Abstract. Introduction. Displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly are challenging due to associated comorbidities, poor tissue quality, high risk of complications, and the possible need for implant removal. Treatment options with such fractures range from non-operative management to internal fixation with various types of implants. Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of olecranon fractures in the elderly with relatively low functional demand. Aim. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the clinical outcomes of various treatment modalities for olecranon fracture in the elderly. Methods. We systematically reviewed the literature covering the treatment of olecranon fractures in the elderly according to PRISMA guidelines. We used search tools of Medline, Embase, Wiley online library, Cochrane and Scopus. Keywords used in the search were Olecranon fracture and Elderly OR Geriatric in all fields. Studies involving patients older than 60 years of age and all modalities of treatment were included. Results. 14 papers studying 270 patients were identified of which, 112 were treated non-operatively, 25 with limited fixation, 98 with tension band wire fixation, 34 with plate fixation, and 1 patient was treated with excision. Conclusions. Nonoperative as well as limited fixation were shown to provide satisfactory results in the elderly. Treatment decisions in this age group should be individualised to factors such as fracture stability, quality of bone & soft tissues, and patient's functional demand. We recommend a treatment protocol for treating olecranon fracture in the elderly based on the above factors

Aim. The treatment of fracture-related infections (FRI) focuses on obtaining fracture healing and eradicating infection to prevent osteomyelitis. Treatment guidelines include removal, exchange, or retention of the implants used according to the stability of the fracture and the time from the infection. Infection of a fracture in the process of healing with a stable fixation may be treated with implant retention, debridement, and antibiotics. Nonetheless, the retention of an intramedullary nail is a potential risk factor for failure, and it is recommended to exchange or remove the nail. This surgical approach implies additional life-threatening risks in elderly fragile hip fracture patients. Our study aimed to analyze the results of implant retention for the treatment of infected nails in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods. Our retrospective analysis included patients 65 years of age or older with an acute fracture-related infection treated with implant retention from 2012 to 2020 in 6 Spanish hospitals with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients that required open reduction during the initial fracture surgery were excluded. Variables included in our analysis were patient demographics, type of fracture, date of FRI diagnosis, causative microorganism, and outcome. Treatment success was defined as fracture healing with infection eradication without the need for further hospitalization. Results. A total of 48 patients were identified. Eight patients with open reduction were excluded and 11 did not complete a 1-year follow-up. Out of the 29 remaining patients, the mean age was 81.5 years, with a 21:9, female to male ratio. FRI was diagnosed between 10 and 48 days after initial surgery (mean 26 days). Treatment success was achieved in 24 patients (82.7%). Failure was objectivated in polymicrobial infections or infections caused by microorganisms resistant to antibiofilm antibiotics. Seven patients required more than one debridement with a success rate of 57%. Twelve patients had an infection diagnosed after 21 days from the initial surgery and implant retention was successful in all of them. Conclusion. Our results suggest implant retention is a valid therapeutic approach for fracture-related infection in elderly hip fracture patients treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nailing

Current recommendations advocate for surgery within 48 hours from time of injury as a keystone in care for elderly patients with hip fractures. A spare population density within regional Australia provides physical challenges to meet time critical care parameters. This study aims to review the impact of delays to timely surgery for elderly hip fracture patients within a regional Australian population. A retrospective, comparative analysis was undertaken of 140 consecutive hip fracture patients managed at a single rural referral hospital, from June 2020 until June 2021. Factors such as age, time to transfer, time to surgery, 30-day complication and 6-month complication rates were collected. Statistical analysis was performed where applicable. Mean time to surgery was 33.9 hours. A greater proportion of patients whom directly presented underwent surgery within the recommended 48 hours (91.5% vs 75.3%). The statistically significant delay in time to surgery was found to be 6.4 hours. Lower 180-day morbidity and mortality rates were observed in patients undergoing surgery within 48 hours (13.8% vs 36%), This is in comparison to the overall mortality rate of 19.2%. Delay to surgery for elderly hip fracture patients was associated with an increase 30-day and 180-day morbidity and mortality rate. A greater proportion of patients transferred from peripheral hospitals experienced a delay in surgery. Early transfer and prioritization of such patients is recommended to achieve comparative outcomes for rural and remote Australians

Aim. Currently, gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including multidrug-resistant (MDR-GNB) pathogens, are gaining importance in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). To characterize the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) causing hip prosthetic joint infections in elderly patients treated at a Brazilian tertiary academic hospital. Method. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients over 60 years of age undergoing hip arthroplasty from 2018 to 2023 at a tertiary academic trauma, which were diagnosed with hip prosthetic joint infection. PJI diagnosed was based on EBJIS criteria, in which intraoperative tissue cultures identified the pathogens. Demographics, reason for arthroplasty, type of implant and susceptibility patterns using disk diffusion method were analysed. Results. Overall, among 17 elderly patients diagnosed with hip infected arthroplasty, 45 bacterial isolated were identified. Debridement, irrigation, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) procedures due to uncontrolled infection occurred in 47.0% (n=8/17), and five patients underwent more than two DAIR surgeries. Tissue cultures yielded eleven different bacterial species, with GNB accounted for 64.4% (n=29/45) of pathogens. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified in 34.5% (n=10/29), 17.25% (n=5/29), 13.8% (n=4/29), and 13.8% (n=4/29), respectively. In the resistance profile analysis, E. coli was most sensitive to antibiotics, whereas K. pneumoniae showed resistance rates higher than 70% for cephalosporins, carbapenems, and quinolones. All A. baumannii isolates were resistant to meropenem, and 80% of these isolates were resistant to amikacin. Conclusions. This study emphasizes the role of GNB in the microbiological profile of PJI among elderly patients at a tertiary hospital in a Brazilian centre. The present study portrays a worryingly higher rates of MDR-GNB, mainly to quinolones and cephalosporins resistance which have been the cornerstone of PJI antibiotic treatment. In addition, higher rates carbapenems and aminoglycosides resistance shows a threat to antibiotic treatment of PJI. More global studies need to be carried out to show a likely change in the microbial epidemiology of PJI

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcome of operative and non-operative management in adults with distal radius fractures, with an additional elderly subgroup analysis. The main outcome was 12-month PRWE score. Secondary outcomes included DASH score, grip strength, complications and radiographic parameters. Randomised controlled trials of patients aged ≥18yrs with a dorsally displaced distal radius fractures were included. Studies compared operative intervention with non-operative management. Operative management included open reduction and internal fixation, Kirschner-wiring or external fixation. Non-operative management was cast/splint immobilisation with/without closed reduction. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used. After screening 1258 studies, 16 trials with 1947 patients (mean age 66yrs, 76% female) were included in the meta-analysis. Eight studies reported PRWE score and there was no clinically significant difference at 12 weeks (MD 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.75 to 1.07, p=0.73) or 12 months (mean difference [MD] 3.30, 95% CI −5.66 to −0.94, p=0.006). Four studies reported on scores in the elderly and there was no clinically significant difference at 12 weeks (MD 0.59, 95% CI −0.35 to 1.53, p=0.22) or 12 months (MD 2.60, 95% CI −5.51 to 0.30, p=0.08). There was a no clinically significant difference in DASH score at 12 weeks (MD 10.18, 95% CI −14.98 to −5.38, p<0.0001) or 12 months (MD 3.49, 95% CI −5.69 to −1.29, p=0.002). Two studies featured only elderly patients, with no clinically important difference at 12 weeks (MD 7.07, 95% CI −11.77 to −2.37, p=0.003) or 12 months (MD 3.32, 95% CI −7.03 to 0.38, p=0.08). There was no clinically significant difference in patient-reported outcome according to PRWE or DASH at either timepoint in the adult group as a whole or in the elderly subgroup

Introduction. Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP). Methods. A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year. Results. A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year. Conclusion. Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures

Complex proximal humerus fractures account for 10% of fractures in patients over 65 years of age. With the emergence of new implants, there is growing trend towards surgical management of these types of fractures, despite the lack of clinical evidence of its superiority over a conservative option. Orthopaedic surgeons' perception plays a large role in the surgical decision making for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. No studies have been conducted to date to examine factors that influence the surgical decision-making in orthopaedic surgeons in regards to these types of fractures. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to orthopaedic surgeons. It included demographic questions as well as clinical vignettes assessing the risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons in different situations. Orthopaedic surgeons self-reported the proportion of proximal humerus fractures that were treated surgically in patients during the last year. Univariate analyzes were conducted to identify the factors that influenced the operation rates. A total of 127 orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. The response rate was 37%. The risk / benefit perception of surgical management varied according to the type of practice, year of training, operation rate as well as the ease of the surgeon in performing shoulder procedures (p < 0.05). According to the queried surgeons, the most important factors affecting their decision-making were patient's age, the type of fracture, co-morbidities, level of independence and potential for rehabilitation. The type of surgery proposed varied depending on the training and familiarity of the surgeon with the procedure. The risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons regarding surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients appears to vary widely. The decision to opt for surgical management is influenced by the surgeon's familiarity with the procedure, their year of training and their subspecialty. This study demonstrates the need to establish a decision-making tool to assist orthopaedic surgeons and patients with this clinical decision

Management of acetabular fractures in the elderly population remains somewhat controversial in regards to when to consider is open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus acute primary total hip. study aims to (1) describe outcome of this complex problem and investigate predictors of successful outcome. This retrospective study analyzes all acetabular fractures in patients over the age of 60, managed by ORIF at a tertiary trauma care centre between 2007 and 2018 with a minimum follow up of one year. Of the 117 patients reviewed, 85 patients undergoing ORIF for treatment of their acetabular fracture were included in the analysis. The remainder were excluded based management option including acute ORIF with THA (n=10), two-stage ORIF (n=2), external fixator only (n=1), acute THA (n=1), and conservative management (n=1). The remainder were excluded based on inaccessible medical records (n=6), mislabelled diagnosis (n=6), associated femoral injuries (n=4), acetabular fracture following hemiarthroplasty (n=1). The mean age of the cohort is 70±7 years old with 74% (n=62) of patients being male. Data collected included: demographics, mechanism of injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA Grade, smoking status and reoperations. Pre-Operative Radiographs were analyzed to determine the Judet and Letournel fracture pattern, presence of comminution and posterior wall marginal impaction. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine Matta Grade of Reduction. Outcome measures included morbidity-, mortality- rates, joint survival, radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at follow-up. A poor outcome in ORIF was defined as one of the following: 1) conversion to THA or 2) the presence of radiographic OA, combined with an OHS less than 34 (findings consistent with a hip that would benefit from a hip replacement). The data was analyzed step-wise to create a regression model predictive of outcome following ORIF. Following ORIF, 31% (n=26) of the cohort had anatomic reduction, while 64% (n=54) had imperfect or poor reduction. 4 patients did not have adequate postoperative radiographs to assess the reduction. 31 of 84 patients undergoing ORIF had a complication of which 22.6% (n=19) required reoperation. The most common reason being conversion to THA (n=14), which occurred an average of 1.6±1.9 years post-ORIF. The remainder required reoperation for infection (n=5). Including those converted to THA, 43% (n=36) developed radiographic OA following acetabular fracture management. The mean OHS in patients undergoing ORIF was 36 ± 10; 13(16%) had an OHS less than 34. The results of the logistic regression demonstrate that Matta grade of reduction (p=0.017), to be predictive of a poor outcome in acetabular fracture management. With non-anatomic alignment following fixation, patients had a 3 times greater risk of a poor outcome. No other variables were found to be predictive of ORIF outcome. The ability to achieve anatomic reduction of fracture fragments as determined by the Matta grade, is predictive of the ability to retain the native hip with acceptable outcome following acetabular fracture in the elderly. Further research must be conducted to determine predictors of adequate reduction in order to identify candidates for ORIF

Fracture neck of femur (NOF) in elderly is a serious debilitating injury and has been presenting in increasing proportions. Some of these patients are unfortunate to come back with a contralateral injury. We attempted at looking into the incidence of these episodes in a cohort attending our trust and compared various parameters. We retrospectively assessed our hospital theatre data for fracture NOF in patients over 60 years in the last 3 years. We reviewed their demographics, mode of injury, time to contralateral injury, incidence of any other insufficiency fracture, operative procedure and any complications. There were 1435 patients who underwent surgery for fracture NOF over the 3 years. Forty-three of these had bilateral fractures. Females had 3 times more incidence as compared to males; average age at first injury was 84 years and at contralateral side was 85 years. Time between the two injuries ranged from 20 to 855 days (Median 242 days). Almost equal incidence of intra / extracapsular fractures was noted. Contralateral fracture pattern (Intra vs Extracapsular) for the was similar in 34 patients. Twelve patients had an associated insufficiency fracture. Fracture NOF in elderly is a rising epidemic. Only 3% of these patients suffer a contralateral fracture NOF which usually occurs within a year. The fracture pattern is frequently similar to the first fracture in and hence similar implants have been used. Only 21% patients were on bone protection medications. It is rather difficult to identify this small group and hence prevent a second contralateral incident

The aim was to predict the number and incidence of distal radius fractures in Scotland over the next two decades according to age group, categorised into under 65yrs(<65) and 65yrs and older (≥65), and estimate the potential increased operative burden of this. The number of distal radius fracture in Scotland was isolated from the Global Burden of Disease database and this was used, in addition to historic population data and population estimates, to create a multivariable model allowing incorporation of age group, sex and time. A Negative Binomial distribution was used to predict incidence in 2030 and 2040 and calculate projected number of fractures according to the population at risk. A 20.4% operative intervention rate was assumed in the ≥65 group (local data). In terms of number of fractures, there was a projected 61% rise in the ≥65 group with an overall increase of 2099 fractures per year from 3417 in 2020 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2960 – 3463) to 5516 in 2040 (95% CI 4155–5675). This was associated with 428 additional operative interventions per year for those ≥65yrs. The projected increase between 2020 and 2040 was similar in both sexes (60% in females, 63% in males), however the absolute increase in fracture number was higher in females (2256 in 2020 [95% CI 1954–2287] to 3620 in 2040 [95% CI 2727–3721]) compared to males (1160 [95% CI 1005–1176] to 1895 [95% CI 1427–1950]). There was a 4% projected fall in the number of fractures in those <65. Incidence of distal radius fractures is expected to considerably increase over the next two decades due to a projected increase in the number of fractures in the elderly. This has implications for the associated morbidity and healthcare resource use

Abstract. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is being increasingly used for complex, displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. The main goal of the current study was to evaluate the functional and radiographic results after primary RSA of three or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Between 2012 and 2020, 70 consecutive patients with a recent three- or four-part fracture of the proximal humerus were treated with an RSA. There were 41 women and 29 men, with a mean age of 76 years. The dominant arm was involved in 42 patients (60%). All surgeries were carried out within 21 days. Displaced three-part fracture sustained in 16 patients, 24 had fracture dislocation and 30 sustained a four-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Patients were followed up for a mean of 26 months. The mean postoperative OSS at the end of the follow-up period was 32.4. The mean DASH score was 44.3. Tuberosity non-union occurred in 18 patients (12.6%), malunion in 7 patients (4.9%), heterotopic ossification in 4 patients (2.8%) and scapular notching in one patient. Anatomical reconstruction was achieved in 25 patients (17.5%), the influence of greater tuberosity healing on shoulder function could not be demonstrated. Heterotopic ossification seems to affect OSS and QDASH, we found statistically significant relation between HO and clinical outcomes. Patients with heterotopic ossification had significantly lower postoperative scores on DASH and OSS (P = .0527). Despite expecting good functional outcome with low complication rate after RSA, the functional outcome was irrespective of healing of the tuberosities

Abstract. Background. Fractures Proximal humerus account for nearly 10 % of geriatric fractures. The treatment options varies. There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment, with almost all modalities giving functionally poor outcomes. Hence literature recommends conservative management over surgical options. MULTILOC nail with its design seems to be a promising tool in treating these fractures. We hereby report our early experience in the treatment of 37 elderly patients. Objectives. To evaluate the radiological outcome with regards to union, collapse, screw back out/cut through, implant failures, Greater tuberosity migration. To evaluate the functional outcome at the end of 6 months using Constant score. Study Design & Methods. All patients aged >65 years who underwent surgery for 3,4-part fracture proximal humerus using the MULTILOC nail were included in the study after consent. Pre – existing rotator cuff disease were excluded. Within the time frame, a total of 39 patients underwent the said surgery. 2 patients were lost to follow up. All the measurements were taken at the end of 6 months and results tabulated and analysed. Results. Union was achieved in all the 37 patients. There were no varus collapse or screw backout/cut through seen in any of the patients. There was Greater tuberosity migration in 1 patient who underwent revision surgery at 6 weeks. All the patients got a minimum of 70 degrees of abduction and forward flexion. We had 29 excellent, 6 good, 2 fair and none poor results as per Constant scoring system. Study done in Tejasvini Hospital & SSIOT Mangaluru India

Traditionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) have been the surgical treatments of choice for displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) despite high rates of fixation failure and tuberosity nonunion, especially in the elderly population with poor bone quality. Recently, there has been a significant increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a treatment option in both acute fractures, as well as a salvage procedure for fracture sequelae (i.e., malunion, nonunion, fixation failure, tuberosity non-union). Despite the growing enthusiasm it remains unknown whether functional outcomes after RTSA as a salvage procedure are similar to those following acute RTSA. As a result, the purpose of this systematic review was to compare functional outcomes after RTSA as a primary versus salvage procedure for displaced PHF in the elderly. A literature search of the electronic databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed was conducted to identify all studies comparing RTSA as a primary treatment for displaced PHF and as a salvage procedure for failed initial management. Only studies with a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Data pertaining to range of motion, patient reported outcome measures and complications were extracted from eligible studies and entered into a meta-analysis software package (RevMan version 5.1, The Cochrane Collaboration) for pooled analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. The search identified four studies consisting of 200 patients with a mean age of 73.3 years and a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. There were a total of 76 patients (75% female) who underwent acute RTSA following displaced PHF, while 124 patients (77% female) required salvage RTSA for failure of initial treatment. Primary RTSA was found to have significantly higher American Shoulder and Elbow (ASES) (P = 0.04), Constant (P = 0.01) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) (P = 0.0004) scores compared to salvage RTSA. Forward flexion (P = 0.001) and external rotation (P< 0.0001) were significantly greater amongst those undergoing RTSA acutely versus as a salvage procedure. The odds of having a complication (e.g., infection, dislocation, fracture) were 76% lower amongst those who had primary RTSA compared to salvage RTSA (P = 0.02). The overall quality of eligible studies was moderate to high. Based on the current available evidence, elderly patients with displaced PHF have significantly greater range of motion, higher patient reported outcomes and lower risk of complications with primary RTSA compared to those undergoing RTSA as a salvage procedure. Additional prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings

Background. Recently, a larger number of elderly individuals with osteoporosis has undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intuitively, such vulnerable bone condition should deteriorate post-TKA functional recovery compared to a non-osteoporotic condition, but this hypothesis has not been directly examined. Methods. To address this issue, we analysed prognosis of patients who underwent TKA in Toranomon Hospital in Japan between April 2016 and March 2017 (27 of 40 cases, age 75.0±8.2 years old, BMI 24.5±3.1), and evaluated effects of osteoporosis on the changes in functions of the knees three/six/twelve months after the operation. The knee functions were quantified based on Knee Society Score (KSS), and the severity of the pre-operative osteoporosis was evaluated by T-score. We examined the relationships between these scores using multiple regression analyses with age, BMI, and sex as covariates. We excluded patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results. The multiple regression analyses revealed that the severity of osteoporosis (T-score) before TKA did not have sufficient explanatory powers for either type of KSS (for Knee Score, adjusted R2 ≤ 0.16; for Functional Score, adjusted R2 ≤ 0.15). In addition, Pearson correlation coefficients between the pre-operative osteoporosis severity and KSS were weak (for Knee Score, |r| < 0.07, P > 0.78; for Functional Score, |r| < 0.27, P > 0.21; Fig 1). This tendency was qualitatively preserved even when we repeated these analyses for each sex group. Conclusions. These analyses suggest that counterintuitively, pre-operative osteoporosis does not significantly deteriorate the functional outcome of TKA in the elderly population. Although longer observations of larger samples will be needed, the current findings indicate the possibility that we may not have to hesitate over TKA even for osteoporotic patients. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Aim. European population is ageing concurrently with an increase number of arthroplasties. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the elderly is considered more severe. The aim of this study is to describe PJI's management of patients over 79 years of age. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study including all patients aged over 79 years old consulting for a suspected hip or knee PJI in our community hospital where a complex bone and joint unit is present. Results. From 2007 to 2015, among the 366 patients who consulted for a PJI suspicion, 44 were older than 79. In this group, median age was 81.5 and 52% were women. A significant comorbidity was present in 24 patients among them 9 were diabetic. Location of suspected PJI was hip for 24 patients and 52% of the patients had a PJI background. Median time from the first arthroplasty was 8 years, however 17 had already an exchange. We classified the presentation as early (before 3 months after surgery, n=7), delayed (3 to 24 months, n=9) and late (more than 24 months, n=28). Pain was the first symptom, 9 presented fever and 10 had a sinus tract communication. Median C-reactive protein rate was 64 mg/l. Pre-operative synovial fluid analysis was performed in 34 patients, the concordance with intra-operative samples was 44%. A surgery was performed in 86% of the patients corresponding in five retentions, 17 one-time and 13 two-time exchange, 2 arthrodesis and one resection of arthroplasty. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n=14), Staphylococcus aureus (n=10) and Enterobacteriaceae (n=5) were the principal microorganisms identified. Antibiotherapy median duration was 10 days for intravenous regimens and 45 days for total treatment. We noted 4 catheter-related infections and 9 side effects of antibiotics. A prolonged antibiotic suppressive therapy was performed for 8 patients (18%). With a median time of follow-up of 21.5 months, we notified 13 failures (30%) and 5 deaths (11%). After the episode, 5 patients could not standup, a walking stick was necessary for 11 patients, 2 for 5 patients while 13 recovered a relatively good autonomy. Conclusion. PJI in elderly people is a severe complication with a significant morbidity but palliative treatment is not the first alternative. We showed acceptable outcomes with more invasive managements. These data need to be compared with younger population in a second analysis

The number of Americans over the age of 80 is increasing at a faster rate than that of the 65–80 population. The cohort age 85–94 years had the fastest rate of growth from 2000–2010. The number of Americans older than 95 years grew at approximately 26% during the same period. This rapid growth has been associated with an increasing incidence of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee in this population. This surge in the growth rate of the elderly population has coincided with an increasing demand for primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Surgeons need to be prepared to perform safely and appropriately these procedures in this rapidly growing segment of the population. Surgeons need to be aware of the 1) clinical outcomes that can be expected when total joint procedures are performed in this group of patients; 2) the morbidity and mortality associated with the performance of these procedures; and 3) the relative cost effectiveness of these interventions. Clinical outcomes of TJA in this population are generally good. Pain and satisfaction scores are similar to those of younger patients. Although pre-operative pain and functional impairment scores are higher pre-operatively in elderly patients, these improve significantly following TJA. However, functional outcome scores decline noticeably after 5 years, reflecting the impact of coexistent comorbidities. The continued need for assistive devices is greater in this age group than in younger total joint patients. The risk of falls, a particular issue of concern in this age group, is reduced after total hip and knee surgery. The rate of complications, including mortality, following TJA in this age group is greater than in the 65–79-year-old group. The use of hospitalists to co-manage peri-operative care is particularly important in this age group. The increased rate of complications is associated with longer lengths of stay. However, the length of stay for this age group after primary total joint replacement is decreasing significantly; reflecting the widespread streamlining of peri-operative care that is being incentivised and implemented nationwide. The use of extended care facilities is also greater in this age group. The performance of revision TJA in this age group is particularly challenging. The rates of revision in elderly patients are anticipated to rise significantly in coming years. Although revision TJA is associated with significant pain relief and patient satisfaction, it is accompanied by mortality and complication rates that are substantially greater than those in younger age groups

Introduction. Electrolyte imbalance in the elderly is a clinical problem faced by both elderly care physicians and orthopaedic surgeons alike. Hyponatraemia is a common condition with a vague clinical profile and severe consequences if untreated. Recent medical editorials have criticised orthopaedic handling of this problem. We therefore sought to establish the incidence of hyponatraemia within our orthopaedic population and a similar age-matched elderly care population in the light of changing attitudes to fluid management. Methods. Retrospective, consecutive analysis of the serum sodium concentrations and fluid regimes of all patients admitted with a fractured neck of femur during a three-month period. An age-matched control group of elderly care patients was used for comparison. Data was analysed using paired t-test and independent t-test as appropriate. Results. 200 patients were identified, 100 in each group. There was no loss to follow-up. The mean admission serum sodium of all patients studied was 135.7mmol/L (SD=5.4). Comparison of two groups showed no statistical significant difference between them (t(198)=0.70, p=0.49). The mean follow-up sodium was 136.6mmol/L (SD=4.5). Comparison of two groups again showed no difference (t(198)=0.64, p=0.52). While the mean levels were greater than 135.0mmol/L in both groups the actual percentage of cases presenting to hospital with hyponatraemia were 29% in the hip fracture group and 33% in the elderly care group. This compared poorly with previously quoted levels of approximately 15% elderly admissions in other studies. We also noted that of those patients that were hyponatraemic on admission, the majority remained hyponatraemic during their hospital stay. Discussion. This study underlines the high incidence of hyponatraemia within the elderly orthopaedic population. It also demonstrates that there is no statistically significant difference in the incidence of hyponatraemia between the elderly orthopaedic population and the general elderly population, both before operative intervention and thereafter

Internal fixation remains the treatment of choice for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, whereas, arthroplasty is preferred for displaced fracture patterns. Given technological advancements in implant design and excellent long-term outcomes, arthroplasty may provide improved outcomes for the treatment of non-displaced femoral neck fractures. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the orthopaedic literature (1) to investigate the outcomes of internal fixation for the treatment of non-displaced and minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients and (2) to compare the outcomes of patients treated with internal fixation to arthroplasty in this patient population. Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Manuscripts were included only if they contained (1) patients 60 years or older with (2) nondisplaced or minimally displaced (Garden I or II) femoral neck fractures (3) treated with internal fixation or arthroplasty or (4) separately reported outcomes in this patient population. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, patient reported outcomes, length of hospital stay, infection, and transfusions. An a priori decision was made to classify studies into comparative or non-comparative groups. Comparative studies directly compared arthroplasty to internal fixation in the specific study population while the non-comparative studies included separate cohorts of patients treated with arthroplasty or internal fixation. A fixed-effects model was used to quantitatively pool study outcomes. Twenty-five non-comparative studies were identified with a total of 22,020 patients, all of which were treated with internal fixation. The pooled incidence of reoperation after internal fixation was 14.4% (95% CI: 10.8 – 18.8). The incidence of mortality within one-year of injury was 14.4% (95% CI: 6.7 – 28.3), based on the reporting in 14 studies. Three comparative studies were identified with a total of 360 patients (128 treated with arthroplasty and 232 treated with internal fixation). All three studies reported reoperation rates. The overall risk of reoperation was 3.1% in the arthroplasty group compared to 9.5% in the internal fixation group (relative risk: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10 – 0.84, p= 0.02). Only two studies reported mortality. The relative risk of mortality in patients treated with arthroplasty compared to internal fixation was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.38 – 4.70, p= 0.003). Internal fixation of minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly is associated with a risk of reoperation and mortality that exceeds 14%. Treatment with arthroplasty may reduce the risk of reoperation by 70%. However, this benefit maybe tempered by a potential increased risk of mortality associated with arthroplasty in this patient population

Objectives. Although most joint surgeons have reached a consensus that preoperative risk assessment and appropriate medical intervention for elderly patients of primary total hip arthrplasty (PTHA) could significantly reduce postoperative complications and mortality, there is still lack of a detailed and comprehensive approach for risk stratifying and a systematic method for risk allaying. We aimed to explore the risk factors related to the aggravation of preoperative complications and the appearance of complications post-operation of primary total hip arthrplasty (PTHA) in elderly patients for hip fracture. Patients and methods. We retrospectively reviewed the demographic and clinical data of 156 patients who underwent PTHA for hip fracture from January 2014 to December 2016, of which there were 61 male (39.1%) and 95 female (60.9%) patients; 111 patients aged 60–79 years (71.2%) and 45 patients ≥ 80 years old (28.8%); 125 patients of femoral neck fracture (80.1%) and 31 patients of inter-trochanteric fracture (19.9%); 109 patients of spinal anesthesia (69.9%) and 48 patients of general anesthesia (30.1%); 85 patients undergoing surgery within 3 days (54.5%) and 71 patients operated ≥ 4 days (45.5%) since admission. We evaluated the correlations among gender, age, type of fracture, methods of anesthesia, time of operation since admission, the aggravation of preoperative complications and the appearance of postoperative complications post PTHA using the IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21) and the Exce1 2016. Results. The appearance of postoperative complications were statistically correlated with age, time of operation since admission, and type of anesthesia. The appearance of postoperative complication were significantly more in patients operated ≥ 4 days since admission (P < 0.05), and patients with general anesthesia (P < 0.05). Age ≥ 80 years old was not only statistically correlated with the aggravation of three kind of preoperative complications, hypertension, heart disease and respiratory tract infection (P < 0.05), also statistically correlated with the postoperative exacerbation of respiratory tract infection (P < 0.01), the appearance of anemia (P < 0.01), hypoalbuminemia (P < 0.01), water and electrolyte balance disorder (P < 0.05), and gastrointestinal reaction (P < 0.05). Age ≥ 80 years old was neither significantly correlated with postoperative aggravation of diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection and abnormal liver and kidney function (P > 0.05), nor with postoperative urinary retention (P > 0.05). Conclusion. The occurrence of postoperative complications of elderly patients post PTHA for hip fracture was correlated with age ≥ 80 years old, delayed surgery longer than 4 days since admission, and general anesthesia. Much more attention should be paid to the patients with preoperative diseases of hypertension, heart diseases, and respiratory tract infection, especially age ≥ 80 years patients with respiratory tract infection. Specific postoperative attention should be paid to correct anemia, supplement albumin, regulate the imbalance of water and electrolyte, and treat the digestive tract response for PTHA patients aged ≥ 80 years

Internal fixation is currently the standard of care for Garden I and II femoral neck fractures in the elderly. However, there may be a degree of posterior tilt on the preoperative lateral radiograph above which failure is likely, and primary arthroplasty would be preferred. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between posterior tilt and the risk of subsequent arthroplasty following internal fixation of Garden I and II femoral neck fractures in the elderly. This study represents a secondary analysis of data collected in the FAITH trial, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the sliding hip screw to cannulated screws in the management of femoral neck fractures in patients aged 50 years or older. For each patient who sustained a Garden I or II femoral neck fracture and had an adequate preoperative lateral radiograph, the amount of posterior tilt was categorized as < 2 0 degrees or ≥20 degrees. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the association between posterior tilt and subsequent arthroplasty during the two-year follow-up period, while controlling for potential confounders. Of the 555 patients in the study sample, posterior tilt was classified as ≥20 degrees for 67 (12.1%) and < 2 0 degrees for 488 (87.9%). Overall, 13.2% (73/555) of patients underwent subsequent arthroplasty in the 24-month follow-up period. In the multivariable analysis, patients with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees had a significantly increased risk of subsequent arthroplasty compared to those with posterior tilt < 2 0 degrees (22.4% (15/67) vs 11.9% (58/488), Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–4, p=0.008). The other factor associated with subsequent arthroplasty was age ≥80 (p=0.03). In this study of patients with Garden I and II femoral neck fractures, posterior tilt ≥20 degrees was associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent arthroplasty. Primary arthroplasty should be considered for Garden I and II femoral neck fractures with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees, especially among older patients