Background. This survey was conducted to gain information about how surgeons use scientific literature and how this is influenced by their knowledge of evidence-based medicine. The results were compared to a survey conducted 10 years previously. Where appropriate, the same questions as in the 2003 survey were used. Methods. We administered a voluntary questionnaire to participants at the AO Foundation courses in Davos, Switzerland, in December 2013. We surveyed, amongst other topics, the surgeons’ levels of education in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), how they implement EBM in daily practice and their publication record. Results. A total of 330 surgeons completed the 27 question survey. 49% (159/322) had learned about EBM in medical school. However, 69% (110/159) of those with EBM education had taken only one semester or less on the subject. 54% of participants (170/317) correctly identified a definition of EBM in surgery. This compares to 45% in the 2003 survey (130/288 respondents) of a subset who said they have previously heard of evidence-based orthopaedic surgery. When it came to applying EBM in their daily work, 45% of respondents (143/320) claim to always practice it (2003 figure: 28%, 113/404), while 26% (84/320) only use EBM for difficult or controversial cases (2003 figure: 26%, 104/404). 27% (88/323) have never published a manuscript as an author or co-author (2003 figure: 14%, 121/453), 53% (170/323) have been involved in 1–10 publications (2003 figure: 59%, 269/453), and 20% (65/323) have published more than 10 times (2003 figure: 27%, 63/453). Conclusions. While at face value there appears to be a greater understanding and utilisation of EBM among AO course participants who completed the 2013 survey compared to the 2003 study, several outcomes do not show any great variation in the intervening decade. Level of Evidence. professional survey

Artificial bone models (ABMs) are commonly used in traumatology and orthopedics for training, education, research and development purposes. The aim of this study was to develop the first evidence-based generic Asian pelvic bone model and compare it to an existing pelvic model. A hundred clinical CT scans of intact adult pelvises (54.8±16.4 years, 161.3±8.3 cm) were acquired. They represented evenly distributed female and male patients of Malay (n=33), Chinese (n=34) and Indian (n=33) descent. The CTs were segmented and defined landmarks were placed. By this means, 100 individual three-dimensional models were calculated using thin plate spline transformation. Following, three statistical mean pelvic models (male, female, unisex) were generated. Anatomical variations were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA). To quantify length variations, the distances between the anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS), the anterior inferior iliac spines (AIIS), the promontory and symphysis (conjugate vera) as well as the ischial spines (diameter transversa) were measured for the three mean models and the existing ABM. PCA demonstrated large variability regarding pelvic surface and size. Principal component one (PC 1) contributed to 24% of the total anatomical variation and predominantly displayed a size variation pattern. PC 2 (17.7% of variation) mainly exhibited anatomical variations originating from differences in shape. Female and male models were similar in ASIS (225±20 mm; 227±13 mm) and AIIS (185±11 mm; 187±10 mm), whereas differed in conjugate vera (116±10 mm; 105±10 mm) and diameter transversa (105±7 mm; 88±8 mm). Comparing the Asian unisex model to the existing ABM, the external pelvic measurements ASIS (22.6 cm; 27.5 cm) and AIIS (186 mm; 209 mm) differed notably. Conjugate vera (111 mm; 105 mm) and diameter transversa (97 mm; 95 mm) were similar in both models. Low variability of mean distances (3.78±1.7 mm) was found beyond a sample number of 30 CTs. Our analysis revealed notable anatomical variations regarding size dominating over shape and gender-specific variability. Dimensions of the generated mean models were comparatively smaller compared to the existing ABM. This highlights the necessity for generation of Asian ABMs by evidence-based modeling techniques

‘Safety’ is at the centre of surgical practice with the aim of minimising the risks of complications and adverse events. Much evidence, based on either retrospective case series or prospective cohorts, concerns the frequency of adverse events. There may be a temptation to describe a procedure as ‘safe’ if no – or few – serious adverse events (the numerator) have occurred out of a number of procedures performed (the denominator). In 1983, Hanley and Lippman-Hand described a simple algorithm to calculate the 95% upper Confidence Interval for data sets in which the numerator is zero (ie series in which there no adverse events). Paediatric orthopaedics suffers from small datasets which may make its researchers especially prone to the erroneous attribution of procedures being ‘safe’. The aim of the current study was to formally assess the evidence on which paediatric orthopaedic surgical procedures are described as ‘safe’. In particular, the objective was to ascertain the proportion of studies describing a procedure as ‘safe’ which achieved a 95% upper limit Confidence Interval of risk of 5% for major adverse events.

We examined all papers published by the Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics in the previous 5 years searching for the single term ‘safe’. 84 papers were returned and 71 were considered appropriate for analysis. Of these 60 papers positively identified their intervention as ‘safe’. These papers were read in full and the number of interventions was recorded along with the rate of complication. 66 data sets were created and the 95% upper confidence interval was calculated for complication rates. Only 16 out of 66 data sets could safely predict a major complication rate of under 5%.

Our work would tend to suggest that a failure to apply proper statistical tools is leading to procedures being erroneously classified as safe in the published literature.

Background

To aid recovery, rehabilitation is an important adjunct to surgery. Acknowledging the MRC framework for complex interventions we assessed the evidence-base for components of comprehensive rehabilitation in total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) pathways.

AO Spine Guideline for Using Osteobiologics in Spine Degeneration project is an international collaborative initiative to identify and evaluate evidence on existing use of osteobiologics in spine degenerative diseases. It aims to formulate clinically relevant and internationally applicable guidelines ensuring evidence-based, safe and effective use of osteobiologics. The current focus is the use of osteobiologics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. The guideline development is planned in three phases. Phase 1- Evidence synthesis and Recommendation; Phase 2- Guideline with osteobiologics grading and Validation; Phase 3- Guideline dissemination and Development of a clinical decision support tool. The key questions formulating the guidelines for the use of osteobiologics will be addressed in a series of systematic reviews in Phase 1. The evidence synthesized by the systematic reviews will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology, including expert panel discussions to formulate a recommendation. In Phase 2, osteobiologics will be graded based on evidence and the grading will be integrated with the recommendation from Phase 1, and thus formulate a guideline. The guideline will be further validated by prospective clinical studies. In the third phase, dissemination of the proposed guideline and development of a decision support tool is planned. AO-GO aims to bridge an important gap between quality of evidence and use of osteobiologics in spine fusion surgeries. With a holistic approach the guideline aims to facilitate evidence-based, patient-oriented decision-making process in clinical practice, thus stimulating further evidence-based studies regarding osteobiologics usage in spine surgeries

In absence of available quantitative measures, the assessment of fracture healing based on clinical examination and X-rays remains a subjective matter. Lacking reliable information on the state of healing, rehabilitation is hardly individualized and mostly follows non evidence-based protocols building on common guidelines and personal experience. Measurement of fracture stiffness has been demonstrated as a valid outcome measure for the maturity of the repair tissue but so far has not found its way to clinical application outside the research space. However, with the recent technological advancements and trends towards digital health care, this seems about to change with new generations of instrumented implants – often unfortunately termed “smart implants” – being developed as medical devices. The AO Fracture Monitor is a novel, active, implantable sensor system designed to provide an objective measure for the assessment of fracture healing progression (1). It consists of an implantable sensor that is attached to conventional locking plates and continuously measures implant load during physiological weight bearing. Data is recorded and processed in real-time on the implant, from where it is wirelessly transmitted to a cloud application via the patient's smartphone. Thus, the system allows for timely, remote and X-ray free provision of feedback upon the mechanical competence of the repair tissue to support therapeutic decision making and individualized aftercare. The device has been developed according to medical device standards and underwent extensive verification and validation, including an in-vivo study in an ovine tibial osteotomy model, that confirmed the device's capability to depict the course of fracture healing as well as its long-term technical performance. Currently a multi-center clinical investigation is underway to demonstrate clinical safety of the novel implant system. Rendering the progression of bone fracture healing assessable, the AO Fracture Monitor carries potential to enhance today's postoperative care of fracture patients

Staphylococcus aureus (SA), the predominant pathogen in human osteomyelitis, is known to persist by forming intracellular reservoirs, including in bone cells (Schwarz et al., 2019, Yang et al., 2018, Krauss et al., 2019, Gao et al., 2020, Bosse et al., 2005), promoting decreased antibiotic susceptibility. However, there are no evidence-based treatment guidelines for intracellular SA infections in osteomyelitis. We sought to address this by systematically reviewing the literature and, testing a selection of antibiotic treatments in a clinically relevant in vitro assay. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the current evidence for the efficacy of antibiotics against intracellular SA infections relevant to osteomyelitis. For the antibiotics identified as potentially useful, we determined their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against 11 clinical osteomyelitis SA- isolates. We selected those for further testing reported able to reach a higher concentration in the bone than the identified MIC against the majority of strains. Thus, rifampicin, oxacillin, linezolid, levofloxacin, oritavancin and doxycycline were tested in human SaOS-2-osteocyte infection models (Gunn et al., 2021) of acute (1d) or chronic (14d) infection to clear intracellular SA. Antibiotics were tested at 1x/4x/10x the MIC for the duration of 1d or 7d in each model. A systematic review found that osteoblasts and macrophages have mostly been used to test immediate short-term activity against intracellular SA, with a high variability in methodology. However, some extant evidence supports that rifampicin, oritravancin, linezolid, moxifloxacin and oxacillin may be effective intracellular treatments. While studies are ongoing, in vitro testing in a clinically relevant model suggests that rifampicin, oxacillin and doxycycline could be effectively used to treat osteomyelitic intracellular SA infections. Importantly, these have lower MICs against multiple clinical isolates than their respective clinically-achievable bone concentrations. The combined approach of a systematic review and disease-relevant in vitro screening will potentially inform as to the best approach for treating osteomyelitis where intracellular SA infection is confirmed or suspected

Abstract. INTRODUCTION. In the NHS the structure of a “regular healthcare team” is no longer the case. The NHS is facing a workforce crisis where cross-covering of ward-based health professionals is at an all-time high, this includes nurses, doctors, therapists, pharmacists and clerks. Comprehensive post-operative care documentation is essential to maintain patient safety, reduce information clarification requests, delays in rehabilitation, treatment, and investigations. The value of complete surgical registry data is emerging, and in the UK this has recently become mandated, but the completeness of post-operative care documentation is not held to the same importance, and at present there is no published standard. This project summarises a 4-stage approach, including 6 audit cycles, >400 reviewed operation notes, over a 5 year period. OBJECTIVE. To deliver a sustainable change in post operative care documentation practices through quality improvement frameworks. METHODS. Stage 1: Characterise the problem and increase engagement through: SMART aims, process mapping, hybrid action-effect and driver diagram and stakeholder analysis. Multi disciplinary stakeholders were involved in achieving a consensus of evidence-based auditable criteria. Stage 2: Baseline audit to assess current practice. Stage 3: Intervention planning by stakeholders. Stage 4: Longitudinal monitoring through run charts and iterative refinement. RESULTS. Stage 1: Process mapping identified numerous downstream effects of the absence of critical information from operation notes, and the action-effect diagram highlighted the multiple unnecessary mitigating actions performed by ward staff. An MDT consensus was achieved on 15 essential criteria for complete documentation, including important negative fields. Interest-influence matrix identified stakeholder groups with high influence but low interest who needed engagement to deliver change. Stage 2: Baseline audit demonstrated unexpectedly poor documentation: >75% compliance in 4 criteria, and <50% compliance in 10 criteria, which elevated the interest of key stakeholders. Stage 3: A post-operative care template based on the 15 criteria was embedded within the existing IT software. It allowed use of existing operative templates, with a non-overwriting suffix requiring only two mouse clicks. Stage 4: Re-audit at 3 and 12 months showed improved and sustained compliance. At 24 months compliance had declined. Questionnaire of template usage identified problems of criteria response options, and lack of awareness of template by newly appointed staff. Template update improved compliance over the next 6 months (>75% compliance in 11 criteria). Finally, a further reaudit conducted 12 months after the template update (5 years post baseline audit) showed a sustained improvement in compliance (>75% compliance in 13 criteria). CONCLUSIONS. Simple innovation through quality improvement frameworks has changed documentation practices by 1) achieving a consensus from stakeholders, 2) a “shock and awe” moment to highlight existing poor documentation and increase engagement 3) implementing change which fit easily into existing systems, 4) respecting autonomy rather than enforcing change and 5) longitudinal monitoring using run charts and an iterative process to ensure the template remains fit for purpose. This model has now successfully been translated to other subspecialities within the orthopaedic department. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction and Objective. Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although, being considered as the surgery of the century up to 23% of the patients report long-term pain and deficits in physical function and muscle strength may persist after THA. Progressive resistance training (PRT) appear to improve several outcomes moderately in patients with hip OA. Current treatment selection is based on low-level evidence as no randomised controlled trials have compared THA to non-surgical treatment. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of THA followed by standard care compared to 12 weeks of supervised PRT followed by 12 weeks of optional unsupervised PRT, on changes in hip pain and function, in patients with severe hip OA after 6 months. Materials and Methods. This is a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial. Patients aged ≥50 years with clinical and radiographic hip OA found eligible for THA by an orthopaedic surgeon will be randomised to THA or PRT (allocation 1:1). The primary outcome will be change in patient-reported hip pain and function, measured using the Oxford Hip Score. Key secondary outcomes will be change in the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, 40-meter fast-paced walk test, 30-second chair stand test, and number of serious adverse events. Results. The trial has been approved by The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (Project-ID: S-20180158) in February 2019 and registration was performed at . ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT04070027) in August 2019. Recruitment was initiated on the 2. nd. of September 2019 and the final deadline will be on the 30. th. of June 2021, or when a sample size of 120 patients has been accomplished. Conclusions. The results of the current trial are expected to enable evidence-based recommendations, which may be used to facilitate the shared-decision making process in the discussion of treatment strategy for the individual patient with severe hip OA. All results will be presented in peer-reviewed scientific journals and international conferences

Introduction and Objective. Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of long-term disability in adults worldwide and it is frequently attributed to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. So far, no consensus has been reached regarding appropriate treatment and LBP management outcomes remain disappointing. Spine unloading or traction protocols are common non-surgical approaches to treat LBP. These treatments are widely used and result in pain relief, decreased disability or reduced need for surgery. However, the underlying mechanisms -namely, the IVD unloading mechanobiology- have not yet been studied. The aim of this first study was to assess the feasibility of IVD unloading in a large animal organ culture set-up and evaluate its impact on mechanobiology. Materials and Methods. Bovine tail discs (diameter 16.1 mm ± 1.2 mm), including the endplates, were isolated and prepared for culture. Beside the day0 sample that was processed directly, three other discs were cultured for 3 days and processed on day4. One disc was loaded in the bioreactor according to a previously established physiological (compressive) loading protocol (2h/day, 0.2Hz). The two other discs were embedded in biocompatible resin, leaving the cartilage endplate free to permit nutrient diffusion, and fitted in the traction holder; one of these discs was kept in free swelling conditions, whereas the second was submitted to cyclic traction loading (2h/day, 0.2Hz) corresponding to 30% of the animal body weight corrected for organ culture. Results. The cell viability assessed on lactate dehydrogenase and ethidium homodimer stained histological slides was not different between the three cultured discs. This means that the disc viability was not affected neither by the embedding, nor by the traction itself. Compared to the physiologically loaded disc, the gene expression of COL1, COL2 and ACAN was higher in the nucleus pulposus and inner annulus fibrosus of the traction treated disc. In the outer annulus fibrosus of this disc TAGLN and MKX were higher expressed upon traction than in the physiologically loaded disc. Conclusions. Based on these preliminary data, we can conclude that large animal organ culture allows effective unloading of the disc, while preserving cell viability and modulating cellular gene expression responses. This sets the ground for future experiments and opens the door to an evidence-based improvement of clinical spine traction protocols and LBP management overall

Objectives. To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice. Methods. A questionnaire was piloted with six orthopaedic surgeons using a ‘think aloud’ process. The final questionnaire contained 29 items and was distributed online to surgeon members of the British Orthopaedic Association and British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Descriptive statistics summarised the sample characteristics and fracture treatment of respondents overall, and grouped them by whether they changed practice based on PROFHER trial findings. Free-text responses were analysed qualitatively for emerging themes using Framework Analysis principles. Results. There were complete responses from 265 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons who treat patients with proximal humeral fractures. Around half (137) had changed practice to various extents because of PROFHER, by operating on fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures. A third (43) of the 128 respondents who had not changed practice were already managing patients non-operatively. Those who changed practice were more likely to be younger, work in a trauma unit rather than a major trauma centre, be specialist shoulder surgeons and treat fewer PROFHER-eligible fractures surgically. This group gave higher scores when assessing validity and applicability of PROFHER. In contrast, a quarter of the non-changers were critical, sometimes emphatically, of PROFHER. The strongest theme that emerged overall was the endorsement of evidence-based practice. Conclusion. PROFHER has had an impact on surgeons’ clinical practice, both through changing it, and through underpinning existing non-operative practice. Although some respondents expressed reservations about the trial, evidence from such trials was found to be the most important influence on surgeons’ decisions to change practice. Cite this article: L. Jefferson, S. Brealey, H. Handoll, A. Keding, L. Kottam, I. Sbizzera, A. Rangan. Impact of the PROFHER trial findings on surgeons’ clinical practice: An online questionnaire survey. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:590–599. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0170

Patient reported outcomes have become validated objective measures of success in research studies. They take time and effort to develop and administer. However, to remain relevant and universal PROMS should be gathered routinely and used to manage evidence-based change in healthcare systems. To ensure that they are adopted individual clinician involvement is key however a framework for comparison and relevance promotes engagement. Several examples will be presented of system change using PROMS and PREMS as well as using routine data to defend patient selection. How and what we present depends on whom we are expecting to influence

The widespread dissemination of high-quality research facilitates keeping up to date with evidence-based practice, but the vast quantity can be overwhelming to physicians and surgeons. Information graphics, abbreviated to infographics, convey information using visualisations and images in an engaging manner. This format of presenting research format is preferable to 80% of clinicians when compared to text articles, and the long-term retention of information has been shown to be improve by a factor of 6.5 when methods were compared. Journal club was audited in our institution over 3 months. A multi-choice questionnaire was constructed weekly so as to test the attendees' recall of the research presented on a weekly basis. After five weeks, infographics were introduced, and the attendees' recall was assessed again on a weekly basis at the end of each journal club. The introduction of infographics to journal club saw improved test results from the journal club attendees. Not only was information retention improved, but the duration of journal club reduced following the intervention. Research can be disseminated efficiently using infographics in place of conventional journal club presentations. Satisfaction rates among clinicians, both with information retention and journal club duration, demonstrate the benefit of their use in teaching hospitals

The World Health Organisation (WHO) Surgical Safety checklist is an evidence-based tool shown to reduce surgery-related morbidity and mortality. Despite audits showing 96% checklist compliance, our hospital had 3 surgical never events in 10 months, 2 of which were in orthopaedics. By March 2018, the authors aimed to achieve 100% compliance with all 5 sections of the WHO Five Steps to Safer Surgery bundle for all surgical patients. Additionally, the authors aimed to assess the impact of the quality of bundle delivery on preventable errors related to human factors. Quantitative assessment involved direct observations of compliance in theatres. Qualitative data in the form of rich, descriptive observations of events and discussions held during checklist delivery was analysed thematically. Interventions included trust-wide policy changes, awareness sessions, introduction of briefing and debrief proformas and documented prosthesis checks. For elective surgeries, checklist compliance increased to 100% in 4 of 5 sections of the bundle. The incidence of reported preventable critical incidents decreased from 6.7% to 2.4%. A chi-squared test of independence demonstrated a significant relationship between the implementation of changes and completion of the checklist, X2 (1, N = 1019) = 25.69, p < 0.0001. Thematic analysis identified leadership, accountability, engagement, empowerment, communication, and teamwork as factors promoting effective checklist use. Our findings highlight the benefits of a qualitative approach to auditing checklists. Exploring the role of human factors and promoting staff awareness and engagement improves checklist compliance and enhances its effectiveness in reducing surgery-related adverse outcomes

Background. Evidence suggests classification system (CS) guided treatments are more effective than generalized and practice guidelines based treatments for low back pain (LBP) patients. This study evaluated clinicians' and managers' attitudes towards LBP classification and its usefulness in guiding LBP management. Methods. Data from 3 semi-structured interviews with physiotherapy service managers and advanced spinal physiotherapy practitioner and a focus group (5 physiotherapists) in two NHS Health Boards, South Wales, UK, was thematically analysed. Results. Five themes emerged. CS knowledge: Clinicians and managers know different CSs and agree with its usefulness. Clinicians have specific CSs knowledge, managers viewed classification related to referral pathways and prognosis. Current CS use: Clinicians classify using their experience and clinical reasoning skills shifting between multiple CSs. Managers are confident that staff provide evidence-based service though believe classification is not always practiced across services. CS advantages/disadvantages: Effectively targeting the right patients for right treatments using evidence-based practice is advantageous. Prevalence of “guru led” CSs developed for research and of limited clinical use is disadvantageous. Barriers: Patients' treatment expectations, threat to clinical autonomy, lack of sufficiently complex CSs, lack of resources to up-skill clinicians and overall CSs fit into complex referral pathways. Enablers: CSs sufficiently complex & placed within clinical reasoning process, mentoring for inexperienced staff, positive engagement with all stakeholders and patients. Conclusion. Clinicians and managers are aware of CSs and agree with its usefulness to guide LBP management. Clinicians classify LBP though there is no formalized CS process in place. Whilst clinicians view classification as the relationship between patients and physiotherapy managers have a broader, whole service view. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: Wales School of Primary Care Research, Cardiff, UK. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has been presented previously at a national meeting

Summary Statement. With increasing emphasis on evidence-based medicine in healthcare, there is global increase in proportion of Level-1 and -2 articles in PUBMED. This study shows the trend of orthopaedic publications from different countries in comparison to other specialties. Introduction. New medical knowledge is expected to improve health through change in existing practices. Articles need to convince readers of the validity of conclusions in order to bring about a change in practice. The last few decades have witnessed an increasing interest in critical appraisal of research aimed at assessing the ‘quality’ of evidence, a trend towards ‘Evidence Based Medicine’. Whether orthopaedic publications are also becoming more evidence-based has hitherto not been reported. This study aimed to compare the trend of publications originating from orthopaedic services versus other specialties, across different countries, with respect to major categories of levels of evidence. Methods. PUBMED was used to collect data on yearly publication of articles, categorised by country, specialty (from author address) and article category (Guideline, Review, Case Report, Comparative Study, Clinical Trial and Meta-Analysis). Results. PUBMED shows 20,572,125 articles published between 1900 and 2010. Of these, 64% were published within the quarter century 1986–2010. Publication type was specified in 25% of articles, of which 8% were review articles, 7% each were case reports and comparative studies while 3% were clinical trials. The top ten countries from which articles originated were US, UK, Japan, Germany, France, Canada, Italy, Australia, Netherlands and Sweden. Comparing the decade of 1990s with 2000s, the number of meta-analyses showed greatest increase from Australia, Japan, Germany, UK and Italy (9.5x-6.1x). When comparing types of articles between the beginning and end of the quarter century, the proportion of clinical trials increased by 2x, guidelines by 5x and meta-analyses/systematic reviews by 28x. There were 121,859 articles from orthopaedic departments/institutes (0.6% of all articles). There was a consistent increase in the proportion of orthopaedic publications from 0.5% to 1.1% over the quarter century; this 231% increase was lower than vascular, cardiothoracic and paediatric surgery but greater than urology, neurosurgery, otolaryngology and obstetrics/gynecology. Among the different types of publications, in orthopaedics the greatest increase between the decades of 1990s and 2000s was in meta-analyses (8.5x) followed by guidelines (5.4x). This increase in number of meta-analyses was higher than other surgical specialties except cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, both of which showed a 13x increase. Among the meta-analyses from surgical specialties, the proportion from orthopaedics and vascular surgery was increasing consistently, with the former now contributing to 13% of all meta-analyses. In comparison, increase in number of clinical trials has been relatively modest for orthopaedics (2.4x), being lower than vascular surgery (3.3x), plastic surgery (2.8x) and neurosurgery (2.6x). Dicussion/Conclusion. The proportion of clinical trials and guidelines was increasing in a linear fashion in the last 25 years, while the proportion of meta-analyses/systematic reviews was increasing logarithmically. Among European countries, Germany, UK and Italy contributed to the highest number of meta-analyses. Publications from orthopaedic departments showed an overall intermediate rate of increase, but meta-analyses/systematic reviews showed a consistently higher increase compared to other surgical specialties. This analysis shows the trend of orthopaedic evidence in published literature and may be used as a guide to future country-specific research directions in the discipline of orthopaedics

Introduction. Guidelines from the North American Spine Society (2009 and 2013) are the best evidence-based instructions on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery. NICE guidelines exist for VTE prophylaxis but do not specifically address spinal surgery. In addition, the ruling of the UK Supreme Court in 2015 resulted in new guidance on consent being published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng). This study assesses our compliance in antibiotic, VTE prophylaxis and consent in spinal surgery against both US and UK standards. Methods. Retrospective review of spinal operations performed between August and December 2016. Case notes, consent forms and operation notes were analysed for consent, peri-operative antibiotic prescribing and post-operative VTE instructions. Results. Four Spinal surgeons performed 45 operations during this period. 31 patients (69%) received a copy of the signed consent with this process being formally documented in 22 (71%) of those cases. All patients were consented by a competent surgeon. 82% of cases consented prior to the date of procedure were countersigned on the day of operation. There was a mean time of 25.3 days between initial consent and operation (Range: 0–170). 37 (82%) cases had clear instructions for VTE and antibiotic prophylaxis. All prescribed post-operative antibiotics were administered. Discussion. The North American Guidelines state that prophylactic antibiotic is appropriate in all spinal surgery with prolonged cases requiring intraoperative re-dosing and only complex cases needing a postoperative regimen. Eight patients underwent a complex procedure and 7 appropriately received postoperative antibiotics. Of the 29 patients that underwent a simple procedure, 12 did not receive post-operative regimen, in line with the guidelines. However, the remainder 17 were over treated. The US Guidelines recommend mechanical VTE prophylaxis only in elective spinal surgery except in high risk patients. All our patients received VTE mechanical prophylaxis. RCSEng guidelines require consent being taken prior to procedure by a competent surgeon and confirmed on day of procedure. All patients in our cohort were consented prior to the date of operation allowing time for considering options and independent research. 82% of patients had consent confirmed on day of operation. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that we met guideline advice for all patients with regards VTE prophylaxis. We have a tendency to over treat with post-operative antibiotics and not all patients had their consent confirmed on day of procedure but was consented well before day of operation. North America still lead the way with guidelines on spinal surgery to which we should adhere, with NICE guidelines providing limited instructions. New consenting guidelines from RCSEng may not be currently widely known and thus should be a source of education for all surgeons

Purpose and background. Effective reassurance is an essential element of treatment for conditions that do not require further investigations, referrals and on-going monitoring. However, research defining what reassurance should consist of and how to deliver it is scarce. The aim of this review was to identify consultation-related processes that improved patients' outcomes, in order to build an evidence-based model of effective reassurance in primary care. Method and results. A literature search identified prospective observational studies that explicitly measured consultation-related factors in appropriate primary care patient groups. The findings from empirical studies were combined with theoretical and systematic reviews to develop a model of effective reassurance. Scrutiny of 8193 Abstracts yielded 29 empirical studies fitting inclusion criteria, and 64 reviews. The majority of studies measured patient satisfaction. Clinical outcomes (e.g. health status / symptom reduction) appear to improve with patients' active participation in the consultation. Behavioural outcomes (e.g. adherence/ health care utilization) were only measured in a handful of studies, but may improve when information was given in the final stage of the consultation. Psychological outcomes (e.g. health concerns) were consistently improved by patient-centred approaches. Conclusion. The synthesis of empirical evidence and theory resulted in a model with two distinct stages: Affective reassurance, which focuses on eliciting patient concerns empathically and leads to trust in the clinician. Cognitive reassurance should then follow, involving iterative and interactive education, leading to enablement and impacting on medium and long term outcomes. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None

Objective. The STarT Back Screening Tool (STarT) is a 9-item patient self-report questionnaire that classifies low back pain patients into low, medium or high risk of poor prognosis. When assessed by GPs, these subgroups can be used to triage patients into different evidence-based treatment pathways. The objective of this study was to translate the English version of STarT into Danish (STarT-dk) and test its discriminative validity. Methods. Translation was performed using methods recommended by best practice translation guidelines. Psychometric validation of the discriminative ability was performed using the AUC statistic. The AUC was calculated for seven of the nine items where reference standards were available and compared with the original English version. Results. The linguistic translation required minor semantic and layout alterations. The response options were changed from “agree/disagree” to “yes/no” for four items. No patients reported item ambiguity using the final version. The AUC ranged from .735 to .855 (CI95% .678 to .897) in a Danish cohort (n=311) and .840 to .925 (CI95% .772 to .948) in the original English cohort (n=500). On four items, the AUC was statistically similar between the two cohorts but lower on three psychosocial sub-score items. Conclusions. The translation was linguistically accurate and the discriminative validity broadly similar, with some differences probably due to differences in severity between the cohorts and the Danish reference standard questionnaires not having been validated. Despite those differences, we believe the results show that the STarT-dk has sufficient patient acceptability and discriminative validity to be used in Denmark. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. This study was financed by a grant from the Region of Southern Denmark. This has not been presented at a national meeting