Revision hip surgery is reportedly rising inexorably yet not all units report this phenomenon. The outcome of 1143 consecutive Corin TaperFit primary hip arthroplasties (957 patients) performed between 1995 and 2010 is presented. The implants were cemented under pressurisation and combined the TaperFit stem with Ogee flanged cups. Data was gathered from local arthroplasty database and case note review of revised joints. 13 hips have been revised (1.1%). Cumulative prosthesis survival is 0.99 +/− 0.0. Two femoral stems were revised (0.2%); one at 6 months for sepsis, one at 14 days after dislodgment during reduction of dislocation. No revisions were undertaken for aseptic loosening of the stem or cup, nor for thigh pain. 32 patients (32 hips) ≥15 year follow up, 13 survive today and none have been revised (0%). Of the 471 with ≥10 year follow up, 38 were aged ≤50 at time of surgery and 1/38 has been revised to date (PLAD for dislocation). The strong population stability in this region, supported by independent investigation by Scottish Arthroplasty Project, endorses the accuracy of the data quoted. The low incidence of revision in this cohort, and absence of revision for aseptic loosening (mean follow up 8.03 years +/− SD 3.94; range 18 months to 16yrs 2 months), substantially supports the longevity and use of cemented, double-taper, polished, collarless femoral stems in combination with cemented polyethylene cups in primary hip arthroplasty in all patient age groups

Introduction. Malalignment of some designs of stem is associated with an increased risk of aseptic loosening and revision. We investigated whether the alignment of the cemented polished, double-taper design adversely affected outcome, in a multicentre prospective study. Methods. A multicentre prospective study of 1189 total hip replacements was undertaken to investigate whether there is an association between surgical outcome and femoral stem alignment. All patients underwent a primary THR with the Exeter femoral stem (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Mahwah, NJ) and a variety of acetabular components. The primary outcome measure was the Oxford hip score (OHS) and change in OHS at five years. Secondary outcomes included rate of dislocation and revision. Radiographic evaluation of the femoral component was also undertaken. The long axis of the Exeter femoral component and the long axis of the femoral canal were located, and the angle at the point of intersection measured. The cementing quality was determined as defined by Barrack et al. Radiolucent lines at the cement-stem and cement-bone interface in the five year radiographs were defined using the zones described by Gruen et al. Subsidence was measured as the vertical dimension of the radiolucency craniolateral to the shoulder of the stem in Gruen zone 1 as described by Fowler et al. Cement fractures were recorded. Results. The incidence of varus (>5 ° to the femoral axis), and valgus (>5 °) malignment were 3.7% and 0.8% respectively. Pre-operative demographics and OHS were similar in all groups (p > 0.4). There was no significant difference in OHS or change in OHS between neutral and malaligned groups at 5 years (neutral, mean=40.1, change=23.1; varus, mean=40.1, change=23.7; valgus, mean=42.0, change=26.6; p=0.46 and p=0.45 respectively). There was no significant difference in dislocation rate between the groups (p=0.66). There was also no significant difference in revision rate (p=0.34). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of femoral radiolucency, stem subsidence or cement fracture (p > 0.1). Conclusion. This study provides evidence that both varus and valgus implantation does not compromise the short to medium term clinical results of the cemented, polished, double-taper stems. Longer follow-up is required to establish the influence of stem alignment on the incidence of aseptic loosening and revision

Aims

The aim of this study was to report the three-year follow-up for a series of 400 patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip, who were randomized to be treated with either a cemented polished tapered hemiarthroplasty or an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty.