The Enhanced Recovery Pathway aims to improve the patient experience as well as expediting discharge. We aim to discharge 85% of patients by day 3. This audit retrospectively looked at primary total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) patients who had 7 days length of stay and evaluated the factors contributing to the delay. There were 24 patients who stayed 7 days, 12 THR and 12 TKR. There were 15 females and 7 males, the mean age was 77 years (52 to 89). Causes for the delay included patient's reluctance to engage in their rehabilitation (21/24) and Occupational Therapists (OT) identifying difficulties in patient's home circumstances on admission (12/24). Medical problems also delayed early mobilisation, particularly urethral catheterisation (9/24), investigation for venous thromboembolism (6/24) and blood transfusion (3/24). Delay in discharge is multifactorial and requires involvement of MDT. We have identified ways to enhance patient engagement, including a “patient journey” DVD shown preoperatively at “Joint School” and individual white boards for daily goal setting. Fostering greater self-efficacy in patients may improve participation in preoperative discharge planning with OTs. Specific preoperative education may help patients understand the importance of continuing their rehabilitation while medical problems are managed

Introduction. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multi-disciplinary approach for establishing procedure–specific, evidence-based perioperative protocols to optimize patient outcomes. ERAS evidence is predominantly for non-orthopaedic procedures. We review the impact of ERAS protocol implementation on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes at our institution. Methods. All primary total hip and knee arthroplasties performed one year before and after ERAS implementation were identified by current procedural terminology code. Length of stay (LOS), disposition, readmission and opioid usage were analyzed before and after ERAS implementation and statistically analyzed with student t-test and chi-square test. Results. 2105 total patients were identified (967 THA, 494 pre-ERAS and 473 post-ERAS;1138 TKA, 575 pre-ERAS and 563 post-ERAS). TKA. After ERAS implementation, opioid consumption decreased for hospital day one (45.5MME to 36.2MME; p=0.000) and overall hospitalization (101.9MME to 83.9MME; p =0.000). Average LOS decreased (73.28hrs to 66.44hrs; p=0.000), blood transfusion rate trended down (3.3% to 1.95%; p=0.155), and disposition to home over skilled nursing facility increased (57.8% to 71.6%; p=0.000). Unplanned return-to-hospital encounters were unchanged (13.22% to 12.79%; p=0.8504). 30-day and 90-day readmission rates decreased (7.30% to 3.02%; p=0.0020 and 8.5% to 4.8%; p=0.0185, respectively). THA. After ERAS implementation, opioid consumption decreased for hospital day one (49.5MME to 35.4MME; p=0.000) and overall hospitalization (79.5MME to 59.5MME; p=0.000). Average LOS decreased (57.84hrs to 51.87hrs; p=0.011), blood transfusion rate was unchanged (4.25% to 3.81%; p=0.725), and disposition to home over skilled nursing facility increased (80.4% to 82.5%; p= 0.022). Unplanned return-to-hospital encounters were unchanged (8.51% to 8.88%; p=0.8486). Readmission trended up during postoperative days 0–30 and trended down during postoperative days 31–90. (1.42% to 2.96%; p=0.1074) and (1.21% to 0.85%; p=0.5748), respectively. Conclusion. ERAS protocols reduce postoperative opioid consumption, decrease hospital LOS, and increase patient disposition to home without adversely affecting short-term readmission rates

The need for hip and knee replacement surgery is increasing. Enhanced recovery programmes, where patients mobilise quickly and safely after surgery, have been adopted now in many hospitals. There are anecdotal reports of Primary Care Trusts raising thresholds for referral for surgery based on patients' Body Mass Index (BMI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the early outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in obese patients (BMI>30) enrolled in the enhanced recovery programme. Between March 2010 and January 2011, 672 patients were enrolled in our enhanced recovery programme. 316 patients (47%) were classified as obese (BMI>30, range 30-39). There was no significant difference in the length of stay: 4.58 days in the obese patients and 4.44 days in the non-obese. There was also no difference in the rates of superficial infections or oozy wounds. Knee replacements was performed more commonly than hip replacements in the obese group. There was no significant difference in the early outcome of hip and knee replacement surgery in patients with a higher Body Mass Index when undergoing lower limb arthroplasty through the enhanced recovery programme. These patients should continue to be offered surgery when clinically indicated

Introduction. Obesity is a direct contributor to degenerative joint disease, and as the prevalence of obesity increases globally it is likely that more overweight patients will present for hip replacement surgery. There are reports that overweight patients in the UK's National Health Service, typically with a Body Mass Index (BMI) over 30 (BMI 30–39 obese, BMI≥40 morbidly obese), are being denied operations on the premise that they are at risk of significant complications. Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) are designed to enable patients to recover quickly and return home safely within a few days. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of hip replacements in obese and non-obese patients enrolled in our ERP. Methods. We prospectively studied 350 patients who underwent primary and revision total hip replacements and were treated through our ERP form March 2010 to January 2011. The mean age was 68 (range 23–92 years). 130 patients (37%) were considered obese with a BMI of >30. 11 patients (3%) were considered morbidly obese with a BMI >40. They were age & sex-matched with the non-obese patients. Outcomes measured included: Length of stay, wound complications (including surgical site infections), deep vein thrombosis and blood transfusion requirements. Data was collected to 42 days following discharge. Results. There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the obese (BMI >30) and non-obese (BMI<30) groups; 4.3 days (median 4) and 4.1 days (median 4) respectively. Mean length of stay in the morbidly obese group (BMI≥40) was interestingly, 3.4 days (median 3). 12 patients (9%) in the obese group experienced non-infective wound complications including oozing and haematoma formation compared to 15 patients (7%) of the non-obese group. One confirmed DVT was identified in the morbidly obese group (BMI 41). There were no significant differences in surgical site infections, blood transfusion requirements, or other patient-reported outcome measures at 42 days. Conclusion. Body mass index (BMI) did not affect the early post-operative outcome of hip replacements in patients enrolled in the ERP. Based on the evidence provided by this study, we would continue to offer hip replacement surgery irrespective of body mass index

Introduction. Enhanced Recovery Protocol (ERP) for elective total hip or total knee replacement has become the gold standard. The main principles are to reduce bleeding, both with a tranexamic acid infusion and local injection of adrenaline, and to reduce the risk of postoperative thrombo-embolic complications by early mobilisation, enabled by local anaesthetic infiltration at time of surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the ERP. Methods. A retrospective review was performed including all patients who underwent primary hip or knee arthroplasty surgery between January 2011 and December 2013. The ERP was implemented in our department in August 2012 thus creating two cohorts; the traditional postoperative group and those undergoing ERP. Outcome measurements of length of stay, postoperative transfusion, thrombo-embolic complications and number of re-admissions were assessed. Results. 1262 patients were included. The traditional group contained a total of 632 patients and the ERP group contained 630 patients. The number of patients receiving a blood transfusion postoperatively significantly decreased from 50 (7.9%) to 27 (4.3%) (p value <0.05). There was no statistical difference in postoperative thrombo-embolic events. The length of stay was reduced from 5.5 days to 4.8 days (P value <0.05). There was no difference in the number of re-admissions. Conclusion. ERP has led to a significant decrease in transfusions after elective arthroplasty surgery, without increasing the incidence of thrombo-embolic events. Furthermore it has significantly reduced the length of stay which has obvious cost implications. This study agrees with the current literature in that enhanced recovery should indeed be the gold standard for elective arthroplasty procedures

