Introduction. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a morphological hip joint deformity associated with pain and early degenerative changes. Cam-type FAI is prevalent in young male athletes. While biomechanical deficiencies (decreased hip muscle strength and range of motion (ROM)) have been associated with symptomatic cam-type FAI (sFAI), results have been conflicting and little is known about biomechanical characteristics during dynamic tasks. Objectives. (1) Compare coronal-plane hip muscle strength, activation and joint rotation during movement tasks in sFAI hips against healthy controls. (2) Investigate the effect of hip internal rotation ROM (IR-ROM) on these outcomes. Methods. 11 sFAI and 24 well-matched healthy control hips from 18 young adult male athletes were recruited (Table.1). Passive hip IR-ROM was measured with goniometry. Weight-normalised hip abductor and adductor isometric maximal voluntary contraction torques were quantified with handheld dynamometry. Gluteus medius and adductor longus activation and hip coronal-plane kinematics were collected with surface electromyography (EMG) and motion-capture during time-defined phases of sit-to-stand (Fig.1) and single-leg-squat (Fig.2) tasks. Effect of sFAI with hip IR-ROM as a separate independent variable was calculated with 1-way MANCOVA. Results. sFAI had significantly less IR-ROM (19.25°±5.94) than controls (28.83°±7.24) (p<0.001). During the sit-to-stand ascent phase, significantly more hip abduction (F=4.93, p=0.03) was observed in sFAI (13.06°±3.16) compared to controls (10.16°±3.72). With IR-ROM differences controlled for, significantly higher gluteus medius:adductor longus EMG activation ratio (F=4.32, p=0.046) was observed in the same phase in sFAI (0.16±0.34) compared to controls (−0.11±0.31). No other significant results were found. Conclusion. sFAI hips demonstrate altered muscle activation and movement patterns when ascending from seated positions compared to controls, with reduced hip IR-ROM in sFAI hips influencing findings. Abductor and adductor function imbalance may explain why sFAI increases risk of early degenerative changes. Despite study limitations (no imaging for sFAI diagnosis), these findings should be considered when optimising rehabilitation in this population. For any figures and tables, please contact the authors directly

In the UK, the posterior approach (PA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) are the most common total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. Few studies however, have compared the subsequent functional outcomes. This exploratory study aimed to examine the effect of PA and DLA approaches on post-operative hip kinematics, strength and hip muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), compared to healthy controls. Participants comprised of 15 cases in the DLA group, > 12 month post-operatively, (ten male, age 68.9+/-5.5 years, BMI 26.9+/-3.0), 13 cases in the PA group (six male; age 72.9+/-6.9 years, BMI 27.1+/-3.6) and 11 age/BMI-matched healthy control participants. All participants underwent 3D kinematic (Vicon, Oxford, UK) and kinetic (AMTI, USA) analysis whist performing self-selected and fast walking as well as sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit. Isometric dynamometry was performed (Biodex Medical systems, USA) for all major muscle groups around the operated hip, and a subset of five participants (three DLA v two PA) underwent “slice encoding for metal artefact correction” (SEMAC) MRI imaging to measure muscle CSA. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected. Both post-operative surgical groups exhibited altered gait, particularly in limited hip extension, compared to the control participants. The DLA group demonstrated forced hip extension matching controls only under fast walking conditions while the PA group did not achieve hip extension. Both surgical approaches achieved high PROMs scores. The PA group were weaker for all strength activities tested, whereas the DLA cases demonstrated similar hip strength to controls. SEMAC imaging revealed reduced CSA for those muscles dissected during surgery, compared to the contralateral side. This exploratory study demonstrated small but measurable differences between surgical approaches for muscle CSA, hip strength of major hip muscle groups and a number of gait variables, although both approaches produce satisfactory functional outcomes for patients after surgery