
1 Sep 2021
Frere G Chan CK Impey C Kydd C Glynn D Maude E
Full Access

1312 patients with idiopathic scoliosis completed the ScolioGold Body Image Questionnaire (SBIQ) before and after a course of intensive PSSE treatment. A paired T-test compared the patient's perception of Body image. Mean age was 24.7 with a range of 6 to 83 years old (<18 = 687; >18 = 625), female = 1061, male = 251).

Pre-treatment average was 5.3 (SD=2.07), which improved to 2.8 after treatment (SD=1.8). The difference of 2.6 was statistically significant (p<0.005). Pre-treatment, the patients in the children group scored 4.67, which was significantly lower than the adult group score of 6.32. On average, the children improved their scores by 2.48 to 2.19 which was statistically significant (p=0.000). The adults improved their scores by 2.81 to 3.51 which was statistically significant (p=0.000). On average patients with mild (11° to 25° Cobb angles) and moderate (26° to 50° Cobb angles) curvatures achieved a larger improvement compared to patients with severe curvatures (>50° Cobb angles). This difference of 0.35 was statistically significant (n=641, p<0.05).

There were significant improvements in the total SBIQ scores before and after treatment in both the child and adult groups with mild to severe curvatures after an intensive course of PSSE treatment. This shows that intensive PSSE treatment can improve scoliotic patients' self-image, therefore addressing aspects of their psychosocial well-being.


Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic low back pain (CLBP > 12 weeks duration) are two of the most common and costly chronic musculoskeletal conditions globally. Healthcare service demands mean that group-based multiple condition interventions are of increasing clinical interest and a priority for research, but no reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of group-based physiotherapy-led self-management interventions (GPSMI) for both conditions concurrently. Rapid review methodologies are an increasingly valid means of expediting knowledge dissemination and are particularly useful for addressing focused research questions.

Methods

The electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from the earliest date possible to August 26th 2013. Structured group-based interventions that aimed to promote self-management and that were delivered by health-care professionals (including at least one physiotherapist) involving adults with OA and/or CLBP were eligible for inclusion. The screening and selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.


Background

Implementation fidelity is the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended by intervention developers, and is extremely important in increasing confidence that changes in study outcomes are due to the effect of the intervention itself and not due to variability in implementation. Growing demands on healthcare services mean that multiple condition interventions involving highly prevalent musculoskeletal pain conditions such as chronic low back pain (CLBP) and/or osteoarthritis (OA) are of increasing clinical interest. This is the first in-depth review of implementation fidelity within self-management interventions for any musculoskeletal pain condition.

Methods

Structured self-management interventions delivered by health-care professionals (including at least one physiotherapist) in a group format involving adults with OA of the lumbar spine, hip or knee and/or CLBP were eligible for inclusion. The National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium Treatment Fidelity checklist was used by two independent reviewers to assess fidelity.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 40 - 40
1 Oct 2022
Howard J Rhodes S Sims J Ampat G
Full Access

Background. Free From Pain (aka Fear Reduction, Exercise Early with Food from plants, Rest and relaxation, Organisation and Motivation to decrease Pain from Arthritis and Increase Natural Strength) is a functional rehabilitation programme to combat sarcopenia and musculoskeletal pain in seniors. It is also published as a book (ISBN-0995676941). The aim of this audit was to evaluate the safety and suitability of the exercises and the usefulness of the exercise book. Methods and Results. Participants were volunteers who paid to attend the Free From Pain Exercise programme. Participants evaluated the exercises using a 5-point Likert scale and the Exercise Book using the Usefulness Scale for Patient Information Material (USE). 30 participants attended the Free From Pain programme. 26 participants completed the questionnaire. This included 20 females and 6 males, with a mean age of 76 years. The mean scores on the 0 to 5 Likert scales were A) Exercises were suitable? 4.69; B) Exercises were safe? 4.58; C) Absence of any injury or medical event whilst exercising? 4.58; D) Covered all body parts? 4.38; E) Easy to do at home? 4.42; F) Encouraged to do more exercise? 4.42; G) Recommend to family and friends? 4.50. The mean scores of the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural sub domains of the USE scale, scored 0 to 30, were 25.23, 23.73 and 23.69, respectively. Conclusion. The pre-pilot study suggests that the suggested exercises are safe and suitable for seniors, and that the exercise book is holistically useful. Conflict of Interest: G Ampat sells the Free From Pain Exercise book online through Amazon and other platforms. S Rhodes and J Sims are employed by Talita Cumi Ltd, of which Free From Pain is a trading name. Jacqueline Howard is a medical student and has no conflict of interest. Sources of funding: No funding was obtained


