Deep infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine if there was a relationship between surgeon volume and the incidence of revision for infection after primary TKA.

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2020 for primary TKA for osteoarthritis that were revised for infection. Surgeon volume was defined by the number of primary TKA procedures performed by the surgeon in the year the primary TKA was performed and grouped as <25, 25-49, 50-74, 75-99, >100 primary TKA procedures per year. Kaplan Meir estimates for cumulative percent revision (CPR) and Cox Proportional Hazard Ratios were performed to compare rates of revision for infection by surgeon volume, with sub-analyses for patella and polyethylene use, age <65 years and male gender.

5295 of 602,919 primary TKA for osteoarthritis were revised for infection. High volume surgeons (>100 TKA/year) had a significantly lower rate of revision for infection with a CPR at 1 and 17 years of 0.4% (95% CI 0.3, 0.4) and 1.5% (95% CI 1.2, 2.0), respectively, compared with 0.6% (95% CI 0.5, 0.7) and 2.1% (95% CI 1.8, 2.3), respectively, for low volume surgeons (<25 TKR/year). Differences between the high-volume group and the remaining groups remained when sub-analysis for age, gender, ASA, BMI, patella resurfacing and the use of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE).

High volume surgeons have lower rates of revision for infection in primary TKA.

Deep periprosthetic infection after hip or knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute periprosthetic infection most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2015

Aim. This study aimed to identify risk factors for development of deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients following surgical treatment of neck of femur fracture. Method. This study identified a consecutive series of 2,822 (2,052 female, 73%) patients who underwent either hemiarthroplasty (n=1,825, 65%) or fixation (DHS) (n=997, 35%) for fractured neck of femur performed between January 2009 and June 2015 at our institution. Full patient demographics, co-morbidity and peri-operative complication data were determined. The majority of patients were either ASA 2 (n=663, 23%) or ASA 3 (n=1,521, 54%), mean age = 81.3 years (SD 10.3). All patients were followed up post-operatively by a dedicated surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring team in order to identify patients who developed a PJI within 1 year. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify patient and surgical factors associated with increased risk of infection. Predictors with a p-value of <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Results. Thirty-nine (39) cases of deep periprosthetic infection were identified (hemiarthroplasty n=35, DHS n=4) representing an overall deep infection rate of 1.4% (hemiarthroplasty 1.9%, DHS 0.4%). The most common infecting pathogen was a pure growth of coagulase negative Staphylococcus (n=9, 23%) followed by a pure growth of Staphylococcus aureus (n=7, 18%). An increased risk of PJI was observed in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty compared to those treated by fixation (odds ratio (OR) 6.50, 95%CI 2.26 – 18.7, p=0.001). Of patient factors, only blood transfusion within 30 days (OR 3.51, 95%CI 1.72 – 7.13, p=0.001) and the presence or development of pressure sores on or during admission (OR 2.99, 95%CI 1.24 – 7.19, p=0.015) were significantly associated with an increased risk of development of PJI. Use of high-dose dual antibiotic cement (gentamicin and clindamycin) was associated with a two-fold reduction in the risk of PJI (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.20 – 0.76, p=0.005) vs standard dose gentamicin antibiotic cement. Conclusions. This study found: 1) a deep infection rate similar to that reported earlier from large number studies from the UK, 2) a six-fold higher deep infection rate in hemiarthroplasties, compared to internal fixations, and 3) a three-fold higher infection rate in patients who suffer concomitant pressure sores or receive a blood transfusion up to 30 days post-operatively

Propionibacteria are organisms of low virulence, although they do cause deep periprosthetic infections. The aim of this study was to show that Propionibacteria do not always cause a significant rise in ESR and CRP. Between May 2001 and May 2004, we identified 77 patients with prosthetic joint replacements colonised with Propionibacteria, 47 males and 30 females. There were 47 hip joint replacements, 27 knee joint replacements, 2 endoprosthetic replacements of the femur and 1 shoulder joint replacement. We retrieved successfully the medical records of 66 patients in order to identify the number of patients treated for an infected prosthetic joint arthroplasty. The pre-operative values of ESR and CRP were recorded. For the purposes of this study, an ESR rate of 30mm/hr or higher and a CRP level of 10mg/lt or higher were considered to be suggestive of infection and were deemed a positive result. All of the 77 patients had both ESR and CRP measured pre-operatively. In only 16 (21%) both ESR and CRP were higher than 30mm/hr and 10mg/l respectively. In 33 patients (43%) with prosthetic joint replacements colonised with Propionibacteria, the pre-operative values of ESR and CRP were normal. 23 patients were treated for an infected prosthetic joint arthroplasty. In 7 (30%) of those patients both ESR and CRP were normal. This suggests that normal pre-operative values of ESR and CRP in suspected failed prosthetic joint replacements might not exclude infection, if the causative organism is of low virulence such as Propionibacteria

Deep peri-prosthetic infection after partial or total knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute peri-prosthetic infection, most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. With carefully selected patients and very aggressive debridement protocols some success has been demonstrated in Europe with single-stage exchange for infection. Most surgeons in North America, however, are unfamiliar with the very aggressive debridement techniques employed at European centers that promote single stage replant; and few surgeons in North America are currently comfortable in cementing a hinged total knee replacement in place for the typical infected TKA nor do they have the patience to re-prep and drape with an entirely new OR setup after debridement and prior to the insertion of the new implant − 2 steps that are often mentioned as important to the success of single stage exchange. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2017

