Objectives. Bioresorbable orthopaedic devices with calcium phosphate (CaP) fillers are commercially available on the assumption that increased calcium (Ca) locally drives new bone formation, but the clinical benefits are unknown.
Introduction:
INTRODUCTION. Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris is thought to be a main factor in the development of osteolysis (1). However, the method for the evaluation of the biological response to UHMWPE particles has not yet been standardized. In this study, four different types of UHMWPE particles were generated using a mechanized pulverizing method and the biological responses of macrophages to the particles were investigated using an inverted cell culturing process (2). MATERIALS & METHODS. Virgin samples were manufactured via Direct Compression Molding (DCM) technique from UHMWPE GUR1050 resin powder (Ticona, USA). For vitamin E (VE)-blended sample, the resin was mixed with VE at 0.3 wt% and the mixture was then molded using DCM. The crosslinked virgin samples were made by gamma ray irradiation to UHMWPE GUR1020 resin sheet (Meditech, USA) with doses of 95kGy ±10% and annealed. The VE-blended crosslinked samples were made by
Introduction. Wear of the UHMWPE component is responsible for many TJR failures. It is now well known that oxidation of UHMWPE, induced by radiation sterilisation in air, dramatically increases the wear rate. ASTM regulations for orthopaedic UHMWPE forbids the addiction of any antioxidant to the polymer powder or to fabricated forms. Vitamin E is widely employed as a biocompatible stabiliser in the food and cosmetic industry. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficiency of Vitamin E as a stabiliser for prosthetic UHMWPE. Materials. Virgin UHMWPE samples were obtained from compression moulded slabs (GUR 1020, Perplas). In addiction, compression moulded slabs of GUR 1020 mixed with 500 and 1000 ppm of Vitamin E respectively were also studied.
Summary. Low energy irradiation of vitamin E blended UHMWPE is feasible to fabricate total joint implants with high wear resistance and impact strength. Introduction. Irradiated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), used in the fabrication of joint implants, has increased wear resistance. But, increased crosslinking decreases the mechanical strength of the polymer, thus limiting the crosslinking to the surface is desirable. Here, we used
Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) greatly reduces wear in total hip arthroplasty, compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE). Cross-linking is commonly achieved by irradiation. This study aimed to compare the degree of cross-linking and in vitro wear rates across a cohort of retrieved and unused polyethylene cups/liners from various brands. Polyethylene acetabular cups/liners were collected at one centre from 1 April 2021 to 30 April 2022. The trans-vinylene index (TVI) and oxidation index (OI) were determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry. Wear was measured using a pin-on-disk test.Aims
Methods
Orthopaedic surgery requires grafts with sufficient mechanical strength. For this purpose, decellularized tissue is an available option that lacks the complications of autologous tissue. However, it is not widely used in orthopaedic surgeries. This study investigated clinical trials of the use of decellularized tissue grafts in orthopaedic surgery. Using the ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) databases, we comprehensively surveyed clinical trials of decellularized tissue use in orthopaedic surgeries registered before 1 September 2022. We evaluated the clinical results, tissue processing methods, and commercial availability of the identified products using academic literature databases and manufacturers’ websites.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface damage, the density of crosslinking, and oxidation in retrieved antioxidant-stabilized highly crosslinked polyethylene (A-XLPE) tibial inserts from total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to compare the results with a matched cohort of standard remelted highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) inserts. A total of 19 A-XLPE tibial inserts were retrieved during revision TKA and matched to 18 retrieved XLPE inserts according to the demographics of the patients, with a mean length of implantation of 15 months (1 to 42). The percentage areas of PE damage on the articular surfaces and the modes of damage were measured. The density of crosslinking of the PE and oxidation were measured at loaded and unloaded regions on these surfaces.Aims
Materials and Methods
Large femoral heads have been used with increasing
frequency over the last decade. The prime reason is likely the effect
of large heads on stability. The larger head neck ratio, combined
with the increased jump distance of larger heads result in a greater
arc of impingement free motion, and greater resistance to dislocation
in a provocative position. Multiple studies have demonstrated clear
clinical efficacy in diminishing dislocation rates with the use
of large femoral heads. With crosslinked polyethylene, wear has
been shown to be equivalent between larger and smaller heads. However,
the stability advantages of increasing diameter beyond 38 mm have
not been clearly demonstrated. More importantly, recent data implicates
large heads in the increasing prevalence of groin pain and psoas impingement.
There are clear benefits with larger femoral head diameters, but
the advantages of diameters beyond 38 mm have not yet been demonstrated
clinically.
We reviewed the literature on the currently available
choices of bearing surface in total hip replacement (THR). We present
a detailed description of the properties of articulating surfaces
review the understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of
existing bearing couples. Recent technological developments in the
field of polyethylene and ceramics have altered the risk of fracture
and the rate of wear, although the use of metal-on-metal bearings has
largely fallen out of favour, owing to concerns about reactions
to metal debris. As expected, all bearing surface combinations have
advantages and disadvantages. A patient-based approach is recommended,
balancing the risks of different options against an individual’s
functional demands. Cite this article: