Aims. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult. All current diagnostic tests have problems with accuracy and interpretation of results. Many new tests have been proposed, but there is no consensus on the place of many of these in the diagnostic pathway. Previous attempts to develop a definition of PJI have not been universally accepted and there remains no reference standard definition. Methods. This paper reports the outcome of a project developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and supported by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Implant-Associated Infections (ESGIAI). It comprised a comprehensive review of the literature, open discussion with Society members and conference delegates, and an expert panel assessment of the results to produce the final guidance. Results. This process evolved a three-level approach to the diagnostic continuum, resulting in a definition set and guidance, which has been fully endorsed by EBJIS, MSIS, and ESGIAI. Conclusion. The definition presents a novel three-level approach to diagnosis, based on the most robust evidence, which will be useful to clinicians in daily practice. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):18–25

Aims. Histology is an established tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Different thresholds, using various infection definitions and histopathological criteria, have been described. This study determined the performance of different thresholds of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (≥ 5 PMN/HPF, ≥ 10 PMN/HPF, ≥ 23 PMN/10 HPF) , when using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria for PJI. Methods. A total of 119 patients undergoing revision total hip (rTHA) or knee arthroplasty (rTKA) were included. Permanent histology sections of periprosthetic tissue were evaluated under high power (400× magnification) and neutrophils were counted per HPF. The mean neutrophil count in ten HPFs was calculated (PMN/HPF). Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the z-test, thresholds were compared. Results. Using the EBJIS criteria, a cut-off of ≥ five PMN/HPF showed a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81 to 98) and specificity of 84% (95% CI 74 to 91). The optimal threshold when applying the IDSA and ICM criteria was ≥ ten PMN/HPF with sensitivities of 94% (95% CI 79 to 99) and 90% (95% CI 76 to 97), and specificities of 86% (95% CI 77 to 92) and 92% (95% CI 84 to 97), respectively. In rTKA, a better performance of histopathological analysis was observed in comparison with rTHA when using the IDSA criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusion. With high accuracy, histopathological analysis can be supported as a confirmatory criterion in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections. A threshold of ≥ five PMN/HPF can be recommended to distinguish between septic and aseptic loosening, with an increased possibility of detecting more infections caused by low-virulence organisms. However, neutrophil counts between one and five should be considered suggestive of infection and interpreted carefully in conjunction with other diagnostic test methods. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(8):536–547

Aim. Accurate diagnosis is key in correctly managing prosthetic joint infection(PJI). Shoulder PJI definition and diagnosis is challenging. Current PJI definitions, based overwhelmingly in hip/knee research, may not accurately diagnose shoulder PJI. Our aim is to compare the preoperative performance of two PJI definitions comparing it to definitive postoperative classification. Method. This is a retrospective study of patients who have undergone total shoulder revision surgery for infection between 2005 and 2022. Cases were classified using two different PJI definitions: a)the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and; 2)the 2018 International Consensus Meeting(ICM) PJI specific shoulder definition. Preoperative classification was based on clinical features, inflammatory markers and synovial fluid leukocyte count and definitive classification also considered microbiology and histology results. Results. Preoperative and definitive PJI classification status of the 21 patients included were evaluated and is summarized in table 1. The shoulder specific 2018 ICM definition showed the highest agreement between preoperative and definitive classification (76.2%, k=0.153, p=0.006) compared to EBJIS (52.4%, k=0.205, p=0.006). In all cases, the classification was changed because of positive intraoperative microbiology (at least two identical isolates). Microbiology findings showed coagulase negative staphylococci, Staphyloccocus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes to be the most frequent. Four patients had polymicrobial infections. Conclusions. Both the EBJIS 2021 and 2018 ICM definitions have low accuracy in predicting shoulder PJI preoperatively. Clearly further studies with larger cohorts are in dire need focusing specifically on shoulder revision arthroplasty to improve on existing definitions. Caution is advised while extrapolating of criteria/thresholds recommended for hip/knee joints. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Our goal is to assess diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid testing in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). In addition to differential leukocyte count, simples and inexpensive biomarkers such as synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and alpha-2-macrogloblulin(A2M) were also investigated and its possible role in increasing accuracy assessed. Method. Between January/2013 and December/2019 total hip or knee arthroplasty revision cases (regardless of preoperative diagnosis) were prospectively included provided enough synovial fluid for biomarker analysis was collected and at least four tissue samples, as well as the implant for sonication, were gathered for microbiological study. Definitive diagnosis was classified according to the new EBJIS PJI definition. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined cutoff values as well as diagnostic accuracy for each marker. Results. Out of 364 revision arthroplasties performed, 102 fully respected inclusion criteria. There were 58 unlikely, 8 likely and 36 confirmed infections. Synovial fluid total leukocyte count, proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN), CRP, ADA and A2M were significantly different between groups. Area under the curve was 0.94 for total leucocyte count, 0.91 for proportion of PMN, 0.90 for CRP, 0.82 for ADA and 0.76 for A2M. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for statistically optimal but also selected rule-in and rule-out cutoffs values are shown in Table 1. Interpreting a raised level of CRP(>2.7mg/L) or ADA(>60U/L) together with high leukocyte count (>1470 cells/μL) or proportion of PMN (>62.5%) significantly increases specificity and positive predictive value for affirming PJI. Conclusions. Differential leukocyte count cutoffs proposed by the EBJIS PJI definition are shown to perform well in ruling out (<1,500 cells/μL) and ruling in (>3,000 cells/μL) PJI. Adding simple and inexpensive biomarkers such synovial CRP or ADA is helpful in interpreting inconclusive results. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the existing published data on tuberculous arthritis involving native joints in adults aged 18 years and older. The specific research questions focused on the diagnosis and management of the disease.

Aims. This study evaluated the definitions developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013, for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods. In this single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, patients with an indicated revision surgery after a total hip or knee arthroplasty were included between 2015 and 2020. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed, identifying the components of the EBJIS, ICM, and IDSA criteria in each patient. Results. Of 206 included patients, 101 (49%) were diagnosed with PJI with the EBJIS definition. IDSA and ICM diagnosed 99 (48%) and 86 (42%) as infected, respectively. A total of 84 cases (41%) had an infection based on all three criteria. In 15 cases (n = 15/206; 7%), PJI was present when applying only the IDSA and EBJIS criteria. No infection was detected by one definition alone. Inconclusive diagnoses occurred more frequently with the ICM criteria (n = 30/206; 15%) compared to EBJIS (likely infections: n = 16/206; 8%) (p = 0.029). A better preoperative performance of the EBJIS definition was seen compared with the ICM and IDSA definitions (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The novel EBJIS definition identified all PJIs diagnosed by any other criteria. Use of the EBJIS definition significantly reduced the number of uncertain diagnoses, allowing easier clinical decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(9):608–618

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the main reasons for revision surgery after primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently the MSIS and EBJIS criteria sets are considered to be the gold standards in determining PJI. These criteria sets are complex and contain tests that are time-consuming and many are rather costly. Therefore, further research is indicated to find a simpler but equally reliable diagnostic test. In this study we evaluated the additional value of calprotectine measurement in synovial fluid in patients undergoing hip and knee (revision) arthroplasty following routine work-up. Method. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 182 synovial fluid samples from 143 patients with suspected PJI after UKA, TKA, THA or revision arthroplasty. Twenty-six of those cases were classified as PJI according to the MSIS and EBJIS criteria. Subsequently, synovial calprotectin was determined, using a lateral flow assay and two cut-off thresholds of ≥14 mg/L and ≥50 mg/L. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of synovial calprotectin was determined. Results. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥14 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.00), with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 92.9% respectively. When applying the MSIS and EBJIS criteria and a calprotectin level ≥ 50 mg/L, synovial calprotectin revealed an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.00), with 88.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PPV and NPV were 100% and 89.7% respectively. Conclusions. The value of calprotectin in synovial fluid gives valuable information with a single test result, resulting in high predictive value in the diagnosis of PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty and should seriously be considered as part of PJI diagnostics in an outpatient clinical setting. The high specificity can help rule in patients that are suspected of PJI. Therefor this test can be helpful in a preop diagnostic work-up to avoid unnecessary revisions in patients with well-placed and well-fixed arthroplasties with a suspected PJI. These conclusions are independent of which criteria set was used as a gold standard

Aim. There have been many attempts to define the criteria by which prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is diagnosed. Our aim is to validate the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI. Method. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who have undergone total hip or knee revision surgery in four different European institutions between 2013–2018. Cases with less than four intraoperative microbiology samples; no preoperative/intraoperative synovial fluid differential leukocyte count or intraoperative histology were excluded. Minimum follow-up of at least two years after revision surgery if no subsequent infection and/or the need for implant removal was also required. All cases were classified using the 2021 EBJIS, the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI definitions. Results. Definitive PJI classification according to the different definitions of the 507 patients included are presented in table 1. The EBJIS definition classifies 40.4%(205/507) of the cases as confirmed infections compared to 33.9%(p=0.038) and 29.4%(p<0.001) in 2018 ICM and 2013 MSIS classifications respectively. Compared to 2018 ICM classification it also offers significantly less undetermined cases – 5.0% vs. 11.4%(p<0.001). Free from infection Kaplan-Meyer survival curve shows significantly better outcome for EBJIS unlikely compared to confirmed subgroup(p=0.031). EBJIS likely subgroup survival is not significantly different from unlikely(p=0.529) or confirmed(p=0.717) cohorts. Among the MSIS not infected cohort the newly classified EBJIS confirmed/likely cases present higher subsequent infection rate (albeit not statistically significant) when compared to EBJIS infection unlikely cases − 16.0%(13/81) vs. 10.1%(28/277). This subsequent PJI rate is similar to the MSIS infected cohort. A similar trend is not obvious within ICM 2018 not infected subgroup. Conclusions. The EBJIS 2021 definition is shown to be the most sensitive definition while also offering a smaller number of undetermined cases. Newly diagnosed infections seem to have a similar prognosis as “classically” infected cases. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. We prospectively evaluated four different microbiological tools for diagnostics of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), and assessed their impact on the categorization of infection according to EBJIS guidelines. We compared culture, in-house real-time mPCR for S. aureus, S. lugdunensis, S. hominis, S. epidermidis, S. capitis, S. haemolyticus, C. acnes (mPCR), broad-spectrum PCR (Molzym) with 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon Sanger sequencing (16S PCR), and 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon next-generation sequencing (16S NGS) on MiSeq (Ilumina). Methods. A total of 341 samples (sonication fluid, tissue biopsy, synovial fluid) were collected from 32 patients with suspected PJI who underwent 56 revision surgeries at the Orthopaedic Centre University Hospital Ljubljana, between 2022 and 2024. Samples were processed using standard protocols for routine culture, followed by DNA isolation using the MagnaPure24 (Roche). All samples were tested with mPCR, and an additional ≥4 samples from each revision (244 in total) were subjected to further metagenomic analysis. Culture results were considered positive if the same microorganism was detected in ≥2 samples, ≥50 CFU/ml were present in the sonication fluid, or ≥1 sample was positive for a more virulent microorganism or if the patient had received antibiotic treatment. Results. Each tool demonstrated high sensitivity for correct EBJIS categorization (100% culture and 16S NGS, 96.88% mPCR and 16S PCR). The highest specificity was observed with mPCR and 16S PCR (87.5%), while culture (79.17%) and NGS (37.5%) showed lower specificity. In 27% (15/56) of revisions, all microbiological tests were negative, although infection was confirmed with histology in one case, and four cases were classified as infection-likely based on clinical signs. In 20% (11/56) of cases, all microbiological tests were positive; in three cases a combination of other EBJIS criteria (without microbiology) categorized the episodes as infection-likely and one as infection-unlikely, emphasizing the importance of microbiological tests in diagnostic criteria. In 43% (24/56) of revisions categorized as infection-unlikely using a combination of other EBJIS criteria, five had positive culture, and three had positive mPCR and 16S PCR. Fifteen (62%) had positive 16S NGS, 12 due to a low number of reads, which may indicate low-grade infection or possible contamination. Conclusion. To date, no test can be established as the ultimate gold standard. The lack of interpretation criteria can result in low specificity of some methods, as the threshold is difficult to determine. A multidisciplinary approach with combination of microbiological tools is still considered the most efficient

Aims. Accurate diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents a significant challenge for hip surgeons. Preoperative diagnosis is not always easy to establish, making the intraoperative decision-making process crucial in deciding between one- and two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Calprotectin is a promising point-of-care novel biomarker that has displayed high accuracy in detecting PJI. We aimed to evaluate the utility of intraoperative calprotectin lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) in THA patients with suspected chronic PJI. Methods. The study included 48 THAs in 48 patients with a clinical suspicion of PJI, but who did not meet European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) PJI criteria preoperatively, out of 105 patients undergoing revision THA at our institution for possible PJI between November 2020 and December 2022. Intraoperatively, synovial fluid calprotectin was measured with LFI. Cases with calprotectin levels ≥ 50 mg/l were considered infected and treated with two-stage revision THA; in negative cases, one-stage revision was performed. At least five tissue cultures were obtained; the implants removed were sent for sonication. Results. Calprotectin was positive (≥ 50 mg/l) in 27 cases; out of these, 25 had positive tissue cultures and/or sonication. Calprotectin was negative in 21 cases. There was one false negative case, which had positive tissue cultures. Calprotectin showed an area under the curve of 0.917, sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 90.9%, positive predictive value of 92.6%, negative predictive value of 95.2%, positive likelihood ratio of 10.6, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.04. Overall, 45/48 patients were correctly diagnosed and treated by our algorithm, which included intraoperative calprotectin measurement. This yielded a 93.8% concordance with postoperatively assessed EBJIS criteria. Conclusion. Calprotectin can be a valuable tool in facilitating the intraoperative decision-making process for cases in which chronic PJI is suspected and diagnosis cannot be established preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):118–124

Aim. Accurate diagnosis is key in correctly managing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our aim is to compare the preoperative performance of three PJI definitions comparing it to definitive postoperative classification. Method. This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients who have undergone total hip or knee revision surgery in four different European institutions. For this specific study, cases with no preoperative synovial fluid differential leukocyte count and less than four intraoperative microbiology samples were excluded. Cases were classified using the 2021 EBJIS, the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) PJI definitions. Preoperative classification was based on clinical features, inflammatory markers and synovial fluid leukocyte count and microbiology results. Results. Preoperative and definitive PJI classification status of the 384 patients included are presented in figure 1. EBJIS definition showed the highest agreement between preoperative and definitive classification (k=0.86, CI95% 0.81–0.90, p<0.001) compared to ICM 2018 (k=0.80, CI95% 0.75–0.84, p<0.001) or MSIS 2013 (k=0.70, CI95% 0.62–0.77, p<0.001). Compared to its respective definitive classification: EBJIS preoperative unlikely result shows 86.8% (95%CI 81.3%–91.2%) sensitivity and 87.7% (95%CI 83.3%–91.1%) negative predictive value (NPV); ICM 2018 preoperative not infected result shows 83.5% (95%CI 77.4%–88.5%) sensitivity and 86.2% (95%CI 81.9%–88.6%) NPV and; MSIS 2013 preoperative not infected result shows 63.9% (95%CI 55.0%–72.1%) sensitivity and 84.3% (95%CI 81.1%–87.1%) NPV. Around half of the preoperative EBJIS likely (45.8%) and ICM 2018 inconclusive (54.5%) turn out to be infected postoperatively. If we consider the more sensitive definition (EBJIS) as the gold standard: ICM 2018 preoperative not infected result shows 75.1% (95%CI 68.5%–81.0%) sensitivity and 78.3% (95%CI 73.9%–82.2%) NPV and; MSIS 2013 preoperative not infected result shows 42.1% (95% CI 35.2%–49.4%) sensitivity and 62.0% (59.2%–64.8) NPV. Conclusions. The EBJIS 2021 definition is not only the most sensitive definition as it was shown to be the most effective in preoperatively ruling out PJI when there is a negative result. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal deep tissue specimen sample number for histopathological analysis in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods. In this retrospective diagnostic study, patients undergoing revision surgery after total hip or knee arthroplasty (n = 119) between January 2015 and July 2018 were included. Multiple specimens of the periprosthetic membrane and pseudocapsule were obtained for histopathological analysis at revision arthroplasty. Based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013 criteria, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria, and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021 criteria, PJI was defined. Using a mixed effects logistic regression model, the sensitivity and specificity of the histological diagnosis were calculated. The optimal number of periprosthetic tissue specimens for histopathological analysis was determined by applying the Youden index. Results. Based on the EBJIS criteria (excluding histology), 46 (39%) patients were classified as infected. Four to six specimens showed the highest Youden index (four specimens: 0.631; five: 0.634; six: 0.632). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of five tissue specimens were 76.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.6 to 81.4), 86.8% (95% CI 81.3 to 93.5), 66.0% (95% CI 53.2 to 78.7), and 84.3% (95% CI 79.4 to 89.3), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated with 0.81 (as a function of the number of tissue specimens). Applying the ICM and IDSA criteria (excluding histology), 40 (34%) and 32 (27%) patients were categorized as septic. Three to five specimens had the highest Youden index (ICM 3: 0.648; 4: 0.651; 5: 0.649) (IDSA 3: 0.627; 4: 0.629; 5: 0.625). Conclusion. Three to six tissue specimens of the periprosthetic membrane and pseudocapsule should be collected at revision arthroplasty and analyzed by a pathologist experienced and skilled in interpreting periprosthetic tissue. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):158–165

Aim. Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be very challenging, especially infections caused by low virulence microorganisms. No single test with a 100% accuracy is available yet. Hence, different infection definitions were introduced to improve the diagnostic confidence and quality of research articles. Due to constant developments in this field, infection definitions are adopted continuously. The aim of our study was to find the most sensitive currently available infection definition among three currently used criteria (International Consensus Meeting – criteria 2018 (ICM), Infectious Diseases Society of America - criteria 2013 (IDSA), and European Bone and Joint Infection Society – criteria 2021 (EBJIS)) for the diagnosis of PJI. Method. Between 2015 and 2020, patients with an indicated revision surgery due to septic or aseptic failure after a total hip or knee replacement were included in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A standardized diagnostic workup was done in all patients. The components of the IDSA-, ICM-, and EBJIS- criteria for the diagnosis of PJI were identified in each patient. Results. Overall, 206 patients (hip: n=104 (50%); knee: n=102 (50%)) with a median age of 74 years (IQR 65 – 80y) were included. 101 patients (49%) were diagnosed with PJI when using the EBJIS- criteria. Based on the IDSA- and ICM- criteria, 99 patients (48%, IDSA) and 86 patients (42%, ICM) were classified as septic. Based on all three criteria, 84 cases (41%) had an infection. 15 septic cases (n=15/206; 7%) were only identified by the IDSA- and EBJIS- criteria. In 2 patients (n=2/206, 1%), an infection was present based on only the ICM and EBJIS criteria. No case was classified as infected by one infection definition alone. A statistically significant higher number of inconclusive cases was observed when the ICM criteria (n=30/206; 15%) were used in comparison to the EBJIS criteria (likely infections: n=16/206; 8%) (Fisher's exact test, p=0.041). The EBJIS definition showed a better preoperative performance in comparison to the other two definitions (p<0.0001). Conclusions. The most sensitive infection definition seems to be the novel EBJIS– criteria covering all infections diagnosed by the IDSA- and ICM-criteria without detecting any further infection. In addition, less inconclusive (infection likely) cases were detected by the EBJIS-criteria in comparison with the ICM-criteria reducing the so called ‘grey zone’ significantly which is of utmost importance in clinical routine

Background. Two-stage revision arthroplasty is the standard treatment for chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Accurate diagnosis of persistent infections at 2nd stage using established biomarkers and diagnostic criteria is of paramount importance. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin, and compare established diagnostic criteria from the International Consensus Meeting (ICM 2018) and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS 2021) to determine persistent PJI at the 2nd stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who underwent 100 two-stage revisions (hip: 39, knee: 61). Synovial fluid samples were assessed for calprotectin and alpha-defensin levels. ICM 2018 and EBJIS 2021 were applied to all patients undergoing 2nd stage revision. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden Index were utilized to determine optimal cut-off values, and correlations between biomarkers were evaluated. The microbiological spectrum was analyzed at 2nd stage and re-revision surgery. Results. Calprotectin levels showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 32.9%, and accuracy of 38.0% in predicting septic failure. Alpha-defensin showed sensitivity of 28.6%, specificity of 87.8%, and accuracy of 79.2%. Significant correlations included: calprotectin with PMN% (r = 0.471, p = 0.05) and alpha-defensin with WBC (r = 0.830, p < 0.01) in the successful cohort. For septic re-revisions, calprotectin and alpha-defensin were highly correlated (r = 0.969, p < 0.01). ICM correctly diagnosed persistent PJI in 26.7%, while EBJIS diagnosed 24.2%. The microbial spectrum shifted from gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria between reimplantation and re-revision surgeries. Conclusion. Synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin demonstrated limited accuracy in ruling out persistent PJI at reimplantation. The low sensitivity of current diagnostic criteria, combined with the observed shift in microbial spectrum, underscores the challenges in diagnosing persistent PJI during 2nd stage of a two-stage revisions arthroplasty

Aim. Apart from other biomarkers isolated in the synovial fluid, alpha-defensin appears to be a promising diagnostic tool to confirm a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the hip or knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an alpha defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test compared to usual standard classifications in the diagnostic management of PJI. Method. This investigation was set up as a multicenter prospective cohort study. Synovial fluid was obtained by means of joint aspiration or intra-operative tissue biopsies. A presumptive PJI diagnosis was made according to criteria outlined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). The intention to treat by the surgeon was logged. Sensibility and specificity for the ADLF test was plotted for each aforementioned diagnostic algorithm. Spearman correlations between all scores were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the contribution of independent variables to the probability of PJI. Results. Hundred thirty-six patients with a painful arthroplasty were assessed for infection and rated by the treating surgeon as potentially infected or not on the basis of clinical and laboratory information. According to the EBJIS criteria sixty-eight patients were deemed infected, fifty according to the IDSA criteria, forty-one according to the MSIS criteria and forty according to the ADLF test. However, the sensitivity of ADLF test was 87.8% for MSIS, 70% for IDSA and 55.8% for EBJIS. The specificity of ADLF test was between 94% – 97%. Good correlation was observed between synovial fluid culture and ADLF test (r = 0.73). Low to excellent correlations between the ADLF test and the EBJIS (r = 0.58), IDSA (r = 0.68), and MSIS score (r = 0.84) were observed. The surgeon's intention to treat correlated well with the MSIS score (r = 0.86), and moderately with the EBJIS (r = 0.59). Conclusions. ADLF test sensibility was variable, but its specificity was excellent. Most of the cases, not retained by MSIS but classified by EBJIS as infected, got a negative microbiological result. Considering an accepted 20% negative microbiological result rate in PJI diagnostic, EBJIS is clearly overestimating the number of infected cases. MSIS score correlates with the surgeon intention to treat and ADLF test

Aim. It still remains unclear whether postoperative antibiotic treatment is advantageous in presumed aseptic revision-arthroplasties of the hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) with unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC). The aim of this study was to evaluate if there is a difference in the septic and/or aseptic re-revision rate in patients with or without postoperative antibiotics. Method. In this retrospective propensity-score (PS) matched cohort-study we compared the re-revision rate and the microbiological spectrum in rTHA and rTKA treated with (AB-Group; n=70) and without (non-AB-Group; n=70) antibiotic treatment in patients with UPIC. Baseline covariates for PS-matching were type of revision, sex, Body-Mass-Index, age, Surgical-Site-Infection-Score, American-Society-of-Anesthesiologists-Classification, serum C-reactive-protein. All patients received routine antibiotic prophylaxis, but empiric AB treatment was started only in patients in the AB-Group. Post-operative treatment was decided on an individual basis according to the preference of the surgeon and the infectious disease specialist for a minimum duration of two weeks. In total, 90 rTHA (45 AB-Group, 45 in non-AB-Group) patients with UPICs and 50 rTKA (25 AB-Group, 25 in non-AB-Group) were included in the study. There was no significant variation in patient demographics. Results. After a median follow-up of 4.1 (IQR: 2.9-5.5) years after rTHA and rTKA, there was no higher re-revision rate (p=0.813) between the AB-group 10/70 (14.3%), and the non-AB-group 11/70 (15.7%). In the AB group, 4.3% (3/70) of patients underwent revision due to septic complications compared to 5.7% (4/70) in the non-AB group (survival log-rank: p=0.691). In total, 30/70 (42.9%) of patients in the AB-group and 23/70 (32.9%) of patients in the non-AB group were diagnosed as having an “infection likely” according to the PJI diagnostic criteria of EBJIS (p=0.223). All UPICs comprised low virulent microorganisms and were considered as a contaminant. In total, 68/70 (97.1%) of the patients in the AB-group received a dual antibiotic treatment for a mean duration of 41 (IQR: 23.5-56.5) days. Conclusion. Postoperative antibiotic treatment did not result in a decreased re-revision rate compared to non-antibiotic treatment in patients with UPIC in presumed aseptic rTHA and rTKA. UPICs with pathogens are likely to be a containment and therefore the classification of “infection likely” according to the EBJIS definition can be safely ignored

Aim. Several options to standardize the definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been created including the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), 2018 Intentional Consensus Meeting (ICM), and the 2019 proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been investigated in an effort to simplify and improve the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of a calprotectin point of care (POC) test for diagnosing PJI in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients comparing different sets of criteria (2013 MSIS, 2018 ICM, and 2019 EBJIS criteria) used to define patients as with or without infection. Method. From October 2018 to January 2020 and under IRB approval 123 intraoperative samples of synovial fluid were prospectively collected at two academic hospitals in the same institution from revision TKA patients. All patients underwent standard clinical and laboratory evaluation for PJI at our institution, allowing for categorization using the 3 criteria. Patients were adjudicated by 2 blinded and independent reviewers for the 3 sets of criteria. The 3 criteria agreed 91.8% of the time. Four likely cases by the 2019 proposed EBJIS were considered unlikely and 1 inconclusive case by the 2018 ICM was considered not infected for the purposes of analysis. Calprotectin POC testing followed manufacturer's instructions using a threshold of >50 mg/L to indicate PJI. Sensitivities, specificities, PPV, NPV, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for the 3 sets of criteria. Results. Using 2013 MSIS criteria the calprotectin POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV AUC of 98.1%, 95.7%, 94.5%, 98.5%, and 0.969, respectively. Using 2018 ICM the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and (AUC) of 98.2%, 98.5%, 98.2%, 98.5%, and 0.984, respectively. Using the 2019 proposed EBJIS criteria the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and area under the curve (AUC) of 93.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 94.2%, and 0.966, respectively. Conclusions. The calprotectin lateral flow POC test has an excellent sensitivity and specificity regardless of the set of criteria used to define PJI. These results are promising and suggest that the calprotectin lateral flow test may be used as a rule out test in a cost-conscious health care model or when conventional diagnostic tools may not be available. Further investigations of the calprotectin PCO test must be completed to validate these results

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents the second most frequent complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with up to 20% of low-grade PJI treated as aseptic failure. Sensitive diagnostic criteria have been provided by EBJIS. However, to date there is no single test to reliably diagnose all PJIs. Studies of Mazzucco et al. and Fu et al. suggest that synovial fluid (SF) viscosity could be considered as an important marker for PJI. The primary aim of our study was to determine if SF viscosity is a more reliable diagnostic criterion of PJI than the SF cell count with differential (CCD), and the combined diagnostic value of SF viscosity and CCD. Method. We prospectively analysed the viscosity of SF samples obtained during TJA of hip and knee revisions. We sampled 2.5–5mL of SF for viscosity and CCD. Intraoperatively, 1mL of the sample was analysed for the CCD. The remaining SF was centrifuged for 4min at 7000rpm. The viscosity of the supernatant was determined on Ostwald viscometer as the time required to pass the viscometer at 20°C. During each surgery at least 5 microbiological and multiple histopathological samples were harvested, and explant sonication was performed. The diagnosis was based on EBJIS definition. The viscosity threshold for detecting PJI was set at 65 seconds. Results. Between December 2020 and January 2023, we analysed 65 knee and 47 hip TJA revision procedures. There were 55 septic and 57 aseptic diagnoses. As a diagnostic marker of PJI, SF viscosity achieved 100% sensitivity and 82.5% specificity, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.832 (95% CI 0.739, 0.925). The specificity and sensitivity of SF CCD were 98.2% and 78.2%, respectively, with AUC of 0.921 (95% CI 0.869, 0.974). Of the 10 cases incorrectly diagnosed as aseptic based on SF viscosity, 2 were acute traumas and 8 metalloses. The SF CCD in all these cases was <0.5. Of the 12 cases incorrectly diagnosed as aseptic based on SF CCD, 6 cases were culture negative, 4 C. acnes and 2 S. epidemidis isolates in microbiology. Taken together, SF viscosity and CCD achieved a combined AUC of 0.953 (95% CI 0.919, 0.987). Conclusions. Our study is the first to report that SF viscosity is more sensitive but slightly less specific for PJI than SF CCD. The study demonstrates diagnostic value of combining SF viscosity with CCD in decision making in TJA revision surgery

Aim. Synovial fluid investigation is the best alternative to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI) before adequate microbiological/histology sampling during revision surgery. Although accurate preoperative diagnosis is certainly recommended, puncturing every patient before revision arthroplasty raises concerns about safety and feasibility issues especially in difficult to access joint (e.g., hip), that often require OR time and fluoroscopy/ultrasound guidance. Currently there is no clear guidelines regarding optimal indications to perform preoperative joint aspiration to diagnose PJI before revision surgery. The main goal of this study is to determine the accuracy of our institutional criteria using the new European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) PJI definition. Method. We retrospectively evaluated every single- or first-stage for presumed aseptic or known infected revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedures between 2013–2020. Preoperative clinical and laboratory features were systematically scrutinized. Cases with insufficient information for accurate final PJI diagnosis (i.e., no perioperative synovial fluid examination or no multiple cultures including sonication of removed implant) were excluded. Preoperative joint aspiration is recommended in our institution if any of the following criteria are met: 1) elevated CRP and/or ESR; 2) early failure (<2 years) or repeat failure; 3) high clinical suspicion/risk factors are present. Performance of such criteria were compared against final postoperative EBJIS definition PJI diagnosis. Results. A total of 364 revision THAs or TKAs were performed during the study period. After excluding 258 cases with insufficient information, a total of 106 patients were ultimately included. 38 (35,8 %) were classified as confirmed infections, 10 (9.4 %) as likely infected and 58 (54.7%) as infection unlikely. Of those, 37 confirmed infection cases, 9 likely infected cases and 32 infection unlikely cases did have indication for preoperative synovial fluid collection before revision surgery. Institutional criteria showed 95.8 % Sensitivity, 44.83 % Specificity, 92.9 % Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and 59 % Positive Predictive Value (PPV). Conclusions. Sensitivity and NPV of the aforementioned institutional criteria are very high even with the use of the more sensitive EBJIS PJI definition. As such they seem to be a valid alternative in selecting patients that should be punctured before revision arthroplasty. They identify the vast majority of infected patients while saving a significant number of patients from unnecessary procedures