Introduction. The current recommendation by the AAOS in the 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the use of MRI to diagnose a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is “inconclusive” given the lack of evidence to support its use. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of MRI with metal reduction artifact sequencing in diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. 176 patients who underwent MRI with multi-acquisition variable resonance image combination (MAVRIC) to reduce metal artifact for a painful THA between the years of 2009–2013 were retrospectively evaluated. All MRIs were read by one of four radiologists with extensive experience in interpreting MRIs after THA. All MRIs were performed using a 1.5 Tesla magnet. Of the 176 patients examined, 16 patients were found to have a deep periprosthetic joint infection using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria after the MRI was performed. MRI reads were classified as either positive (read as “evidence of active infection” or “suspicious for infection”) or negative (read as no evidence of infection). Only one patient who had a positive MRI read was excluded because of loss to followup after the MRI was performed. Results. Of the 160 aseptic patients, only one patient was read as suspicious for infection (false positive rate = 0.6%, specificity=99.4%, negative predictive value (NPV)=98.8%). Of the 16 patients with an infected THA, 14 patients were read as positive for infection (false negative rate=12.5%, sensitivity = 87.5%, positive predictive value (PPV)=93%). Conclusion. MRI with metal reduction artifact sequence is a highly specific test to diagnose or rule out a PJI with a low false positive rate and excellent PPV and NPV however, given its lower sensitivity than published for the serum C-reactive protein, is not recommended as a general “screening” test for all patients with pain after THA to rule out infection

Introduction. The current recommendation by the AAOS in the 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the use of MRI to diagnose a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is “inconclusive” given the lack of evidence to support its use. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of MRI with metal reduction artifact sequencing in diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. 176 patients who underwent MRI with multi-acquisition variable resonance image combination (MAVRIC) to reduce metal artifact for a painful THA between the years of 2009–2013 were retrospectively evaluated. All MRIs were read by one of four radiologists with extensive experience in interpreting MRIs after THA. All MRIs were performed using a 1.5 Tesla magnet. Of the 176 patients examined, 16 patients were found to have a deep periprosthetic joint infection using Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria after the MRI was performed. MRI reads were classified as either positive (read as “evidence of active infection” or “suspicious for infection”) or negative (read as no evidence of infection). Only one patient who had a positive MRI read was excluded because of loss to followup after the MRI was performed. Results. Of the 160 aseptic patients, only one patient was read as suspicious for infection (false positive rate = 0.6%, specificity=99.4%, negative predictive value (NPV)=98.8%). Of the 16 patients with an infected THA, 14 patients were read as positive for infection (false negative rate=12.5%, sensitivity = 87.5%, positive predictive value (PPV)=93%). Conclusion. MRI with metal reduction artifact sequence is a highly specific test to diagnose or rule out a PJI with a low false positive rate and excellent PPV and NPV however, given its lower sensitivity than published for the serum C-reactive protein, is not recommended as a general “screening” test for all patients with pain after THA to rule out infection

Objective. Bacterial infection is a serious complication after joint replacement surgery. In particular, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and epidermidis(MRSE) are very difficult to eradicate in infected prosthetic joint. Therefore, the retention rate of initial prosthesis affected with such resistant microorganisms is still low. Gentian violet shows potent antibacterial activity against gram-positive cocci as minimal bactericidal concentration is less than 0.1 %. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of treatment with gentian violet against MRSA and MRSE infections after THA, TKA, and bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHP). Methods. There were 8 patients in this study; five patients with deep periprosthetic MRSA infection (2 THA, 2 BHP, 1 revision TKA); 3 patients with MRSE infection (1 revision THA, 1 BHP, 1 TKA). When infection was suspected after the surgery, we quickly obtained synovial fluid and periprosthetic soft tissue from the joint and applied to culture and microscopic examinations for detection of microorganisms. After identification of bacterial species, we immediately debrided the affected joint and washed thoroughly twice with 0.1% solution of gentian violet for 3 minutes each, followed by intra-articular multiple injection of arbekacin sulfate solution. Then we inserted an aspiration tube into the joint and administered appropriate antibiotics intravenously. If the inflammatory symptoms persisted in spite of the first treatment, we repeated the treatment until inflammation signs and intra-articular microorganisms could not be detected. Results. At first we examined the bactericidal activity of gentian violet solution against MRSA and MRSE by culture examination with or without the solution. We confirmed gram-negative bacillicould be alive but the both MRSA and MRSE could not be alive by the treatment with 0.01 % solution of gentian violet for 3 minutes. The treatment with gentian violet allowed subsidence of the infection in all patients. Furthermore, we could preserve 4 prostheses with MRSA infection; 1 THA, 1 revision TKA and 2 BHPs; 2 prostheses with MRSE infection; 1 TKA, 1BHP. However, we could not preserve 2 prostheses, 1 THA with MRSA infection and 1 revision THA with MRSE infection. Thus, the prosthetic retention rate of this study for MRSA and MRSE infections was 75 %. We performed two-stage operation for the 2 patients in whom we could not preserve the prostheses as follows: after excision of the infected total hips followed by successful reimplantation. Moreover, all of the patients in this study are able to keep the walking ability after joint replacements. Conclusion. Infection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species after joint replacement surgery has tended to increase. Gentian violet exerts a potent antibacterial activity against such microorganisms at the concentration of less than 0.1 %. We obtained good retention rate by the treatment using gentian violet against MRSA and MRSE infections after the joint surgeries. In addition, both MRSA and MRSE have not showed drug resistance for gentian violet. Therefore, we suggest that gentian violet will become a promising adjunct agent for infection after joint replacement surgery not only methicillin-sensitive but also methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus species