While double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction attempts to recreate the two-bundle anatomy of the native ACL, recent research also indicates that double-bundle reconstruction more closely reproduces the biomechanical properties of the ACL and restores the rotatory and sagittal stability to the level of the intact knee that was not attainable with anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Though double-bundle reconstruction provides these potential biomechanical benefits, it poses a significant challenge to the surgeon who must attempt to accurately place twice as many tunnels while avoiding tunnel convergence compared to single-bundle reconstruction. In addition, previous work has shown that tunnel malpositioning may cause grafts that fail to reproduce the native biomechanics of the ACL, increase graft tension in deep knee flexion, increase anterior tibial translation, and produce lower IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) scores. We hypothesise that experienced surgeons without the use of computer-assisted navigation will place tunnels on the tibial plateau and lateral femoral condyle that more closely emulate the locations of the native anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) ACL bundles than inexperienced surgeons with the use of computer-assisted navigation. A novice surgeon group comprised of three medical students each performed double-bundle ACL reconstruction using passive computer-assisted navigation on a total of eleven cadaver knees. Their individual results were compared to three experienced orthopaedic surgeons each performing the identical procedure without the use of computer-assisted navigation on a total of nine cadaver knees. There were no significant differences in placement of either the AM or PL tunnels on the tibial plateau between novice surgeons using computer-assisted navigation and experienced surgeons without the use of computer navigation. On the lateral femoral condyle, novice surgeons placed the AM and PL tunnels significantly more anterior along Blumensaat's line on average compared to experienced surgeons. Both groups placed femoral AM and PL tunnels anterior to previously described AM and PL bundle positions. Novice surgeons utilizing computer-assisted navigation and experienced surgeons without computer assistance place the AM and PL tunnels on the tibial side with no significant difference. On the lateral femoral condyle, novice surgeons utilising computer-assisted navigation place tunnels significantly anterior along Blumensaat's line compared to experienced surgeons without the use of computer navigation

The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of patients with isolated bundle ACL tear (either isolated posterolateral or anteromedial bundle) during arthroscopy, and its correlation with physical exam. The relevant surgical technique to reconstruct the ligament is discussed. Between September 2006 and March 2009, patients with ACL injuries who received double- bundle ACL reconstruction were reviewed retrospectively. A specialist fellow performed a physical exam before and after anaesthesia. Intraop status of the ACL tear was assessed with correlation of the physical findings. Patients with isolated bundle tear would receive anatomical reconstruction of the torn bundle with preservation of the intact bundle. Double-bundle hamstrings reconstruction would be performed to those with complete tear. Medical notes of 159 patients were reviewed. There were 118 patients (74%) with complete ACL tear, 36 (23%) with isolated AM tear, and 5 (3%) with PL tear. For patients with complete ACL tear, 94% and 100% had positive Lachman, 50% and 87% had positive pivot shift, before and after anaesthesia. For patients with isolated AM tear, 100% had positive Lachman, 36% and 19% had positive pivot shift, before and after anaesthesia. For patients with isolated PL tear, 100% had positive Lachman, 20% and 80% had positive pivot shift, before and after anaesthesia. With better understanding of ACL, patients with isolated-bundle tear can preserve their intact bundle during reconstruction. However, in this study we find that physical exam correlates poorly with the arthroscopic findings. Further imaging (e.g. MRI) may be helpful to differentiate patients from isolated- bundle tear to complete tear

Thirty-three knees in thirty-three patients who underwent ACLR using four-strand semitendinousus and gracilis tendon in our hospital were included in this study. In 17 knees, we use a fluoroscopic-based navigation system (Vector Vision ACL, BrainLab. Inc.) for positioning of the tunnels (Group 1). In the remaining 16 knees, positioning of the femoral and tibial tunnels was done without navigation (Group 2). In navigation operation, anteroposterior and lateral images of the knee were taken with a fluoroscope and captured into the computer. The optimal target points for bone tunnels were semi-automatically calculated and displayed on the screen. Femoral placement was determined based on the quadrant method. The target for tibial tunnel was set at 43% of tibial plateau AP length. Intraoperatively, positions of the drill guides were decided referring to both navigation image and arthroscopic image. We evaluated Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lachman test and pivot shift test at 1 year after operation and calculated bone tunnel position on the postoperative lateral x-ray films and expressed them as relative values against total AP length of the Blumensaat's line and of the tibia plateau. Lysholm score, IKDC subjective score, Lachman test and pivot shift test were not significantly differed between the groups. The femoral tunnels were 74.2±3.3% in Group 1 and 71.7±6.0% in Group 2 along and the tibial tunnels were 42.1±1.4% in group 1 and 43.0±4.6% in group 2 along the tibia plateau. Although femur and tibial tunnel positions were not significantly differed between the groups, variation of bone tunnel position was significantly smaller in Group 1, indicating a good reproducibility. One pin tract infection occurred in Group 1. This case successfully treated with debridment and antibiotics containing cement filling. Fluoroscopic navigation system is quite helpful for precise and reproducible creation of both femur and tibial tunnel. The results encourage us to use this system for double-bundle anatomical ACLR. However, a special care must be taken to avoid complication caused by tracker pin placement