Introduction. Rivaroxiban is a direct inhibitor of factor Xa, a licensed oral thromboprophylactic agent that is increasingly being adopted for lower limb arthroplasty. Rivaroxiban has been NICE-approved for use in primary hip and knee arthroplasty following the RECORD 4 trials; proving it more effective in preventing venous thrombo-embolic (VTE) events compared to enoxaparin. Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) are designed to enable patients to recover quickly and return home safely within a few days. Methods. We prospectively studied 1223 patients (age- and sex-matched) who underwent lower-limb arthroplasty enrolled in our ERP between March 2010 and December 2011; 454 patients (Group 1) received enoxaparin, 769 patients (Group 2) received rivaroxiban. Patients wore thrombo-embolic stockings for six weeks post surgery. Patients were monitored for thrombo-embolic events and wound-related complications for 42 days post-operatively. Results. 1223 patients underwent lower-limb arthroplasty during our study period. There were similar numbers of THRs and TKRs in each group 230:224 and 370:399. Average length of stay was 4.9 days (range 1–19) in group 1 and 4.5 days (range 2–23) in group 2. The rate of VTE events was the same in both groups (< 1%). In group 1 (enoxaparin), 21(4.6%) of the 454 patients experienced oozing/infected wounds that required further surgical attention. In group 2 (rivaroxiban), 46 (6%) of the 769 patients had wound-related complications, of which 70% were in primary THR patients. Conclusion. Rivaroxabans use in clinical practice has been questioned concerning its wound-related complications. The RECORD 4 trial focused on major bleeding as the primary safety outcome, however we postulate slow post-operative oozing can lead to haematoma formation, increasing the risk of superficial wound and deep infections potentially requiring revision surgery. This study shows an increased wound complication rate in the Rivaroxiban group, highlighting the need for further clinical trials to assess its safety and efficacy

Aim:. Enhanced recovery pathway is compromised by increased wound oozing due to chemical thromboprophylaxis increasing length of stay (LoS) and complications. We aimed to analyse the difference between LoS, VTE episodes, deep infection and return to theatre between matched cohort of patients either receiving combination therapy of Clexane followed by Rivaroxaban or Rivaroxaban only. Methods:. We retrospectively collected data on LoS of patients undergoing hip and knee replacements, The cohorts consisted of 458 THRs (235 group I & 223 group II and 526 TKRs (250 group I & 276 group II). Group I received Rivaroxaban. Age was not an exclusion criteria and matched in both groups. ASA 1 to stable ASA3 patients were included in the cohort. Included were patients on aspirin 75 mg PO which was not stopped pre-operatively in either cohort in equal numbers. Anaesthetic and perioperative management of the patients as part of our enhanced recovery protocols were the same for both groups. Multimodal pain management, antibiotic prophylaxis, same day mobilisation, flowtron calf pumps, TED stockings, preoperative MRSA screening was standardised and matched. For TKRs a standard medial parapatellar approach and THRs a standard posterolateral (Southern) approach were utilised. Patients did not have a drain insitu. Exclusion criteria was patients with malignancy, haematological co-morbidities, Hb below 11 and BMI greater than 40. All prosthesis used were standardised to cemented TKR, cemented THR or uncemented THR depending on bone quality at the time of surgery. Patients in first cohort (group I) received 10 mg Rivaroxaban at 8 hours post op and continued for 14 days for TKRs and 35 days for THRs. Patients in group II received Clexane 40 mg SC at 8 hours post op followed by Rivaroxaban at 24 hours after first dose of Clexane and continued daily for 14 days for TKRs and 35 days for THRs. Results:. LoS in group I was 3.52 days for THRs and 3.57 days for TKRs. LOS in Group II was 2.37 days for THRs and 2.52 days for TKRs. Return to theatre in group 1 was1.3% for THRs and 0% for TKRs. In Group II was 0.4% for THRs and 0% for TKRs. Deep infection in group I was 0.4% for THRs and 0.8% for TKRs. In Group II was 0%. VTE episodes was similar in both groups. These are statistically significant. Conclusion:. By using a combined use of Chemical VTE agents we halved our complications such as deep infection and helped in our enhanced recovery programme by reducing the LoS by one day whilst VTE events remained the same. The novel combination of administration of low molecular weight heparin followed by an extended course of Rivaroxaban appeared to be a safer means of chemical thromboprophylaxis

Background. The Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) is an evidence based initiative aimed at speeding up patient recovery after major surgery and improving their outcomes. The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore (RNOH) is a specialist orthopaedic and implemented an ERP for primary knee arthroplasties from October 2010. Aims. To analyse the initial results of patients participating in our ERP for primary knee arthroplasty to identify what factors predict their Length of Stay (LoS) and establish where changes can be made to improve outcomes further. Method. We interrogated our prospective ERP database and determined which patients achieved and which ones exceeded the 5-day LoS target. We then performed a further retrospective notes review to gather supplementary information including non-modifiable patient factors to identify factors which influenced their LoS. Results. 261 patients participated in the Knee ERP at the RNOH between October 2010 and December 2011 including patients undergoing complex procedures and bilateral procedures during the same in-patient episode. Mean age was 64 years (32–85 years). Mean LoS was 6.1 days (2–29 days). ASA grade and attendance at the multidisciplinary Joint School all had a positive influence on the LoS, particularly when combined. The day of mobilisation had the greatest correlation with those mobilising early. Mean LoS was 2.8 (Day 0), 4.41 (Day 1), 6.38 (Day 2), 9.23 (Day 3) and 12.95 (Day 4 or later). Conclusion. Identifying and targeting modifiable variables can further improve the outcomes for this particular group of patients. ASA grade and attendance at the multidisciplinary Joint School are among the positive influences on patient LoS. Adjusting analgesia to reduce unwanted effects may facilitate earlier engagement with the physiotherapy service and thus earlier mobilisation. Early results suggest encouraging patients to attend Joint School with subsequently early postoperative mobilisation can positively influence safe return to the home environment

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) utilise multimodal rehabilitation techniques to reduce post-operative pain and accelerate the rehabilitation process following surgery. Originally described following elective colonic surgery enhanced recovery pathways have gained increasing use following elective hip and knee joint replacement in recent years. Early studies have indicated that enhanced recovery pathways can reduce length of hospital stay, reduce complications and improve cost-effectiveness of joint replacement surgery. Despite this growing evidence base uptake has been slow in certain centres and many surgeons are yet to utilise enhanced recovery pathways in their practice. We look at the process and effects of implementing an enhanced recovery pathway following total hip replacement surgery at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. A retrospective study was initially undertaken over a four-month period to assess patient demographics, length of stay, time to physiotherapy and complication rates including re-admission within 28 days. Based on national recommendations an enhanced recovery pathway protocol was then implemented for an elective total hip replacement list. Inclusion criteria were elective patients undergoing primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery. The pathway included pre-operative nutrition optimisation, 4mg ondansetron, 8mg dexamethasone and 1g tranexamic acid at induction and 150mL ropivacaine HCL 0.2%, 30mg ketorolac and adrenaline (RKA) mix infiltration to joint capsule, external rotators, gluteus tendon, iliotibial band, soft-tissues and skin around the hip joint. The patient was mobilised four-hours after surgery where possible and aimed to be discharged once mobile and pain was under control. Following implementation a prospective study was undertaken to compare patient demographics, length of stay and complication rates including re-admission within 28 days. 34 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in each group pre and post-enhanced recovery pathway. Following implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway mean length of stay decreased from 5.4 days to 3.5 days (CI 1.94, p < 0.0001). Sub-group analysis based on ASA grade revealed that this reduction in length of stay was most pronounced in ASA 1 patients with mean length of stay reduced from 5.0 days to 3.2 days (CI 1.83, p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the number of complications or re-admission rates following enhanced recovery pathway. The enhanced recovery pathway was quick and easy to implement with co-ordination between surgeons, anaesthetist, nursing staff and patients. This observational study of consecutive primary total hip replacement patients shows a substantial reduction in length of stay with no change in complication rates after the introduction of a multimodal enhanced recovery protocol. Both of these factors reduce hospital costs for elective THR patients and may improve patient experiences

Aims. To establish if the principles of Enhanced Recovery, an evidence-based, integrated, multi-modal approach to improving recovery following colonic resection are transferable to elective orthopaedic primary arthroplasty surgery. The principles are to reduce the stress response provoked by surgery and eliminate the peri-operative catabolic state by optimally managing patients' metabolism, expectations, postoperative pain and mobility. This combination of interventions has not been tested in Orthopaedics before. Methods. We conducted a single surgeon, consecutive patient, interventional, cohort study of primary total hip and knee arthroplasties. Our intervention was Enhanced Orthopaedic Recovery (EOR). Results. We retrospectively reviewed 138 primary joint replacements. We performed a power calculation before prospectively assessing the next 50 hip and 32 knee arthroplasties. A two-tailed t-test showed a highly statistically significant fall in mean time to discharge (Hips 8.1-5.4 total nights stay, p=0.003, knees 8.5-5.3 total nights stay, p<0.001) and a fall in expected date of discharge from 5 to 3 postoperative days. We studied the complication and readmission rate and found no apparent difference. Conclusions. We have shown that by implementing EOR, reduced time to functional recovery and subsequent hospital discharge can be safely achieved with consequent quality of life and health economic benefits

An enhanced recovery programme for knee arthroplasty was introduced two years ago to our orthopaedic department. It involved the setting up of an educational programme for patients along with an extensive rehabilitation programme. The main aim of the programme is to provide an efficient and personalised service that results in an improved patient experience and fewer bed days following surgery.

We carried out a retrospective study, randomly selecting 100 patients over a period of a year who were enrolled in the enhanced recovery programme. We analysed three main areas involving the pre-, peri- and post-operative period. We looked for any key factors that led to an increase or decrease in bed days. The re-admissions were analysed and the cost benefit was calculated.

99 patients were randomly selected and satisfied the inclusion criteria. We found that with the enhanced recovery programme the average length of stay for a knee arthroplasty was four days. There were no re-admissions within the population.

We would like to share our enhanced recovery programme model as we feel it is a robust and effective way of providing a high level of care and decreasing the length of stay post-operatively.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, there has been a shift toward outpatient and short-stay protocols for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We developed a peri-operative THA and TKA short stay protocol following the Enhance Recovery After Surgery principles (ERAS), aiming at both optimizing patients’ outcomes and reducing the hospital length of stay. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of our ERAS short-stay protocol. We hypothesized that our ERAS THA and TKA short-stay protocol would result in a lower complication rate, shorter hospital length of stay and reduced direct health care costs compared to our standard procedure.

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of combining enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) interventions with an outpatient THA/TKA program are uncertain. The primary objective was to compare adverse event rate and secondly to compare pain management, functional recovery, PROMs and patients' satisfaction.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing major surgery. ERAS allows for the incorporation of evidence based practices and incorporated a comprehensive assessment of the patient's journey through the surgical process from pre-operative screening through to post-operative care. The purpose of this study was to determine if optimisation of ERAS protocol with pre-operative screening and incorporating patient-specific factors into their post operative care would improve length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a Canadian community hospital setting. The study collected clinical, demographic data and the physical status perioperative using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification on 508 patients who underwent TJA between January and August 2015 and compared similar data from the same time frame in the previous calendar year prior to implementation of the pathway. Cohorts were analysed for length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, Pre-operative assessments (completed by anaesthesia, nursing and pharmacy), relevant labs, patient history (surgery, medical, social), and patient values were all considered when developing a specific patient plan for care post-operatively. A post-operative management tool was used to optimise pain control, post-operative nausea and vomiting, bowel management, diabetes blood glucose control, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, as well as monitoring parameters specific to patient medical history (e.g. respiratory, cardiac). While in hospital, physiotherapy and nursing were consulted by the pharmacist to assess whether patient's post op management needed to be altered to optimise mobilisation and recovery in hospital. The average patient's LOS and readmission rates in 30 days was analysed to assess the change after implementation of the post-operative management tool based on patient specific factors. A total of 508 patients (mean age: 66 years), ASA classification was 3 or greater for 430 patients. The patients were assessed for LOS, readmission rates in 30 days. The mean LOS decreased from 3.6 to 3.3 days after optimisation of the ERAS protocol (student t test p=0.021). The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 2.9% to 1.4% post intervention (z test p=0.087) when compared to the same time period in the previous calendar year prior to protocol implementation. Overall, the cost savings to optimising the ERAS protocol for the hospital is substantial; with approximately $238 saved per patient. Pre-operative screening and incorporating patient-specific factors into an individualised care plan to optimise the ERAS protocol for TJA reduced mean length of stay without a concomitant increase in readmission rates with significant cost saving

As Total Hip Replacement (THR) rates increase healthcare providers have sought to reduce costs, while at the same time improving patient safety and satisfaction. Up to 50% of patients may be appropriate for Day Case THR, and in appropriately selected patients’ studies show no increase in complication rate while affording a significant cost saving and maintaining a high rate of patient satisfaction. Despite the potential benefits, levels of adoption of Day Case THR vary. A common cause for this is the perception that doing so would require the adoption of new surgical techniques, implants, or theatre equipment. We report on a Day-Case THR pathway in centres with an established and well-functioning Enhanced Recovery pathway, utilising the posterior approach and standard implants and positioning. We prospectively collected the data on consecutive THRs performed by a single surgeon between June 2018 and July 2021. A standardised anaesthetic regimen using short acting spinal was used. Surgical data included approach, implants, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Outcome data included time of discharge from hospital, post operative complications, readmissions, and unscheduled health service attendance. Data was gathered on 120 consecutive DCTHRs in 114 patients. 93% of patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery. Four patients required re-admission: one infection treated with DAIR, one dislocation, one wound ooze admitted for a day of monitoring, one gastric ulcer. One patient had a short ED attendance for hypertension. Our incidence of infection, dislocation and wound problems were similar to those seen in inpatient THR. Out data show that the widely used posterior approach using standard positioning and implants can be used effectively in a Day Case THR pathway, with no increase in failure of same-day discharge or re-admission to hospital

Introduction. Enhanced recovery programmes (ERP) have recently been adopted in the UK, enabling patients to recover quickly and return home sooner. Choice of anaesthetic is an important factor effecting post-operative outcome; studies show regional anaesthesia is more cost-effective, decreasing the incidence of venous thromboembolic events and reducing intra-operative blood loss, the need for transfusion and the length of hospital stay. Objectives. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term outcome of patients enrolled in our ERP who underwent either general or spinal +/− epidural anaesthesia. Methods. We prospectively studied 1222 patients (age- and sex-matched) who underwent lower limb arthroplasty enrolled in our ERP between March 2010-December 2011. Patients were given the opportunity to discuss their preferred mode of anaesthesia with their anaesthetist. Group 1 underwent general anaesthesia (GA), Group 2 underwent spinal +/− epidural anaesthesia (SA+/−EA). Results. 1222 patients underwent lower limb arthroplasty during our study period; 690 patients underwent GA, and 532 patients received SA+/−EA. There were similar ratios of THRs and TKRs in each group 343:347 and 257:275, respectively. Group 1 had an average age of 67.8 years (range 23–92; 65% female, 35% male), group 2 average age was 70 years (range 29–96; 58% female, 42% male). Average length of stay was 4.65 days in group 1 and 4.75 days in group 2 (Median 4, range 1–23). Similar rates of post-operative wound complications were noted in each group. Both groups had just two incidences of venous thromboembolic events. Conclusion. Enhanced Recovery Programmes have been initiated to reduce hospital stay following lower limb arthroplasty. We have shown no statistically significant difference between the patient being asleep or awake during surgery in the short-term outcome following surgery. The biggest contributing factors to the mode of anaesthesia used were individual anaesthetists' preference and patient choice

