The application of immune regenerative strategies to deal with unsolved pathologies, such as tendinopathies, is getting attention in the field of tissue engineering exploiting the innate immunomodulatory potential of stem cells [1]. In this context, Amniotic Epithelial Cells (AECs) represent an innovative immune regenerative strategy due to their teno-inductive and immunomodulatory properties [2], and because of their high paracrine activity, become a potential stem cell source for a cell-free treatment to overcome the limitations of traditional cell-based therapies. Nevertheless, these immunomodulatory mechanisms on AECs are still not fully known to date. In these studies, we explored standardized protocols [3] to better comprehend the different phenotypic behavior between epithelial AECs (eAECs) and mesenchymal AECs (mAECs), and to further produce an enhanced immunomodulatory AECs-derived secretome by exposing cells to different stimuli. Hence, in order to fulfill these aims, eAECs and mAECs at third passage were silenced for CIITA and Nrf2, respectively, to understand the role of these molecules in an inflammatory response. Furthermore, AECs at first passage were seeded under normal or GO-coated coverslips to study the effect of GO on AECs, and further exposed to LPS and/or IL17 priming to increase the anti-inflammatory paracrine activity. The obtained results demonstrated how CIITA and Nrf2 control the immune response of eAECs and mAECs, respectively, under standard or immune-activated conditions (LPS priming). Additionally, GO exposition led to a faster activation of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal transition (EMT) through the TGFβ/SMAD signaling pathway with a change in the anti-inflammatory properties. Finally, the combinatory inflammatory stimuli of LPS+IL17 enhanced the paracrine activity and immunomodulatory properties of AECs. Therefore, AECs-derived secretome has emerged as a potential treatment option for inflammatory disorders such as tendinopathies. Acknowledgement: This research is part of the P4FIT project ESR1, funded under the H2020-ITN-EJD-Marie-Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement 955685

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women with an estimation of 2.1 million new diagnoses in 2018. Even though primary tumours are usually efficiently removed by surgery, 20–40% of patients will develop metastases in distant organs. Bone is one of the most frequent site of metastases from advanced breast cancer, accounting from 55 to 58% of all metastases. Currently, none of the therapeutic strategies used to manage breast cancer bone metastasis are really curative. Tailoring a suitable model to study and evaluate the disease pathophysiology and novel advanced therapies is one of the major challenges that will predict more effectively and efficiently the clinical response. Preclinical traditional models have been largely used as they can provide standardization and simplicity, moreover, further advancements have been made with 3D cultures, by spheroids and artificial matrices, patient derived xenografts and microfluidics. Despite these models recapitulate numerous aspects of tumour complexity, they do not completely mimic the clinical native microenvironment. Thus, to fulfil this need, in our study we developed a new, advanced and alternative model of human breast cancer bone metastasis as potential biologic assay for cancer research. The study involved breast cancer bone metastasis samples obtained from three female patients undergoing wide spinal decompression and stabilization through a posterior approach. Samples were cultured in a TubeSpin Bioreactor on a rolling apparatus under hypoxic conditions at time 0 and for up to 40 days and evaluated for viability by the Alamar Blue test, gene expression profile, histology and immunohistochemistry. Results showed the maintenance and preservation, at time 0 and after 40 days of culture, of the tissue viability, biological activity, as well as molecular markers, i.e. several key genes involved in the complex interactions between the tumour cells and bone able to drive cancer progression, cancer aggressiveness and metastasis to bone. A good tis sue morphological and microarchitectural preservation with the presence of lacunar osteolysis, fragmented trabeculae locally surrounded by osteoclast cells and malignant cells and an intense infiltration by tumour cells in bone marrow compartment in all examined samples. Histomorphometrical data on the levels of bone resorption and bone apposition parameters remained constant between T0 and T40 for all analysed patients. Additionally, immunohistochemistry showed homogeneous expression and location of CDH1, CDH2, KRT8, KRT18, Ki67, CASP3, ESR1, CD8 and CD68 between T0 and T40, thus further confirming the invasive behaviour of breast cancer cells and indicating the maintaining of the metastatic microenvironment. The novel tissue culture, set-up in this study, has significant advantages in comparison to the pre-existent 3D models: the tumour environment is the same of the clinical scenario, including all cell types as well as the native extracellular matrix; it can be quickly set-up employing only small samples of breast cancer bone metastasis tissue in a simple, ethically correct and cost-effective manner; it bypasses and/or decreases the necessity to use more complex preclinical model, thus reducing the ethical burden following the guiding principles aimed at replacing/reducing/refining (3R) animal use and their suffering for scientific purposes; it can allow the study of the interactions within the breast cancer bone metastasis tissue over a relatively long period of up to 40 days, preserving the tumour morphology and architecture and allowing also the evaluation of different biological factors, parameters and activities. Therefore, the study provides for the first time the feasibility and rationale for the use of a human-derived advanced alternative model for cancer research and testing of drugs and innovative strategies, taking into account patient individual characteristics and specific tumour subtypes so predicting patient specific responses