Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of revision ankle replacements, using the Invision implant and impaction allograft for massive talar dome defects following primary ankle replacement failure. Outcomes were assessed in terms of bone graft incorporation; improvement in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); and survivorship of the revision ankle arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified eleven patients who had massive bone cysts and underwent revision of a failed primary total ankle replacement to the Invision revision system, combined with impaction grafting using morselized femoral head allograft. These revisions occurred at a single high volume ankle arthroplasty centre. Computed tomography (CT) scans were used to assess bone graft incorporation and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and EQ-5D scores were used pre and post operatively to assess PROMs. Results. The mean follow up was 18 months (12–48months). In all eleven patients, improvement was reported in the post-operative MOXFQ and EQ-5D scores. CT scans showed bone graft incorporation in all cases. None of the patients have required further surgery and are continue to do well clinically at latest follow up. Conclusions. In the short term, this study confirms revision ankle replacements with the Invision prosthesis and impaction with morselized femoral head allograft is a suitable revision option for primary ankle replacement failure with massive talar bone loss. Long term follow up continues of these complex patients

Revision options for a failed Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have historically been limited to complex hindfoot fusions, bespoke ankle arthroplasty revision or amputation. The patient outcomes of these procedures has been felt to be poor. The introduction of the INBONE-II and INVISION ankle arthroplasty revision systems has created a range of revision arthroplasty options, with the possibility of improved patient outcomes. We aim to report on the early results of 20 sequential revision TAA. All patients undergoing revision TAA with INBONE-II or INVISION had prospective collection of pre-operative and post-operative MOx-FQ and EQ-5D scores. Between September 2013 and June 2019 23 patients underwent revision TAA with mean time from implantation of 35 months (6 to 74). Those with greater than 1 year follow-up had scores included. Other outcomes included radiographic assessment for loosening and revision. 13 patients had INBONE-II and 10 INVISION. None required revision at the time of review. Pre-operative MOx-FQ averaged 40.6 (13.4 pain, 21 walking, 6.2 social). Post-operative MOx-FQ averaged 17.4 (6.2 pain, 8.1 walking, 3.1 social). Average EQ-5D improved from 8 to 6.6 and average EQ-VAS from 60 to 80. On radiograph review one patient had radiolucent lines around their INBONE-II stem evident at 1 year. This had not progressed by 4 years total follow-up. Another patient had uncoupling of part of the stem of her INBONE-II but had not required revision. This was attributed to surgeon error. Revision TAA using the INBONE-II and INVISION systems shows promising early results relating to loosening and revision and good maintained improvement in MOx-FQ and EQ-5D scores. This provides further evidence that patients with a failed TAA can safely have revision rather than having to commit to complex ankle/hindfoot fusion. This provides surgeons with flexibility particularly in those patients with other hindfoot arthritis or arthrodesis

Background. Patients who undergo either primary or revision total ankle replacement (TAR) expect improvements in pain, function and quality of life. The goal of this study was to measure the functional outcome improvements and the difference in patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing primary total ankle replacements compared to revision TAR. Methods. A single-center prospective cohort study was undertaken between 2016 and 2022. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Patients undertook the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MoxFQ) and EQ-5D health quality questionnaires pre-operatively, at 6 months and yearly for life. The Mann Whitney test was undertaken for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 165 primary and 71 revision ankle replacements were performed between 2016 and 2022. The mean age was 71 years for primary replacements and 69 years for revisions. The INFINITY was utilized in the majority of primary total ankle replacements. Revision replacements were either the INBONE II or INVISION and they were most often revising the MOBILITY implant. The main indication for revision was aseptic loosening (83%). Other causes included infection, malalignment and insert wear. The overall MoxFQ improved by a mean of 46.5 for primaries and 40.2 for revisions. The EQ-5D score also showed overall improvements with the mean difference in mobility increasing by 1.6. Conclusion. Both primary and revision ankle replacements result in improved functional scores at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. In this cohort with the implants used, both primary and revision ankle replacements demonstrate similar improvements in functional scores

Introduction. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of first MTPJ arthritis, ankle arthritis and hallux valgus on patient reported outcomes, and to assess the efficacy of surgery. Methods. Patients who underwent first MTPJ fusion, ankle fusion or hallux valgus correction from July 2013 to October 2014 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included revision or simultaneous bilateral surgery, inflammatory arthropathy, or arthritis of a proximal joint awaiting arthroplasty. Subjects completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ), EQ-5D index, and EQ-5D health scale on presentation and at least six months post-operatively. Between group statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA, pre- and post-operative scores were compared using a paired t-test. Results. Eighty-two patients completed pre-operative questionnaires. Seventy-four (22 male, 52 female) of these (90%) completed post-operative questionnaires at a median of 10 months (range 6–17 months). The median age was 64 years (range 36–85 years). Pre-operative MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores differed significantly between the groups (both p< 0.001) with ankle fusion patients reporting the worst scores and hallux valgus patients the best. Post-operative MOX-FQ and EQ-5D did not differ between groups (p=0.52, p=0.06 respectively). MOX-FQ significantly improved in all groups from pre-operatively (MTPJ p=0.0001; Ankle p=0.0002; Hallux Valgus p< 0.0001). EQ-5D only statistically improved following surgery for arthritic conditions (MTPJ p< 0.001; ankle p< 0.001; Hallux valgus p=0.06). The EQ-5D health scale did not show any differences between the groups either pre- or post-operatively, nor between pre- and post-op scores for each type of surgery. Conclusions. MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores differ between patients with different foot and ankle pathologies. Both scores significantly improve following surgery for arthritic conditions, but only the more specific MOX-FQ improves following hallux valgus correction. These results will be of benefit when consenting patients pre-operatively, and potentially for prioritisation of healthcare provision

Background. Previous studies have individually shown extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) to be beneficial for mid-substance Achilles tendinopathy, insertional Achilles tendinopathy or plantar fasciitis. The purpose of this pragmatic study was to determine the efficacy of ESWT in managing the three main causes of refractory heel pain in our routine clinical practice. Methods. 236 patients (261 feet) aged between 25 – 81 years (mean age 50.4) were treated in our NHS institute with ESWT between April 2014 and May 2016. They all underwent a clinical and radiological assessment (ultrasonography +/− magnetic resonance imaging) to determine the primary cause of heel pain. Patients were subsequently categorized into three groups, mid-substance Achilles tendinopathy (55 cases), insertional Achilles tendinopathy (55 cases) or plantar fasciitis (151 cases). If their symptoms were recalcitrant to compliant first line management for 6 months, they were prescribed three consecutive ESWT sessions at weekly intervals. All outcome measures (foot & ankle pain score, EQ-5D) were recorded at baseline and 3-month follow-up (mean 18.3 weeks, range 11.4 to 41). Results. Complete data sets were obtained for 41% of the ESWT treatments (107/261). EQ-5D scores showed a statistically significant improvement between baseline and follow-up in all three-treatment groups; mid-substance Achilles tendinopathy 0.681 to 0.734, insertional Achilles tendinopathy 0.687 to 0.742 and plantar fasciitis 0.684 to 0.731 (p< 0.05). The foot & ankle pain scores grouped for all causes of heel pain also showed a statistically significant reduction from 6.78 at baseline to 5.36 at follow-up (p< 0.05). Conclusion. Overall our results showed that ESWT is an effective tool for the management of all refractory heel pain in an NHS foot & ankle clinical practice

Aims

Although absorbable sutures for the repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) have been attracting attention, the rationale for their use remains insufficient. This study prospectively compared the outcomes of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for the repair of acute ATR.

Aims

We report the medium-term outcomes of a consecutive series of 118 Zenith total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) from a single, non-designer centre.

Aims

The aim was to compare long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture in the context of a randomized controlled trial.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients undergoing implant removal (IR) after fracture fixation below the level of the knee.

Aims

Patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) take a long time to heal, have a high incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and widely variable functional outcomes. This variation in outcome may be explained by a lack of knowledge of adverse factors, and a subsequent shortage of appropriate interventions.