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2022
Paskins Z Le Maitre C Farmer C Clark E Mason D Wilkinson C Andersson D Bishop F Brown C Clark A Jones R Loughlin J McCarron M Pandit H Richardson S Salt E Taylor E Troeberg L Wilcox R Barlow T Peat G Watt F
Full Access

Background. Involving research users in setting priorities for research is essential to ensure research outcomes are patient-centred and to maximise research value and impact. The Musculoskeletal (MSK) Disorders Research Advisory Group Versus Arthritis led a research priority setting exercise across MSK disorders. Methods. The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHRNI) method of setting research priorities with a range of stakeholders were utilised. The MSKD RAG identified, through consensus, four research Domains: Mechanisms of Disease; Diagnosis and Impact; Living Well with MSK disorders and Successful Translation. Following ethical approval, the research priority exercise involved four stages and two surveys, to: 1) gather research uncertainties; 2) consolidate these; 3) score uncertainties using agreed criteria of importance and impact on a score of 1–10; and 4) analyse scoring, for prioritisation. Results. The first survey had 209 respondents, who described 1290 research uncertainties, which were refined into 68 research questions. 285 people responded to the second survey. The largest group of respondents represented patients and carers, followed by researchers and healthcare professionals. A ranked list was produced, with scores ranging between 12 and 18. Key priorities included developing and testing new treatments, better targeting of treatments, early diagnosis, prevention and better understanding and management of pain, with an emphasis on understanding underpinning mechanisms. Conclusions. For the first time, we have summarised priorities for research across MSKD, from discovery science to applied clinical and health research, including translation. We present a call to action to researchers and funders to target these priorities. Conflict of Interest: None. Sources of funding: We thank the funder, Versus Arthritis for their support of the research advisory groups and this activity


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Oct 2022
Mandani M Reagon C Hemming R Sparkes V
Full Access

Purpose and Background. Patients’ engagement with self-management strategies (SMS) is key when managing low back pain (LBP) and relies on appropriate information being delivered by the treating Clinician. However, patients have differing coping mechanisms which may affect success with SMS. This study aimed to determine Patient and Physiotherapist's perceptions of coping responses and SMS in patients with LBP. Methods. Patient completed a Pain Coping strategies questionnaire, before and after LBP treatment. Semi-structured interviews gathered data from of 10 patients (6 males; and 6 physiotherapists. Questionnaire data was described descriptively, and qualitative data was transcribed/analysed thematically. Results. 5 patients were categorized as ‘active copers’ and 5 as ‘passive copers’ before treatment. SMS success appeared to be impacted by patient coping strategies they adopted. Spiritual religious coping strategies linked to cultural beliefs was a common strategy for all patients. However, the active copers were more likely to engage with active strategies compared to passive copers. All patients felt they had not received full education/details about the home exercises. One patient became an ‘active coper’ following treatment demonstrating high self-confidence to self-manage pain and accepted exercises as a lifestyle. Physiotherapists did not use a valid method for screening purposes for coping, although they referred to ascertaining this verbally and they did tailor exercises differently for passive and active copers. Conclusion. Screening for individual coping strategies would enhance targeting treatments and all patients would benefit from full exercise programmes for self- management and pain self-efficacy approaches to change patients ‘behaviour and enhance patients’ self-confidence. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: The study is sponsored by Kuwait Government


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 56 - 56
1 Sep 2019
Echeita JA Preuper HS Dekker R Reneman M
Full Access

Background and purposes. Central Sensitization (CS) may occur in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Functional capacity these patients is limited. However, the association of CLBP with functioning assessed via lifting and aerobic capacity tests has been moderately explained and results are contradictory. Let alone pain response following strenuous exercise. Finally, whether CS is associated with either or both lifting and aerobic capacities is unknown. To analyze the relationship between CS, and lifting and aerobic capacities in patients with CLBP. To describe pain response to strenuous exercise in patients with CLBP. Methods. Cross-sectional observational study. CS, lifting and aerobic capacities, and pain response were respectively measured with Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), floor-to-waist lifting test, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), and Pain response questionnaire. Statistical analyses:. Stepwise-forward multiple regression with lifting and aerobic capacities (dependent), CSI (independent), physical, work- and disability-related characteristics (covariates);. Paired t-test of pain response before CPET pain to immediately and 24h after, and correlation of the changes with CSI. Results and Conclusion. 43 patients were measured. Higher CSI was associated with lower lifting (r=−0.16) and aerobic capacity (r=−0.06) performance after controlling for confounders. Explained variance were 64% and 42% respectively. Immediate pain response slightly decreased in the low back in response to strenuous exercise whereas it significantly increased in the upper legs; diffuse noxious inhibitory control could possibly explain such change. 24-hr pain response revealed no significant differences. CSI was found to be negatively associated with low back immediate pain response (r=−0.13) change. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 46 - 46
1 Oct 2019
Rathnayake A Sparkes V Sheeran L
Full Access

Purpose of the study and background. The preliminary study aimed to establish clinical and research expert opinion with regards to the key components of an assessment of a person with Mechanical Low Back Pain (MLBP). We aimed to identify the key subjective questions and objective tests which would be helpful for clinicians to develop the most appropriate self-management exercise programme. This is the first part of the study to develop the ‘Back-to-Fit’ digital tool offering personalised self-management exercise solutions for people with MLBP. Summary of the methods. A Bristol online survey which included a questionnaire with a series of open and closed questions was developed using the literature and was distributed among clinicians/researchers with a background in the clinical management of MLBP. The questionnaire included 6 demographic questions followed by sections related to subjective questions and objective tests of the MLBP assessment. 71 participants responded to the survey. Results. In the subjective assessment component, ≥80% level of agreement was obtained for 17 of 26 proposed subjective questions and 05 of the 21 suggested objective tests. Two more questions and two objective tests to be included in the assessment had been suggested by the partcipants. Conclusion. These expert agreements on questions and opinions provides an indication of the key subjective and objective components to be included in a self-assessment tool in a personalised self-management platform for MLBP. Further testing with a multiple round Delphi study in a large sample of experts is now required to obtain consensus for the above findings. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Biomechanics and Bioengineering Research Centre Versus Arthritis, Cardiff University, UK


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Oct 2019
Godfrey N Donovan-Hall M Shannon R Roberts L
Full Access

Purpose. Clinical guidelines identify a clear role for managing back pain with structured exercise. Pilates is a commonly recommended modality, however, Pilates-specific research is limited. Research suggests the patient-practitioner relationship may be important in managing persistent low back pain, although further research is needed to evaluate its impact on outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify the components of the relationship between Pilates teachers and clients with persistent low back pain. Methods and Results. This qualitative study used a multi-site, ethnographically-informed methodology. Data collection included observation of 24 Pilates sessions at eight sites across the South of England, and 19 semi-structured interviews with Pilates teachers and clients with persistent low back pain. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. From the interviews and observations, ten themes emerged, of which four related to components of the relationship: (1) ‘being known’; (2) support; (3) teacher expertise; and (4) mastery of exercises, facilitated by the teacher. Key influences on the relationship were identified in four themes: (5) professional identity of Pilates teachers; (6) health perceptions; (7) social influences such as group dynamic; and (8) service perceptions. An additional two themes described the perceived impact of the relationship: (9) feelings of safety; and (10) ‘feeling good’. Conclusion. These findings demonstrate the complex, multi-faceted interaction that occurs during Pilates sessions that includes instruction, demonstration, verbal and tactile feedback. This study illustrates the perceived importance of Pilates teachers in providing a safe environment for clients with persistent low back pain to exercise. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained