(Case) 79-year-old woman. Past history, in 1989, right femur valgus osteotomy. in 1991, THA at left side. Follow-up thereafter. Hyaluronic acid injection for both knee osteoarthritis. (Clinical course)Her right hip pain getting worse and crawling indoors from the beginning of July 2013. We did right hybrid THA at August 2013(posterior approach, TridentHA cup, Exeter stem, Biolox Forte femoral head 28mm). But immediately, she dislocated twice than the third day after surgery because she became a delirium. It has been left by nurse for about 6 hours because of the midnight after the second dislocation. Next morning, check the dislocation limb position, closed reduction wasdone under intravenous anesthesia. As a result of waking up from the anesthesia, and complained of paralysis and violent pain in the right leg backward. A right lower extremity nerve findings, there is pain in the lower leg after surface about the calf, there was no apparent perception analgesia. Toe movement is weak, but the G-toe planter anddorsiflexion possible about M2, and neurological symptoms to relieved by flexion(above 70 degrees) of the right hip joint. Therefore, we thought that she suffered anterior dislocation of the sciatic nerve by the stem neck (retraction), judged to closed reduction was impossible, open reduction surgery was performed after waitingat hip flex position. But paralysis is gradually worsened during waiting surgery, toes movement had become impossible to operating room admission. Sciatic nerve is caught in front of the stem neck as expected, operative findings were able to finally reduction after removing the femoral head after dislocation. Anteversion of the cup was changed to 25 degrees from 15 degrees, and changed to 32mm diameter metal head and polyethylene liner. And we needed Intensive Care Unit(ICU) management after surgery for prevent recurrence of dislocation. Fitted with a hip brace for her, has not been re-dislocation. The sciatic nerve palsy improved in three months after the operation, the patient became able to walk without a cane. (Summary) We experienced a rare case suffered anterior dislocation of the sciatic nerve by the stem neck, and she had a good result after open reduction surgery

Abstract. Background. Elderly patients with degenerative lumbar disease are increasingly undergoing posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation. There is a paucity of studies examining clinical outcomes, morbidity & mortality associated with this procedure in this population. Methods. A retrospective analysis of aged 80–100 years who underwent posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stabilisation at University Hospitals of Derby &Burton between 2016–2020. Results. Total 167 eligible patients, 163 octogenarians & 4 nonagenarians. Mean age was 82.78 ± 3.07 years. Mean length of hospital stay 4.79 ± 10.92 days. 76% were pain free at 3months following decompression. The average Charleston co-morbidity index (CCI) was 4.87. No association found with CCI in predicting mortality (ODD ratio 0.916, CI95%). 17patients suffered complications; dural tear (0.017%), post-op paralysis (0.017%), SSI(0.01%), and 0.001% of hospital acquired pneumonia, delirium, TIA, urinary retention, ileus, anaemia. High BMI (35+) was associated with increased incidence of complication (CI 95%, p<0.002). There was significant social drift following discharge as 147 patients went home and 4 patients to rehabilitation facility (p<0.001FE test). The mean operative time was 91.408±41.17 mins and mean anaesthetic time was 36.8±16.06 mins. Prolonged operative time was not associated with increased mortality.2year revision decompression rate was 0.011%. Conclusion. Posterior lumbar decompression without instrumented stablisation in elderly is safe & associated with low mortality with 99.5%survival at 1 year. It significantly improves PROMs & has extremely low revision rate. Incidence of post-op complication is <0.05% and 54% of patients get discharged within 72hours of surgery. Careful selection & optimising patients with high BMI would reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality

Background. As life expectancy increases, the number of octogenarians requiring primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Recently, primary TKA has become a common treatment option in octogenarians. However, surgeons are still hesitant about performing revision TKA on octogenarians because of concerning about risk- and cost-benefit. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative complications and mid-term survival in octogenarians following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 231 primary TKAs and 41 revision TKAs performed on octogenarians between 2000 and 2016. The mean age was 81.9 for primary TKA and 82.3 for revision TKA (p=0.310). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was not different, but the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was higher in revision TKA (4.4 vs. 4.8, p=0.003). The mean follow-up period did not differ (3.8 vs. 3.5 years, p=0.451). The WOMAC scores and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative complication and survival rate (end point; death determined by telephone or mail communication with patient or family) were investigated. Results. The postoperative WOMAC and ROM were better in primary TKA (33.1 vs. 47.2, p<0.001; 128.9° vs. 113.6°, p<0.001). The most common postoperative complication was delirium in both groups (7.4% vs. 14.6%, p=0.131). There were no differences in the specific complication rates between the two groups. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 87.2% and 62.9%, respectively, in primary TKA and 82.1% and 42.2%, respectively, in revision TKA (p=0.017). Conclusions. Both primary and revision TKAs are viable options for octogenarians when considering the clinical results and mid-term survival. Delirium needs to be managed appropriately as the most common complication in both primary and revision TKAs for octogenarians

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgical intervention, which alleviates pain and improves function and health-related quality of life in patients with end-stage arthritis of the knee joint. With improvements in anesthesia, general health care, and surgical techniques, this procedure has become widely accepted for use in very elderly patients. However, many elderly patients tend to have compromised function and low reserve capabilities of organs and are therefore likely to develop various complications during the perioperative period. Thus, elderly patients often hesitate to undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA (SBTKA). Our purpose was to report the short-term results and clinical complications of octogenarians undergoing SBTKA. Materials and Methods. Between 2015 and 2016 all patients greater than 80years of age who underwent SBTKA by a single surgeon were retrospectively evaluated demographics, comorbidity, complications, and 30days mortality following SBTKA. Arthroplasty was performed sequentially under general anesthesia by one team led by primary surgeon. After the first knee, the patient's cardiopulmonary status was assessed by anesthesiology to determine whether or not to begin the second side. Cardiopulmonary decompensation, such as significant shifts in heart rate, oxygen saturation or blood pressure, was not showed. Then the second procedure was undertaken. Inclusion criteria of this study was underlying diseases were osteoarthritis. Exclusion criteria were (1) previous knee surgery; (2) underlying diseases were osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, fracture, and others. Fifty-seven patients with an average age of 82.7years were identified. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of patients greater than 80years of age of 89 patients unilateral TKA (UTKA) that had been performed by the same surgeon. Results. The study groups did not differ significantly with regard to age, gender, or body mass index. The mean age was 82.7years with a mean body mass index of 25.8 for the SBTKA group, compared with 84.0years with a mean body mass index of 24.9 for the UBTKA group. The length of hospital stay was longer in SBTKA groups. There was no serious complication. No deaths, no pulmonary embolisms and no nerve paralysis occurred within 30days in both groups. There was one wound problem in SBTKA group, compared 10 wound problem in UBTKA group; this difference was significant. Three deliriums occurred in SBTKA group, compared 13 deliriums in UBTKA group; this difference was significant. Minor complications included urinary tract infection, decubitus ulcer, transfusion reaction and ileus were noted seven in SBTKA group, compared in 11 UBTKA group; this difference was not significant. Conclusions. Complications and mortality are not higher for SBTKA compared to UTKA, SBTKA can be a safe and effective option for octogenarians

We performed a randomized feasibility trial to examine the impact of preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) on elderly patients with hip fractures, including those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. We evaluated the impact of preoperative FNB on the following outcomes within 5 days of surgical fixation: 1. Pain levels, 2. Total narcotic consumption, 3. Postoperative mobilization. Randomized allocation of 73 patients in a 2:1 intervention:control ratio. To allow comparison between the 2 groups as well as sub- analysis of the intervention group to examine treatment fidelity (i.e. the ability to deliver the intervention as planned). Inclusion criteria: Patient age≥ 65 years admitted with a low energy hip fracture, ambulatory preinjury, Mini Mental State Exam MMSE score≥13 (moderate dementia), Able to provide direct or proxy consent. Exclusion criteria: Admission ≥ 30 hours after injury, prior regular use of opiates. Potential participants were identified and either participants or proxy respondents provided signed informed consent. Participants allocated to the intervention group received a FNB administered by the UAH acute pain service (APS) within 20 hours of admission to hospital in addition to the usual care. Participants in the control group received usual care. Participants were followed for 5 days postoperatively with daily assessment of pain, narcotic consumption, delirium and mobility. Main outcome measure: (1) Pain at rest and activity (2) Preoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, (3) Mobilization in POD#1. Overall, 73 participants were enrolled (23 Control: 50 FNB). The FNB group was slightly older (mean [SD] 80.1 [8.7] vs. 76.2 [9.2], p=0.09) and had more males (21 [42%] vs. 5 [22%], p=0.09) than the Control group. The mean MMSE score for both groups was >24 (p=0.35 for group comparison), suggesting minimal cognitive impairment of participants. The FNB group reported significantly less pain at rest and activity than the control group over time (p < 0 .001 for both). Opioid consumption were non-significantly higher and more variable in the control group preoperatively (Median [25, 75 quartile] 10.6 [0, 398] vs 7.5 [0, 125], p=0.26) and postoperatively (13.1 [0, 950] vs 10 [0, 260], p=0.31). 41 (85%) of FNB participants mobilized on day 1 vs. 16 (73%) of control participants (p=0.21). Preoperative FNB significantly reduced pain. Opioid consumption was not significantly different, but more variable in the control group. Although not significant, more FNB patients successfully mobilized on day 1 postoperatively. Participants with cognitive impairment were not enrolled due to difficulty in obtaining proxy consent. A definitive randomized trial would be feasible and add valuable information about pain management following hip fracture

To progress to a same day surgery program for arthroplasty, it is important that we examine and resolve the issues of why patients stay in the hospital. The number one reason is fear and anxiety of the unknown and of surgical pain. The need for hospital stay is also related to risk arising from comorbidities and medical complications. Patients also need an extended stay to manage the side effects of our treatment, including after effects of narcotics and anaesthesia, blood loss, and surgical trauma. The process begins pre-operatively with an appropriate orthopaedic assessment of the patient and determination of the need for surgery. The orthopaedic team must motivate the patient, and ensure that the expectations of the patient, family and surgeon are aligned. In conjunction with our affiliated hospitalist group that performs almost all pre-admission testing, we have established guidelines for patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. The outpatient surgical candidate must have failed conservative measures, must have appropriate insurance coverage, and must be functionally independent. Previous or ongoing comorbidities that cannot be optimised for safe outpatient care may include: congestive heart failure, or valve disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or home use of supplemental oxygen; untreated obstructive sleep apnea with a BMI >40 kg/m2; hemodialysis or severely elevated serum creatinine; anemia with hemoglobin <13.0 g/dl; cerebrovascular accident or history of delirium or dementia; and solid organ transplant. Pre-arthroplasty rehabilitation prepares the patient for peri-operative protocols. Patients meet with a physical therapist and are provided with extensive educational materials before surgery to learn the exercises they will need for functional recovery. Enhancement of our peri-operative pain management protocols has resulted in accelerated rehabilitation. The operative intervention must be smooth and efficient, but not hurried. Less invasive approaches and techniques have been shown to decrease pain, reduce length of stay, and improve outcomes, especially in the short term. Between June 2013 and December 2015, 1957 primary knee arthroplasty procedures (1010 total, 947 partial) were performed by the author and his 3 associates at an outpatient surgery center. Seven percent of patients required an overnight stay, with a majority for reasons of convenience related to travel distance or later operative time. Importantly, no one has required overnight stay for pain management. Outpatient arthroplasty is safe, it's better for us and our patients, and it is here now. In an outpatient environment the surgeon actually spends more time with the patients and family in a friendly environment. Patients feel safe and well cared for, and are highly satisfied with their arthroplasty experience

Background. Despite studies into patient consent and their understanding of the potential risks of trauma surgery, no study has looked at the patient's understanding of the procedure involved with neck of femur fracture surgery. Method. Prospective analysis of 150 patients who had operative fixation of neck of femur fractures in a district general hospital. Patients were asked on the third post-operative day to select which procedure they had undergone from a diagram of four different neck of femur surgeries (cannulated screws, cephalomedullary nail, dynamic hip screw and hemiarthroplasty). Exclusion criteria for patient selection - mini mental score of < 20 and confusion secondary to delirium. Results. All patients had signed consent form 1 which was matched to the procedure. All patients were consented by an FP2, CT1 or other SHO. The mean age of patients was 83years. 5% had cannulated screw fixation, 45% had a hemiarthroplasty, 42% had a dynamic hip screw and 8% had a cephalomedullary nail. 47% of patients could correctly identify the procedure they had undergone on the 3. rd. post-operative day. Conclusions. This study shows that there are questions about the effectiveness of informed consent and patient understanding of the procedure before and after hip fracture surgery. We suggest that further detailed studies may highlight the need for alternative ways of communicating procedures to the patients or that more specialised training is required for those explaining hip fracture surgery to patients. Improvements in these areas might help ensure the true informed consent required

To progress to a same day surgery program for arthroplasty, it is important that we examine and resolve the issues of why patients stay in the hospital. The number one reason is fear and anxiety for the unknown and for surgical pain. The need for hospital stay is also related to risk arising from comorbidities and medical complications. Patients also need an extended stay to manage the side effects of our treatment, including after-effects of narcotics and anesthesia, blood loss, and surgical trauma. The process begins pre-operatively with an appropriate orthopaedic assessment of the patient and determination of the need for surgery. The orthopaedic team must motivate the patient, and ensure that the expectations of the patient, family and surgeon are aligned. In conjunction with our affiliated hospitalist group that performs almost all pre-admission testing, we have established guidelines for patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. The outpatient surgical candidate must have failed conservative measures, must have appropriate insurance coverage, and must be functionally independent. Previous or ongoing comorbidities that contraindicate the outpatient setting include: cardiac – prior revascularization, congestive heart failure, or valve disease; pulmonary – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or home use of supplemental oxygen; untreated obstructive sleep apnea – BMI >40 kg/m2; renal disease – hemodialysis or severely elevated serum creatinine; gastrointestinal – history or post-operative ileus or chronic hepatic disease; genitourinary – history of urinary retention or severe benign prostatic hyperplasia; hematologic – chronic Coumadin use, coagulopathy, anemia with hemoglobin <13.0 g/dl, or thrombophilia; neurological – history of cerebrovascular accident or history of delirium or dementia; solid organ transplant. Pre-arthroplasty rehabilitation prepares the patient for peri-operative protocols. Patients meet with a physical therapist and are provided with extensive educational materials before surgery to learn the exercises they will need for functional recovery. Enhancement of our peri-operative pain management protocols has resulted in accelerated rehabilitation. The operative intervention must be smooth and efficient, but not hurried. Less invasive approaches and techniques have been shown to decrease pain, reduce length of stay, and improve outcomes, especially in the short term. In 2014, 385 primary partial knee arthroplasty procedures (7 patellofemoral replacement, 13 lateral, and 365 medial) were performed by the author and his 3 associates at an outpatient surgery center. Of those, 348 (95%) went home the same day while 17 (5%) required an overnight stay, with 11 for convenience related to travel distance or later operative time and 6 for medical issues. Outpatient arthroplasty is safe, it's better for us and our patients, and it is here now. In an outpatient environment the surgeon actually spends more time with the patients and family in a friendly environment. Patients feel safe and well cared for, and are highly satisfied with their arthroplasty experience

Cognitive impairment is common in patients with hip fracture both on admission and may develop later on. Reduced cognitive function is a risk factor for development of delirium, correlates with poor rehabilitation, and is an independent predictor of increased mortality. Despite its commonplace and potential for serious morbidity, cognitive dysfunction is often poorly assessed & diagnosed. Our aims were to 1) assess the practice of cognitive assessment on admission for hip fracture patients according to local guidelines and 2) ascertain whether it can be improved by the formal introduction of Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) & Clock Drawing Test (CDT) in the hip fracture admission proforma. A prospective audit was undertaken of cognitive assessment by either AMTS or CDT for 50 consecutive patients admitted with hip fracture from 4/8/2010. Subsequently, the hip fracture admission proforma was amended to include both the AMTS & CDT. A re-audit was performed on 50 consecutive patients admitted from 17/2/2011 to determine the change in practice. Patient demographics were comparable in both audit loops, with the mean age being equal (84 years) and an equal majority of female patients (76%). Cognitive assessment by either AMTS or CDT significant increased from 28% (n=14) to 86% (n=43) in the re-audit (p<0.0001). All AMTS were completed in accordance with instructions, whereas almost half of CDTs were incompletely or incorrectly filled out (45%). The assessment of cognitive function can be greatly improved by inclusion of both the AMTS & CDT to the hip fracture admission proforma, allowing the most appropriate multi-disciplinary care to be planned for the patient. Whilst both CDT and AMTS are good screening tools for cognitive impairment, many are unfamiliar with CDT & more training is needed

It is unusual, if not unique, for three major research papers concerned with the management of the fractured neck of femur (FNOF) to be published in a short period of time, each describing large prospective randomized clinical trials. These studies were conducted in up to 17 countries worldwide, involving up to 80 surgical centers and include large numbers of patients (up to 2,900) with FNOF. Each article investigated common clinical dilemmas; the first paper comparing total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for FNOF, the second as to whether ‘fast track’ care offers improved clinical outcomes and the third, compares sliding hip with multiple cancellous hip screws. Each paper has been deemed of sufficient quality and importance to warrant publication in The Lancet or the New England Journal of Medicine. Although ‘premier’ journals, they only occationally contain orthopaedic studies and thus may not be routinely read by the busy orthopaedic/surgical clinician of any grade. It is therefore our intention with this present article to accurately summarize and combine the results of all three papers, presenting, in our opinion, the most important clinically relevant facts.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:198–202.

Aims

This study aimed to identify patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) for trauma during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and quantify the risks of contracting SARS-CoV-2 virus, the proportion of patients requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), and rate of complications including mortality.

Aims

The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is directly impacting the field of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology with postponed operations, changed status of planned elective surgeries and acute emergencies in patients with unknown infection status. To this point, Germany's COVID-19 infection numbers and death rate have been lower than those of many other nations.