Clinicians are often asked by patients, “When can I drive again?” after lower limb injury or surgery. This question is difficult to answer in the absence of any guidelines. This review aims to collate the currently available evidence and discuss the factors that influence the decision to allow a patient to return to driving. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched using the following terms: ‘brake reaction time’, ‘brake response time’, ‘braking force’, ‘brake pedal force’, ‘resume driving’, ‘rate of application of force’, ‘driving after injury’, ‘joint replacement and driving’, and ‘fracture and driving’. Of the relevant literature identified, most studies used the brake reaction time and total brake time as the outcome measures. Varying recovery periods were proposed based on the type and severity of injury or surgery. Surveys of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, the Police, insurance companies in the United Kingdom and Orthopaedic Surgeons offered a variety of opinions. There is currently insufficient evidence for any authoritative body to determine fitness to drive. The lack of guidance could result in patients being withheld from driving for longer than is necessary, or returning to driving while still unsafe. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:290–4

Introduction:. The aim of this study was to assess patients reported fitness to return to work and to driving after ankle replacement. Method:. Using Hospital Joint Registry, patients who underwent ankle replacement between 2006 and 2011 were invited to take part in the study. Questionnaires were sent to these patients. Participants were asked to report the nature and pattern of their work (full time or part time), time it took to return to work and subsequent nature of work. Participants were also asked about time to return to driving. Results:. 173 participants were given eight weeks to reply. In this time there were 131 responses (response rate 76%). There were 79 male and 52 female respondents. Of the responses 61% (n=80) were retired, 24% (n=42) were employed, 5% (n=9) were unemployed before the surgery. Of those who were employed prior to ankle replacement, 29 respondents reported working full time and 11 respondents were working part time and 5 were self employed. 10 (24%) patients returned to work at 6 weeks 22 (52%) were able to work by 3 months. Following surgery 5 of the patients did not return to work off which one took retirement. 45 (40%) respondents could drive at 6 weeks, 34 (22%) at 3 months and 11 by 6 months. 20 (12%) patients did not drive before surgery. There were 23 responses about nature of employment, 10 being manual workers and 13 being office workers. Of the manual workers 5 patients returned to full time work. Conclusion:. We conclude from this study that the 76% of the employed patients prior to their ankle replacement were able to return to work by 6 months with 24 % returning by 6 weeks. 71% were able to drive at 3 months after surgery

Aims

Limb salvage for diabetic foot infections often require multiple procedures. Some patients will eventually end up with below knee amputation (BKA) when all limb salvage attempts fail. We seek to study the patients’ ability to return to normal life, functional status, prosthesis usage and perspectives on multiple limb salvage procedures that culminated in BKA to review if they would undertake a similar path if their situation was repeated.

A total of 80 patients with an acute rupture of tendo Achillis were randomised to operative repair using an open technique (39 patients) or non-operative treatment in a cast (41 patients). Patients were followed up for one year. Outcome measures included clinical complications, range of movement of the ankle, the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), and muscle function dynamometry evaluating dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the ankle. The primary outcome measure was muscle dynamometry.

Re-rupture occurred in two of 37 patients (5%) in the operative group and four of 39 (10%) in the non-operative group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). There was a slightly greater range of plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle in the operative group at three months which was not statistically significant, but at four and six months the range of dorsiflexion was better in the non-operative group, although this did not reach statistically significance either. After 12 weeks the peak torque difference of plantar flexion compared with the normal side was less in the operative than the non-operative group (47% vs 61%, respectively, p < 0.005). The difference declined to 26% and 30% at 26 weeks and 20% and 25% at 52 weeks, respectively. The difference in dorsiflexion peak torque from the normal side was less than 10% by 26 weeks in both groups, with no significant differences. The mean SMFA scores were significantly better in the operative group than the non-operative group at three months (15 vs 20, respectively, p < 0.03). No significant differences were observed after this, and at one year the scores were similar in both groups.

We were unable to show a convincing functional benefit from surgery for patients with an acute rupture of the tendo Achillis compared with conservative treatment in plaster.