Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 7 - 7
8 May 2024
Cunningham I Kumar C
Full Access

Aim. Surgical options for management of a failed ankle arthroplasty are currently limited; typically conversion to fusion is recommended with only a few patients being considered for revision replacement surgery. This paper presents our experience of revision ankle replacements in a cohort of patients with failed primary replacements. Method. A total of 18 revision TAR in 17 patients were performed in patients with aseptic loosening. The technique was performed by a single surgeon (CSK) over a 4 year period between July 2014 and August 2018 using the Inbone total ankle replacement system. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected retrospectively using - MOXFQ, EQ5D, VAS pain score and patient satisfaction questionnaires. Results. 12 right and 6 left ankle replacements were revised in 17 patients (11 male/ 6 female). The mean age at revision was 69.1 years (range 56–81 years) with a mean BMI of 31. The mean surgical time was 171 minutes with 22% of cases requiring bone grafting. 6 patients had early wound complications, all superficial and settled with dressings. There were no deep infections, 2 patients had further surgery for exploration for possible nerve injuries. At a mean follow up of 20.6 months, 4 patients had mild/moderate ongoing pain with the majority of patients being satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Conclusion. This study represents one of the largest group of patients reported to have undergone revision total ankle arthroplasty. Our experience shows that this results in acceptable level of complications and provides satisfactory function in most patients. We feel revision TAR is a viable option in patients with failed primary arthroplasty who wish to continue to maintain mobility at the ankle joint


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 22 - 22
16 May 2024
Drake B Blundell M Gibson B Kingman A Kakwani R Townshend D
Full Access

Introduction. Day Case Surgery (defined as same day discharge) is a priority within the National Health Service and has been shown to provide beneficial outcomes for patients and hospitals. We report our experience developing a Day Case Programme for Total Ankle Replacement (TAR). Methods. Prior to the introduction of a Day Case Programme, average length of stay following TAR in our unit was 3.5 days. Stakeholders were consulted about ways in which same day discharge could be facilitated. Patients' post-operative pain charts were reviewed prior to the introduction of this programme. Inclusion criteria included non-complex surgery (anticipated tourniquet < 2hrs), friend or relative support and pre-operative walking-aid assessment. An enhanced recovery protocol included long-acting popliteal block and dexamethasone. Patients were discharged with opiate analgesia and written pain instructions. Patients were asked to complete a pain and satisfaction questionnaire. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were recorded. Results. From September 2017 to April 2019 21 of 70 patients underwent TAR as a Day Case. Mean age was 67 years (43-85 years). Complications included two delayed wound healings and one representation on day three with urinary retention. No patients reported post-operative nausea or vomiting, 60% did not use Oramorph at home. Average Visual Analogue Score for pain was 23/100 on day one and 21/100 day three post-operatively. There was no significant difference in pre-operative or overall change in MOXFQ, VAS or EQ5D PROMS. Conclusions. Early results suggest that Day Case Total Ankle Replacements are safe. Appropriate patient selection is necessary. Day Case Surgery relies on support and communication between multiple teams to organise and run effectively


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Dec 2015
Ahmad K Pillai A Somasundaram K Fox A Kurdy N
Full Access

Background. Patient reported outcome and experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus. Methods. Prospective PROMs/PREMs data was collected. Scores used to asses outcomes included EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D Health Index, and MOxFQ, collected pre-operatively and post-operatively (Post-op follow-up 6–12months) Patient Personal Experience (PPE-15) was collected postoperatively. Results. 40 patients (35Female/5Male) (19Left +21Right). Average age- 60.7 years (Range 29–88). No bilateral procedures. Pre-op average MOXFQ scores for pain, walking and social interaction: 51.6 (range 5–100), 51.4 (range 0–96) and 48.8 (range 0–100) respectively. Post-operatively improved to 24.4 (range 0–100), 22.9 (range 0–86) and 23.1 (range 0–88). Corresponding P values for all < 0.00001 and statistically significant. 32/40 (80%) patients showed improvement in all three domains. Of 8 who worsened- 6 worse with pain, 4 with walking and 5 with social-interaction. EQ5D improved; pre-op index average- 0.70 and pre-op VAS score average- 79.3. Post-op index average- 0.80. VAS score average- 82.9. Index improvements were significant, P-value < 0.0023 (significant). EQ5D improvements in line with those found in hip/knee replacements. No differences between 6/12m follow-up. Patients stratified according to age-groups for analysis, 11 patients under 54 years old, 15 between 55–64, and 14 over 65. Greatest improvement in over 65s for MOxFQ and under 55s for EQ5D. 27/35 women improved in all MOxFQ domains, whilst 5/5 men did. P-value for age and sex both < 0.05 therefore significant. Age/sex EQ5D showed results of no statistical significance. 65 patients filled post-op PPE questionnaire. Average overall satisfaction of 72.9%. Conclusion. The procedure is very effective with high PROMs/PREMs. Older sub-group have best outcomes and highest satisfaction. Level of evidence. Prospective case series- Level 3


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Nov 2016
Drampalos E Karim T Clough T
Full Access

Aim. To examine the mid-term survival, clinical and patient reported outcomes of the silastic 1. st. metatarsophalangeal joint replacement for the treatment of end stage hallux rigidus. Methods. We reviewed 83 consecutive silastic arthroplasties performed in 79 patients for end stage hallux rigidus. There were 3 men and 76 women; mean age 63 years (range 45–78 years). No patient was lost to follow up. Average follow-up was 5.3 years (1.1–11.3 years). The EQ 5D–5L Health index, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain and overall satisfaction rate (Likert scale) were collected for patient reported outcomes. Results. 2 patients required revision; 1 for early infection (2 months) and 1 for stem breakage (10 years 1 month). 5 patients reported lateral metatarsalgia, 2 patients reported neuropathic pain, 6 patients developed superficial infection which fully responded to oral antibiotics, and 1 patient developed interphalangeal joint pain. 2 patients died in the cohort. Pre-operative mean MOXFQ was 44, mean EQ5D Index was 0.564 and VAS was 6.97. At mean follow-up of 5.3 years, the mean MOXFQ was 12.7 (0–57), the mean EQ5D Index was 0.851 (−0.02–1) and the mean VAS was 1.67 (0–8). The mean range of motion was 35° (30° dorsiflexion and 5° plantarflexion). The overall satisfaction rate was 90.2%. The implant survival rate was 97.6%. Conclusions. The silastic big toe arthroplasty offers excellent clinical mid term survival and functional outcomes and could be considered as an attractive alternative to traditional fusion for end stage hallux rigidus


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Nov 2016
Williams G Kadakia A Ellison P Mason L Molloy A
Full Access

Introduction. Traditional treatment of idiopathic flatfoot in the adult population include calcaneal neck lengthening or fusions. These surgical methods result in abnormal function with significant complication rates. Our prospective study aimed to quantify the functional and radiological outcome of a new technique for spring ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft, calcaneal osteotomy and medial head of gastrocnemius recession if appropriate. Methods. 22 feet were identified from the senior authors flatfoot reconstructions over a 3 year period (Jan 2013 to Dec 2015). 9 feet underwent a spring ligament reconstruction. The control group were 13 feet treated with standard tibialis posterior reconstruction surgery. Follow up ranged from 8 to 49 months. Functional assessment comprised VAS heath and pain scales, EQ-5D and MOXFQ scores. Radiographic analysis was performed for standardised parameters. Results. Each group contained two bilateral procedures. The spring ligament patients had a mean age of 43, BMI of 29 and a male to female ratio of 4;1 There were no statistical differences between groups starting point functional scores or pre-operative radiological deformity. Post-operatively there was a statistically significant improvement of all domains and overall MOXFQ, EQ5d and VAS in the spring ligament patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in all radiological parameters with all patients being returned to normal. Functional scores were not significantly better than the control group [MOXFQ components, Control vs spring ligament group, Pain: 42 vs 45 (p=0.71), Walking: 50 vs 56 (p=0.43), Social: 35 vs 39 (p=0.72), EQ-5D: 0.64 vs 0.70 (p=0.72)]. Spring ligament reconstruction produced statistically better deformity correction for 4 of 5 measured radiological parameters (p< 0.05). Conclusion. Our new method of spring ligament reconstruction restores normal anatomy. In comparison to traditional procedures our method provides equivalent functional results and improved deformity correction


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 2 | Pages 215 - 221
1 Feb 2012
Dawson J Boller I Doll H Lavis G Sharp R Cooke P Jenkinson C

The responsiveness of the Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) was compared with foot/ankle-specific and generic outcome measures used to assess all surgery of the foot and ankle. We recruited 671 consecutive adult patients awaiting foot or ankle surgery, of whom 427 (63.6%) were female, with a mean age of 52.8 years (18 to 89). They independently completed the MOXFQ, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaires pre-operatively and at a mean of nine months (3.8 to 14.4) post-operatively. Foot/ankle surgeons assessed American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores corresponding to four foot/ankle regions. A transition item measured perceived changes in foot/ankle problems post-surgery. Of 628 eligible patients proceeding to surgery, 491 (78%) completed questionnaires and 262 (42%) received clinical assessments both pre- and post-operatively. The regions receiving surgery were: multiple/whole foot in eight (1.3%), ankle/hindfoot in 292 (46.5%), mid-foot in 21 (3.3%), hallux in 196 (31.2%), and lesser toes in 111 (17.7%). Foot/ankle-specific MOXFQ, AOFAS and EQ-5D domains produced larger effect sizes (> 0.8) than any SF-36 domains, suggesting superior responsiveness. In analyses that anchored change in scores and effect sizes to patients’ responses to a transition item about their foot/ankle problems, the MOXFQ performed well. The SF-36 and EQ-5D performed poorly. Similar analyses, conducted within foot-region based sub-groups of patients, found that the responsiveness of the MOXFQ was good compared with the AOFAS.

This evidence supports the MOXFQ’s suitability for assessing all foot and ankle surgery.