Background. Patient reported outcomes/experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS since 2009. Osteotomy procedures for hallux valgus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess what the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus are at UHSM. Methods. Prospective PROMS data was collected from November 2012 to February 2015. Scores used to asses outcomes included EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D Health Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Patient Personal Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively. Results. 40 patients (35F/5M) (19LT +21RT) had undergone an osteotomy. Average age was 60.7 years (Range 29–88). No bilateral procedures. The pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction were: 51.6 (range 5–100), 51.4 (range 0–96) and 48.8 (range 0–100) respectively. Post operatively these improved to 24.4 (range 0–100), 22.9 (range 0–86) and 23.1 (range 0–88). All statistically significant.
Background. Patient reported outcomes measures are a fundamental part of the NHS. Since 2009, they have been used to measure quality from the patient's perspective. PROMS2.0 is a semi-automated web based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data. This study looks at the factors, which can influence PROMS. These include looking at general trends which affect reported outcomes such as surgeon, age and gender. We also look to assess the reasons for non-uptake in the study. Methods. Data was collected from October 2012 to March 2015. Scores used to asses outcome measures included EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D Health Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Results. 97/350 (27.8%) (69F+28M) patients consented and provided pre-op and post op scores. Average age was 57.2 years (Range-19–89). 69 Rt Vs 36 Lt. Surgeon A-51, B-31, C-8 procedures. MOxFQ- all three domains improved on average- Pain- 51.2 to 28.2. Walking/standing- 53.5 to 30.4 and Social interaction- 46.1 to 27.3.
Background. PROMS and PREMS are a fundamental and essential part of the NHS. Chilectomy and fusion procedures for hallux rigidus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to compare what PROMS/PREMS for chilectomy/fusion for hallux rigidus are at UHSM including variance across osteoarthritis grades. Methods. Data was collected from March-2013 to December-2014. Scores used to assess outcomes included EQ-5D-VAS, EQ-5D Health-Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. Patient-Personal-Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively. Data was compared. Results. 10 patients (4F, 6M) (9R, 1L) had a 1st MTPJ chilectomy. Average age- 47.3 (range 34–70). 16 patients (12F, 4M) (9RT, 7LT) had a 1st-MTPJ fusion. Average age-60.3yrs (range19–83). Chilectomy pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction: 33.5 (range 5–70), 27.6 (range 0–64) and 24.9 (range 0–75) respectively. Post operatively these improved to 25.0 (range 0–70), 24.3 (range 0–68) and 21.9 (range 0–50).
Introduction. We used patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) to evaluate qualitative and societal outcomes of trauma. Methods. We collected PROMs data between Sept 2013 and March 2015 for 92 patients with injury severity score (ISS) greater than 9. We enquired regarding return to work, income and socioeconomic status, dignity and satisfaction and the EQ-5D questionnaire. Results. Return to work. Of patients working at admission 15/58(26%) anticipated returning to work within 14 days of discharge. Work plans at discharge did not correlate with ISS scores overall (r=−0.05, ns), or when stratified by working group. Increased physicality of work showed a trend towards poorer return to work outcomes (not significant in Spearman's rank analysis: r= 0.14, p= 0.32). Income and socioeconomic status: No significant difference was demonstrated between the comparative incomes of patients with the best and worst return to work outcomes (ANOVA n=61, t=0.63, ns). Lowest quartile earners (n=19) were more likely to complete the open questions (79%) than higher income patients (62%). Dignity and satisfaction: Prominent positive themes were: care, staff, professionalism, and communication. Prominent negative themes were: food, ward response time, and communication. %). Patients ‘mostly’ or ‘always’ satisfied with their care did not have significantly different incomes (ANOVA, t=0.13, ns). EQ-5D: Self-rated health status correlated with perceived likelihood of return to work (r=0.25, p=0.0395). Correlation was demonstrated between EQ-5D scores and perceived dignity preservation (r=0.38, p=0.0004), and overall satisfaction (r=0.46, p< 0.0001). There was no correlation between EQ-5D and ISS score. Conclusion.
Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis is a common condition in the ageing population. In Spinal decompression surgery a balance needs to be struck between the need to decompress the neural elements in the spinal canal and the risk of worsening the segmental instability that often coexists in this condition. Traditionally decompression has been supplemented with rigid stabilization e.g. fusion, which is irreversible. Recently semi-rigid or ‘soft’ stabilization philosophies have evolved. The Wallis Device is a second generation interspinous distraction/stabilization implant designed to achieve ‘soft’ segmental stabilization. In addition to stabilising the decompressed segment, it also provides a ‘block’ to full segmental extension, helping to maintain spinal canal dimensions even in the erect position. We followed up and assessed outcomes in 50 patients (25 spinal decompression + Wallis implant and 25 spinal decompression alone). The two arms of the study were matched for gender, age and level of lumbar decompression. A single surgeon was involved in each case and carried out a standard procedure of fenestration and medial facetectomy. Outcomes were assessed during clinical follow-up as well as by telephone, and included the VAS, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the