Introduction. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common occurrence following total joint arthroplasty, and can result in patient discomfort, delayed discharge, and decreased patient satisfaction. Carbohydrate loading as part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol has gained popularity, and has been shown to minimize postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain, and lead to accelerated recovery and better overall outcome following abdominal surgery. This study aims to investigate the effects of preoperative carbohydrate-rich drinks on PONV following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Patients undergoing primary TKA at one institution were enrolled randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 received preoperative carbohydrate-rich drink, Group 2 received placebo water drink of similar appearance and taste, and Group 3 did not receive a drink (control). All healthcare personnel and patients (group 1 and 2) were blinded to group allocation. We compared rate of postoperative nausea, vomiting, length of stay (LOS), and opiate consumption (morphine equivalents, meq). We also reviewed visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and serum glucose at 0–4 hours, 4–12 hours, and 12–24 hours postoperatively. Results. 229 eligible patients were enrolled and randomized. 79 patients were later excluded due to reasons precluding appropriate participation. 150 patients were included for final analysis, with 50 patients in Group 1, 48 patients in Group 2, and 52 patients in Group 3. The demographics and comorbid conditions known to increase risk of nausea and vomiting were similar between the groups. Rate of vomiting was not statistically significant across groups; group 1 (6%, 3/50), group 2 (13%, 6/48), group 3 (8%, 4/52), p=0.51. Rate of requiring antiemetic medication in group 1 (30%, 15/50) did not differ significantly from group 2 (27%, 13/48) and group 3 (40%, 21/52), p=0.32. Average LOS was not different in group 1 (32 hours) compared to group 2 (32.5 hours) and group 3 (32 hours), p=0.79. Average postoperative opiate consumption for group 1 (57.0 meq) was not statistically different from group 2 (61.3) or group 3 (61.0), p=0.91. Pain VAS scores and serum glucose measurements did not differ between groups for all three time periods (p>0.05). There was no difference in reported adverse events between groups. Conclusion. There appears to be no significant difference in PONV, antiemetic requirements, LOS, pain VAS scores, serum glucose measurements, and opiate consumption in patients receiving preoperative carbohydrate-rich drink prior to primary TKA. Preoperative carbohydrate-rich drinks are safe, however, their utility in the setting of arthroplasty does not yet demonstrate clinical benefit. Continued investigation is required. Summary. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effect of preoperative carbohydrate-rich drinks on postoperative nausea and vomiting following primary total knee arthroplasty. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Enhanced recovery programmes have improved outcomes following elective arthroplasty surgery. Most studies assess whole advanced recovery programmes. There are few studies assessing the role of patient education. We therefore assessed our outcomes. As part of our enhanced recovery programme at Wrexham Maelor Hospital, all patients are offered the chance to attend ‘joint school’, a preoperative education class. Not all patients attend these sessions allowing comparison of outcomes in these two groups using our prospectively collected database of outcome measures. Between April 2009 and March 2013, 915 patients underwent elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Revision cases were excluded, leaving 567 knee replacements, 315 hip replacements and 27 unicompartmental knee replacements. In patients undergoing knee replacement, those attending joint school had shorter length of stay (4.38 vs 4.85 days, p=0.145) and better Oxford Knee Score at 6 months (p=0.026) and two years (p=0.035). Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty had a statistically significantly shorter length of stay (3.64 vs 4.54 days, p=0.011); increased frequency of mobilising on the day of surgery (28.1% vs 22.6%, p=0.203) and higher Oxford Hip Scores (non-significant) if they attended joint school. Our retrospective analysis demonstrates that preoperative education for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty produces significantly shorter lengths of stay. There are also effects on mobilisation and outcome scores. These effects are also seen in knee arthroplasty. These results will have clinical and financial implications. Assessing cost of saved bed days alone, joint school saves the trust over £10,000 per year

The NW Advancing Quality programme is a regional one aimed at improving the delivery of evidence based care. Hip and knee replacement has been one of 5 clinical areas. Over a 3 year period performance at all 24 NW trusts has been measured. For hip and knee replacement patients the evidence based care has been delivery of antibiotic and thromboembolic prophylaxis. Robust data has been collected on the choice and timeliness of prophylaxis and readmission rates for each trust. The programme included financial and reputational (public reporting) rewards for top performing units. Sharing of data and collaborative working has been put in place to improve overall performance. Over the 3 years of the programme data has been collected on 47,825 patients. Across the region delivery of the measures has improved from 88 to 96%. Patients achieving all measures and avoiding readmission has improved from 64 to 85%. There has been reduced variation in performance. The biggest improvement in performance has occurred in the initially poorer perfoming trusts (year 1 range 54–97%, year 3 range 86–99%). All cause readmission within 28 days of discharge has fallen from 9 to 7%. The progamme has demonstrated that it is possible to improve delivery of evidence based care and clinical outcomes on a regional basis. It has evolved from a stand alone programme to continue as a regional CQUIN. The programme has had wider benefits. Units report a change of culture producing improved delivery of other protocols. The collaboraive working has created a multidisciplinary network with improvement initiatives widened to include comparing PROMS data, Enhanced Recovery and Shared Decision Making. Challenges have included obtaining consensus regarding the initial and now soon to be introduced updated thromboembolic measures

Aims

Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre.