The tibial component of total knee arthroplasty can either be an all-polyethylene (AP) implant or a metal-backed (MB) implant. This study aims to compare the five-year functional outcomes of AP tibial components to MB components in patients aged over 70 years. Secondary aims are to compare quality of life, implant survivorship, and cost-effectiveness. A group of 130 patients who had received an AP tibial component were matched for demographic factors of age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, sex, and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) to create a comparison group of 130 patients who received a MB tibial component. Functional outcome was assessed prospectively by KSS, quality of life by 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12), and range of motion (ROM), and implant survivorships were compared. The SF six-dimension (6D) was used to calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for AP compared to MB tibial components using quality-adjusted life year methodology.Aims
Methods
Pain is the main indication for performing total knee replacement (TKR). In most patients after TKR there is an improvement, but a few continue to have pain. Generally, the cause of the pain can be addressed when it is identified. However, unexplained pain can be more difficult to manage because revision surgery is likely to be unrewarding in this group. In our study of 622 cemented TKRs in 512 patients with a mean age of 69 years (23 to 90) treated between January 1995 and August 1998, we identified 24 patients (knees) with unexplained pain at six months. This group was followed for five years (data was unavailable for 18 knees) and ten patients (55.5%) went on to show an improvement without intervention. In the case of unexplained pain, management decisions must be carefully considered, but reassurance can be offered to patients that the pain will improve in more than half with time.
The results of 41 consecutive total knee replacements performed on morbidly obese patients with a body mass index >
40 kg/m2, were compared with a matched group of 41 similar procedures carried out in non-obese patients (body mass index <
30 kg/m2). The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis, type of prosthesis, laterality and pre-operative Knee Society Score. We prospectively followed up the patients for a mean of 38.5 months (6 to 66). No patients were lost to follow-up. At less than four years after operation, the results were worse in the morbidly obese group compared with the non-obese, as demonstrated by inferior Knee Society Scores (mean knee score 85.7 and 90.5 respectively, p = 0.08; mean function score 75.6 and 83.4, p = 0.01), a higher incidence of radiolucent lines on post-operative radiographs (29% and 7%, respectively, p = 0.02), a higher rate of complications (32% and 0%, respectively, p = 0.001) and inferior survivorship using revision and pain as end-points (72.3% and 97.6%, respectively, p = 0.02). Patients with a body mass index >
40 kg/m2 should be advised to lose weight prior to total knee replacement and to maintain weight reduction. They should also be counselled regarding the inferior results which may occur if they do not lose weight before surgery.
