Abstract. Introduction. Displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly are challenging due to associated comorbidities, poor tissue quality, high risk of complications, and the possible need for implant removal. Treatment options with such fractures range from non-operative management to internal fixation with various types of implants. Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of olecranon fractures in the elderly with relatively low functional demand. Aim. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse the clinical outcomes of various treatment modalities for olecranon fracture in the elderly. Methods. We systematically reviewed the literature covering the treatment of olecranon fractures in the elderly according to PRISMA guidelines. We used search tools of Medline, Embase, Wiley online library, Cochrane and Scopus. Keywords used in the search were Olecranon fracture and Elderly OR Geriatric in all fields. Studies involving patients older than 60 years of age and all modalities of treatment were included. Results. 14 papers studying 270 patients were identified of which, 112 were treated non-operatively, 25 with limited fixation, 98 with tension band wire fixation, 34 with plate fixation, and 1 patient was treated with excision. Conclusions. Nonoperative as well as limited fixation were shown to provide satisfactory results in the elderly. Treatment decisions in this age group should be individualised to factors such as fracture stability, quality of bone & soft tissues, and patient's functional demand. We recommend a treatment protocol for treating olecranon fracture in the elderly based on the above factors

The ideal operative treatment of displaced sub capital femoral fractures in the elderly is controversial. Recently, randomised controlled trials have suggested a better outcome with the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat displaced intra capsular fractures of the femur for elderly patients in good health. More recently the concept of dual mobility cups is being promoted to avoid dislocations in this cohort of patients. However, overall there is limited evidence to support the choice between different types of arthroplasty. Dislocation remains a main concern with THA, especially when a posterior approach is used.

We analysed the outcome of 115 primary THR (112 cements and 3 uncemented) THR using a posterior approach with soft tissue repair in active elderly patients presenting with displaced intra capsular femoral neck fractures. Size 28 mm head was used in 108 and a size 32 mm head in the rest. All surgery was performed by specialist hip surgeons.

Satisfactory results were noted in terms of pain control, return to pre-morbid activity and radiological evidence of bone implant osteo-integration. The 30-day mortality was nil. There were two dislocations and only one needed revision surgery due to recurrent dislocation.

In conclusion, with optimal patient selection, THA seems to provide a good functional outcome and pain relief in the management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Excellent outcome can be achieved when done well using the standard cemented THR and with 28mm head. A good soft tissue repair and a specialist hip surgeon is preferable.

Long-term prospective RCT comparing hemiarthroplasty (HEMI) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of intracapsular neck of femur fracture.

81 previously mobile, independent, orientated patients were randomised to receive THA or HEMI after sustaining a displaced neck of femur fracture. Patients were followed up with radiographs, Oxford hip score (OHS), SF-36 scores and their walking distance.

At a mean follow up of 8.7 years, overall mortality following THA was 32.5% compared to 51.2% following HEMI (p=0.09). Following THA, patients died after a mean of 63.6 months compared to 45 months following HEMI (p=0.093). Patients with THA walked further and had better physical function. No HEMIs dislocated but three (7.5%) THAs did. Four (9.8%) HEMI patients were revised to THA, but only one (2.5%) THA required revision. All surviving HEMI patients had acetabular erosion and all surviving THA patients had wear of the cemented polyethylene cup.

Patients with THA have better function in the medium-term and survive longer.

Abstract. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is being increasingly used for complex, displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. The main goal of the current study was to evaluate the functional and radiographic results after primary RSA of three or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Between 2012 and 2020, 70 consecutive patients with a recent three- or four-part fracture of the proximal humerus were treated with an RSA. There were 41 women and 29 men, with a mean age of 76 years. The dominant arm was involved in 42 patients (60%). All surgeries were carried out within 21 days. Displaced three-part fracture sustained in 16 patients, 24 had fracture dislocation and 30 sustained a four-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Patients were followed up for a mean of 26 months. The mean postoperative OSS at the end of the follow-up period was 32.4. The mean DASH score was 44.3. Tuberosity non-union occurred in 18 patients (12.6%), malunion in 7 patients (4.9%), heterotopic ossification in 4 patients (2.8%) and scapular notching in one patient. Anatomical reconstruction was achieved in 25 patients (17.5%), the influence of greater tuberosity healing on shoulder function could not be demonstrated. Heterotopic ossification seems to affect OSS and QDASH, we found statistically significant relation between HO and clinical outcomes. Patients with heterotopic ossification had significantly lower postoperative scores on DASH and OSS (P = .0527). Despite expecting good functional outcome with low complication rate after RSA, the functional outcome was irrespective of healing of the tuberosities

Tibial plateau fractures are common injuries. Displaced fractures are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Goals of treatment include restoration of extremity axial alignment, joint stability and congruity, allowing for early motion and prevention of osteoarthritis. Short term results of surgical fixation of tibial plateau fractures are good, however, longer term outcomes have demonstrated a higher risk of end-stage arthritis and total knee arthroplasty. Despite the vast literature around tibial plateau fractures, to our knowledge there are no series examining post-operative reductions using axial imaging. It is our goal to define the incidence of articular malreductions following surgical fixation of tibial plateau fractures, to identify patient or surgeon factors associated with malreductions, and to define any regional patterns of malreduction location. De-identified post operative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to identify tibial plateau malreductions with a step or gap greater than 2 mm, or condylar width greater than 5 mm. Three independent assessors reviewed the scans meeting criteria using Osirix DICOM software. Steps and gaps were mapped onto the axial sequence at the level of the joint line. Images were then matched to side and overlaid as best fit in Photoshop software to create a map of malreductions. A grid was created to divide the medial and lateral plateaus into quadrants to identify the density of malreductions by location. A multi-variate regression model was used to assess risk factors for malreduction. Sixty five post-operative CT scans were reviewed. Twenty one reductions had a step or gap more than 2 mm for a malreduction incidence of 32.3%. The incidence in patients undergoing submeniscal arthrotomy or fluoroscopic assisted reduction was 16.6% and 41.4%, respectively (p <0.001). Side of injury, age, BMI, AO fracture type, and use of locking plates were not predictive of malreduction. Malreductions were heavily weighted to the posterior lateral tibial plateau. The incidence of articular malreductions was high at 32.3%. Fluoroscopic reduction alone was a predictor for articular malreduction with most malreductions located in the posterior lateral quadrants of the plateau

Displaced femoral neck fractures can have devastating impacts on quality of life and patient function. Evidence for optimal surgical approach is far from definitive. The Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemi-Arthroplasty (HEALTH) trial aimed to evaluate unplanned secondary procedures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemi-arthroplasty (HA) within two years of initial surgery for displaced femoral neck fractures. Secondary objectives evaluated differences in patient function, health-related quality of life, mortality, and hip-related complications HEALTH is a large randomized controlled trial that included 1,495 patients across 81 centers in 10 countries. Patients aged 50 years or older with displaced femoral neck fractures received either THA or HA. Participants were followed for 24 months post-fracture and a Central Adjudication Committee adjudicated fracture eligibility, technical placement of prosthesis, additional surgical procedures, hip-related complications, and mortality. The primary analyses were a Cox proportional hazards model with time to the primary study endpoint as the outcome and THA versus HA as the independent variable. Using multi-level linear models with three levels (centre, patient, and time), with patient and centre entered as random effects, the effect of THA versus HA on quality of life (Short Form-12 (SF-12) and EQ-5D), function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)), and mobility (Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)) were estimated separately. The majority of patients were female (70.1%), 70 years of age or older (80.2%), and able to ambulate without the aid of an assistive device before their fracture (74.4%), and the injury in the majority of the patients was a subcapital femoral neck fracture (61.9%). The primary end point occurred in 57 of 718 patients (7.9%) who were randomly assigned to THA and 60 of 723 patients (8.3%) who were randomly assigned to HA (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.40; p=0.79). Hip instability or dislocation occurred in 34 patients (4.7%) assigned to total hip arthroplasty and 17 patients (2.4%) assigned to hemi- arthroplasty (hazard ratio, 2.00; 99% CI, 0.97 to 4.09). Function, as measured with the total WOMAC total score, pain score, stiffness score, and function score, modestly favored THA over HA. Mortality was similar in the two treatment groups (14.3% among the patients assigned to THA and 13.1% among those assigned to HA, p=0.48). Serious adverse events occurred in 300 patients (41.8%) assigned to THA and in 265 patients (36.7%) assigned to HA. Among independently ambulating patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, the incidence of secondary procedures did not differ significantly between patients who were randomly assigned to undergo THA and those who were assigned to undergo HA, and THA provided a clinically unimportant improvement over HA in function and quality of life over 24 months

As the incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) rises, an increasing prevalence of peri-prosthetic femur fractures has been reported. This is likely due to the growing population with arthroplasties, increasing patient survival and a more active life-style following arthroplasty. It is the 3rd most common reason for THA reoperation (9.5%) and 5th most common reason for revision (5% with fracture risk after primary THA reported at 0.4%-1.1% and after revision at 2.1%-4%). High quality radiographs are usually sufficient to classify the fracture and plan treatment. Important issues in treatment include stem fixation status and fracture location relative to the stem. Additional comorbidities will also influence treatment choices, of which the most critical is the presence of infection and the quality of bone stock. The most commonly studied, and reported classification system is the Vancouver. Type A are peri-trochanteric fractures with AL at the lesser and AG at the greater trochanter. B fractures are those around the stem with B1 fractures having a well-fixed stem, B2 a loose stem with adequate bone stock, and B3 representing loose stem and inadequate bone stock. C fractures are distal to the stem. Type A) Trochanteric Fractures: These are usually associated with lysis. Displaced fractures can be managed adequately with cerclage fixation and cancellous allograft to fill osteolytic defects. Undisplaced fractures usually heal well with symptomatic treatment. Type B) Fractures Around the Stem: The B1 type has a well-fixed component and is usually treated with extramedullary fixation plus graft. Contemporary plates have been designed specifically for these fractures. Strut allograft may be used to provide a more rigid construct. Spiral and long oblique fractures can be cerclaged while short oblique or transverse fractures require fixation anterior and lateral with cable plates and cortical strut grafts. Screws can be used distal to the implant, and cables used proximally. The B2 type has a loose prosthesis but otherwise good bone stock. In this setting, the fracture line may be extended on the lateral cortex of the femur as an extended osteotomy to provide easy access for cement removal. These fractures can be managed with an extensively coated stem if rotational stability can be obtained in the distal segment. If rotational stability over a 4 cm scratch interference fit of the stem isn't possible, then a fluted tapered modular stem should be used. Strut allografts improve initial stability. The B3 type has both a loose prosthesis and poor bone stock and in the younger patient restoration of bone stock should be a priority. Bulk femoral grafts may be needed. The elderly or low functional demand patient may be treated with a proximal femoral replacement. Because of soft-tissue deficiencies, a constrained acetabular liner may be needed to prevent instability. Type C) Fractures Distal to the Stem: These usually accompany a stable stem and many fixation devices are available. Locking plates have become most popular and should be secured with cerclage wires proximally around the component with screws distally. Retrograde nails may be employed if there is adequate bone distal to the stem tip and above the fracture

Over the past decade there has been a shift in the approach to management of many femoral neck fractures. As noted by Miller et al. those trends are reflected in the practice patterns of surgeons applying for board certification through the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons. From 1999 to 2011 there was a trend toward total hip arthroplasty and corresponding small decreases in the use of hemi-arthroplasty and internal fixation for treatment of femoral neck fractures. For many years the treatment approach has been a simple diagnosis-related algorithm predicated upon classification of the fracture as displaced (historically treated with hemi-arthroplasty) or non-displaced (historically treated with internal fixation). More recently, however, the focus has shifted to a patient-centered approach. In the patient-centered approach factors such as age, functional demands, pre-existent hip disease and bone quality should all be considered. In the contemporary setting it is still important to distinguish between displaced and non-displaced fracture patterns. Non-displaced femoral neck fractures, regardless of patient age or activity, are well-suited to closed reduction and internal fixation, most commonly with three cannulated screws. The union rate is high in non-displaced fractures treated with internal fixation and the benefits of preserving the native hip joint are substantial. Displaced femoral neck fractures in younger active patients, particularly those without pre-existent hip arthritis, are best treated with early anatomic reduction and internal fixation. While a subgroup of young, active patients who undergo ORIF may fail, the benefits of native hip preservation in that group are again substantial. Displaced femoral neck fractures in older patients or those with substantial pre-existing hip arthritis are best treated with arthroplasty. The biggest practice change has been the trend to total hip arthroplasty as opposed to hemi-arthroplasty for a subgroup of patients. Total hip arthroplasty is now favored in almost all active, cognitively well-functioning patients as the degree of pain relief is better and the risk of reoperation is lower in the current era (32mm and 36mm femoral heads). Hemi-arthroplasty, either uni-polar or bi-polar, remains an appropriate treatment for cognitively impaired patients who also have limited functional demands in whom the risk of dislocation is particularly high

Supracondylar femur fractures are an uncommon but serious complication following TKA. The optimal treatment method often depends on the specific fracture pattern and various patient-related factors, and can be controversial in many cases. Nonoperative treatment can be considered in low-demand patients with minimally displaced fractures, whereas fractures associated with loose components typically require revision surgery. Displaced fractures with well-fixed implants can be treated successfully using one of several different strategies. Internal fixation after open or closed reduction can be achieved using either an intramedullary device or plate-and-screw constructs. Good results have been reported using intramedullary nails, although their use is limited to certain fracture patterns and implants designs. Modern periarticular locking plates featuring polyaxial locking screws can be inserted laterally in a submuscular fashion and offer the ability to achieve rigid fixation in the short distal fragment. These plates offer a robust treatment option for most fracture patterns. Alternatively, reliable healing and good functional results can also be achieved by revision of the femoral component using stemmed implants to bypass the fracture site. This strategy typically does not require distal femoral replacement or conversion to a hinge, and can provide consistently good results. Regardless of the treatment method chosen, careful attention should be given at the time of surgery avoid malalignment, malrotation, and distraction at the fracture site which can compromise the ultimate clinical outcome. Intra-operative femoral fractures are a rare complication that usually occurs during exposure, bone preparation, or trialing. If recognised intra-operatively and treated appropriately, reliable healing can occur

Displaced fractures of the neck of femur are routinely treated in the elderly by either cemented hemiarthoplasty, in the fit, or uncemented hemiarthroplasty, in the less fit. In Scotland the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines are followed to identify which patients should have a cemented prosthesis. This is based on cardiovascular status, and the age and fragility of the patient. An uncemented prosthesis should be a final operation. A peri-prosthetic fracture is considered a failure of treatment as the patient then has to undergo an operation with a far greater surgical insult. We looked at all neck of femur fractures over a period of Jan 2007 to June 2010. The number of the peri-prosthetic fractures for uncemented hip hemiarthroplasties was established and a case note review was carried out. There was 1397 neck of femur fractures. 546 hemiarthroplasties were carried out, of which 183 were cemented, and 363 uncemented. 14 patients (4% of uncemented hemiarthoplasties) had peri-prosthetic fractures. The case notes of these patients were analysed. We found there was a common link of significant cardiovascular risk, lack of falls assessment (only 14% of patients had a completed falls assessment and 35% sustained their fracture during an admission to hospital) and confusion (43% had a degree of dementia that caused significant confusion). Cemented implants should be considered in those who have failed falls assessment, or are confused; even if the cardiovascular risk is significant. This decision should be made in conjunction with a senior anaesthetist. This is being implemented in our unit and a prospective audit is being carried out over the same time period (July 2010 to Dec 2013) to assess the benefit

Displaced fractures of the radial neck in children can lead to limitation of elbow and forearm movements if left untreated. Several management techniques are available for the treatment of radial neck fractures in children. Open reduction can disturb the blood supply of the soft tissue surrounding the radial head epiphysis and is associated with more complications. We report our experience of treating 14 children between the age of 4 and 13 years, who had severely displaced radial neck fractures (Judet type 111 and 1V). 12 patients were treated with indirect reduction and fixation using the Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nail (ESIN) technique, (3 with assisted percutaneous K-wire reduction) and 2 had open reduction followed by ESIN fixation of the radial head fragment. This method reduces the need for open reduction and thus the complication rate. Three patients had associated fractures of the same forearm which was also treated surgically at the same time. We routinely immobilised the forearm for two weeks and removed the nail in all cases in an average of 12 weeks. We had no complication with implant removal. All 14 patients have been followed up for average of 28 months. One patient (7%) developed asymptomatic avascular necrosis (AVN) of the head of radius. Thirteen patients (93%) had excellent result on final review. One patient had neuropraxia of the posterior interosseous nerve which recovered within 6 weeks. In conclusion we advocate ESIN for the closed reduction and fixation of severely displaced radial neck fractures in children. It remains a useful fixation method even if open reduction is required and allows early mobilisation

Background. This is an epidemiological study of patients with middle third clavicle fractures presenting to a tertiary hospital. The data is used to formulate a classification system for middle third clavicle fractures based on fracture configuration and displacement. Description of methods. Patients presenting primarily to a referral hospital with middle third clavicle fractures were identified using the PACS radiology system. The radiographs were reviewed to determine the fracture type, displacement, shortening and amount of comminution. The clinical notes of each patient were reviewed to determine the mechanism of injury, soft tissue status, neurovascular status and treatment rendered. A novel classification system was developed to describe the different fracture configurations seen in the group. The interobserver and intraobserver correlation of the classification system as well as the ability of the classification system to predict treatment were tested. Summary of results. Three hundred and three patients were included in the review, 223 males and 80 females. Middle third clavicle fractures were displaced in 69% of cases. Displaced fractures tend to have a significant amount of displacement and shortening in most cases with averages of 19.64mm (Std Dev. 6.901) and 19.15mm (Std Dev. 9.616) respectively. Acceptable interobserver and intraobserver correlation levels were shown for the proposed classification system. Conclusion. The epidemiology of middle third clavicle fractures found in the population studied differs substantially from first world populations. It underlines the high level of road traffic accidents and interpersonal violence seen in South Africa. Surgeons treating clavicle fractures are still divided on the indications for surgery with little correlation found between the fracture type and displacement on radiographs and the type of treatment rendered. The classification system provides guidelines to treating surgeons to the correct treatment modality. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

Background. Scaphoid fractures with displacement have a higher incidence of nonunion and unite in a humpback position that can cause pain and reduced movement, strength and function. The aim of this study is to review the evidence available and establish the risk of nonunion associated with management of displaced scaphoid fractures in a plaster cast. Methods. Electronic databases were searched using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) controlled vocabulary (scaphoid fractures, AND'd with explode displaced, or explode nonunion, or explode non-healing or explode cast immobilisation, or explode plaster, or explode surgery). As no randomised or controlled studies were identified, the search was limited to observational studies based on consecutive cases with displaced scaphoid fractures treated in a plaster cast. The criterion for displacement was limited to gap or step of more than 1mm. The ‘random effects’ calculation was used to allow for the possibility that the results from the separate studies differ more than would be expected by chance. Results. Of the 27 articles identified, seven studies were eligible for the meta-analysis with a total of 1401 scaphoids. 93% (1311 scaphoids) of these scaphoid fractures healed in a plaster cast. 207 (15%) of all scaphoid fractures showed displacement of at least 1mm (Gap/step) between fracture fragments. Nonunion was identified in 18% (37/207) of displaced scaphoid fractures treated in a plaster cast. The pooled odds ratio of fracture nonunion between the displaced and undisplaced groups was five times higher with fracture displacement (pooled odds ratio: 5.5, 95%CI: 2.5–12.3; p=0.00, I. 2. =54.6%). The pooled relative risk of fracture nonunion was 4.4 (95%CI: 2.3–8.7; p=0.00 I. 2. =54.3%). Conclusions. Displaced fractures of scaphoid have a four times higher risk of nonunion when treated in a plaster cast and the patients should be advised of this potential risk

Introduction. When using press-fit stems in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), diaphyseal engagement optimizes stability. Attempts to maximize press fit may lead to periprosthetic fracture; however, the literature offers no guidance regarding the prevalence or management of this complication. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of these fractures. Methods. 634 Stemmed implants (307 femoral and 327 tibial) from 413 consecutive revision TKAs were reviewed. Immediate and 6 week post-operative radiographs were examined. Patient age, gender, stem length, diameter, and offset were evaluated as potential risk factors for fracture occurrence using a paired t-test for continuous and a chi-square analysis for categorical variables. Results. 15 Periprosthetic fractures (2.4%) were identified including two femoral (0.65%) and 13 tibial (4.0%). 10 Fractures were non-displaced, 3 had cortical displacement <2mm, and 2 were displaced >2mm. 1 Femur fracture was recognized and fixed intra-operatively with cables. 11 patients with non or minimally displaced fractures were allowed to bear weight as tolerated and 2 were protected for 2 weeks. 1 Displaced fracture was braced for 3 months, while the other was casted for concomitant extensor allograft reconstruction. All fractures showed radiographic evidence of healing and all patients were able to painlessly bear weight within 6 months. There was no evidence of implant migration at a mean of 15 months (range 3-47 months). 1 Patient developed recurrent infection at 10 months; no other complications were identified. With the sample size available for study, no significant differences in age (p=0.09), implant parameters (p=0.06-0.85) or gender (p=0.37) were detected between the fracture and non-fracture groups. Conclusions. Periprosthetic fractures occurred in approximately 2.4% of press-fit stems in revision TKA, more commonly in the tibia than femur. All fractures were managed non-operatively without complication or loss of prosthetic fixation

Salvage Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) presents a viable solution following failed treatment of a hip fracture. Several studies have suggested higher complication rate including high dislocation rate associated with salvage THA. The present study evaluates the results and complications of hip arthroplasty performed as a salvage procedure after the failed treatment of a hip fracture and comparison made to Primary THA in osteoarthritis (OA). Between 1992 and 2007, 53 patients with a mean age of seventy years were treated with THA after the failed treatment of a hip fracture under the care of a single surgeon. The indication for conversion arthroplasty was Avascular necrosis head – 24(45.3%), screw cut out – 6 (11.3%), non-union – 2(3.8%), Displaced fracture – 2(3.8%), Secondary OA – 19 (35.8%). The implants retrieved were Cannulated screws – 3, Sliding plate and screw – 46, Spline plate – 2, Smith Petersons nail – 1, Martin Plate – 1. This group of patients were matched for age, sex, side, and ASA grading with a group of 59 patients who underwent THA for primary osteoarthritis (THA-OA group). Posterior approach was used in all cases. Four patients (7.5%) required grafting of cup and 21 patients (39.6%) required soft tissue release. The average blood loss was 555 ml, mean duration of surgery was 85.5 min, average inpatient stay was 6.7 days. Cemented THA was used in 43 patients and Cementless THA in 10 patients. At one year follow up there were no dislocations, one patient had an undisplaced femoral fracture treated in Spica. Three patients had broken screws; one patient with shortening > 1 inch. There was one revision for deep infection. The mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 28.4 to 82.5 at one year, while the Oxford Hip score (OHS) improved from 50.9 to 21.9 (Old system). When the scores were compared to the THA-OA group there was no difference in the oxford hip scores and the the mean one year HHS in the THA-OA group was slightly higher than the group with salvage THA, but the difference was not statistically significant. Hip arthroplasty is an effective salvage procedure in patients with prior surgery for hip fracture. Most patients have good pain relief and functional improvement. Despite the operative challenges, remarkably few serious orthopaedic complications were associated with this procedure in the present study

Peri-prosthetic fractures around implants in the proximal humerus can present substantial challenges. Most individuals who undergo upper limb arthroplasty tend to be osteopenic to begin with, and the anatomy of the proximal humerus does not provide an excess of bone to work with. Therefore, peri-prosthetic fractures pose difficulties to rotator cuff function and implant stability. There are multiple classification systems, but series are small and the classification does not always lead to treatment algorithms. Risk factors for humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty include endosteal notching, cortical perforation, varus malalignment, stem perforation, ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties, and loose stems. Many of these risk factors are directly related to technical errors at the time of surgery. Poor exposure can lead to aberrant starting point and errors in reaming. Oversized prostheses can lead to cortical perforation or even stem perforation. Proper positioning of the patient on the table and surgical releases help avoid these technical errors. Peri-prosthetic fractures should be carefully evaluated radiographically for stability. Two important considerations: 1. Is the implant stable? 2. Is the fracture stable? Generally, if the implant is unstable, the implant must be revised. In the setting of a stable implant, many humeral fractures can be treated nonoperatively. Many fractures at or below the level of the tip of the implant can be treated as typical humeral fractures. Options for fixation include plates with cables or long stem prostheses which bypass the fracture. Displaced tuberosity fractures are treated with suture or wire fixation. Risk factors for a poor outcome include increased time to union, skin breakdown, and stiff shoulder

Michael Robinson has been a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom for 10 years. His special interests include the treatment of proximal humeral and clavicle fractures, and shoulder instability. The traditional view that the vast majority clavicle fractures heal with non- operative treatment with consistently good functional outcomes is no longer valid. Recent studies have identified a higher rate of nonunion and specific defects of shoulder function in sub-groups of patients with these injuries. These fractures should therefore be viewed as a spectrum of injuries with diverse functional outcomes, each requiring careful assessment and individualised treatment. This talk provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding their epidemiology, classification, clinical assessment and treatment in adults. The following key points will be highlighted:. Undisplaced fractures of both the diaphysis and the lateral end of the clavicle have a high rate of union and good functional outcomes after non-operative treatment. Non-operative treatment of displaced shaft fractures may be associated with a higher rate of non-union and functional deficit than previously reported. However, it remains difficult to predict which patients will develop these complications. Since satisfactory functional outcome may be regained from operative treatment for clavicular nonunion or malunion, there is currently considerable debate about the benefits of primary operative treatment for these injuries. Displaced lateral-end fractures have a higher risk of nonunion after non-operative treatment than shaft fractures. However, nonunion is difficult to predict and may be asymptomatic in the elderly. The results of operative treatment are more unpredictable than for shaft fractures. None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study

Aims

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, incidence of hip fracture has not changed. Evidence has shown increased mortality rates associated with COVID-19 infection. However, little is known about the outcomes of COVID-19 negative patients in a pandemic environment. In addition, the impact of vitamin D levels on mortality in COVID-19 hip fracture patients has yet to be determined.