Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_21 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Apr 2013
Bone J Rymaszewski L Kumar C Madeley N
Full Access

Introduction. Fifth metatarsal fracture is a common injury. Current practice supports conservative management, with surgery in the event of non-union. Early fracture clinic review is not perceived to improve patient experience or increased detection of non-union. A new protocol standardises treatment to symptom level and discharges patients from ED with advice but without any routine follow-up arranged. A leaflet advises on management, prognosis and helpline details and there is an open-access policy for those whose symptoms persist to investigate potential non-union. Method. A prospective audit evaluated the protocol, surveying patients at 8-weeks and 6-months post-injury. A minor injuries unit continued to refer to fracture clinic and was the control group. During 6-months 46 acute fractures were recorded in the new protocol(group 1) and 47 in the control(group 2). 1 patient in each group was known to experience non-union. 31 of group 1 and 22 of group 2 responded to at least one survey. Results. Satisfaction with information provided at initial presentation was high for both protocols. 87%(27/31) satisfied in group 1 and 90%(20/22) group 2(p=1.0000). At 8-weeks 82%(19/23) were satisfied with their progress following the new protocol compared to 89%(17/19) in the control(p=0.6729). At 6-months 88%(22/25) were satisfied compared to 76%(13/17) respectively(p=0.4133). The new protocol is not associated with a significant symptoms increase. At 8 weeks 22%(5/23) described their pain severity as >5/10 reducing to 8%(2/25) by 6-months. Compared to 10%(2/19) of the control at 8-weeks and 6%(1/17) at 6-months. Patients rating fracture management overall as ‘good or excellent’ were comparable between both new, 67%(21/31) and traditional, 77%(17/22) protocols(p=0.5441). Conclusion. No significant difference in patient satisfaction and symptom levels between the old and new protocol was found. The new protocol reduces unnecessary patient appointments. This reduces demands on fracture clinic while maintaining a safe, resource efficient service


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 38 - 38
1 Sep 2012
Ramaskandhan JR Bettinson K Siddique M
Full Access

This project highlights the red flags in postoperative rehabilitation of total ankle replacement (TAR) patients managed with two different postoperative rehab regimes. 20 TAR patients were recruited for a pilot RCT between 2008 and 2011; they were randomized to 2 groups (immobilisation in a below knee plaster cast for 6 weeks vs. early mobilisation following TAR); all patients underwent a graded outpatient Physiotherapy program until 12 weeks postoperatively. Assessments included questionnaires, complications, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) done preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results. 20 TARs for OA (13) and PTOA (7) took part in the trial. There were 10 patients in each arm of the study. Mean age 61.2 years; mean BMI was 29.4. Of the plaster group, there was 1 incidence of fracture medial malleolus (MM) at 6 weeks after removal of plaster cast, 1 fracture MM at 5 months following walking on the beach, 1 fracture (MM) after completion of outpatient physiotherapy session, and 1 fracture MM of unknown reason at 1 year. Of the early mobilisation group, there was 1 intraoperative fracture of tibia (treated conservatively); 1 fracture MM 6 weeks post-op; 2 fracture MM at 8 weeks post-op. All patients had good clinical outcomes at successive follow up assessments. Conclusion. These results highlights the need for considering a lighter exercise regime, and re-evaluating patient lifestyle, return to recreational activities and feedback on home exercise programs during planning and execution of each phase of postoperative rehabilitation programs to aid prevention of early fractures in patients following TAR


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1352 - 1358
1 Oct 2018
Clough TM Alvi F Majeed H

Aims

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) surgery is complex and attracts a wide variety of complications. The literature lacks consistency in reporting adverse events and complications. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of each of these complications from a literature review, and to compare them with rates from our Unit, to aid clinicians with the process of informed consent.

Patients and Methods

A total of 278 consecutive total ankle arthroplasties (251 patients), performed by four surgeons over a six-year period in Wrightington Hospital (Wigan, United Kingdom) were prospectively reviewed. There were 143 men and 108 women with a mean age of 64 years (41 to 86). The data were recorded on each follow-up visit. Any complications either during initial hospital stay or subsequently reported on follow-ups were recorded, investigated, monitored, and treated as warranted. Literature search included the studies reporting the outcomes and complications of TAA implants.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 2 | Pages 176 - 182
1 Feb 2018
Petrie MJ Blakey CM Chadwick C Davies HG Blundell CM Davies MB

Aims

Fractures of the navicular can occur in isolation but, owing to the intimate anatomical and biomechanical relationships, are often associated with other injuries to the neighbouring bones and joints in the foot. As a result, they can lead to long-term morbidity and poor function. Our aim in this study was to identify patterns of injury in a new classification system of traumatic fractures of the navicular, with consideration being given to the commonly associated injuries to the midfoot.

Patients and Methods

We undertook a retrospective review of 285 consecutive patients presenting over an eight- year period with a fracture of the navicular. Five common patterns of injury were identified and classified according to the radiological features. Type 1 fractures are dorsal avulsion injuries related to the capsule of the talonavicular joint. Type 2 fractures are isolated avulsion injuries to the tuberosity of the navicular. Type 3 fractures are a variant of tarsometatarsal fracture/dislocations creating instability of the medial ray. Type 4 fractures involve the body of the navicular with no associated injury to the lateral column and type 5 fractures occur in conjunction with disruption of the midtarsal joint with crushing of the medial or lateral, or both, columns of the foot.