Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite improvements in trauma-related morbidity and mortality in high-income countries over recent years, outcomes following MSK injuries in low and middle-income countries, such as South Africa (SA), have not. Despite governmental recognition that this is required, funding and research into this significant health burden are limited within SA. This study aims to identify research priorities within MSK trauma care using a consensus-based approach amongst MSK health care practitioners within SA. Members from the Orthopaedic Research Collaborative (ORCA), based in SA, collaborated using a two round modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on research priorities within orthopaedic trauma care. Members involved in the process were orthopaedic healthcare practitioners within SA. Participants from the ORCA network, working within SA, scored research priorities across two Delphi rounds from low to high priority. We have published the overall top 10 research priorities for this Delphi process. Questions were focused on two broad groups - clinical effectiveness in trauma care and general trauma public health care. Both groups were represented by the top two priorities, with the highest ranked question regarding the overall impact of trauma in SA and the second regarding the clinical treatment of open fractures. This study has defined research priorities within orthopaedic trauma in South Africa. Our vision is that by establishing consensus on these research priorities, policy and research funding will be directed into these areas. This should ultimately improve musculoskeletal trauma care across South Africa and its significant health and socioeconomic impacts

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI. The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI. Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI. The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients

Introduction. Because of the low cost and easy access, surgical video has become a popular method of acquiring surgical skills outside operating rooms without disrupting normal surgical flow. However, currently existing video systems all use a single point of view (POV). Some complex orthopedic procedures, such as joint replacement, require a level of accuracy in several dimensions. So single and fixed POV video may not be enough to provide all the necessary information for educational and training purposes. The aim of our project was to develop a novel multiple POV video system and evaluate its efficacy as an aid for learning joint replacement procedure compared with traditional method. Materials and Methods. Based on the videos of a hip resurfacing procedure performed by an expert orthopedic surgeon captured by 8 cameras fixed all around the operating table, we developed a novel multiple POV video system which enables users to autonomously switch between optimal viewpoints (Figure 1). 30 student doctors (undergraduate years 3–5 and naive to hip resurfacing procedure) were recruited and randomly allocated to 2 groups: experiment group and control group, and were assigned to learn the procedure using multiple or single POV video systems respectively. Before learning they were first asked to complete a multiple choicetest designed using a modified Delphi technique with the advice and feedback sought from 4 experienced orthopedic surgeons to test the participants' baseline knowledge of hip resurfacing procedure. After video learning, they were asked to answer the test again to verify their gained information and comprehension of the procedure, followed by a 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire to demonstrate their self-perception of confidence and satisfaction with the learning experience. The scores in the 2 tests and in the Likert-scale questionnaire were compared between 2 groups using Independent-Samples t-test (for normally distributed data) or Mann-Whitney U test (for non-normally distributed data). Statistical significance was set as p<0.05. Results. There was no significant difference regarding the ages of the participants between the experiment group (22.27 ± 1.79 years) and the control group (23.00 ± 1.56 years) (p value=0.242). The 10 questions in the test were divided into 3 subcategories: 4 questions regarding spatial awareness, 4 regarding operation details and 2 regarding sequence comprehension. There was no significant difference between both cohorts in the baseline test scores (for overall scores or scores in any subcategory) before video-learning, thus ensuring homogeneity. Yet, there was a 31.6–75.4% significantly (p<0.033) higher test score after video learning in the experiment group compared with the control group (for overall, spatial awareness and operation details scores) (Figure 2). The mean Likert-scale questionnaire score in the experiment group was also 32% significantly greater than the control group (Figure 3). Conclusion. Trainees could gain better knowledge and comprehension of hip resurfacing procedure and show higher confidence and satisfaction after learning using the novel multiple POV video system compared with traditional single POV video. The novel system could serve as an effective tool for teaching hip resurfacing procedure before trainees proceed to the real operating room. For figures, please contact authors directly