Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most common cause of disability worldwide, and lumbar spine fusion (LSF) is often chosen to treat pain caused by advanced degenerative disease when clinical treatment failed certain cases, the post-surgical outcomes are not what was expected. Several studies highlight how important are. In psychological variables during the postoperative spine surgery period. The aim of this study is to assess the role of preoperative
Mental disorders in particular
We sought to determine the relationship between patient preoperative psychological factors and postoperative THA outcomes. We performed an electronic search up to December 2021 using the following terms: “(mental OR psychological OR psychiatric) AND (function OR trait OR state OR predictor OR health) AND (outcome OR success OR recovery OR response) AND total joint arthroplasty)”. Peer-reviewed, English language studies regarding THA outcomes were analyzed for preoperative patient mental health metrics and objective postoperative results regarding pain, functionality and surgical complications. We extracted study data, assessed the risk of bias of included studies, grouped them by outcome measure and performed a GRADE assessment. Seventeen of 702 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Overall, compared to cohorts with a normal psychological status, patients with higher objective measures of preoperative
The primary purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine the impact of physical and mental well-being on a successful return to work after cartilage or ligament knee injury. A secondary purpose was to examine the effectiveness of our program regarding ordering imaging (plain X-rays, US, MRI, CT scan), and the impact that costly investigations made in clinical management. Workers who had sustained a work-related knee injury and were assessed at the lower extremity specialty clinic of our hospital program were followed up until they were discharged. All patients completed the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and the Hospital Anxiety and
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) diagnosis is based on symptoms, assessed through questionnaires such as the WOMAC. However, the inconsistency of pain recording and the discrepancy between joint phenotype and symptoms highlight the need for objective biomarkers in KOA diagnosis. To this end, we study relationships among clinical and molecular data in a cohort of women (n=51) with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2–3 KOA through Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a regulation network model (RNM). Clinical descriptors (i.e., pain catastrophism (CA);
With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, remote working has been ubiquitously implemented to reduce disease transmission via minimization of in-person interactions. Low back pain (LBP) is the first cause of disability worldwide and is frequently reported by workers with sedentary occupations. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the role of remote working in a population of adults affected by LBP through an online questionnaire. We enrolled 136 teleworkers affected by LBP. A total of 101 responses were received and 93 suitable questionnaires were included in the final analysis. Demographic data, remote working features and tasks, and LBP burden were analysed. The psychological burden of remote working was evaluated with the World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). LBP severity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). LBP-related disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The effect of LBP on working capacity was examined with the Occupational Role Questionnaire (ORQ). Independent risk factors related to LBP worsening were identified using a multivariate logistic regression model. LBP severity was significantly higher compared to previous in-person working (p<0.0001) as well as average weekly work hours (p<0.001). Furthermore, the risk of LBP deterioration was associated with being divorced (OR: 4.28, 95% CI: 1.27-14.47; p=0.019) or living with others (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.81; p=0.021), higher ill-being (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; p=0.035) and
Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparing differences in clinical outcomes between either autologous or synthetic bone grafts in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures: a traumatic pattern of injury, associated with poor long-term functional prognosis. A structured search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Bone & Joint and CENTRAL databases from inception until 07/28/2021 was performed. Randomised, controlled, clinical trials that compared autologous and synthetic bone grafts in tibial plateau fractures were included. Preclinical studies, clinical studies in paediatric patients, pathological fractures, fracture non-union or chondral defects were excluded. Outcome data was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) framework and synthesised in random-effect meta-analysis. Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidance was followed throughout. Six comparable studies involving 352 patients were identified from 3,078 records. Following ROB2 assessment, five studies (337 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. Within these studies, more complex tibia plateau fracture patterns (Schatzker IV-VI) were predominant. Primary outcomes showed non-significant reductions in articular
Objectives. This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. Methods. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety
Summary Statement. Applying appropriate upper limb regional-specific and joint-specific tools along with suitable psychologic tools provides an effective assessment of supportive, interventional, and treatment strategies in TE. Background. Tennis elbow (TE) is a painful pathologic condition with its origin in the common wrist extensor muscles at the lateral epicondyle. As the second most frequently diagnosed musculoskeletal disorder in the neck and upper limb in a primary care setting, with an annual incidence of 4 to 7 cases per 1000 patients in general practice (with a peak at 35 to 54 yrs of age), TE has considerable socioeconomic costs. As pain relief and improvement in functional performance are the 2 common aims of all treatment strategies, the importance of using appropriate tools for the assessment of pain and functional disability in TE is evident. In view of the high prevalence of TE, uncertainties about its treatment, and its substantial socioeconomic consequences, using more specific, patient-centred assessment tools is essential for providing more useful information on the level of pain and functional disability in TE. The Study aimed to: 1) compare pain and functional disability in tennis elbow (TE) patients with healthy controls; and 2) evaluate the relationship between the 2 major psychologic factors (anxiety and depression) and TE. Methods. Sixteen consecutive TE patients were recruited at an upper limb clinic: inclusion criteria were lateral epicondyle tenderness, pain with resisted wrist and middle finger extension and at least 3 months localised lateral elbow pain. Sixteen healthy controls with no upper limb problem were recruited from students and staff. Participants were given 4 questionnaires, together with instructions for completion: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and
The diagnosis and treatment of hip disease in young adults has rapidly evolved over the past ten years. Despite the advancements of improved diagnostic skills and refinement of surgical techniques, the psychosocial impact hip disease has on the young adult has not yet been elucidated. This observational study aimed to characterise the functional and psychosocial characteristics of a group of patients from our young hip clinic. 49 patients responded to a postal questionnaire which included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Hospital Anxiety and
Introduction. The STarT Back trial demonstrated that targeting back pain treatment according to patient prognosis (low, medium or high-risk subgroups) is effective. However, the mechanisms leading to these improved treatment outcomes remain unknown. This study aimed to identify which psychological variables included in the study were mediating treatment outcome for all patients and within the low, medium and high-risk subgroups. Methods. Secondary analysis was conducted on 466 patients randomised to the active treatment arm with 4-month follow-up available. Psychological variables included
ONFH with large or lateral-located lesion is challenging due to difficulty of regeneration. We introduce novel tissue engineering technique using ex vivo expanded bone marrow stromal cell seeded on calcium metaphosphate (CMP) scaffold to regenerate dead bone for these challenging cases. Ten millilitres of bone marrow was aspirated from iliac crest and mononuclear cells were collected. These cells were expanded and differentiated to osteoblast-lineage cells using osteogenic media and autologous serum for 2–4 weeks ex vivo. Porous bead-form scaffolds were made of CMP and cells were seeded in a density of million/ml³ into 20 to 30 beads for 1 hour. The necrotic area was curetted and the beads were implanted through core tract in 9 hips (Steinberg IIc in 5 hips and IVc in 4 hips which involved greater than 30% of whole head; JIC classification C1 in 4 hips, and C2 in 5 hips which involved weight bearing area). The tract was blocked with a CMP rod. The age of patients ranged from 16 to 37. Associated factors were; steroid in 4, idiopathic in 3, alcoholic in 1 and traumatic in 1 hip, respectively. Kerboul combined necrotic angle was more than 200° in all hips. We compared preoperative and annual radiographs and MRI images to check dome
Background. A wide array of measures has been developed to assess the role of psychological factors in the development and persistence of pain. Yet there is likely to be considerable conceptual overlap between such measures, and consequently a lack of clarity about the importance of psychological factors. Purpose. To investigate whether conceptual overlap exists within psychological measures used in back pain research. Methods. An observational cohort study of 1591 back pain primary care consulters provided data on anxiety,
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is regarded as an uncommon clinical complication to orthopaedic surgery. Few have looked into its prevalence in foot and ankle surgery. This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery, operated on by the foot and ankle team in our department in 2009. The objectives of this study was to determine the prevalence CRPS in these patients post-operatively and to examine the associated factors. 17 patients from 390 (4.4%) were identified as meeting the IASP (International Association for the Study of Pain) criteria for the diagnosis of CRPS. Of these, the majority were female (n = 14, 82.4%) and the average age was 47.2 (SD 9.7). All were elective patients. The majority involved operating on the forefoot (n = 9, 52.9%), followed by the hindfoot and ankle (3 cases each, 17.6%). Most of these patients had new onset CRPS (n = 12, 70.6%), with no previous history of the condition. 3 patients (17.6%) had documented nerve damage and therefore suffered from CRPS Type 2. Blood results were available for 14 (82.4%) patients at a minimum of 3 months post-operatively, and none had elevated inflammatory markers. 5 of the patients (29.4%) were smokers and 8 (47.1%) had a pre-existing diagnosis of anxiety or
Background. Nerve Root compression can lead to severe back pain. Different risk factors like high BMI, smoking, alcohol and psychological history have been identified. The aim of our study was to identify if the incidence of these risk factors was higher in patients with nerve root compression. Patients and methods. We collected data prospectively for 26 consecutive patients admitted between January and March 2011 with severe back pain and had an MRI scan. Demographic details were recorded along with occupation, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake and psychological history. 12 patients had nerve root compression (Group A) on MRI scan and 14 had normal MRI scan (Group B). Results. The mean age for Group A was 46 years (range-35–67). 6 (50%) were female and 6 male. 2 patients had degenerative disc disease (DDD), 2 had simple falls, and one had tumour. 5 (42%) were employed, 2 (17%) unemployed and 2 (17%) housewives. The mean BMI was 26 (range-14–34). 4 patients (33%) were smokers and 5 were (42%) alcohol users. 2 patients (17%) had associated psychological history of
Background. Total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective operation for many patients, however approximately 20% of patients experience chronic pain and functional limitations in the months and years following their TKR. If modifiable pre-operative risk factors could be identified, this would allow patients to be targeted with individualised care to optimise these factors prior to surgery and potentially improve outcomes. Psychosocial factors have also been found to be important in predicting outcomes in the first 12 months after TKR, however their impact on long-term outcomes is unknown. This study aimed to identify pre-operative psychosocial predictors of patient-reported and clinician-assessed outcomes at one year and five years after primary TKR. Patients and methods. 266 patients listed for a Triathlon TKR because of osteoarthritis were recruited from pre-operative assessment clinics at one orthopaedic centre. Knee pain and function were assessed pre-operatively and at one and five years post-operative using the WOMAC Pain score, WOMAC Function score and American Knee Society Score (AKSS) Knee score. Pre-operative
Introduction. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip replacement. A recent systematic review of patient risk factors for PJI identified male gender, smoking status, increasing BMI, steroid use, previous joint surgery and comorbidities of diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and
Background. People with back pain often experience long-term pain with recurrences and fluctuations. However, few studies have considered which factors predict long-term outcomes. Purpose. To determine the prognostic factors, measured around the time of a primary care back pain consultation, that predict clinically significant pain in both the short (6 months) and long-term (5 years). Methods. Back pain consulters at 8 GP practices received a questionnaire shortly after consultation. Information was collected on potential prognostic factors: demographics (age, gender, educational, social class), physical (pain, disability, pain duration, distal leg pain), psychological (illness perceptions, coping, fear avoidance, pain self-efficacy,
Summary. Cognitive testing scores do not correlate with physical braking performance. Psychological questioning shows patients are more dependent on driving than a control group. Introduction. Returning to driving after surgery is a multifaceted issue. There are the medical aspects to consider- whether the patient is medically fit to drive. The term ‘medically fit to drive’ can encompass a range of issues which fall to doctors to solve, including the psychological and mental wellbeing. Groups whose governance involves patients or driving do not issue sound advice for patients or doctors to follow. Investigation of aspects affecting a driver's ability to control their vehicle in a safe manner could go towards providing an evidence base for guidance to be issued in the future. Methods. A custom force assessment rig was used to gather peak force and reaction time measurements from a group of patients waiting for, or having undergone lower limb surgery. A bespoke questionnaire that investigated patient's attitudes towards returning to driving; their behaviours and concerns was issued. Other mobility questions were also issued to these patients, including the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS). The final tests (Stroop task, tower of Hanoi, and the opposite worlds test [OWT]) were aimed at assessing a patient's neurological function, in an attempt to investigate the effect of post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) on driving ability. These data were compared against a control cohort. Results. No significant differences were observed in the physical results between cohorts. However, significant differences between the control cohort and patient cohort were observed in a number of tests. The tower of Hanoi was the only significantly different neurological test (p=0.027). The Stroop task and OWT were not significantly different (p=0.103, p=0.131 respectively). There were significant differences in many of the psychological and mobility questions posed (reliance on driving [p<0.001], keenness to return [p=0.014], anxiety about being unable to drive [p=0.019],
Summary Statement. Service industry metrics (the net promoter score) are being introduced as a measure of UK healthcare satisfaction. Lower limb arthroplasty, as a ‘service’, scores comparably with the most successful commercial organisations. Background. Satisfaction with care is important to both the patient and the payer. The Net Promoter Score, widely used in the service industry, has been recently introduced to the UK National Health Service as an overarching metric of patient satisfaction and to monitor performance. This questionnaire asks ‘customers’ if they would recommend a service or products to others. Scores range from −100 (everyone is a detractor) to +100 (everyone is a promoter). In industry, a positive score is well regarded, with those over 50 regarded as excellent. Our aims were to assess net promoter scores for joint arthroplasty, to compare these scores with direct measures of patient satisfaction, and to evaluate which factors contributed to net promoter response. Methods. 6912 individuals undergoing primary lower limb joint replacement over a five year period (Jan 2007 – Dec 2011) took part in a prospective cohort study at a single NHS University hospital. Net promoter score, clinical outcomes as measured by PROMS (Oxford Hip or Knee Score and SF-12 score), multi-faceted patient satisfaction questionnaire, demographic data and length of hospital stay were recorded. Data was collected preoperatively and at 1 year post-surgery. Multivariate regression was performed to determine which factors could predict an outcome of ‘promoter’ and ‘detractor’ at 1 year post-surgery. Significance was accepted at p = 0.1 to accommodate the confounding effect of other variables. Results. Net promoter scores for knee and hip replacements were 49 and 71 respectively. Strong correlation was seen between overall satisfaction and whether the patient would recommend the operation to another (r = 0.637), though regression of these factors was modest (R. 2. = 0.406). Only 4 factors were relevant to the net promoter response: pain relief (OR 2.13, CI 1.83 – 2.49), meeting expectations (OR 2.57, CI 2.24 – 2.97), hospital experience (OR 2.33, CI 2.03 – 2.68) and arthroplasty type (OR 2.31, CI 1.68 – 3.17). These factors drove a model able to explain 95% of the variation in net promoter score. Conclusions. This is the first analysis of net promoter score for joint arthroplasty, and demonstrates values that compare favourably with the services provided by the most successful commercial organizations. The UK Department of Health describes this score as a measure of patient satisfaction. This is perhaps not completely accurate, as only a third of the variation in one response can be explained by the other, suggesting that although clearly related, these concepts are not the same. Pain relief, meeting of expectations of surgery, the hospital experience and whether the hip or knee joint is replaced are the only relevant factors in determining the net promoter response. Factors thought to influence clinical outcome such as
