The aim was to examine the descriptive epidemiology of Slipped Capital Femoral
Aim. With the link between obesity and Slipped Upper Femoral
Purpose. This report compares midterm results of open neck osteoplasty +
neck osteotomy vs arthroscopic osteoplasty for severe Slipped Capital Femoral
This study analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of
anatomical reduction of a moderate or severe stable slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated by subcapital osteotomy (a modified
Dunn osteotomy) through the surgical approach described by Ganz. We prospectively studied 31 patients (32 hips; 16 females and
five males; mean age 14.3 years) with SCFE. On the Southwick classification,
ten were of moderate severity (head-shaft angle >
30° to 60°) and
22 were severe (head-shaft angle >
60°). Each underwent open reduction
and internal fixation using an intracapsular osteotomy through the
physeal growth plate after safe surgical hip dislocation. Unlike
the conventional procedure, 25 hips did not need an osteotomy of
the apophysis of the great trochanter and were managed using an
extended retinacular posterior flap. Aims
Patients and Methods
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disorder in children 9–15 years old. The epidemiology for SCFE in the total population of Sweden has not yet been described. In a prospective cohort study, we analysed pre- and postoperative radiographs and medical records for all children treated for SCFE in Sweden 2007–2013, and noted demographic data, severity of slip, and surgical procedures performed.Purpose
Methods
The purpose of this study was to determine the oblique plane deformity in slipped upper femoral epiphysis. A retrospective radiographic review was undertaken in patients admitted with a slipped upper femoral epiphysis between March 2008 and October 2010. Patients in whom a CT scan had been performed in addition to plain radiographs were assessed further. Angular deformity in the coronal and sagittal planes were measured by the angle formed between the femoral neck and a line perpendicular to the physis on the AP pelvic radiograph and the axial CT scan respectively. The magnitude and direction of the resultant deformity was defined in the oblique plane. Additional demographic data (gender, age, side, procedure and complications) was collected. Seven girls, average age of 12 (range 10 – 13) and 6 boys, average age of 13 (range 10 – 15) were identified. The slip was bilateral in 2, left sided in 6 and right sided in 5 cases. Two patients were pinned in situ, 8 had surgical dislocation performed to facilitate reduction prior to pinning and 3 patients had secondary procedures performed following in situ pinning. The average angulation in the oblique posteroinferior plane (25 degrees) was less than in the coronal (30 degrees) and the sagittal planes (62 degrees). The average magnitude was 67mm (range 31 – 88). CT is useful adjunct particularly when a frog legged lateral view is not possible because of pain or the fear of further displacement. Determination of the deformity in the oblique plane may aid in positioning of the screw during in situ pinning and may be helpful in identifying patients in whom pinning maybe difficult.
Debate remains over the optimal treatment for severe unstable SCFE. AVN is the principle problem; current thinking suggests this can be minimized by emergent reduction and fixation within 24 hours. If emergent treatment is not possible, open osteotomy with a variable delay of 10–21 days has been advocated. We present our experience of delayed intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy (ICO) SCFE cases were identified through ICD-10 coding and theatre records. Unstable slips were identified and reviewed retrospectively. When ICO was performed, the hip was accessed via anterior approach without hip dislocation. A cuneiform shortening osteotomy of the neck with physeal excision was undertaken. The epiphysis was carefully reduced and stabilized with a single screw.Aim
Methods
Several authors have reported complications from screw removal after treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis by single screw fixation, and have attributed these to poor screw design. We have developed a simple and reliable method of screw removal which uses a cannulated 8.0 mm end-threaded cancellous screw (Smith &
Nephew Richards Medical, Memphis, Tennessee) and a specially designed cannulated trephine. The method has been successful, with minimal complications, and a limited surgical exposure.
The decision to undertake prophylactic pinning to prevent contralateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) remains controversial; we hypothesised that the grade of initial SUFE could predict the grade of a second SUFE and risk of poor outcome. We retrospectively reviewed radiographs of all children who presented to Alder Hey with a new diagnosis of SUFE between 2007–2014. Of those who developed a contralateral SUFE, grade of first and second SUFE was determined radio-graphically using %
slip and Southwick angle on frog lateral radiograph.Purpose
Method
This purpose of this study was to investigate whether prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis affects subsequent femoral morphology. To determine the effect of prophylactic pinning on growth we compared contralateral hip radiographs of 24 proximal femora prophylactically pinned with 26 cases observed, in a cohort of patients with unilateral SUFE. Validated measurements were used to determine hip morphology; the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance (TTD) to articulo-trochanteric distance (TTD:ATD) in addition to direct measurement of the femoral neck length. Post-operative radiographs were compared to radiographs taken at a 12–84 months follow-up. Comparing pinned and unpinned hips the neck length was shorter (mean 5.1 mm vs 11.1 mm) and the ATD was lower (p=0.048). The difference between initial and final radiograph TTD:ATD ratio for each case was calculated. The average was 0.63 in the prophylactically pinned group and 0.25 in the unpinned group (p=0.07). When hips of the same patient were compared on final radiographs, there was a smaller difference in TTD:ATD between the two sides when the patient had been prophylactically pinned (0.7) as opposed to observed (1.47). This was not statistically significant (p=0.14). Universal prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and alteration of the proximal femoral morphology is one reason for this. Our results show that prophylactic pinning does not stop growth but does alter subsequent proximal femoral morphology by causing a degree of coxa vara and breva. Some loss of growth in the prophylactically pinned hip contributes to reduction in leg length inequality at skeletal maturity which is advantageous. No iatrogenic complications were observed with single cannulated screw fixation. Prophylactic pinning prevents the potential catastrophe of a subsequent slip, is safe and the effect on growth is, if anything, beneficial. Level of evidence: III
We reviewed the long-term results of the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) using realignment procedures in 36 patients (37 hips) at an average follow-up of 33.8 years (26 to 42). There were serious short-term complications in seven of the 22 hips treated by subcapital osteotomy, three of the 11 hips treated by intertrochanteric osteotomy and three of the four hips treated by manipulative reduction. At re-examination, the clinical and radiological results were excellent or good in 41% of the hips treated by subcapital osteotomy, in 36% treated by intertrochanteric osteotomy and in none treated by manipulative reduction. In all, seven hips (19%) had had arthrodesis or total hip replacement. The natural history of SUFE was probably not improved by any of the treatments used in our study. We therefore discourage the use of subcapital and intertrochanteric osteotomy as well as manipulative reduction in the primary treatment of chronic SUFE.
The aim was to assess contemporary management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by surveying members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). A questionnaire with 5 case vignettes was used. Two questions examined the timing of surgery for an acute unstable SCFE in a child presenting at 6 hours and at 48 hours after start of symptoms. Two further questions explored the preferred method of fixation in mild and severe stable SCFE. The final question examined the management of the contralateral normal hip. Responses were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and the data w analysed using a chi-squared test. The response rate was 56% (110/196). 88.2% (97/110) responded that if a child presented with an acute unstable SCFE within 6 hours, they would treat it within 24 hours of presentation, compared with 40.9% (45/110) for one presenting 48 hours after the onset of symptoms (P<0.0001). 52.6% (58/110) of surveyed BSCOS members would offer surgery for an unstable SCFE between 1 and 7 days after onset of symptoms. Single screw fixation in situ was advocated by 96.4% (106/110) and 70.9% (78/110) while corrective osteotomy was preferred by 1.8% (2/110) and 26.4% (29/110) of respondents for the mild and the severe stable slips respectively (P<0.0001). Surgeons preferring osteotomy are more likely to perform an intracapsular technique. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral normal hip was performed by 27.3% (30/110) of participants. There are significant differences in opinions between BSCOS members as to the optimal management of SCFE in children. This reflects the variable recommendations and quality in the current scientific literature. Further research is therefore required to determine best practice and enable consensus to be reached.
Audit of the outcome of subcapital osteotomy for a series of cases of severe unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. 57 cases of unstable severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis were operated on by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2011. The procedure was performed through the anterior abductor sparing approach. Patients have been followed up prospectively and the results are presented at average follow up is 6.4 years with a minimum of 18 month follow to include all risks of avn.Aim:
Method:
We have reviewed the complication rate over a ten year period for removal of screws placed for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and have surveyed the views of orthopaedic surgeons with an adult hip practice in Scotland on leaving the metalwork in situ. Whilst screw removal is favoured by many orthopaedic surgeons, a recent review of the literature reported that the complication rate for removal of implants placed for SCFE was 34%. Between 1998 and 2007 84 patients had insertion of screws for SCFE. Of these 54 patients had screws removed, 51 of these records were available. The median duration between insertion and removal of screws was 2 yrs 7 months. Of the 51 children, overall five (9.8%) had complications - three (5.9%) major and two (3.9%) minor. Two screws could not be removed; one patient sustained a fracture after screw removal and two developed an infection. We assessed the attitudes of adult hip surgeons on this topic using an electronic questionnaire which was completed by 29 out of 40 recipients. 78.6% of respondents support routine removal and 21.4% favour leaving the screw permanently in place. 82.2% had needed to remove metalwork from a hip requiring arthroplasty in a patient whose metalwork was inserted during childhood; and described their experience of this including the complications encountered. We have identified a lower complication rate following screw removal inserted for SCFE than in published series. Most adult hip surgeons support routine removal once the physis is closed but studies regarding the long-term outcome of retained orthopaedic implants are needed since even with this lower complication rate the question of routine removal remains unclear.
To inform a working group of UK paediatric surgeons (the UK SCFE Study Group) convened to design pertinent trials in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), three centres (Bristol, Newcastle and Barts and The London) reviewed the demographics and management of children with SCFE presenting between 2007 and 2012. At all contributing centres with digital PACS records for a minimum of 5 years, a search for the following terms was made of PACS reports: slipped capital femoral epiphysis, slipped upper femoral epiphysis, SCFE and SUFE. From the results, radiographs and electronically stored clinic letters were assessed to confirm the diagnosis and ascertain age at presentation, incidence of bilaterality, chronicity, stability (Loder criteria), management and complications.Aim
Method
We report 3 cases from different centres of infantile tibia vara in which the deformity was due to slippage of the proximal tibial epiphysis on the metaphysis; the aim of this study was to define the features of this previously unreported condition, and their implications for management. Three cases of tibia vara secondary to atraumatic slippage of the upper tibial epiphysis on the metaphysis were identified from three different centres. The case notes and imaging studies were retrospectively reviewed to distinguish common clinical and radiographic features.Introduction
Method
Purpose. We share our experience in management of failed in-situ pinning in severe unstable Slipped Capital Femoral
Osteonecrosis (ON) can cause considerable morbidity in young people who undergo treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The aims of this study were to determine the operations undertaken for ON in this population in the UK, along with the timing of these operations and any sequential procedures that are used in different joints. We also explored the outcomes of those patients treated by core decompression (CD), and compared this with conservative management, in both the pre- or post-collapse stages of ON. UK treatment centres were contacted to obtain details regarding surgical interventions and long-term outcomes for patients who were treated for ALL and who developed ON in UKALL 2003 (the national leukaemia study which recruited patients aged 1 to 24 years at diagnosis of ALL between 2003 and 2011). Imaging of patients with ON affecting the femoral head was requested and was used to score all lesions, with subsequent imaging used to determine the final grade. Kaplan-Meier failure time plots were used to compare the use of CD with non surgical management.Aims
Methods
High-quality clinical research in children’s orthopaedic surgery
has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. This study used
a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical
trials in children’s orthopaedics. A modified Delphi technique was used, which involved an initial
scoping survey, a two-round Delphi process and an expert panel formed
of members of the British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery.
The survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic surgeons treating children
in the United Kingdom and Ireland.Aims
Methods
We undertook a retrospective comparative study
of all patients with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis presenting
to a single centre between 1998 and 2011. There were 45 patients
(46 hips; mean age 12.6 years; 9 to 14); 16 hips underwent intracapsular
cuneiform osteotomy and 30 underwent pinning Pinning Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy may have a protective effect
on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay
of at least two weeks. The place of emergency pinning Cite this article: